Received date: 2024-06-03
Revised date: 2024-08-06
Online published: 2024-11-28
The Tibetan Plateau is key to environmental and biological evolution but has long been considered a “forbidden zone” for human habitation. With the advancement of archaeological work, lithic remains on the Plateau, including the high-altitude Xizang Autonomous Region, have encompassed technologies such as core-flake, blade, microblade and handaxe. Taking Xizang Autonomous Region as the focus area, this article reviews archaeological discoveries, chronological frameworks, and understandings of technological origins by different lithic technologies on the Plateau.
Handaxe technology had spread to the south-eastern edge of Tibetan Plateau before 130 ka, represented by Piluo site. But the available materials are not sufficient to support its distribution to the interior Plateau sites like Xiada Co and Nwya Devu site.
Blade assemblages are discovered concentrated around Siling Co. Excavation of Nwya Devu site suggests that hunter-gatherers using prismatic blade cores arrived at the interior Plateau before 40 kaBP. However, no reliable Levallois elements have been found on the Plateau. Due to the paucity of archaeological findings, it is difficult to determine the exact dispersal routes of blade technology so far.
More than 100 localities on the Plateau suggest that microblade technology reached the northeastern part of the Plateau from North China around 14 kaBP to 10 kaBP, then spread across the Plateau at 8 kaBP to 7 kaBP. Due to the introduction of agriculture and pastoralism, it finally retreated to the marginal valleys of the Plateau after 5.5 kaBP.
Core-flake technology was also widespread on the Tibetan Plateau. Some core-flake assemblages may be contemporaneous with microblade remains but separated from them due to the lack of stratigraphic context. Some scholars have suggested that there are also Middle Paleolithic core-flake remains, which are not common in other parts of East Asia. Nevertheless, the evidence is not robust yet. Dated core-flake sites are found on both east and west sides of the Plateau. On the northeastern Plateau, core-flake remains are dated back to 190 kaBP in Baishiya Karst Cave. The Jiangjunfu 1 site also yields core-flake assemblages of MIS 5. At Piluo, core-flake remains present in both upper and lower cultural layers of the stratum containing handaxes. On the western Plateau, the cave site excavated recently is reported to contain two differentiated core-flake assemblages earlier than 53 kaBP and 45 kaBP.
Due to environmental and historical factors, the quantity and quality of archaeological work on Tibetan Plateau are insufficient. Therefore, systematic investigations, excavations and multidisciplinary researches are strongly needed. In addition, understanding of the Paleolithic outside the Plateau, developing interpretative methods for archaeological materials and deepening knowledge of landscape diachronic changes are also required for a better comprehension of the process and mechanism of human peopling and adaption on the Plateau.
Key words: Tibetan Plateau; Paleolithic; Lithic technology; Human activity
ZHANG Xiaoling , WANG Chengxiang , TAN Yunyao , JIN Yingshuai , YANG Ziyi , WANG Shejiang . Paleolithic discoveries and research on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024 , 43(06) : 967 -978 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0093
[1] | 钟大赉, 丁林. 青藏高原的隆起过程及其机制探讨[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 1996, 4: 289-295 |
[2] | 张镱锂, 李炳元, 刘林山, 等. 再论青藏高原范围[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(6): 1543-1553 |
[3] | 杨一博, Galy A, 方小敏, 等. 东亚季风增强加剧中国南部富Mg上地壳化学风化及其全球意义[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2021, 51(8): 1289-1305 |
