Hunting and utilization of roe deer by prehistoric humans at the Honghe site in Heilongjiang
Received date: 2024-01-05
Revised date: 2024-05-02
Online published: 2025-02-13
The Honghe site (123°35′56″E, 47°06′49″N), situated on the right bank of the middle reaches of the Nenjiang River in Qiqihar, Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China, has been ascertained to be a pivotal location for comprehending prehistoric and historical human activities in this region. Between 2013 and 2019, the Heilongjiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology carried out five excavations at the Honghe site, leading to the discovery of copious cultural relics and faunal remains. These findings span an extensive chronological range, from the Late Neolithic to the Qing Dynasty, underlining the protracted history of human settlement and resource exploitation in the area. Among the diverse animal remains unearthed, the bones of roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) stand out notably.
The principal aim of this study was to analyze the roe deer bones excavated from the Honghe site, with the intention of discerning the interactions between humans and roe deer during the Late Neolithic era. By conducting a comprehensive examination of the roe deer skeletal remains, researchers endeavored to reconstruct the modalities of hunting, processing, and utilization by ancient inhabitants. The analysis incorporated the investigation of the age structure at death, sex ratios, seasonal hunting patterns, skeletal distributions, and techniques of bone processing and utilization. The results demonstrated that the mortality of roe deer predominantly transpired within two age brackets: Prime ages of 3~7 years and 7~9 years, and a higher proportion of males was detected among the specimens. This suggests that hunters might have deliberately targeted these age groups, potentially due to their size and the quality of their antlers.
Hunting activities at the Honghe site seemingly took place throughout the year, indicating a continuous dependence on roe deer as a resource. Although seasonal fluctuations were observed, the data imply that roe deer served as a dependable source of both meat and bone materials year-round. The bones most commonly unearthed comprised mandibles, antlers, and limb bones, affording glimpses into the portions of the animal that were most prized. The presence of antlers intimates that hunters may have focused on males for their antlers, which could have been employed for fabricating tools and ornaments.
Furthermore, the site yielded an assortment of bone tools fashioned from roe deer bones, such as fishhooks, awls, and daggers. These artifacts accentuate the role of roe deer bones as a crucial raw material for tool manufacture, exemplifying the adaptability and ingenuity of the Neolithic inhabitants. It is highly probable that the roe deer hides played a significant part in the production of clothing, furnishing warmth and safeguarding against the frigid climate of Northeast China.
In toto, the study of the Honghe site illuminates the significant part that roe deer played in the subsistence and material culture of the ancient inhabitants of this region. The findings offer precious insights into the broader fishing and hunting economy of the Late Neolithic period in Northeast China, stressing the importance of roe deer as a multifaceted resource. Through this analysis, researchers have attained a more profound understanding of the means by which the Neolithic communities acclimated to and thrived in their environment, relying on local fauna to support their livelihoods.
LIANG Qiyao , YUE Jianping , ZHANG Wei , CHEN Quanjia . Hunting and utilization of roe deer by prehistoric humans at the Honghe site in Heilongjiang[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025 , 44(01) : 105 -116 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0101
[1] | Yuan J, Rowan F. Pig domestication in ancient China[J]. Antiquity, 2002, 76(293): 724-732 |
