Paleolithic Archaeology of South China

Core reduction strategies and retouch technologies at Guanyindong site, Guizhou Province

  • HU Yue
Expand
  • Center for Archaeological Science, School of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207

Received date: 2025-02-05

  Accepted date: 2025-06-24

  Online published: 2025-12-15

Abstract

The lithic technology of the Middle Paleolithic in East Asia has traditionally been regarded as primarily characterized by simple choppers and core-flake industries, with limited evidence of complexity and innovations. Recent archaeological discoveries and research findings have increasingly challenged this perspective. Based on the latest research progress on the Guanyindong cave site, this paper systematically reviews and summarizes the key characteristics of its lithic industry. The study reveals that between 180000 and 80000 years ago, hominins at Guanyindong employed diverse flaking strategies and demonstrated proficient tool retouch techniques.

Flakes are mostly knapped by unifacial detachments. Other core reduction systems include Levallois concept, discoidal production, volumetric exploitation, and core-on-flakes, etc. The Levallois assemblage comprises 11 cores, 30 flakes, and 4 retouched flakes. Both preferential and recurrent knapping approaches were employed in the production of oriented flakes. The primary method used to maintain the convexity of the upper surface is centripetal, supplemented by bidirectional, unidirectional, and convergent configurations. Coefficients of variation calculated for Levallois flakes and other flakes indicates that Levallois flakes exhibit a higher degree of uniformity. Core-on-flakes are commonly found at the Guanyindong site. The reduction strategy is predominantly similar to unifacial detachments, although truncated-faceted pieces and the Kombewa method are also present. A total of 10 discoidal cores were identified, which can be classified into bifacial and unifacial types based on the number of exploited surfaces. At Guanyindong, most of these cores were unifacially detached. Volumetric exploitation cores appear in small quantities (n=12) as well. This reduction strategy focuses on the narrow frontal face of the core, resulting in elongated products. Retouched pieces constitute a significant portion of the assemblage (n=999, 45%), primarily made on flakes. The tool types are diverse, including scrapers, denticulates, borers, and notches. Most tools display two or more retouched edges with steep edge angles, indicating a high frequency of recycling or resharpening. A dual pattern of curation is evident, consisting of both simple and elaborate forms. The elaborated tools include elongated-pointed pieces, tanged points, end-scrapers with parallel removals, standardized denticulates and borers. Additionally, 70 specimens exhibit Quina retouch. These Quina retouches may result from either intentional modification or repeated resharpening during the tool’s use-life. A potential Quina exploitation system may be discernible across multiple aspects, although further investigation is required for confirmation.

These technological features demonstrate a level of complexity comparable to Middle Paleolithic /Middle Stone Age sites in Western Eurasia and Africa, providing crucial evidence for reassessing the position of East Asian Middle Paleolithic industries within the global framework of lithic technological systems.

Cite this article

HU Yue . Core reduction strategies and retouch technologies at Guanyindong site, Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025 , 44(06) : 1019 -1033 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0091

