Invited Article

The concept of Acheulean technocomplex and implications on related issues in China

  • MA Dongdong ,
  • PEI Shuwen
Expand
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2 Key Scientific Research Base on Paleolithic Human Evolution and Paleogenetics (IVPP), SACH, Beijing 100044

Received date: 2025-05-30

  Online published: 2026-08-12

Abstract

The Acheulean, characterized by the emergence of Large Cutting Tools (LCTs), represents a critical stage in the technological evolution of human history. The diffusion of this technology across the Old World, particularly its eastward expansion and interactions in eastern Eurasia, has long been a hot topic in Paleolithic archaeology. In recent years, the diversified research on the Acheulean technocomplex provide new approaches for understanding the dispersal of Acheulean population, technological innovation, cognitive ability and behavioral complexity. Since the new century, a series of research has been conducted on Chinese sites bearing large cutting tools (LCTs), while debates over the character and origins of these assemblages continue. This paper reviews the technological attributes and evolutionary trajectory of the Acheulean, we argue that while LCTs are characteristic, they represent a sufficient but not necessary component of the broader Acheulean technocomplex concept. This technocomplex encompasses diverse technical behaviors driven by advanced cognitive abilities, including sophisticated techniques found in small debitage assemblages like structured flaking and prepared core technology, which distinguish it from earlier Oldowan industries in Africa. The modern understanding shifts from a focus purely on tool morphology and frequency to one emphasizing the production technologies, operational sequences, and the underlying cognitive abilities required for their manufacture, often examined through methods such as the chaîne opératoire.

The presence of Acheulean technology in East Asia, particularly China, has been a subject of debate. LCTs from China tend to be fewer, less frequent, and morphologically rougher than their Western counterparts, raising questions about cultural diffusion versus independent development. We propose that the concept of the Acheulean technocomplex offers a more inclusive framework for understanding these assemblages. This perspective allows for regional variability in tool forms as adaptations to local environments and resources, while recognizing shared technical and cognitive capabilities. Importantly, we highlight the significance of small debitage within the East Asian context. Using the Cenjiawan site (~1.1 Ma) as an example, we show evidence of prepared core technology in producing small tools, indicating sophisticated technological and cognitive abilities similar to those associated with the Western Acheulean, even in the absence of LCTs. This suggests that hominins with comparable technological capacities were present in East Asia before the Middle Pleistocene.

We recommend that future research in China prioritize the systematic study of lithic operational sequences and the knapping skills they reflect, rather than being overly reliant on morphological typologies of final products. By examining both LCT-bearing sites and those with advanced small debitage technologies within the framework of the Acheulean technocomplex, we can have broader insights into the nature and origins of the stone tool tradition in East Asia and its role in global patterns of human dispersal and behavioral evolution.

Cite this article

MA Dongdong , PEI Shuwen . The concept of Acheulean technocomplex and implications on related issues in China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026 , 45(04) : 623 -638 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0112