[2] | 罗运兵.中国古代猪类驯化、 饲养与仪式性使用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012, 112-185 |
[3] | Cai DW, Zhu SQ, Gong M, et al. Radiocarbon and genomic evidence for the survival of Equus Sussemionus until the late Holocene[J]. eLife, 2022, 11: 1-22 |
[4] | 王华, 王炜林, 胡松梅. 仰韶时代人类狩猎梅花鹿的策略:以铜川瓦窑沟遗址为案例[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(1): 90-100 |
[5] | Zhang NF, Liang QY, Shao XY, et al. Ancient cattle DNA provides novel insight into the subsistence mode transition from the late Neolithic to Bronze Age in the Nenjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2023, 51: 1-8 |
[6] | 陈全家, 赵海龙, 王法岗, 等. 桦甸仙人洞遗址出土的动物化石与孢粉[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(1): 52-62 |
[7] | 张哲. 后套木嘎遗址(2011-2012)新石器时代动物遗存研究[D].硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2015,5-24 |
[8] | 汤卓炜, 王立新, 段天璟, 等. 吉林白城双塔新石器时代遗址的动物遗存及其环境[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(4): 537-552 |
[9] | 吕鹏, 贾笑冰, 金英熙. 人类行为还是环境变迁:小珠山贝丘遗址动物考古学研究新思考[J]. 南方文物, 2017, 1: 136-141 |
[10] | 黄蕴平. 牛河梁遗址出土动物骨骼鉴定报告[A]. 见:辽宁省文物考古研究所(主编).牛河梁:红山文化遗址发掘报告(1983-2003年度)·中册[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2012, 507-510 |
[11] | 陈全家. 白金宝遗址(1986年)出土的动物遗存研究[J]. 北方文物, 2004, 4: 111-112 |
[12] | 张伟, 田禾, 李有骞, 等. 黑龙江齐齐哈尔市洪河遗址[J]. 考古, 2020, 7: 20-33 |
[13] | Leng CC, Jie DM, Zhang C, et al. Quantitative climatic reconstruction and prehistoric human subsistence strategy evolution since the mid-Holocene in Nenjiang river Basin, Northeastern China[J]. Quaternary International, 2023, 649: 1-9 |
[14] | Liang QY, Chen QJ, Zhang NF, et al. Subsistence strategies in the Late Neolithic and Bronze Age in Nenjiang River Basin: A zooarchaeological and stable isotope analysis of faunal remains at Honghe site, Northeast China[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2023, 33(2): 271-284 |
[15] | Deng MX, Xiao B, Yuan JX, et al. Ancient Mitogenomes Suggest Stable Mitochondrial Clades of the Siberian Roe Deer[J]. Genes, 2022, 13(1): 1-14 |
[16] | Behrensmeyer AK. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering[J]. Paleobiology, 1978, 4(2): 150-162 |
[17] | Todd LC. Taphonomy of the Horner II bone bed[A]. In: Frison GC, Todd LC(Eds). The Horner Site: The Type Site of the Cody Cultural Complex[C]. London: Academic Press, 1987, 107-198 |
[18] | Linares-Matás GL, Ruiz NF, Uriarte MH, et al. Hyaenas and early humans in the latest Early Pleistocene of South-Western Europe[J]. Scientific reports, 2021, 11(1): 1-18 |
[19] | Tomé C, Vigne JD. Roe deer (capreolus capreolus) age at death estimates: New methods and modern reference data for tooth eruption and wear, and for epiphyseal fusion[J]. Archaeofauna, 2003, 12(2): 157-173 |
[20] | 盛和林. 中国鹿科动物[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1992, 20-65 |
[21] | 李长生, 马丽娟, 周会敏, 等. 狍的生物学特性[J]. 动物科学与动物医学, 2002, 4: 54-57 |
[22] | Reitz EJ, Wing ES. Zooarchaeology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 32-65 |
[23] | Binford LR. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1978, 5-34 |
[24] | 梁琪瑶, 张伟, 陈全家, 等. 黑龙江齐齐哈尔洪河遗址出土的骨器[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(5): 751-763 |
[25] | 内蒙古自治区编辑组. 鄂伦春族社会历史调查[M]. 北京: 民族出版社, 2009, 18-76 |
[26] | 朱洪敏. 鄂伦春族风俗琐谈[J]. 黑龙江史志, 2010, 24: 43-44 |
[27] | Chase PG. The hunters of Combe Grenal: Approaches to Middle Paleolithic subsistence in Europe[M]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Oxford Ltd, 1986, 28-59 |
[28] | Campana DV, Crabtree P. Evidence for skinning and craft activities from the Middle Paleolithic of Shanidar Cave, Iraq[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2019, 25: 7-14 |
[29] | Zhang SQ, Zhang Y, Li JS, et al. The broad-spectrum adaptations of hominins in the later period of Late Pleistocene of China: Perspectives from the zooarchaeological studies[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2016, 59(8): 1529-1539 |
[30] | 赵宾福. 嫩江流域新石器时代生业方式研究[J]. 考古, 2007, 11: 55-61 |
[31] | 刘晓溪. 嫩江流域新石器至早期铁器时代聚落考古研究[D].博士学位毕业论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2020, 95-108 |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |