Excavation / Investigation Reports

Excavation report of the Yanling paleolithic site in the Luonan Basin, Shaanxi Province

  • Jiameng LI ,
  • Shejiang WANG ,
  • Xuefeng SUN ,
  • Huayu LU ,
  • Xiaobing ZHANG ,
  • Hongyan ZHANG ,
  • Gaike ZHANG ,
  • Wenting XIA ,
  • Jingjing BIE
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
    5. Museum of Luonan County, Luonan 726100
    6. Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, Xi’an 710054
    7. School of History and Administration, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500

Received date: 2022-01-06

  Revised date: 2022-05-20

  Online published: 2023-04-03

Abstract

The Yanling site is located on the second terrace of the South Luohe River in the Luonan Basin, Qinling mountains, central China, where is the confluence between the South Luohe river and its branch of the Xianhe river, the landform is a loess tableland with a loess-paleosol deposit sequence of 26 meters. A systematic archaeological excavation was carried out from October to November in 2012 in order to cooperate with the construction of Siyuan Experimental School. The excavation exposed a total area of 251 m2, identifying five depositional layers, with 856 stone artifacts yielded. The lithic assemblage consists of manuports, cores, flakes, chunks, chips, and retouched tools. The retouched tools include scrapers, points, awls, notches, cleaver and pick. The stone artifacts did not move in long distance, and the site is a primary deposit site and only slightly disturbed by rains or other low-energy hydrodynamic element in the formation process. The thermally transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) dating and the Post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence 290 (pIRIR290) dating results of the deposits suggest that the Paleolithic sequence in the Yanling site could be divided into two development stages, that is the late Middle Pleistocene and early Late Pleistocene, and the site occupied mainly by the hominin could be dated back to 120-70 kaBP. The lithic assemblages from layer 2~5 demonstrated similarities in the aspects of raw material, size, core debitage reduction and tool retouch technology. Firstly, the lithic artifacts are produced by local cobbles/pebbles, which were collected from riverbank alluvial deposits close to this site. Quartz and quartzite were the most frequently used raw materials for knapping and retouching tools, although quartzite sandstone, fine sandstone, igneous rock and siliceous limestone were occasionally used. Secondly, most of the stone artifacts are small (<50 mm) in size, followed by medium (50~100 mm) in size, but finely retouched tools such as cleaver and pick, are large(>100 mm) in size. Thirdly, the proportion of chunks and chips produced by processing stone artifacts is high, followed by manuport and cores, and the number of retouched tools is at a minimum. Fourthly, the tools are mainly retouched flake tools. Pebbles and chunks are also occasionally used as blanks. Most of the tools are small (<50 mm) or medium (50~100 mm) in size. Quartz is used as raw material for retouched tools smaller than 50 mm, and quartzite is used for retouched tools larger than 100 mm. Fifthly, The principal flake knapping method is direct hammer hard percussion. Nevertheless, apart from direct percussion, the bipolar technique was occasionally used.

Cite this article

Jiameng LI , Shejiang WANG , Xuefeng SUN , Huayu LU , Xiaobing ZHANG , Hongyan ZHANG , Gaike ZHANG , Wenting XIA , Jingjing BIE . Excavation report of the Yanling paleolithic site in the Luonan Basin, Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(02) : 248 -259 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0005

References

[1] 王社江, 张小兵, 胡松梅, 等. 洛南盆地旧石器时代考古调查有重要收获[N]. 中国文物报,1996-06-09(004)
[2] 王社江, 张小兵, 胡松梅, 等. 洛南盆地旧石器时代考古发现意义重大[N]. 中国文物报,1997-12-07(001)
[3] 陕西省考古研究院,商洛地区文管会,洛南县博物馆. 花石浪(I)洛南盆地旷野类型旧石器地点群研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007, 1-250
[4] 陕西省考古研究院,洛南县博物馆. 花石浪(II)洛南花石浪龙牙洞遗址发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008, 1-272
[5] 王社江, 张小兵. 陕西洛南盆地孟洼旧石器地点发掘[N]. 中国文物报,2011-7-29(004)
[6] 王社江, 张小兵, 沈辰, 等. 陕西洛南盆地张豁口旧石器地点发掘取得重要突破[N]. 中国文物报,2011-11-04(004)
[7] 王社江, 张小兵, 邢路达, 等. 洛南盆地再次发现阿舍利手斧等工具组合[N]. 中国文物报,2013-01-25(001)
[8] 邢路达. 洛南盆地十字路口地点出土石制品的初步研究硕士论文[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014
[9] 邢路达, 王社江, 张改课, 等. 陕西洛南盆地夜塬地点发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(1): 1-13
[10] 于青瑶, 王晓勇, 刘全玉, 等. 洛南盆地槐树坪地点2013年出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(2): 154-164
[11] 林圣龙. 中国的薄刃斧[J]. 人类学学报, 1992, 11(3): 193-201
[12] 王社江. 洛南盆地的大型石刀[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 26(1): 26-33
[13] 高星. 中国旧石器时代手斧的特点与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 97-112
[14] Lu HY, Zhang HY, Wang SJ, et al. Multiphase timing of hominin occupations and the paleoenvironment in Luonan Basin, Central China[J]. Quaternary Research, 2011, 76(1): 142-147
[15] 鹿化煜, 张红艳, 王社江, 等. 东秦岭南洛河上游黄土地层年代的初步研究及其在旧石器考古中的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(4): 559-567
[16] 鹿化煜, 张红艳, 孙雪峰, 等. 中国中部南洛河流域地貌、黄土堆积与更新世古人类生存环境[J]. 第四纪研究, 2012, 32(4): 167-177
[17] Sun XF, Lu HY, Wang SJ, et al. Age of newly discovered Paleolithic assemblages at Liuwan site Luonan Basin, central China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 193-199
[18] 王社江, 鹿化煜. 秦岭地区更新世黄土地层中的旧石器埋藏与环境[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(7): 881-890
[19] Wang SJ, Lu HY. Taphonomic and paleoenvironmental issues of the Pleistocene loessic Paleolithic sites in the Qinling Mountains, central China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2016, 59(8): 1519-1528
[20] Wang KX, Xu XH, Sun XF, et al. Cosmogenic nuclide burial dating of Liuwan Paleolithic site in the Luonan Basin, Central China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(3): 406-416
[21] 王社江, 鹿化煜. 秦岭南麓汉水上游旧石器考古研究现状与契机[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 315-328
Outlines

/