[4] | Deng T, Wu FX, Zhou Z, et al. Tibetan Plateau: An evolutionary junction for the history of modern biodiversity[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2020, 63(2): 172-187 |
[5] | Deng T, Wang X, Fortelius M, et al. Out of Tibet: Pliocene woolly rhino suggests high-plateau origin of Ice Age megaherbivores[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6047): 1285-1288 |
[6] | 张东菊, 董广辉, 王辉, 等. 史前人类向青藏高原扩散的历史过程和可能驱动机制[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 8: 1007-1023 |
[7] | 童恩正. 西藏高原上的手斧[J]. 考古, 1989, 9: 822-826 |
[8] | 邱中郎. 青藏高原旧石器的发现[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1958, (2-3): 157-163 |
[9] | 戴尔俭. 西藏聶拉木县发現的石器[J]. 考古, 1972, 1: 43-44+47 |
[10] | 张森水. 西藏定日新发现的旧石器[A].见:中国科学院西藏科学考察队(主编).珠穆朗玛峰地区科学考察报告:1966-1968·第四纪地质[C].北京:科学出版社, 1976, 105-109 |
[11] | 安志敏, 尹泽生, 李炳元. 藏北申扎、双湖的旧石器和细石器[J]. 考古, 1979, 6: 481-491+494+577-578 |
[12] | 张森水. 西藏细石器新资料[A].见:中国科学院青藏高原综合考察队(主编).西藏古生物(第一分册)[C].北京:科学出版社, 1980, 105-109 |
[13] | 刘泽纯, 王富葆, 蒋赞初, 等. 西藏高原马法木湖东北岸等三个地点的细石器[J]. 南京大学学报 (社会科学版), 1981, 4: 87-90 |
[14] | 刘泽纯, 王富葆, 蒋赞初, 等. 西藏高原多格则与扎布地点的旧石器:兼论高原古环境对石器文化分布的影响[J]. 考古, 1986, 4: 289-299+384-388 |
[15] | 李旻, 李永宪. 考古学在西藏的发展[J]. 西藏研究, 2020, 6: 112-123 |
[16] | 杨清凡. 21世纪以来西藏文物考古事业的发展及研究回顾[J]. 中国藏学, 2018, 3: 188-194 |
[17] | 霍巍, 李永宪. 西藏阿里象泉河流域考古调查取得重大进展[N]. 中国文物报,2004-10-15(001) |
[18] | 西藏自治区文物局, 四川大学考古系, 陕西省考古研究所. 青藏铁路西藏段田野考古报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005 |
[19] | Brantingham PJ, Gao X. Peopling of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. World Archaeology, 2006, 38(3): 387-414 |
[20] | Madsen DB, Ma HZ, Brantingham PJ, et al. The late Upper Paleolithic occupation of the northern Tibetan Plateau margin[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2006, 33(10): 1433-1444 |
[21] | 高星, 周振宇, 关莹. 青藏高原边缘地区晚更新世人类遗存与生存模式[J]. 第四纪研究, 2008, 6: 969-977 |
[22] | 仪明洁, 高星, 张晓凌, 等. 青藏高原边缘地区史前遗址2009年调查试掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(2): 124-136 |
[23] | Brantingham PJ, Kerry KW, Krivoshapkin AI, et al. Time-space dynamics in the early Upper Paleolithic of North East Asia[A]. In: Madsen DB(ed). Entering America: North East Asia and Beringia Before the Last Glacial Maximum[C]. University of Utah Press, 2004, 255-284 |
[24] | Brantingham PJ, Gao X, Olsen JW, et al. A short chronology for the peopling of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Developments in Quaternary Sciences, 2007, 9: 129-150 |
[25] | 高星. 中国旧石器时代手斧的特点与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 97-112 |
[26] | 郑喆轩, 冯玥, 谭培阳, 等. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14+2 |
[27] | 王社江, 张晓凌, 陈祖军, 等. 藏北尼阿木底遗址发现的似阿舍利石器:兼论晚更新世人类向青藏高原的扩张[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(2): 253-269 |
[28] | 吕红亮. 西藏旧石器时代的再认识:以阿里日土县夏达错东北岸地点为中心[J]. 考古, 2011, 3: 59-68 |
[29] | 李锋. 石叶概念探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(1): 41-50 |
[30] | Brantingham PJ, Olsen JW, Schaller GB. Lithic assemblages from the Chang Tang region, northern Tibet[J]. Antiquity, 2001, 75(288): 319-327 |
[31] | Frenzel B, Huang WW, Liu SJ. Stone artefacts from south-central Tibet, China[J]. Quart?r, 2001, 33-53 |
[32] | 刘景芝. 青藏高原小柴达木湖和各听石制品观察[J]. 文物季刊, 1995, 3: 6-20 |
[33] | Zhang XL, Ha BB, Wang SJ, et al. The earliest human occupation of the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 thousand to 30 thousand years ago[J]. science, 2018, 362(6418): 1049-1051 |
[34] | 葛俊逸, 张晓凌, 王社江, 等. 尼阿底遗址新的测年结果表明过去-45 ka古人类间歇地占据青藏高原腹地[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2024, 54(2): 550-572 |
[35] | Zhang PP, Zhang XL, Li LH, et al. The peopling of the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau during the late MIS 3[J]. Science Bulletin, 2022, 67(23): 2411-2415 |
[36] | Zhang XL, Jin YS, He W, et al. A consideration of the spatiotemporal distribution of microblade industries on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 559: 165-173 |
[37] | 靳英帅, 张晓凌, 何伟, 等. 自然地理分区视角下的青藏高原细石叶技术遗存[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(6): 961-971 |
[38] | Hudson AM, Olsen JW, Quade J. Radiocarbon Dating of Interdune Paleo-Wetland Deposits to Constrain the Age of Mid-to-Late Holocene Microlithic Artifacts from the Zhongba site, Southwestern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Geoarchaeology, 2014, 29(1): 33-46 |
[39] | Qiu YH, Shu PX, Ao H, et al. The earliest microblade site 6800 years ago reveals broader social dimension than previous thought at the central high altitude Tibetan plateau[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2024, 328: 108551 |
[40] | 靳英帅, 张晓凌, 王社江, 等. 青藏高原腹地发现最早细石叶技术遗址[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2024, 54(5): 1588-1601 |
[41] | Chen Y, Hu Y, Li ZY, et al. The world’s earliest ground stone needles: Archaeological evidence from the early Holocene of the Western Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2024, 57: 104610 |
[42] | Rhode D, Zhang HY, Madsen DB, et al. Epipaleolithic/early neolithic settlements at Qinghai Lake, western China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2007, 34(4): 600-612 |
[43] | Madsen DB, Perreault C, Rhode D, et al. Early foraging settlement of the Tibetan Plateau highlands[J]. Archaeological Research in Asia, 2017, 11: 15-26 |
[44] | 王建, 夏欢, 姚娟婷, 等. 青藏高原末次冰消期狩猎采集人群的生存策略研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2020, 50(3): 380-390 |
[45] | Gliganic LA, Meyer MC, May JH, et al. Direct dating of lithic surface artifacts using luminescence[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7(23): eabb3424 |
[46] | 钱方, 吴锡浩, 黄慰文. 藏北高原各听石器初步观察[J]. 人类学学报, 1988, 1: 75-83+104 |
[47] | 李永宪, 霍巍. 西藏仲巴县城北石器地点[J]. 考古, 1994, 7: 577-586 |
[48] | 袁宝印, 黄慰文, 章典. 藏北高原晚更新世人类活动的新证据[J]. 科学通报, 2007, 13: 1567-1571 |
[49] | 霍巍, 李永宪, 尼玛. 吉隆县文物志[M]. 拉萨: 西藏人民出版社, 1993, 15-30 |
[50] | Chen FH, Welker F, Shen CC, et al. A late middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7756): 409-412 |
[51] | Zhang DJ, Xia H, Chen FH, et al. Denisovan DNA in late pleistocene sediments from Baishiya Karst Cave on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6516): 584-587 |
[52] | Cheng T, Zhang D, Smith GM, et al. Hominin occupation of the Tibetan Plateau during the last interglacial complex[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2021, 265: 107047 |
[53] | 西藏自治区文物保护研究所, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 阿里文化局, 等. 世界屋脊上的远古家园:西藏阿里地区革吉县梅龙达普史前洞穴遗址[N]. 中国文物报,2024-01-19(008) |
[54] | 张晓凌, 谭韵瑶, 何伟, 等. 西藏噶尔切热旧石器时代遗址[A].见:国家文物局(主编).2020中国重要考古发现[C].北京:文物出版社, 2021, 6-9 |
[55] | Zhao YC, Obie M, Stewart BA. The archaeology of human permanency on the Tibetan plateau: a critical review and assessment of current models[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2023, 313: 108211 |
[56] | Meyer MC, Aldenderfer MS, Wang Z, et al. Permanent human occupation of the central Tibetan Plateau in the early Holocene[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6320): 64-67 |
[57] | Zhang DD, Li SH. Comment on “Permanent human occupation of the central Tibetan Plateau in the early Holocene”[J]. Science, 2017, 357(6351): eaam9231 |
[58] | Tostevin GB. Social intimacy, artefact visibility, and acculturation models of Neanderthal-modern human interaction[A]. In: Mellars P, Boyle K, Bar-yosef O, et al(eds). Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans[C]. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2007, 341-357 |
[59] | 张萌. 狩猎采集者的高海拔适应:对青藏高原与安第斯山脉的比较考古学研究[J]. 南方文物, 2023, 5: 76-86 |
[60] | Hou GL, Gao JY, Chen YC, et al. Winter-to-summer seasonal migration of microlithic human activities on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Scientific reports, 2020, 10(1): 11659 |
/
〈 | 〉 |