Acta Anthropologica Sinica >

2025 , Vol. 44 >Issue 06: 978 - 988

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0090

Yuanmou Hominin Site

A preliminary report on the survey of Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex in the Yuanmou Basin, Yunnan Province

  • RUAN Qijun ,
  • ZHANG Shuai ,
  • LI Xiang ,
  • LIU Jianhui ,
  • GUO Xiangqi ,
  • LI Jun ,
  • CHE Decai ,
  • LI Junyi ,
  • ZHENG Xiaoyong ,
  • YONG Chun ,
  • WANG Zhenzhen ,
  • JIA Zhenxiu ,
  • LI Hao
Expand
  • 1. Yunnan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Kunming 650206
    2. Alpine Paleoecology and Human Adaptation Group (ALPHA), State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    3. Institute of Archaeology, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191
    4. Yunnan Provincial Museum, Kunming 650200
    5. Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture Museum, Chuxiong 675000
    6. Yuanmou County Cultural Relics Management Office, Yuanmou 651300
    7. Yuanmou Man Museum, Yuanmou 651300

Received date: 2025-02-05

  Accepted date: 2025-04-02

  Online published: 2025-12-15

Fold

Abstract

During 2022~2023, the joint archaeological team of the Yuanmou hominin site conducted a systematic investigation in the Laoyatang region of the Yuanmou Basin. In total, eight Paleolithic sites with clear strategraphy have been found, along with 391 stone artifacts. Together, we name them as the Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex. According to the depostional relationship among different sites, we can divide all stone artifacts into three phases. The first phase contains only two pieces, and thus the technological feature is not clear. The age of the first phase likely falls in the Middle Pleistocene or earlier. The second phase contains 133 stone artifacts and has been dated to ca. 74 ka-72 ka based on OSL dating, while the third phase contains 74 stone artifacts and was dated to ca. 56 ka-33 ka by OSL method. In addition, 182 stone artifacts have been collected from both surface and disturbed deposits. Lithic technologies in the second and third phases are close to each other and show expedient core-flake tools industry in general. On one hand, the finding of the Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex provides valuable materials for reconstructing the evolutionary sequence of humans and Paleolithic culture following the Yuanmou hominind, and on the other hand, it provides important materials for deepening our understanding of human evolutionary history in Southwest China during the Late Pleistocene.

Key words： Yuanmou Basin; Laoyadong Paleolithic site-complex; Late Pleistocene; Core-flake industry; Human evolution

Cite this article

RUAN Qijun , ZHANG Shuai , LI Xiang , LIU Jianhui , GUO Xiangqi , LI Jun , CHE Decai , LI Junyi , ZHENG Xiaoyong , YONG Chun , WANG Zhenzhen , JIA Zhenxiu , LI Hao . A preliminary report on the survey of Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex in the Yuanmou Basin, Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025 , 44(06) : 978 -988 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0090

References

[1] 程捷. “元谋人”时代刍议[J]. 地质科技情报, 2000, 19(4): 40-44
[2] 中国地质学编辑委员会, 中国科学院地质研究所. 中国区域地层表[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1965, 413-415
[3] 陈恩志. 关于元谋组地质和元谋人地层[J]. 史前研究, 1989, 155-164
[4] 陈云. 元谋盆地的第四纪红土[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1994, 14(1): 75-86
[5] 文本亨. 云南元谋盆地发现的旧石器[A]. 见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所. 古人类论文集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978, 126-133
[6] 周国兴, 张兴勇. 元谋盆地的细石器遗存[J]. 北京自然博物馆研究报告, 1980, 5: 1-11
[7] 周国兴. 元谋盆地人类化石与文化遗存的研究[A]. 见:《“元谋人”发现三十周年纪念暨古人类国际学术研讨会文集》编委会. “元谋人”发现三十周年纪念暨古人类国际学术研讨会文集[C]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1998, 18-32
[8] 黄慰文, 卫奇, 张兴永. 元谋盆地的旧石器[J]. 史前研究, 1985, 4: 19-22
[9] 钱方, 浦庆余, 袁振新, 等. 云南元谋盆地第四纪冰期与地层[A]. 见:周国兴,张兴永.元谋人[C]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1984, 45-74
[10] Murray AS, Wintle AG. The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2003, 37: 377-381
[11] 李炎贤, 蔡回阳. 贵州白岩脚洞石器的第二步加工[J]. 江汉考古, 1986, 2: 56-64
[12] Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya: An Experimental Approach[M]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[13] 卫奇. 石制品观察格式讨论[A]. 见:邓涛,王原(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218
[14] 阮齐军, 刘建辉, 胡越, 等. 云南鹤庆天华洞旧石器遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 166-181
[15] Hu Y, Ruan QJ, Liu JH, et al. Luminescence chronology and lithic technology of Tianhuadong Cave, an early Upper Pleistocene Paleolithic site in southwest China[J]. Quaternary Research, 2020, 94:121-136
[16] Ruan QJ, Li H, Xiao PY, et al. Quina lithic technology indicates diverse Late Pleistocene human dynamics in East Asia[J]. PNAS, 2025, 122(14): e2418029122
[17] 云南省文物考古研究所, 大理白族自治州文物管理所, 鹤庆县文物管理所. 云南鹤庆龙潭旧石器遗址2019-2020年度发掘简报[J]. 南方文物, 2020, 1: 105-118
[18] Zhang SQ, d’Errico F, Backwell LR, et al. Ma’anshan cave and the origin of bone tool technology in China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016, 65: 57-69
[19] Wang YN, Zhang XL, Sun XF, et al. A new chronological framework for Chuandong Cave and its implications for the appearance of modern humans in southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 178: 103344
[20] 贵州省文物考古研究所, 四川大学考古文博学院, 成都文物考古研究院. 贵州贵安新区岩孔村招果洞遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2024, 679(4): 3-20
[21] 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王晓敏, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 461-478
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