Starch grains on the Luonan handaxe and strategy of ancient humans using stone tools
Received date: 2024-05-27
Online published: 2024-11-28
In this study, we examine the functional attributes of Acheulean tools recovered from Zhanghuokou in the Luonan Basin, Shaanxi, China, through an analysis of plant residues, particularly starch granules. In the Paleolithic era, the handaxe was a ubiquitous implement in daily activities. Despite extensive research on handaxes, their precise functions and applications remain largely unresolved. The Luonan Basin is an essential Paleolithic site where the abundance of archaeological finds offers significant objects for study. This research aims to elucidate the specific utility of these Acheulean tools by employing starch granule analysis techniques, thereby contributing to our understanding of Paleolithic human survival strategies and everyday life.
The study’s objective is to determine the particular functions of Acheulean implements unearthed in Zhanghuokou through starch granule analysis, and to elucidate their roles in the lives of Paleolithic humans. For this research, the process involved sample collection, starch granule extraction, and microscopic observation and identification. Initially, we gathered samples from the tool surfaces at the Zhanghuokou site and chemically extracted the starch granules. Subsequently, through microscopy, the starch granules were categorized and analyzed. The interpretation of these results allows us to deduce the specific applications of handaxes, further elucidating their role in Paleolithic human life.
The study revealed a significant presence of starch particles on the handaxe surfaces, suggesting their potential use in digging activities. This finding contributes novel evidence on how these tools were utilized in daily activities by Paleolithic humans. Moreover, the diverse terrain and abundant faunal and floral resources in the Luonan region likely provided various survival strategies for its inhabitants, influencing both the strategic use and functional diversity of the handaxes. Through starch identification and analysis, we not only gain insights into the dietary habits of early humans but also gather evidence on how ancient populations exploited their local environments and developed adaptive strategies.
Looking to the future, this research will serve as a pivotal reference for understanding the evolution of ancient hominin technological and cultural traditions as well as their environmental adaptation strategies. The integration of starch granule analysis within archaeological research promises to uncover further details regarding ancient human tool function and use. Subsequent studies may expand the scope of starch granule analysis application, integrating it with additional archaeological methods to further investigate ancient human survival strategies, technological practices, and cultural traditions. Moreover, the findings offer historical insights that are relevant to modern human concepts of sustainable resource use, providing valuable reference for current ecological conservation and resource management. It is anticipated that ongoing research and exploration will afford a more comprehensive understanding of human evolutionary processes, thereby furnishing valuable insights for future developments.
Key words: Paleolithic; Handaxe; Ancient human cognition; Ancient starch; Subsistence strategy
GUAN Ying , WANG Shejiang , ZHOU Zhenyu , GAO Xing , ZHANG Xi . Starch grains on the Luonan handaxe and strategy of ancient humans using stone tools[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024 , 43(06) : 1064 -1074 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0092
[1] | Kibunjia M. Pliocene archaeological occurrences in the Lake Turkana basin[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1994, 27(1): 159-171 |
[2] | Semaw S. The World's Oldest Stone Artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their Implications for Understanding Stone Technology and Patterns of Human Evolution Between 2.6-1.5 Million Years Ago[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2000, 27(12): 1197-1214 |
[3] | Beyene Y, Katoh S, WoldeGabriel G, et al. The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at Konso, Ethiopia[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(5): 1584-1591 |
[4] | Toth N, Schick K. Why did the Acheulean happen? Experimental studies into the manufacture and function of Acheulean artifacts[J]. L'Anthropologie, 2019, 123(4): 724-768 |
[5] | Keeley LH, Toth N. Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya[J]. Nature, 1981, 293(5832): 464-465. |
[6] | Dominguez- Rodrigo M, Serrallonga J, Juan-Tresserras J, et al. Woodworking activities by early humans: a plant residue analysis on Acheulian stone tools from Peninj (Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2001, 40(4): 289-299 |
[7] | Gao X, Guan Y. Handaxes and the Pick-Chopper Industry of Pleistocene China[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 480: 132-140 |
[8] | Wang SJ, Lu JY. Taphonomic and paleoenvironmental issues of the Pleistocene loessic Paleolithic sites in the Qinling Mountains, central China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2016, 59: 1519-1528 |
[9] | Norton CJ, Bae K. Erratum to “The Movius Line sensu lato (Norton et al., 2006) further assessed and defined” J. H. Evol. 55 (2008) 1148-1150[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2009, 57(3): 331-334 |
[10] | 关莹, 高星. 旧石器时代残留物分析:回顾与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(4): 418-429 |
[11] | Leeuwenhoek A. Epistolae Physiologicae super Compluribus Naturae Arcanus: Epistolae 26[M]. Delphis: Apud Adrianum Beman, 1719 |
[12] | Reichert ET. The differentiation and specificity of starches in relation to genera, species, etc.; stereochemistry applied to protoplasmic processes and products, and as a strictly scientific basis for the classification of plants and animals (Vol. Pt.2)[M]. Washington DC: Carnegie institution of Washington, 1913 |
[13] | Fritzsche J. Ueber das Amylum[J]. Annalen der Pharmacie, 1834, 12(2-3): 263-276 |
[14] | Guan Y, Pearsall DM, Gao X, et al. Plant use activities during the Upper Paleolithic in East Eurasia: Evidence from the Shuidonggou Site, Northwest China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 74-83 |
[15] | Hardy BL, Kay M, Marks AE, et al. Stone tool function at the paleolithic sites of Starosele and Buran Kaya III, Crimea: Behavioral implications[J]. PNAS, 2001, 98(19): 10972-10977 |
[16] | Liu L, Bestel S, Shi J, et al. Paleolithic human exploitation of plant foods during the last glacial maximum in North China[J]. PNAS, 2013, 110(14): 5380-5385 |
[17] | Loy TH, Spriggs M, Wickler S. Direct evidence for human use of plants 28,000 years ago: starch residues on stone artefacts from the northern Solomon Islands[J]. Antiquity, 1992, 66(253): 898-912 |
[18] | Langejans G. Micro-residue analysis on Early Stone Age Tools from Sterkfontein South Africa: A Methodological enquiry[J]. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2012, 67(196): 120-144 |
[19] | Salleh A. Bloody stone tools tell hominids' tales[CP/OL]. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2004/07/19/1156792.htm |
[20] | Williamson. Prehistoric stone tool residue analysis from Rose Cottage Cave and other Southern Africa sites[D]. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand, 2000 |
[21] | Van Peer P, Fullagar R, Stokes S, et al. The Early to Middle Stone Age Transition and the Emergence of Modern Human Behaviour at site 8-B-11, Sai Island, Sudan[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 45(2): 187-193 |
[22] | Marlize L. Distribution Patterns of Organic Residues on Middle Stone Age Points from Sibudu Cave, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa[J]. The South African Archaeological Bulletin, 2004, 59(180): 37-44 |
[23] | Williamson BS. Down the microscope and beyond: Microscopy and molecular studies of stone tool residues and bone samples from Rose Cottage Cave[J]. South African Journal of Science, 1997, 93(10) |
[24] | Williamson BS. Middle Stone Age tool function from residue analysis at Sibudu Cave[J]. South African Journal of Science, 2004, 100(3) |
[25] | Haslam M. The decomposition of starch granules in soils: implications for archaeological residue analyses[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004, 31(12): 1715-1734 |
[26] | Perry L. Starch analyses reveal the relationship between tool type and function: an example from the Orinoco valley of Venezuela[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004, 31(8): 1069-1081 |
[27] | Chandler-Ezell K, Pearsall DM. “Piggyback” microfossil processing: Joint starch and phytolith sampling from stone tools[J]. The Phytolitharien, 2003, 15: 2-8 |
[28] | Duncan NA, Pearsall DM, Benfer RA. Gourd and squash artifacts yield starch granules of feasting foods from preceramic Peru[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(32): 13202-13206 |
[29] | Pearsall DM, Chandler-Ezell K, Zeidler JA. Maize in ancient Ecuador: results of residue analysis of stone tools from the Real Alto site[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2004, 31(4): 423-442 |
[30] | 关莹, Pearsall DM, 高星, 等. 石制品残留物分析的实验室方法-以水洞沟石制品处理为例[J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(4): 130-140 |
[31] | Torrence R. Ancient Starch Research[M]. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press Inc, 2006 |
[32] | Pearsall DM. Paleoethnobotany[M]. California: Left Coast Press Inc, 2015 |
[33] | Henry AG, Ungar PS, Passey BH, et al. The diet of Australopithecus sediba[J]. Nature, 2012, 487(7405): 90-93 |
[34] | O'Connell JF. Tubers and human evolution[A]. In: TorrenceB, BartonH(Eds). Ancient starch research[M]. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc, 2006, 20-21 |
[35] | Teaford MF, Ungar PS. Diet and the evolution of the earliest human ancestors[J]. PNAS, 2000, 97(25): 13506-13511 |
/
〈 | 〉 |