References

[1] Tryon CA, Faith JT. Variability in the Middle Stone Age of Eastern Africa[J]. Current Anthropology, 2013, 54(S8): 234-254
[2] Kuhn SL. Roots of the Middle Paleolithic in Eurasia[J]. Current Anthropology, 2013, 54(S8): 255-268
[3] Dibble HL, McPherron SP. The Missing Mousterian[J]. Current Anthropology, 2006, 47(5): 777-803
[4] Tryon CA, McBrearty S, Texier PJ. Levallois Lithic Technology from the Kapthurin Formation, Kenya: Acheulian Origin and Middle Stone Age Diversity[J]. African Archaeological Review, 2005, 22(4): 199-229
[5] Fontana F, Moncel MH, Nenzioni G, et al. Widespread diffusion of technical innovations around 300,000 years ago in Europe as a reflection of anthropological and social transformations? New comparative data from the western Mediterranean sites of Orgnac (France) and Cave dall’Olio (Italy)[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2013, 32(4): 478-498
[6] Goren-Inbar N. Behavioral and Cultural Origins of Neanderthals: A Levantine Perspective[A]. In: Condemi S, Weniger GC (Eds.). Continuity and Discontinuity in the Peopling of Europe: One Hundred Fifty Years of Neanderthal Study[C]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011, 89-100
[7] Moncel MH, Ashton N, Arzarello M, et al. Early Levallois core technology between Marine Isotope Stage 12 and 9 in Western Europe[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 139: 102735
[8] Li H, Li ZY, Gao X, et al. Technological behavior of the early Late Pleistocene archaic humans at Lingjing (Xuchang, China)[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11: 3477-3490
[9] Yang SX, Wang FG, Xie F, et al. Technological innovations at the onset of the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in high-latitude East Asia[J]. National Science Review, 2021, 8(1): nwaa053
[10] Hu Y, Ruan Q, Liu J, et al. Luminescence chronology and lithic technology of Tianhuadong Cave, an early Upper Pleistocene Paleolithic site in southwest China[J]. Quaternary Research, 2019, 94: 121-136
[11] Ma DD, Pei SW, Xie F, et al. Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2024, 121(11): e2313123121
[12] Hu Y, Marwick B, Zhang JF, et al. Late Middle Pleistocene Levallois stone-tool technology in southwest China[J]. Nature, 2019, 565(7737): 82-85
[13] Hu Y, Marwick B, Zhang JF, et al. Robust technological readings identify integrated structures typical of the Levallois concept in Guanyindong Cave, south China[J]. National Science Review, 2019, 6(6): 1096-1099
[14] Hu Y, Marwick B, Lu H, et al. Evidence of Levallois strategies on cores at Guanyindong cave, Southwest China during the Late Middle Pleistocene[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2023, 47: 103727
[15] Hu Y, Zhang J, Lu H, et al. New chronology of the deposits from the inner chambers of the Guanyindong cave, southwestern China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2023, 159: 105872
[16] Hu Y, Marwick B, Lu H, et al. Lithic technologies at Guanyindong cave, Southwest China: diversity and innovation during the Chinese Middle Palaeolithic[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2024, 16(8): 119
[17] 李炎贤, 文本亨. 观音洞:贵州黔西旧石器时代初期文化遗址[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1986, 1-181
[18] Leng J. Early Paleolithic technology in Eastern and Southern Asia[M]. Oxford: BAR Publishing, 2001, 1-152
[19] Li YH, Hou YM, Bo?da E. Mode of débitage and technical cognition of hominids at the Guanyindong site[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54(21): 3864-3871
[20] Forestier HJP, Revue d’Archéologie Préhistorique. Le Clactonien: mise en application d’une nouvelle méthode de débitage s’ inscrivant dans la variabilité des systèmes de production lithique du Paléolithique ancien[J]. Paléo, 1993, 5(1): 53-82
[21] Bo?da E. Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique[A]. In: Dibble H, Bar-Yosef O (Eds.). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[M]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 41-68
[22] White M, Ashton N. Lower Palaeolithic core technology and the origins of the Levallois method in North-Western Europe[J]. Current Anthropology, 2003, 44(4): 598-608
[23] Shea JJ. The Middle Paleolithic of the East Mediterranean Levant[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2003, 17(4): 313-394
[24] Goder-Goldberger M, Cheng H, Edwards RL, et al. Emanuel Cave: the site and its bearing on early Middle Paleolithic technological variability[J]. Paléorient, 2012, 203-225
[25] Bar-Yosef O. The Lower and Middle Palaeolithic in the Mediterranean Levant: Chronology, and cultural entities[A]. In: Ullrich H (Ed.). Man and Environment in the Palaeolithic[C]. Liege: Université de Liège, 1995, 247-263
[26] Shea JJ. The Middle Stone Age archaeology of the Lower Omo Valley Kibish Formation: excavations, lithic assemblages, and inferred patterns of early Homo sapiens behavior[J]. J Hum Evol, 2008, 55(3): 448-485
[27] Eren MI, Lycett SJ. Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘preferential’ Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(1): 1-10
[28] Lycett SJ, Eren MI. Levallois economics: an examination of ‘waste’ production in experimentally produced Levallois reduction sequences[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013, 40(5): 2384-2392
[29] Picin A, Vaquero M. Flake productivity in the Levallois recurrent centripetal and discoid technologies: New insights from experimental and archaeological lithic series[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2016, 8: 70-81
[30] Groucutt HS, Scerri EML, Stringer C, et al. Skhul lithic technology and the dispersal of Homo sapiens into Southwest Asia[J]. Quaternary International, 2019, 515: 30-52
[31] Adler DS, Wilkinson KN, Blockley S, et al. Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus[J]. Science, 2014, 345(6204): 1609-1613
[32] Picin A. Technological adaptation and the emergence of Levallois in Central Europe: new insight from the Markkleeberg and Zwochau open-air sites in Germany[J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2018, 33(3): 300-312
[33] Moncel MH, Moigne AM, Combier J. Towards the Middle Palaeolithic in Western Europe: The case of Orgnac 3 (southeastern France)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2012, 63(5): 653-666
[34] Otte M, Weiwen H, Hu Y, et al. Panxian Dadong et le Levallois chinois[J]. L’Anthropologie, 2017, 121(3): 255-269
[35] 黄慰文, 侯亚梅, 斯信强. 盘县大洞:贵州旧石器初期遗址综合研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012, 1-176
[36] Lycett SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel N. Toward a “Quantitative Genetic” Approach to Lithic Variation[J]. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2015, 22(2): 646-675
[37] Hérisson D, Brenet M, Cliquet D, et al. The emergence of the Middle Palaeolithic in north-western Europe and its southern fringes[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 411: 233-283
[38] Owen WE. The Kombewa Culture,Kenya Colony[M]. Man, 1938, 203-205
[39] Solecki RL, Solecki RS. A new secondary flaking technique at the Nahr Ibrahim cave site, Lebanon[J]. Bulletin Du Musee De Beyrouth, 1970, 23: 137-142
[40] Goren-Inbar N. Too Small to Be True? Reevaluation of Cores on Flakes in Levantine Mousterian Assemblages assemblages[J]. Lithis Technology, 1988, 17:(1): 37-44
[41] Rossoni-Notter E, Notter O, Simone S, et al. Acheulean breccias of Prince cave (Liguria, Italy): New insights and regional issues[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 411: 236-253
[42] Mathias C, Bourguignon L. Cores-on-flakes and ramification during the middle palaeolithic in Southern France: A gradual process from the early to late middle palaeolithic?[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2020, 31: 102336
[43] Hovers E. The many faces of cores-on-flakes: a perspective from the Levantine Mousterian[A]. In: McPherron SP (Ed.). Cores or Tools? Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2007, 42-74
[44] Schroeder B. Truncated-faceted pieces from Jerf Al-Ajla[A]. In: McPherron SP (Ed.). Tools Versus Cores Alternative Approaces to Stone Tool Analysis[C]. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2007, 17-41
[45] Wallace IJ, Shea JJ. Mobility patterns and core technologies in the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2006, 33(9): 1293-1309
[46] Brantingham PJ, Olsen JW, Rech JA, et al. Raw Material Quality and Prepared Core Technologies in Northeast Asia[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2000, 27(3): 255-271
[47] Inizan ML, Reduron-Ballinger M, Roche H, et al. Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone[M]. Paris: CREP, 1999
[48] 王建, 陶富海, 王益人. 丁村旧石器时代遗址群调查发掘简报[J]. 文物世界, 1994, 3: 1-75
[49] Zhang P, Huang W, Wang W. Acheulean handaxes from Fengshudao, Bose sites of South China[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, (223-224): 440-443
[50] Simanjuntak T, Sémah F, Gaillard C. The palaeolithic in Indonesia: Nature and chronology[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, (223-224): 418-421
[51] Gaillard C, Mishra S, Singh M, et al. Lower and Early Middle Pleistocene Acheulian in the Indian sub-continent[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, (223-224): 234-241
[52] Wang SJ. Perspectives on Hominid Behaviour and Settlement Patterns: A Study of the Lower Palaeolithic Sites in the Luonan Basin, China[M]. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2005, 1-260
[53] Terradas X. Discoid flaking method: conception and technological variability[A]. In: Peresani M. Discoid Lithic Technology: advances and implications[C]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003, 19-31
[54] Peresani M. La variabilité du débitage disco?de dans la grotte de Fumane (Italie du Nord) / The variability of discoid production at the grotte de Fumane[J]. Paléo, 1998, 10: 123-146
[55] Delagnes A, Meignen L. Diversity of Lithic Production Systems During the Middle Paleolithic in France[A]. In: Hovers E, Kuhn SL (Eds.). Transitions Before the Transition: Evolution and Stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age[C]. Boston: Springer US, 2006, 85-107
[56] Thiébaut C. Discoid debitage stricto sensus: a method adapted to highly mobile Middle Paleolithic groups?[J]. Palethnologie, 2013, 1-17