References

[1] de la Torre I. The origins of the Acheulean: Past and present perspectives on a major transition in human evolution[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 371(1698): 20150245
[2] Kuman K. Acheulean Industrial Complex[A]. In: SmithC(Ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology[M]. New York: Springer, 2014: 7-18
[3] de la Torre I, Mora R, Martínez-Moreno J. The early Acheulean in Peninj (Lake Natron, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2008, 27(2): 244-264
[4] de la Torre I. Technological Strategies in the Lower Pleistocene at Peninj (west of Lake Natron, Tanzania)[A]. In: Schick K, Toth N (Eds.). The Cutting Edge: New Approaches to the Archaeology of Human Origins[M]. Gosport: Stone Age Institute Press, 2009: 93-113
[5] Mesfin I, Texier PJ. Prepared core technology from the Early Pleistocene site of Nyabusosi 18, Uganda[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2022, 46: 103695
[6] Leader GM, Kuman K, Gibbon RJ, et al. Early Acheulean organised core knapping strategies ca. 1.3 Ma at Rietputs 15, Northern Cape Province, South Africa[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 480: 16-28
[7] Hou YM, Potts R, Yuan BY, et al. Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like Stone Techonology of the Bose Basin, South China[J]. Science, 2000, 287: 1622-1626
[8] Wang W, Bae CJ, Huang S, et al. Middle Pleistocene bifaces from Fengshudao (Bose Basin, Guangxi, China)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 69: 110-122
[9] Li H, Kuman K, Li CR. What is currently (un)known about the Chinese Acheulean, with implications for hypotheses on the earlier dispersal of hominids[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2018, 17(1-2): 120-130
[10] Li H, Wang S, Lotter MG, et al. The temporal-spatial evolution of handaxe technology in China: Recent progress and future directions[J]. Science Bulletin, 2024, 69(14): 2161-2165
[11] Kleindienst MR. Component of the East African Acheulian assemblage:an analytic approach[A]. In: Mortelmans G, Nenquin J (Eds.). Actes du IV Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l′Etude du Quaternaire, Leopoldville, 1959[C]. Tervuren: Belgie Annalen, Musée Royal de l′Afrique Centrale, 1962: 81-108
[12] Clark JD, Kurashina H. An analysis of Earlier Stone Age bifaces from Gadeb (Locality 8E), Northern Bale Highlands, Ethiopia[J]. South African Archaeological Bulletin, 1979, 34: 93-109
[13] de la Torre I, Mora R. Technological behaviour in the early Acheulean of EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120: 329-377
[14] Clark JGD. World Prehistory: A new outline (2nd edition)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969
[15] 李锋. 克拉克的“技术模式”与中国旧石器技术演化研究[J]. 考古, 2017, 9: 73-81
[16] Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A. From Africa to Eurasia—early dispersals[J]. Quaternary International, 2001, 75: 19-28
[17] Villa P. Early Italy and the colonization of Western Europe[J]. Quaternary International, 2001, 75: 113-130
[18] Pei SW, Niu DW, Guan Y, et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin occupation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China: studies of formation processes and stone technology of Maling 2A site[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, 53: 391-407
[19] Liao W, Tian C, Fan Y, et al. New discovery of Acheulean artifacts from the fluvial gravel bed of terminal Early Pleistocene in Bose Basin, southern China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2024, 58: 104693
[20] Yang SX, Huang WW, Hou YM, et al. Is the Dingcun lithic assembly a “chopper-chopping tool industry”, or “Late Acheulian”?[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 321: 3-11
[21] Diez-Martín F, Eren MI. The Early Acheulean in Africa:Past paradigms, current ideas, and future directions[A]. In: Domínguez-Rodrigo M(Ed.). Stone Tools and Fossil Bones: Debates in the Archaeology of Human Origins[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 310-358
