A preliminary report on the survery and trial excavation of Xinxing Locality 1 in Wangqing, Jilin Province

doi:10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0020

Abstract

Abstract:

The Xinxing Locality 1 is located in the second terrace on the North Bank of Qianhe River, a tributary of Gaya River in Wangqing county, Jilin Province. According to the survey in 2018, the site was rechecked and trial excavated in 2019, with an area of 14 m². 131 specimens, mainly stone products, were found in the collection and trial excavation, including cores, flakes, blades, micro-blades, scrapers, choppers, pointed tools, hand-axes and grinded stone tools. In addition, a small amount of clay chips tempered with sand were also found. The site contains two cultural relics: Paleolithic and Neolithic. The main technical features of Paleolithic relics are blade and micro-blade technology, and the main raw materials of artifacts are siliceous hornfel and obsidian. Based on the technical characteristics of the stone artifacts and the ¹⁴C dating results, the site is dated to around 15-16 kaBP. Neolithic cultural remains belong to the category of Jingu culture in Tumen River Basin.

Key words: Wangqing County, Blade, Micro-blade, Late Paleolithic to Early Neolithic

CLC Number:

K871.11

XU Ting, FANG Qi, , SHI Yuxin, YANG Guorong, YAN Jiahai. A preliminary report on the survery and trial excavation of Xinxing Locality 1 in Wangqing, Jilin Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 904-916.

Figures/Tables 10

References 8

[1]	徐廷, 张恒斌. 吉林省和龙市新发现三处旧石器时代遗址[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2018, 23:1-9
[2]	郑永振, 朴润武. 吉林汪清考古调查[J]. 北方文物, 1985(4):2-11
[3]	徐廷. 吉林汪清发现一批旧石器时代遗址[N]. 中国文物报, 2018-6-1(008)
[4]	卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2):85-96
[5]	朴龙渊. 吉林省龙井县金谷新石器时代遗址清理简报[J]. 北方文物, 1991(1):3-16
[6]	陈全家, 王春雪. 东北地区近几年旧石器考古的新发现与研究[J]. 考古学研究(七), 2008: 183-204
[7]	李有骞. 东北地区末次冰期以来旧石器遗存的分期、类型及相关问题[J]. 中原文物, 2009(3):25-35
[8]	李有骞, 陈全家. 长白山黑曜岩旧石器的技术模式研究[J]. 东北史地, 2014(5):3-6

类型岩性		黑曜岩	角页岩	流纹岩	石英岩	石英砂岩	角砾岩	玄武岩	砂岩	玛瑙	燧石	总计
采集	石核		27	4			1					32
	石片	9	6	1			1	1				18
	石叶		1				1					2
	石器	12	3			3	2			1		21
	碎屑/断块	9	1									10
	合计	30	38	5		3	5	1		1		83
试掘	石核		2									2
	石片	24	2	1					3		1	31
	石叶		1									1
	细石叶	5										5
	石器	2	2	1					1			6
	断块	1			5							6
	合计	32	5	2	5				4		1	51

类型岩性		黑曜岩	角页岩	流纹岩	石英岩	石英砂岩	角砾岩	玄武岩	砂岩	玛瑙	燧石	总计
采集	石核		27	4			1					32
	石片	9	6	1			1	1				18
	石叶		1				1					2
	石器	12	3			3	2			1		21
	碎屑/断块	9	1									10
	合计	30	38	5		3	5	1		1		83
试掘	石核		2									2
	石片	24	2	1					3		1	31
	石叶		1									1
	细石叶	5										5
	石器	2	2	1					1			6
	断块	1			5							6
	合计	32	5	2	5				4		1	51

器型	分类	数量	长（mm）	宽（mm）	厚（mm）	质量（g）
石核	采集	32	40.29-220.11	33.33-136.4	15.7-91.3	28.2-5020
石核	试掘	2	60.24-125.1	42.83-84.63	36.6-63.03	151-1070.6
完整石片	采集	8	10.49-111.5	13.9-94.5	1.72-54.2	0.4-501.9
完整石片	试掘	5	13.1-61.78	13.18-46.92	3.64-20.73	0.6-77
刮削器	采集	14	18.5-104.2	9.33-61.73	4.08-22.34	2.8-171.6
刮削器	试掘	6	20.27-63.02	15.27-44.56	3.83-19.72	1.4-45.5
砍砸器	采集	2	103.81-245.7	73.1-94.13	35.18-38.5	442.5-1325.6
尖状器	采集	2	27.67-65.95	19.1-20.82	8.27-10.5	3.3-16.4
断块碎屑	采集	10	10.28-61.08	6.71-53.87	2.49-14.43	0.1-75.7
断块碎屑	试掘	6	21.18-71.29	11.6-57.12	7.87-40.8	2.2-160.5

