Research Articles

Reduction strategy of the microblade cores from the Xiqiaoshan site in Guangdong

  • Shixia YANG ,
  • Faxiang HUAN ,
  • Hong WANG ,
  • Zhenyu WU ,
  • Xiaohong LU ,
  • Jingya LI
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    3. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, CAS, Xi’an 710061
    4. Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081
    5. Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275
    6. Nanhai Museum, Foshan 528211
    7. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2021-05-06

  Revised date: 2021-07-22

  Online published: 2022-10-13

Abstract

Development and spread of the microblade technology are topics of interest and debate intense research relating to the cultural diffusion and ecological adaptation from the late Pleistocene to the early Holocene. In the 1950s, a large amount of microblade products at the Xiqiaoshan lithic manufacturing site located in the Pearl River Delta region was discovered, and reshaped our understanding of the geographical extent of microblade technology. When these microblades were first recovered, this tropical microblade industry was initially described by several scholars. The early publications mainly focused on morphological characteristics of the microblade products, and subsequently very little further research has been carried out. Now we need an in-depth analysis to interpret the reduction strategies of these microblade cores to inform our discussions of cultural diffusion and population migrations. Xiaoqiaoshan, about 40 km southwest of Guangzhou, is an old volcano mountain on the deltaic plain of Pearl River Delta. As Xiaoqiaoshan is rich in raw materials, including different kind of igneous rocks and chert, it is a manufacturing center for the early Holocene habitants in the region. Earlier reports released the results of radiocarbon dating on the shells around 7000-5900 BP. The Guye residential base site is just 10 km to the west of Xiqiaoshan, and provide some new informations. Different from the Xiqiaoshan site, the Guye site is a habitation place and its pottery and seeds are more conducive to dating accurately by radiocarbon method. The Guye site could also provide more details on the contemporaneous remains and help us to know how the microblades were used in this tropical area. The new dating results show that the microblades were used around 5900~5500 BP. All the available data show that the microblade industry appeared in tropical area of South China during the Middle Holocene. In this paper, 343 microblade cores from the Museum of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed. They are all collected during the archaeological surveys in 1980’s. Based on the stone materials, blank types, striking platform types, striking platform quantities, and debitage surfaces, we established the models of reduction strategies of microblade technology at the Xiqiaoshan site. Through observing the microblade cores and the schemes of reduction strategies, this study reveals some of the main characteristics of the Xiqiaoshan microblade industry: Both the flake and chunk blanks were expediently used as microblade cores; the flake blanks are more controlled to form wedge-shaped cores, and with less dimensional variation; as the chunk blanks were shaped according to the sizes of raw material nodules, they are various in sizes; the multi-platforms reduction is the most prominent feature of the Xiqiaoshan microblade reduction, since microblade cores with double and even more platforms are rare in the regions of traditionally well-developed microblade industry (Northeast China, North China, Northwest China and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau). This work not only summarized the characteristics of the microblade technology of the Xiqiaoshan site, but also compared it with the microblade techniques of other sites. The results of the current research enriched our knowledge of this tropical microblade industry and shed light on further understanding of the population migrations and cultural diffusion during the Middle Holocene.

Cite this article

Shixia YANG , Faxiang HUAN , Hong WANG , Zhenyu WU , Xiaohong LU , Jingya LI . Reduction strategy of the microblade cores from the Xiqiaoshan site in Guangdong[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022 , 41(05) : 804 -815 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0077

References

[1] 王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576
[2] Yue JP, Yang SX, Li YQ, et al. Human adaptations during MIS 2: Evidence from microblade industries of Northeast China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2021, 567: 110286
[3] 加藤真二. 试论华北细石器工业的出现[J]. 华夏考古, 2015, 2: 56-57+98
[4] 贾兰坡. 中国细石器的特征和它的传统、起源与分布[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1978, 2: 137-143
[5] Pargeter J, Shea JJ. Going big versus going small: Lithic miniaturization in hominin lithic technology[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2019, 28(2): 72-85
[6] 仪明洁. 中国北方的细石叶技术与社会组织复杂化早期进程[J]. 考古, 2019, 9: 70-78
[7] Bar-Yosef O, Kuhn SL. The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution[J]. American Anthropologist, 1999, 101(2): 322-338
[8] 陈淳, 张萌. 细石叶工业研究的回顾与再思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 577-589
[9] 王幼平. 中国南方旧石器时代考古:进展与问题[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 55-61
[10] Xie GM, Lin Q, Wu Y, et al. The Late Paleolithic industries of southern China (Lingnan region)[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 535: 21-28
[11] 李英华, 周玉端, 郝思德, 等. 海南三亚落笔洞遗址石器工业新研究——与东南亚和平文化遗址的比较[J]. 考古, 2020, 1: 68-81
[12] 曾骐. 西樵山东麓的细石器[J]. 考古与文物, 1981, 4: 1-13
[13] 王仁湘. 四川广元市中子铺细石器遗存[J]. 考古, 1991, 4: 289-299
[14] 傅宪国, 付永旭, 张兴龙, 等. 贵州贵安新区牛坡洞遗址[J]. 考古, 2017, 7: 3-17
[15] 李永宪. 试论中国西南地区的细石器[A]. 见:中国考古学会第九次年会论文集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1997, 195-204
[16] 攀枝花市文物管理处. 我市回龙湾古人类洞穴堆积遗址的发现及其意义[J]. 攀枝花史志, 1988, 1: 45-48
[17] 张兴永. 三十年来云南发现的古猿、古人类和旧石器[J]. 史前研究, 1983, 2: 23-33
[18] 陈祖军, 雷雨, 代强, 等. 雅安沙溪遗址发掘及调查报告[A]. 见:四川大学博物馆,四川大学考古学系,成都市文物考古研究所.南方民族考古(第3辑)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991, 293-339
[19] 曹桂梅, 陈学志, 李俊, 等. 四川金川县刘家寨遗址调查简报[J]. 四川文物, 2012, 5: 3-7
[20] 陈显双, 札西次仁. 四川炉霍卡莎湖石棺墓[J]. 考古学报, 1991, 2: 207-238+273-278
[21] 马继贤. 汉源县狮子山新石器时代遗址[A]. 见:中国考古学会.中国考古学年鉴·1991[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1992, 270-271
[22] 黄慰文, 李春初, 王鸿寿, 等. 广东南海县西樵山遗址的复查[J]. 考古, 1979, 4: 289-299+319
[23] 曾骐, 李松生. 1986-1987年西樵山考古的新收获[J]. 中山大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1988, 3: 74-77+73
[24] 中山大学调查小组. 广东南海县西樵山石器的初步调查[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 1959, 1: 44-56
[25] 莫稚. 广东南海西樵山出土的石器[J]. 考古学报, 1959, 4: 1-15
[26] 张镇洪. 1986-1987年西樵山发掘简报[J]. 文物, 1993, 9: 32-39
[27] 中山大学人类学系, 南海县博物馆. 1986年西樵山考古发掘[A]. 见:张杰龙(编).西樵山遗址与西樵山文化文集[M]. 广州: 广东旅游出版社, 2013, 153-173
[28] Yang MA, Fan XC, Sun B, et al. Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China[J]. Science, 2020, 369(6501): 282-288
[29] Dai JQ, Cai XP, Jin JH, et al. Earliest arrival of millet in the South China coast dating back to 5,500 years ago[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2021, 129: 105356
[30] 李松生. 西樵山考古研究的发展[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 1991, 4: 74-79
[31] 贾兰坡, 尤玉桂. 山西怀仁鹅毛口石器制造场遗址[J]. 考古学报, 1973, 2: 13-26
[32] 李松生. 关于西樵山遗址的两个问题[A]. 见:张杰龙(编).西樵山遗址与西樵山文化文集[M]. 广州: 广东旅游出版社, 2013, 174-180
[33] 李岩, 崔勇. 古椰贝丘遗存初识——兼谈香港沙下等相关遗存[J]. 湖南考古辑刊, 2018, 1: 226-250
[34] 靳英帅, 张晓凌, 仪明洁. 楔形石核概念内涵与细石核分类初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 307-319
[35] 田川, 徐廷, 关莹, 等. 吉林抚松枫林遗址细石核研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(1): 19-32
[36] 仪明洁, 裴树文, 陈福友, 等. 水洞沟第12地点楔形石核“操作链”分析[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2015, 2: 105-120
[37] 李占扬, 李雅楠, 加藤真二. 灵井许昌人遗址第5层细石核工艺[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 285-303
[38] 李占扬, 邢颖, 慕俊红, 等. 灵井许昌人遗址第5层细石器2008-2013年发掘报告[J]. 华夏考古, 2018, 2: 3-33
[39] 盖培, 王国道. 黄河上游拉乙亥中石器时代遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 1: 49-59+116
[40] 王仁湘. 中子铺:细石器文化南进的路标——写在四川广元中子铺遗址发现三十周年之际[J]. 南方文物, 2019, 1: 237-244
[41] 王建, 王益人. 下川细石核形制研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 10(1): 1-9
[42] 岳健平, 王晗, 加藤真二. 日本北海道地区细石叶技术研究概述[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(3): 392-403
[43] 万晨晨, 陈全家, 方启, 等. 吉林和龙大洞遗址的调查与研究[J]. 考古学报, 2017, 1: 1-24
[44] 陈卫东, 郑万泉, 赵建, 等. 四川宣汉县罗家坝遗址2015-2016年度新石器时代遗存发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2018, 4: 5-17+2
[45] 付永旭, 韦松恒, 文应峰. 贵州平坝县牛坡洞遗址2012-2013年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2015, 8: 16-36
[46] 周良, 王洋, 杜学斌, 等. 珠江三角洲西缘晚第四纪沉积演化和最大海侵古岸线的重建[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 1-24, https://doi.org/10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2020.087
[47] 张虎男, 赵红梅. 华南沿海晚更新世晚期—全新世海平面变化的初步探讨[J]. 海洋学报(中文版), 1990, 12(5): 620-630
[48] Wang MD, Hou JZ, Duan YW, et al. Internal feedbacks forced Middle Holocene cooling on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Boreas, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12531
[49] Feng S, Lu HY, Guo ZT et al. The position of the Current Warm Period in the context of the past 22,000 years of summer climate in China[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48: e2020GL091940
Outlines

/