[22] Mortillet GD. Classification des diverses périodes de l’age de la pierre[A]. In: Extrait du Compte Rendu du Congrès International d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistoriques, 6me Session, Bruxelles, 1872[C]. Bruxelles: Weissenbruch, 1873: 432-444
[23] Mortillet GD. Le Préhistorique. Antiquité de l′homme[M]. Paris: C. Reinwald, Bibliotèque des sciences contemporaines, 1883
[24] Mortillet G, Mortillet A. La préhistoire: origine et antiquité de l’homme[M]. Paris: Schleicher, 1910
[25] Breuil H. Les industries à éclats du paléolithique ancien, I, Le Clatonien[J]. Préhistoire, 1932, 1: 125-190
[26] Leakey LSB. Stone Age Africa. An outline of Prehistory in Africa[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1936: 218
[27] Leakey LSB. Olduvai Gorge. A Report On The Evolution Of The Hand-Axe Culture In Beds I-IV[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951
[28] Goodwin AJH. The Stone Ages in South Africa[J]. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 1929, 2(2): 174-182
[29] Goodwin AJH. A Commentary on the History and Present Position of South African Prehistory with Full Bibliography[J]. Bantu Studies, 1935, IX: 291-417
[30] Leakey MD. Olduvai Gorge. Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960-1963[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971, Vol 3
[31] Binford LR. Archaeology as Anthropology[J]. American Antiquity, 1962, 28(2): 217-225
[32] Binford LR, Binford SR. A Preliminary Analysis of Functional Variability in the Mousterian of Levallois Facies[J]. American Anthropologist, 1966, 68(2): 238-295
[33] Isaac GL. New evidence from Olorgesailie relating to the character of Acheulean occupation sites[A]. In: Cuscoy LD. Actas del V Congreso Panafricano de Prehistoria y de Estudio del Cuaternario[C]. Tenerife: Museo Arqueológico de Tenerife, 1966, 135-145
[34] Isaac GL. Studies of Early Culture in East Africa[J]. World Archaeology, 1969, 1(1): 1-28
[35] Isaac GL. The Stratigraphy of the Peninj Group- Early Middle Pleistocene Formations West of Lake Natron, Tanzania[A]. In: Bishop WW, Clark JD(Eds.). Background to Evolution in Africa[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967: 229-257
[36] Isaac GL. The Archaeology of Human Origins:Studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa 1971-1981[A]. In: Wendorf F, Close AE(Eds.). Advances in World Archaeology[M]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984: 1-87
[37] Isaac GL. The first geologists—the archaeology of the original rock breakers[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1978, 6(1): 139-147
[38] Toth N. Experiments in quarrying large flake blanks at Kalambo Falls[A]. In: ClarkJD(Ed.). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, III: The Earlier Cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 600-604
[39] Madsen B, Goren-Inbar N. Acheulian Giant Core Technology and beyond: An archaeological and experimental Case Study[J]. Eurasian Prehistory, 2004, 2(1): 3-52
[40] Stout D. Skill and Cognition in Stone Tool Production: An Ethnographic Case Study from Irian Jaya[J]. Current Anthropology, 2002, 43(5): 693-722
[41] Texier PJ. Approche expérimentale qualitative des principales cha?nes opératoires d′un nouveau site acheuléen d′Afrique orientale[A]. In: La vien aux temps préhistoriques. Preactes du 23 Congrès Préhistorique de France[C]. Paris:Société Préhistorique Fran?aise, 1989: 32-33
[42] Texier PJ, Roche H. The impact of predetermination on the development of some Acheulean cha?nes opératoires[A]. In: Bermúdez De Castro JM, Arsuaga JL, Carbonell E (Eds.). Evolución humana en Europa y los yacimientos de la Sierra de Atapuerca[C]. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León, 1995: 403-420
[43] Clark JD. The Acheulian Industrial Complex in Africa and Elsewhere[A]. In: Corruchini RS, Ciochon RL(Eds.). Integrative Paths to the Past:Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1994: 451-469
[44] Wynn T, Tierson L. Regional Comparison of the Shapes of Later Acheulean Handaxes[J]. American Anthropologist, 1990, 92: 73-84
[45] Wynn T. Handaxe Enigmas[J]. World Archaeology, 1995, 27 (1): 10-24
