Human Fossils and Dating

Sedimentary feature and chronology of Hualongdong site in Dongzhi, Anhui Province

  • CAI Yanjun ,
  • PEI Shuwen ,
  • JIN Zetian
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Global Environment Change, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054
    2. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    3. Key Scientific Research Base on Paleolithic Human Evolution and Paleogenetics (IVPP), SACH. Beijing 100044
    4. Administration of Culture and Tourism of Dongzhi County, Dongzhi 247200

Received date: 2025-06-20

  Revised date: 2025-07-16

  Online published: 2025-10-13

Abstract

Resolving sedimentary processes and constraining the ages of the Hualongdong site in Dongzhi County, Anhui Province, are crucial for researching ancient human evolution, as well as its living environment and adaptive survival behaviors. This paper comprehensively analyzes the geological, geomorphological, and sedimentary characteristics of the deposits at the Hualongdong site and its surroundings. In addition, we also examine the 230Th-234U-238U dating results of the speleothem debris and animal fossils collected during the excavation. It is confirmed that the deposits at the Hualongdong site formed from a mixture of cave deposits and surrounding rock fragments during the collapse of an ancient karst cave. The transition from the ancient karst cave to the accumulation at the Hualongdong site occurred in three main stages: the cave formation and development period, a relatively stable deposition period, and a rapid collapse and accumulation period. The collapse of the ancient karst cave and the formation of mixed deposits at the site occurred later than approximately 216 thousand years before present (ka BP), and ancient cave deposits containing fossils are the main components of the mixed accumulation at the site. Along with the dating results attained previously, the 230Th-234U-238U dating results of the recently discovered flowstone within the deposits indicate that the cave underwent at least two accumulation periods during its stable sedimentation phase, with early deposition occurring prior to 600 ka BP and later deposition spanning from around 331 to 275 ka BP. The mixing of deposition across at least two depositing episodes adds complexity to the chronological study of the site. By integrating the 230Th-234U-238U dating results of all available speleothem, fossil teeth and bones, this study speculates that the burial age of the most complete human skull fossil discovered at the Hualongdong site can be bracketed between 275 and 331 ka BP, placing it in the late Middle Pleistocene. We suggested that Uranium-series dating of representative fossil specimens can offer vital insights for the chronological study of the site and is strongly recommended for understanding the evolution of the fauna and ancient humans at this site.

Cite this article

CAI Yanjun , PEI Shuwen , JIN Zetian . Sedimentary feature and chronology of Hualongdong site in Dongzhi, Anhui Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025 , 44(05) : 742 -753 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0075

References

[1] 陈胜前, 罗虎. 安徽东至县华龙洞旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2012, 4: 7-13
[2] 刘武, 吴秀杰. 华龙洞发现的古人类化石及其在人类演化上的意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(5): 727-741
[3] 裴树文, 董哲, 耿帅杰, 等. 华龙洞遗址发现的石制品及人类行为[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(5): 765-778
[4] 同号文, 江左其杲, 李强, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞哺乳动物化石新材料[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(5): 779-798
[5] Wu XJ, Pei SW, Cai YJ, et al. Archaic human remains from Hualongdong, China, and Middle Pleistocene human continuity and variation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116: 9820
[6] 裴树文, 蔡演军, 董哲, 等. 安徽东至华龙洞遗址洞穴演化与古人类活动[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 593-607
[7] Edwards RL, Chen JH, Wasserburg GJ. 238U-234U-230Th-232Th systematic and the precise measurement of time over the past 500,000 years[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1987, 81: 175-192
[8] Cheng H, Edwards RL, Shen CC, et al. Improvements in 230Th dating, 230Th and234U half-life values, and U-Th isotopic measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2013, 371-372: 82-91
[9] Howell FC, Cole GH, Kleindienst MR, et al. Uranium-series dating of bone from Isimala prehistoric sites, Tanzania[J]. Nature, 1972, 237: 51-52
[10] Tandon L, Iyengar GV, Parr RM. A review of radiologically important trace elements in human bones[J]. Applied Radiation Isotopes, 1998, 49: 903-910
[11] Sambridge M, Gru?n R, Eggins S. U-series dating of bone in an open system: The diffusion-adsorption-decay model[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2012, 9: 42-53
[12] Rae A, Ivanovich M. Successful application of uranium series dating of fossil bone[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1986, 1: 419-426
[13] Chen TM, Yuan SX. Uranium series dating of bones and teeth from Chinese Palaeolithic sites[J]. Archaeometry, 1988, 30(1): 59-76
[14] 沈冠军. 洞穴地点骨化石铀系年龄可信度的讨论[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(4): 539-545
[15] Jaffey AHK, Flynn F, Glendenin LE, et al. Precision measurement of half-lives and specific activities of 235U and 238U[J]. Physical Review C, 1971, 4: 1889-1906
Outlines

/