黑龙江林富遗址石核的剥片技术
收稿日期: 2025-03-12
修回日期: 2025-05-23
网络出版日期: 2026-08-12
基金资助
国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CKG001);全国考古人才振兴计划资助(2025-197);辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(L24CKG001);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD780008)
Technological analysis on lithic reduction of Linfu site, Heilongjiang
Received date: 2025-03-12
Revised date: 2025-05-23
Online published: 2026-08-12
林富遗址位于黑龙江省富裕县友谊达斡尔族柯尔克孜族乡林富村西的岗地上,该遗址于第三次文物普查时发现。2011~2013年黑龙江省文物考古研究所多次对该遗址进行调查和试掘,获得了一批石制品和测年样本。本文以2011~2013年试掘和调查所得的石制品为研究对象,从石核剥片的角度对石制品进行技术分析。石核剥片策略显示,遗址内存在两种剥片体系:石片石核技术体系和细石叶技术体系。石片石核剥片采用锤击法,剥片模式包括台面和剥片面固定和不固定两种模式。标本技术阅读发现台面和剥片面固定模式的剥片体系受到了细石核技术影响;细石叶技术剥片采用压制法,技术分析显示林富遗址既有华北地区的船形细石核技术又有我国东北地区楔形细石核技术,这两种技术体系在处于末次盛冰期后夏季季风最盛期的林富遗址内出现了交叉融合,印证了细石叶技术在末次盛冰期时期形成的二元分化格局,反映了在二元分化格局下人群的扩散与技术交流。
张雪微 , 李有骞 , 王春雪 , 王家琪 , 安睿 , 刘杨 . 黑龙江林富遗址石核的剥片技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2026 , 45(04) : 651 -660 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0080
The Linfu site is located in the west of Youyi Dagur Kirghiz Linfu village, Fuyu County, Heilongjiang Province. The site was found during the third cultural relics census, and the Heilongjiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology has conducted several investigations and test excavations of the site from 2011 to 2013 and has obtained a number of stone artifacts and dating samples. A total of 2567 stone artifacts were discovered at the site. The lithic assemblage is dominated by flakes and chunks, mainly produced by direct hammer percussion. Tuff is utilized as the main material used for the lithic technology of the ancient occupants. The raw material were all derived from river gravels.
This paper presents a specific lithic analysis of stone artifacts. The flaking strategy of the cores showed that two technology types existed at the site: flake-core technology and microblade technology. The results show that core reduction is characterized by hard-hammer percussion, including platform and working face fixed and unfixed. Technology analysis found that the faking core of the fixed mode of working face was influenced by microblade technology. Microblade technology, characterized by pressure flaking, has been analyzed technically at the Linfu site. The findings indicate that this site exhibits both the boat-shaped microblade technology typical of North China and bifacially prepared wedge-shaped cores associated with Northeast China. These two technological systems are integrated within the Linfu site. The Linfu site was formed during the height of the summer monsoon after the LGM (Last Glacial Maximum), and its stratigraphic accumulation is thick and stone artifacts are dense. This temporal context reflects the movements and migrations of ancient populations under a dichotomous pattern.
The technological study of the site provides a new reference for revealing the origin, dispersal, and development of microblade technology in the Nenjiang River Basin and thus opens a window for researchers to discuss ancient human behavior and dispersal in this area. The discovery of this site is of great significance to how hominids in Northeast and North China and even in Northeast Asia responded to the adaptation of the environment before and after the LGM. At the same time, it also provides important materials for research on the origins of microblade technology and the evolution of craftsmanship, modern human behavior, and migratory diffusion.
