Excavation / Investigation Reports

2014 excavation report of the Fuyihegeliang Locality Pit 3 of Xiachuan site, Shanxi

  • Shuisheng DU ,
  • Ting ZHANG ,
  • Haiyun REN
Expand
  • 1. Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    2. Shanxi Archaological Institute, Taiyuan 030001

Received date: 2022-07-31

  Revised date: 2022-10-31

  Online published: 2023-10-16

Abstract

In summer 2014, we excavated the Fuyihegeliang Locality Pit 3(named QX2014T3, 35°26′22′′N, 112°0′43′′E) for 6 m2 in area, which is an important locality of the Xiachuan site. There were 1036 stone artifacts recovered from the pit, with 853 pieces from the Lower Cultural Layer and 183 from the Upper Cultural Layer. The lower layer dated to 40~30 kaBP with the upper layer formed after 30 kaBP.

Exotic black flint was the predominant raw material, and included light-duty tools such as scrapers, pièces esquillées, denticulates, endscrapers and backed segments. In the Lower Cultural Layer, heavy-duty implements such as grinding tools, stone axes and adze-like tools were mostly of local quartz sandstone. There was also a small amount of agate and siliceous mudstone used.

The Lower Cultural Layer objects were formed directly from hard hammer percussion without prepared cores. Products lacked standardization. In the Upper Cultural Layer, pressure flaking was widely used in producing microblades and retouched tools.

Heavy-duty tools (stone axes and adze-like tools) were missing from the Upper Cultural Layer, which also showed different retouching methods. For example, endscapers were mostly processed by hard hammer in the Lower Cultural Layer, in contrast to pressure flaking of the Upper Cultural Layer.

In general, the cultural technology of these two layers was different. The Lower Culture Layer belonged to a simple core-flake technology with heavy-duty tools (stone axes, grinding tools, stone hammers) and light-duty tools (scrapers, notches, points, denticulates, pièces esquillées, endscrapers, spur-like tools, backed segments). The Upper Cultural Layer was mostly microblade technology, with burins, endscraper and pièces esquillées as the main tool types. These findings offer new materials for research of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition and the emergence of microblade technology in China.

Cite this article

Shuisheng DU , Ting ZHANG , Haiyun REN . 2014 excavation report of the Fuyihegeliang Locality Pit 3 of Xiachuan site, Shanxi[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(05) : 638 -650 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0023

References

[1] 王建, 王向前, 陈哲英. 下川文化—山西下川遗址调查报告[J]. 考古学报, 1978, 3: 259-288
[2] 中国社会科学院考古研究所, 山西省考古研究所. 下川—旧石器时代晚期文化发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016
[3] 北京师范大学历史学院, 山西省考古研究所. 山西沁水县下川遗址富益河圪梁地点 2014年T1发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 4: 15-29
[4] 杜水生. 连续与断裂——重新认识下川遗址在中国旧石器文化研究中的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(1): 153-163
[5] 北京师范大学历史学院, 山西省考古研究院. 山西下川遗址小白桦圪梁地点发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2019, 2: 383-404
Outlines

/