Paleolithic Archaeology of South China

A preliminary report of 2022 excavation of Shangbaitang site in Anji County, Zhejiang Province

  • LIU Yalin ,
  • WEI Tianxu ,
  • SHI Xiao ,
  • WANG Chunxue ,
  • SUN Xuefeng ,
  • QIU Hongliang
Expand
  • 1. Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Hangzhou 310014
    2. School of History and Culture, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062
    3. School of Archaeology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012
    4. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
    5. Anji County Museum, Anji 313300

Received date: 2024-12-19

  Accepted date: 2025-05-28

  Online published: 2025-12-15

Abstract

The Shangbaitang site is located in Anji County, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province. The site is buried in red clay deposits within the Xitiaoxi River basin. In 2022, the Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and the Anji County Museum carried out excavations at the Shangbaitang site, covering an area of 1100 m2. Stone artifacts were unearthed in layer 3 and layer 4. Layer 3 is a homogeneous red soil layer, and stone products were mainly unearthed in this layer. Layer 4 is a reticulated red soil layer, and just unearthed a small amount of stone artifacts. According to the dating results, the age of layer 3 is 35~88 ka before present, and the age of layer 4 is more than 100 ka before present. A total of 889 stone artifacts were founded at this site, including 817 from Layer 3 and 47 from Layer 4, along with 25 collected from ground survey. The artifacts include stone cores, flakes, tools, broken blocks and fragments. Preliminary analysis indicates that the raw materials were mainly local gravels, primarily quartz sandstone and a high proportion of siliceous cobbles. Stone cores were percussed through freehand hammering without a prepared process, but the presence of discoidal and prismatic cores suggests some degree of organization in the reduction sequence, reflecting a progressive aspect of core-flake industry. Flakes were predominantly small. There is a low proportion of tools. Scraper was the dominant tool type, along with a small number of choppers, spheriods, and hammers. Tool blanks were mostly flakes with limited retouching, and finely retouched tools were almost absent. Additionally, 18 refitted groups of artifacts were identified, indicating minimal post-depositional disturbance. The early and middle Late Pleistocene was a crucial phase in human evolutionary history. During this period, the majority of sites in northern South China transformed into a lithic industry dominated by flake tools, but the cultural landscape of the lower Yangtze River region during this period remains unclear. Shangbaitang is a rare site that has undergone scientific excavation and dating, and has yielded a large number of stone artifacts. Compared to the Middle Pleistocene, the raw materials, sizes, and types of stone artifacts at this site have undergone significant changes. The proportion of small and medium-sized flake tools is significantly higher than that of large pebble tools, making it a typical representative site of the miniaturization and flaking of the pebble industry. In conclusion, the chronological data and lithic assemblages from the Shangbaitang site provide crucial materials for understanding the emergence and development of small flake tool industries in southern China.

Cite this article

LIU Yalin , WEI Tianxu , SHI Xiao , WANG Chunxue , SUN Xuefeng , QIU Hongliang . A preliminary report of 2022 excavation of Shangbaitang site in Anji County, Zhejiang Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025 , 44(06) : 1120 -1130 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0088

References

[1] 张森水, 徐新民, 邱宏亮, 等. 浙江安吉上马坎遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 4: 264-280
[2] 徐新民. 浙江旧石器考古综述[J]. 东南文化, 2008, 2: 6-10+97
[3] 徐新民, 梁奕建, 汪良, 等. 浙江长兴七里亭旧石器时代遗址发掘取得重大成果[N]. 中国文物报,2006-07-26(002)
[4] 浙江省文物考古研究所. 七里亭与银锭岗[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
[5] 安吉县地方志编纂委员会. 安吉县志[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1994
[6] 卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A]. 见:邓涛,王原(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218
[7] Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya:An Experimental Approach. Dissertation[D]. PhD thesis, Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[8] 王社江. 洛南花石浪龙牙洞1995年出土石制品的拼合研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(1): 1-17
[9] 李锋, 陈福友, 李罡, 等. 甘肃徐家城旧石器遗址石制品拼合研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(2): 180-191
[10] 张森水, 高星, 徐新民. 浙江旧石器调查报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2003, 2: 105-119
[11] 李意愿. 石器工业与适应行为:澧水流域晚更新世古人类文化研究[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2020
[12] Li H, Li YY, Yu LP, et al. Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2022, 298: 107850
[13] Yu RF, Zhu LD, Guo LC, et al. Cooling induced the stagnation of vermicularisation in the subtropical region of East Asia during the Late Quaternary[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2024, 346: 109078
Outlines

/