Key words: Nenjiang River Basin; Linfu site; LGM; flaking technology; microblades
| [1] | 李有骞. 嫩江流域细石器考古的回顾与展望[J]. 黑龙江社会科学, 2018, 5: 136-142 |
| [2] | 李有骞. 嫩江流域细石器遗存的年代框架与发展序列[J]. 考古与文物, 2021, 5: 61-70 |
| [3] | 刘伟, 李有骞, 杨石霞. 黑龙江龙江县西山头旧石器时代遗址试掘简报[J]. 考古, 2019, 11: 3-13 |
| [4] | 李有骞. 黑龙江省林富旧石器遗址的发现与年代[A].见:内蒙古博物馆,内蒙古自治区文物考古研究所(编). 中国北方及蒙古、贝加尔、西伯利亚地区古代文化(上)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015, 121-130 |
| [5] | 李有骞. 黑龙江富裕县老虎屯遗址发现的旧石器[J]. 北方文物, 2015, 1: 3-9 |
| [6] | 张雪微, 王春雪, 李有骞. 黑龙江查哈阳农场石制品的剥片与修理技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(6): 967-981 |
| [7] | 王立新. 后套木嘎新石器时代遗存及相关问题研究[J]. 考古学报, 2018, 2: 141-164 |
| [8] | 田禾, 张伟, 李有骞, 等. 黑龙江齐齐哈尔市洪河遗址新石器时代遗存发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2019, 8: 46-70 |
| [9] | 张雪微. 嫩江流域旧石器晚期晚段至旧新石器过渡期石器工业研究[D]. 博士研究生毕业论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2023 |
| [10] | 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 旧大陆东西方比较视野下的细石器起源再讨论[J]. 华夏考古, 2008, 5: 37-43 |
| [11] | 加藤真二. 试论华北细石器工业的出现[J]. 华夏考古, 2015, 2: 56-67+98 |
| [12] | 冯玥. 晚更新世末华北细石器及人群与社会变迁[J]. 考古, 2024, 3: 74-87 |
| [13] | 陈胜前, 叶灿阳. 细石叶工艺起源研究的理论反思[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 547-562 |
| [14] | 陈淳, 张萌. 细石叶工业研究的回顾与再思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 577-589 |
| [15] | 仪明洁. 中国北方的细石叶技术与社会组织复杂化早期进程[J]. 考古, 2019, 9: 70-78+2 |
| [16] | 朱之勇. 华北地区细石叶组合演变与生态适应研究[J]. 考古学报, 2023, 4: 435-458 |
| [17] | 王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576 |
| [18] | 杜水生, 王晶, 王益人, 等. 山西沁水下川遗址小白桦圪梁地点2015年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2019, 3: 383-408 |
| [19] | 宋艳花, 石金鸣. 山西吉县柿子滩遗址S29地点发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2017, 2: 35-51+2 |
| [20] | Song YH, Grimaldi S, Santaniello F, et al. Re-thinking the evolution of microblade technology in East Asia: Techno-functional understanding of the lithic assemblage from Shizitan 29 (Shanxi, China)[J]. PloS One, 2019, 14(2): 1-23 |
| [21] | 宋艳花, 石金鸣. 山西吉县柿子滩旧石器时代遗址S14地点2002-2005年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2013, 2: 3-13+2 |
| [22] | 宋艳花, 石金鸣. 山西吉县柿子滩旧石器时代遗址第五地点发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2016, 4: 3-15+2 |
| [23] | 李罡, 任雪岩, 李珺. 泥河湾盆地二道梁旧石器时代晚期遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(4): 509-521 |
| [24] | 仪明洁, 裴树文, 陈福友, 等. 水洞沟第12地点楔形石核“操作链”分析[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2015, 2: 105-120 |
| [25] | 仪明洁, 高星, 王惠民, 等. 水洞沟第12地点2007年出土石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(2): 166-179 |
| [26] | 刘德成, 陈福友, 张晓凌, 等. 水洞沟12号地点的古环境研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 4: 295-303 |
| [27] | 王幼平, 张松林, 何嘉宁, 等. 河南新密李家沟遗址南区2009年发掘报告[J]. 古代文明(辑刊), 2013, 9: 208-239 |
| [28] | 王幼平, 张松林, 何嘉宁, 等. 河南新密市李家沟遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2011, 4: 3-9+115+97-99 |
| [29] | 高星. 昂昂溪新发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1988, 1: 84-88 |
| [30] | 董祝安. 大布苏的细石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1989, 1: 49-58+103 |
| [31] | 刘法祥. 吉林乾安县大布苏泡东岸遗址调查简报[J]. 考古, 1984, 5: 396-404 |
| [32] | 于汇历, 邹向前. 黑龙江省龙江县缸窑地点的细石器遗存[J]. 北方文物, 1992, 3: 8-15 |
| [33] | 李霞. 和龙崇善大洞旧石器遗址(2007年)发掘的石器研究[D].硕士研究生毕业论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2008 |
| [34] | 仪明洁, 曹彧. 细石叶技术的起源、二元分化及环境驱动因素[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(3): 355-366 |
| [35] | 加藤真二. ユーラシア東部における細石刃石器群の出現と拡散:中国北部クロスロー ド仮説の検証[M]. 奈良: 奈良文化財研究所, 2024 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |