Excavation / Investigation Reports

A report of the 2020 excavation of the Shanghu Paleolithic site in Gaoan city, Jiangxi Province

  • Wenjie ZHAO ,
  • Zhenxiu JIA ,
  • Sanling LI ,
  • Hao LI
Expand
  • 1. Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, Nanchang 330095
    2. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    3. School of History, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2022-06-21

  Revised date: 2022-08-17

  Online published: 2023-06-13

Abstract

The Shanghu Paleolithic site is located in the town of Shanghu, Gaoan city, Jiangxi Province in central South China. The site occurs in red clay soils that were deposited at the top of the third terrace of the Jinjiang River. A total of 3030 stone artifacts have been excavated from Area B of the site. Among them, 1274 were unearthed from Layer 1, 1722 from Layer 2, and only 34 from Layer 3. Layer 1 is disturbed by modern agricultural activities and its age has not been established. The OSL dating of Layer 2 indicates that intensive site occupations began at the early stage of MIS 2 (i.e., approximately 26 kaBP). Layer 3 yielded a few artifacts and its age has not yet been established. The types of stone artifacts include cores, flakes, tools, chunks, debris and unmodified cobbles, and our analysis shows that vein quartz from the nearby river bank was favored for exploitation by humans. In addition, cherts were infrequently used, and non-preferentially given their development of inner fractures that compromised reduction sequences. Various core reduction patterns have been identified including discoidal cores that reflect centripetal flaking, which indicates some degree of organization during reduction sequences. Scrapers are the predominant tool type, with small samples of notches, denticulates, points, awls, etc. Tools are small and light and occur primarily on chunk and flake blanks, along with limited retouching. Overall assemblage dimensions confirm the prevalence of miniaturized lithics, clearly evident in the average length, width and thickness for free-hand percussed flakes (24.6 mm, 18.2 mm, and 8.9 mm), free-hand percussed cores (43.7 mm, 34.8 mm, and 25.5 mm) and tools (29.2 mm, 22.6 mm, and 12.3 mm, respectively). Traditionally, South China lithic assemblages are well-known for their large cobble tools, but there is increasing evidence for small-sized cores and flakes and flake-based tools at sites in different regions across South China. Therefore, the emergence of a small-sized flake tool industry in South China has become a key academic question. Some scholars argue that such an industry may be related to the migration of northern China populations, under relatively dry and cold environmental conditions that prevailed during MIS2. However, recent discoveries in South China of similar yet far older (~100 kaBP) lithic assemblages likely indicate a different scenario, and that this technology was probably locally developed in response to changing climatic conditions. Given its chronology and lithic technology, the Shanghu assemblage therefore provides new data that significantly improve our understanding of the emergence and development of a small flake tool industry in South China.

Cite this article

Wenjie ZHAO , Zhenxiu JIA , Sanling LI , Hao LI . A report of the 2020 excavation of the Shanghu Paleolithic site in Gaoan city, Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(03) : 373 -380 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0007

References

[1] 李超荣, 徐长青. 江西安义潦河发现的旧石器及其意义[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 10(1): 34-41+89-90
[2] 李超荣, 侯远志, 王强. 江西新余发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1994, 13(4): 309-313
[3] 李浩. 探究早期现代人的南方扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 630-648
[4] Toth N. The Oldowan reassessed: A close look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2): 101-120
[5] 李三灵, 李浩. 旧石器时代早期石核分类方法试析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 194-207
[6] 袁家荣. 长江中游地区的旧石器时代考古[A].见:吕遵谔.中国考古学研究的世纪回顾—旧石器时代考古卷[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004, 370-391
[7] 董哲, 裴树文, 袁四方. 安徽水阳江流域2017年旧石器考古调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 223-231
[8] 张森水, 徐新民, 邱宏亮, 等. 浙江安吉上马坎遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(4): 264-280
[9] 房迎三. 江苏南部旧石器调查报告[J]. 东南文化, 2002, 1: 17-25
[10] 祝恒富. 湖北旧石器文化初步研究[J]. 华夏考古, 2002, 3: 13-23
[11] 王幼平. 华南晚更新世晚期人类行为复杂化的个案——江西万年吊桶环遗址的发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(3): 397-406
[12] 王幼平. 砾石工业传统与华南旧石器晚期文化[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 91-97
[13] Xie GM, Lin Q, Wu Y, et al. The Late Paleolithic industries of southern China (Lingnan Region)[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 535: 21-28
[14] 杜水生, 周立, 庞海娇, 等. 河南栾川龙泉洞遗址2011年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2017, 2: 227-252
[15] 杜水生. 连续与断裂:重新认识下川遗址在中国旧石器文化研究上的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(1): 153-163
[16] 王幼平. 华北晚更新世的石片石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 525-535
[17] 王小庆. 陕西宜川龙王辿遗址第一地点细石器的观察与研究[J]. 考古与文物, 2014, 6: 59-64
[18] 李昱龙. 华北地区石叶技术源流——河南登封西施遗址的发现及相关研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2018, 1-209
[19] 北京大学考古文博学院, 江西省文物考古研究所. 仙人洞与吊桶环[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014
[20] 广西柳州市白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
[21] 蒋远金, 刘文. 鲤鱼嘴遗址旧石器文化向新石器文化过渡的探讨[J]. 史前研究, 2004, 232-240
[22] 李意愿, 李浩. 湖南临澧发掘伞顶盖旧石器遗址[N]. 中国文物报,2019-12-20(008)
[23] 李意愿. 湖南临澧县条头岗旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2019, 3: 3-14+2
[24] 李意愿, 王轩, 陆翼捷, 等. 湖南澧县乌鸦山旧石器遗址2011年发掘简报[J]. 江汉考古, 2019, 6: 20-31+16
[25] 李意愿. 华南旧石器时代中期文化初步探讨[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 98-104
Outlines

/