[57] Delpiano D, Peresani M. Exploring Neanderthal skills and lithic economy. The implication of a refitted Discoid reduction sequence reconstructed using 3D virtual analysis[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2017, 16(8): 865-877
[58] Faivre JP, Gravina B, Bourguignon L, et al. Late Middle Palaeolithic lithic technocomplexes (MIS 5-3) in the northeastern Aquitaine Basin: Advances and challenges[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 433: 116-131
[59] Carmignani L, Moncel MH, Fernandes P, et al. Technological variability during the Early Middle Palaeolithic in Western Europe. Reduction systems and predetermined products at the Bau de l’Aubesier and Payre (South-East France)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(6): e0178550
[60] Eren MI, Greenspan A, Sampson CG. Are Upper Paleolithic blade cores more productive than Middle Paleolithic discoidal cores? A replication experiment[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55(6): 952-961
[61] Delagnes A. Blade production during the Middle Paleolithic in Northwestern Europe[J]. Acta Anthropogica Sinica, 2000, S19: 181-188
[62] Meignen L. Early Middle Palaeolithic blade technology in Southwestern Asia[J]. Acta Anthropogica Sinica, 2000, S19: 158-168
[63] 李炎贤. 中国旧石器时代晚期文化的划分[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(3): 214-223
[64] Bar-Yosef O, Kuhn SL. The big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution[J]. American Anthropologist, 1999, 101(2): 322-338
[65] Wojtczak DB. More than blades. Early Middle Palaeolithic of the Levant[J]. L’Anthropologie, 2022, 126(3): 103046
[66] Meignen L, Bar-Yosef O. Acheulo-Yabrudian and Early Middle Paleolithic at Hayonim Cave (Western Galilee, Israel): Continuity or break?[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 139: 102733
[67] Kuhn SL. A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1990, 17(5): 581-593
[68] Hiscock P, Tabrett A. Generalization, inference and the quantification of lithic reduction[J]. World Archaeology, 2010, 42(4): 545-561
[69] Hiscock P, Clarkson C. Experimental evaluation of Kuhn’s geometric index of reduction and the flat-flake problem[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2005, 32(7): 1015-1022
[70] Agam A, Zupancich A. Interpreting the Quina and demi-Quina scrapers from Acheulo-Yabrudian Qesem Cave, Israel: Results of raw materials and functional analyses[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 144: 102798
[71] Hiscock P, Clarkson C. The Construction of Morphological Diversity: A Study of Mousterian Implement Retouching at Combe Grenal[A]. In: Andrefsky JW (Ed.). Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use and Curation. Cambridge[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008: 106-135
[72] Lin SC, Marreiros J. Quina retouch does not maintain edge angle over reduction[J]. Lithic Technology, 2021, 46(1): 45-59
[73] Hardy BL. Neanderthal behaviour and stone tool function at the Middle Palaeolithic site of La Quina, France[J]. Antiquity, 2004, 78(301): 547-565
[74] Preysler J. Experimental approach to the function and technology of Quina side-scrapers[A]. In: Nami HG (Ed.). Experiments and Interpretation of Traditional Technologies: Essays in Honor of Errett Callahan[C]. Buenos Aires: Arqueolog ía Contemporánea. 2010, 171-202
[75] Hiscock P, Turq A, Faivre JP, et al. Quina Procurement and Tool Production[A]. In: Adams B, Blades BS (Eds.). Lithic Materials and Paleolithic Societies[C]. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 232-246
[76] Yang SX, Hou YM, Yue JP, et al. The Lithic Assemblages of Xiaochangliang, Nihewan Basin: Implications for Early Pleistocene Hominin Behaviour in North China[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(5): e0155793
[77] Yang SX, Petraglia MD, Hou YM, et al. The lithic assemblages of Donggutuo, Nihewan basin: Knapping skills of Early Pleistocene hominins in North China[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(9): e0185101
[78] Li H, Lotter MG. Lithic production strategies during the late Middle Pleistocene at Dali, Shaanxi Province, China: implications for understanding late archaic humans[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11(5): 1701-1712
[79] Li H, Li Y, Yu L, et al. Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2022, 298: 107850
[80] 阮齐军, 刘建辉, 胡越, 等. 云南鹤庆天华洞旧石器遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 166-181
[81] Ruan QJ, Li H, Xiao PY, et al. Delpiano, Quina lithic technology indicates diverse Late Pleistocene human dynamics in East Asia[J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2025, 122(14): e2418029122
[82] Wang Y, Zhang X, Sun X, et al. A new chronological framework for Chuandong Cave and its implications for the appearance of modern humans in southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 178: 103344
[83] Peng W, Huang X, Storozum MJ, et al. An updated chronology and paleoenvironmental background for the Paleolithic Loufangzi site, North China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 152: 102948
[84] 刘武. 二十一世纪中国人类演化研究的发现、认识与理论探索[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(6): 881-899
Outlines

/