[46] Wynn T, Gowlett JAJ. The handaxe reconsidered[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2018, 27 (1): 21-29
[47] Wynn T. The intelligence of later Acheulean hominids[J]. Man, 1979, 14: 371-391
[48] Gowlett JAJ. Mental Abilities of Early Homo:Elements of Constraint and Choice in Rule Systems[A]. In: Mellars P, GibsonK(Eds.). Modelling the early human mind[M]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs, 1996: 191-215
[49] Gowlett JAJ. The elements of design form in Acheulian bifaces: modes, modalities, rules and language[A]. In: Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G(Eds.). Axe Age: Acheulian Toolmaking from Quarry to Discard[M]. London: Equinox, 2006: 203-221
[50] Stout D. Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011, 366(1567): 1050-1059
[51] Stout D, Apel J, Commander J, et al. Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 41: 576-590
[52] de la Torre I, Mora R. How Many Handaxes Make an Acheulean? A Case Study from the SHK-Annexe Site, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[A]. In: Cole J, Mcnabb J, Grove M, Hosfield R(Eds.). Landscapes of Human Evolution: Contributions in honour of John Gowlett[M]. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2020: 64-91
[53] Gowlett JAJ. Culture and conceptualisation: the Oldowan-Acheulian gradient[A]. In: Bailey GN, Callow P(Eds.). Stone Age Prehistory: Studies in Memory of Charles McBurney[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 243-260
[54] Goren-Inbar N, Alperson-Afil N, Sharon G, et al. The Acheulian Site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov. Volume IV[M]. Verlag: Springer, 2018
[55] Sharon G, Goren-Inbar N. Soft Percussor Use at the Gesher Benot Ya′aqov Acheulian Site?[J]. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society, 1999, 28: 55-79
[56] de la Torre I, Mora R, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of Lower Pleistocene hominids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 44: 203-224
[57] Brain CK, Sillen A. Evidence from the Swartkrans Cave for the earliest use of fire[J]. Nature, 1988, 336: 464-466
[58] Gowlett JAJ, Harris JWK, Walton D, et al. Early archaeological sites, hominid remains and traces of fire from Chesowanja, Kenya[J]. Nature, 1981, 294: 125-129
[59] de la Torre I, Doyon L, Benito-Calvo A, et al. Systematic bone tool production at 1.5 million years ago[J]. Nature, 2025, 640: 130-134
[60] Belitzky S, Goren-Inbar N, Werker E. A Middle Pleistocene wooden plank with man-made polish[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1991, 20(4): 349-353
[61] Potts R, Behrensmeyer AK, Ditchfield P. Paleolandscape variation and Early Pleistocene hominid activities: Members 1 and 7, Olorgesailie Formation, Kenya[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1999, 37: 747-788
[62] Gallotti R, Mohib A, Fernandes P, et al. Dedicated core-on-anvil production of bladelet-like flakes in the Acheulean at Thomas Quarry I - L1 (Casablanca, Morocco)[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 9225
[63] Moncel MH, Ashton N. From 800 to 500 ka in Western Europe: The Oldest Evidence of Acheuleans in Their Technological, Chronological, and Geographical Framework[A]. In: Gallotti R, Mussi M (Eds.). The Emergence of the Acheulean in East Africa and Beyond: Contributions in Honor of Jean Chavaillon[C]. Springer International Publishing, 2018: 215-235
[64] Gallotti R, Peretto C. The Lower/early Middle Pleistocene small débitage productions in Western Europe: New data from Isernia La Pineta t.3c (Upper Volturno Basin, Italy)[J]. Quaternary International, 2015, 357: 264-281
[65] Gallotti R. The East African origin of the Western European Acheulean technology: Fact or paradigm?[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 411: 9-24
[66] Moncel M-H, Ashton N, Lamotte A, et al. The Early Acheulian of north-western Europe[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2015, 40: 302-331
[67] Leakey MD. Preliminary survey of the cultural material from Beds I and II, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[A]. In: Bishop WW, Clark JD(Eds.). Background to Evolution in Africa[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967: 417-446
[68] Asfaw B, Beyene Y, Suwa G, et al. The earliest Acheulean from Konso-Gardula[J]. Nature, 1992, 360: 732-735
[69] Mussi M, Skinner MM, Melis RT, et al. Early Homo erectus lived at high altitudes and produced both Oldowan and Acheulean tools[J]. Science, 2023: eadd9115
[70] Spoor F, Leakey MG, Gathogo PN, et al. Implications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya[J]. Nature, 2007, 448(9): 688-691
[71] Moncel MH, Santagata C, Pereira A, et al. The origin of early Acheulean expansion in Europe 700 ka ago: new findings at Notarchirico (Italy)[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 13802
[72] Roberts MB, Parfitt SA(Eds.). Boxgrove. A Middle Pleistocene hominid site at Eartham Quarry, Boxgrove, West Sussex[M]. London: Englisht Heritage, 1999
[73] Arsuaga JL, Martínez I, Arnold LJ, et al. Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6190): 1358-1363
[74] Leakey LSB. Was Homo erectus Responsible for the Hand-axe Culture?[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1973, 2: 493-498
[75] Rightmire GP. Brain Size and Encephalization in Early to Mid-Pleistocene Homo[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2004, 124: 109-123
[76] Toth N, Schick KD. Hominin Brain Reorganization, Technological Change, and Cognitive Complexity[A]. In: Broadfield D, Yuan M, Schick K, et al(Eds.). The Human Brain Evolving: Paleoneurological Studies in Honor of Ralph L. Holloway[M]. Gosport: Stone Age Insitutte Press, 2010: 293-312
[77] Stout D, Toth N, Schick KD, et al. Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: technology, language and cognition in human evolution[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008, 363(1499): 1939-1949
[78] Stout D, Chaminade T. Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1585): 75-87
[79] Gossa T, Asrat A, Hovers E, et al. Claims for 1.9-2.0 Ma old early Acheulian and Oldowan occupations at Melka Kunture are not supported by a robust age model[J]. Quaternary Science Review, 2024, 326: 108506
[80] Mussi M. Reply to Gossa et al. (2024) “Claims for 1.9-2.0 Ma old early Acheulian and Oldowan occupations at Melka Kunture are not supported by a robust age model”[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2024, 328: 108536
[81] Lepre CJ, Roche H, Kent DV, et al. An earlier origin for the Acheulian[J]. Nature, 2011, 477(7362): 82-85
[82] Beyene Y, Katoh S, Woldegabriel G, et al. The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at Konso, Ethiopia[J]. PNAS, 2012, 110(5): 1584-1591
[83] Pappu S, Gunnell Y, Akhilesh K, et al. Early Pleistocene Presence of Acheulian Hominins in South India[J]. Science, 2011, 331: 1596-1599
[84] Bar-Yosef O, Goren-Inbar N. The Lithic Assemblages of ′Ubeidiya. A Lower Palaeolithic Site in the Jordan Valley[M]. Jerusalem: Quedem, Monographs of the Institute of Archaeology, 1993
[85] Herzlinger G, Brenet M, Varanda A, et al. Revisiting the Acheulian Large Cutting Tools of ‘Ubeidiya, Israel[J]. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 2021, 4(4): 31
[86] Mosquera M, Saladié P, Ollé A, et al. Barranc de la Boella (Catalonia, Spain): an Acheulean elephant butchering site from the European late Early Pleistocene[J]. Journal of Quaternary Science, 2015, 30(7): 651-666
[87] Mosquera M, Ollé A, Saladié P, et al. The Early Acheulean technology of Barranc de la Boella (Catalonia, Spain)[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 393: 95-111
[88] Gowlett JAJ. Why the Muddle in the Middle Matters:the Language of Comparative and Direct in Human Evolution[A]. In: Barton CM, Clark GA(Eds.). Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archeological Explanation[C]. Arlington: Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 1997: 49-65
[89] Goren-Inbar N, Feibel CS, Verosub KL, et al. Pleistocene Milestones on the Out-of-Africa Corridor at Gesher Benot Ya′aqov, Israel[J]. Science, 2000, 289: 944-947