器型	分类	数量	长（mm）	宽（mm）	厚（mm）	质量（g）
石核	采集	32	40.29-220.11	33.33-136.4	15.7-91.3	28.2-5020
石核	试掘	2	60.24-125.1	42.83-84.63	36.6-63.03	151-1070.6
完整石片	采集	8	10.49-111.5	13.9-94.5	1.72-54.2	0.4-501.9
完整石片	试掘	5	13.1-61.78	13.18-46.92	3.64-20.73	0.6-77
刮削器	采集	14	18.5-104.2	9.33-61.73	4.08-22.34	2.8-171.6
刮削器	试掘	6	20.27-63.02	15.27-44.56	3.83-19.72	1.4-45.5
砍砸器	采集	2	103.81-245.7	73.1-94.13	35.18-38.5	442.5-1325.6
尖状器	采集	2	27.67-65.95	19.1-20.82	8.27-10.5	3.3-16.4
断块碎屑	采集	10	10.28-61.08	6.71-53.87	2.49-14.43	0.1-75.7
断块碎屑	试掘	6	21.18-71.29	11.6-57.12	7.87-40.8	2.2-160.5

[1]	FENG Yue, HUANG Fen, LI Wencheng, DENG Wanwen, LIU Tuo, ZHANG Jiafu, LEI Huarui, YU jianjun, WANG Youping. New discoveries from the Qijiaojing site of Hami, Xijiang in 2019 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(06): 1086-1095.
[2]	GUAN Ying, LI Youqian, XING Song, HUANG Liping, CHENG Li, ZHOU Zhenyu. Stone materials discovered newly in the Upper Paleolithic sites of Gannan county, Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 281-291.
[3]	JIN Yingshuai, ZHANG Xiaoling, YI Mingjie. Defining wedge-shaped cores and classification of microblade cores [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(02): 307-319.
[4]	CHEN Youcheng, HOU Guangliang, GAO Jingyi, CHEN Xiaoliang. A new microblade assemblage from Dongjicuona Lakeside in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and its technological relationship with adjacent areas [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 28-39.
[5]	LI Youqian. A preliminary report on the excavation of the Xiaolongtoushan site, Hailin, Heilongjiang Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(01): 118-127.
[6]	LI Gang, REN Yapeng, LI Meng. A preliminary report on a reconnaissance of Paleolithic sites in the Shanting District, Zaozhuang City [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(03): 357-366.
[7]	YUE Jianping, WANG Han, KATO Shinji. An overview of studies on microblade technology in Hokkaido, Japan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(03): 392-403.
[8]	YU Guanyue, YI Mingjie, ZHANG Xiaoling, CHEN Fuyou. An experimental study of use-wear on dolomite microblades from Shuidonggou [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(02): 193-207.
[9]	CHEN Shengqian, YE Canyang. Theoretical retrospection on the origin of microblade technology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(04): 547-562.
[10]	LEE Heonjong, LEE Sangseok. Chronology and characteristics of the Upper Palaeolithic blade tool industry in Korea [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(03): 373-388.
[11]	TIAN Chuan, XU Ting, GUAN Ying, GAO Xing. A study of microblade cores from the Fenglin Paleolithic site in Jilin Province, Northeast China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(01): 19-32.
[12]	GAO Xing, PEI Shuwen, PENG Fei, ZHANG Tienan, FENG Xingwu, CHEN Fuyou, ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Xiaoling, Idelisi Abuduresule. A preliminary report on the Paleolithic reconnaissance in Xinjiang, Northwest China in 2004 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 499-509.
[13]	WANG Youping. Emergence and dispersal of the micro-blade technology in North China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 565-576.
[14]	CHEN Chun, ZHANG Meng. Retrospect and rethinking on the microblade industries [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 577-589.
[15]	HAN Fang, CAI Linhai, DU Wei, HE Yuanhong, LI Pei, MA Chunyan, LU Hongliang. A study on the microblade technology from the Deng’equ valley in South Qinghai Plateau [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(01): 53-69.