[90] García-Medrano P, Ollé A, Ashton N, et al. The Mental Template in Handaxe Manufacture: New Insights into Acheulean Lithic Technological Behavior at Boxgrove, Sussex, UK[J]. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2018, 26(1): 396-422
[91] Semaw S, Rogers MJ, Cáceres I, et al. The Early Acheulean -1.6-1.2 Ma from Gona, Ethiopia:Issues related to the Emergence of the Acheulean in Africa[A]. In: Gallotti R, MussiM(Eds.). The Emergence of the Acheulean in East Africa and Beyond: Contributions in Honor of Jean Chavaillon[C]. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series, Pessac: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018: 115-128
[92] Saragusti I, Goren-Inbar N. The biface assemblage from Gesher Benot Ya′aqov, Israel: illuminating patterns in “Out of Africa” dispersal[J]. Quaternary International, 2001, 75: 85-89
[93] Ollé A, Mosquera M, Rodríguez X P, et al. The Early and Middle Pleistocene technological record from Sierra de Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain)[J]. Quaternary International, 2013, 295: 138-167
[94] de la Torre I. The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the Developed Oldowan/early Acheulean in East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 60(6): 768-812
[95] Texier JP. The Oldowan assemblage from NY 18 site at Nyabusosi (Toro-Uganda)[J]. Prehistory, 1995: 647-653
[96] Mora R, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, de la Torre I, et al. The Archaeology of the Peninj “ST Complex” (Lake Natron, Tanzania)[A]. In: Martínez-Moreno J, Mora R, de la Torre I (Eds.). Oldowan: Rather more than smashing stones. First Hominid Technology Workshop. Bellaterra, December 2001[C]. Barcelona: Treballs d′Arqueologia, 2003: 77-116
[97] Delagnes A, Lenoble A, Harmand S, et al. Interpreting pachyderm single carcass sites in the African Lower and Early Middle Pleistocene record: A multidisciplinary approach to the site of Nadung’a 4 (Kenya)[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2006, 25(4): 448-465
[98] Isaac GL. Olorgesailie. Archeological Studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977
[99] JelinekAJ. The Middle Paleolithic in the Southern Levant from the perspective of the Tabun cave[A]. In: SanlavilleJCYP(Eds.). Prehistoire du Levant[M]. Paris: CNRS, 1981: 265-280
[100] Jelinek AJ. The Tabun Cave and Paleolithic Man in the Levant[J]. Science, 1982, 216(4553): 1369-1375
[101] Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, Alperson-Afil N, et al. The Acheulean massive scrapers of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqovda product of the biface cha?ne opératoire[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55: 702-712
[102] Texier PJ. L′ensemble lithique oldowayen sur quartz du site NY18 à Nyabusosi[J]. Préhistoire-Anthropologie Méditerranéennes, 1997, 6: 227-237
[103] Roche H, Texier PJ. La notion de complexité dans un ensemble lithique. Application aux séries acheuléenes d′Isenya (Kenya)[A]. In: 25 ans d′études technologiques en Préhistoire[C]. Juan-les-Pins: APDCA, 1991: 99-108
[104] de la Torre I, Mora R. The Technology of the ST Site Complex[A]. In: Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Alcalá L, Luque L (Eds.). Peninj: A research project on human origins (1995-2005)[M]. Oxford: Oxbow, 2009: 145-189
[105] de la Torre I, Mora R. Technological Strategies in the Lower Pleistocene at Olduvai Beds I & II[M]. Liege:ERAUL 112, 2005
[106] Lycett SJ, Von Cramon-Taubadel N. Acheulean variability and hominin dispersals: a model-bound approach[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35(3): 553-562
[107] White MJ. The Clactonian Question: On the Interpretation of Core-and-Flake Assemblages in the British Lower Paleolithic[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2000, 14(1): 1-63
[108] Aureli D, Rocca R, Lemorini C, et al. Mode 1 or mode 2? “Small tools” in the technical variability of the European Lower Palaeolithic: The site of Ficoncella (Tarquinia, Lazio, central Italy)[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 393: 169-184
[109] Ma DD, Pei SW, Xie F, et al. Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia[J]. PNAS, 2024, 121(11): e2313123121
[110] 林圣龙. 关于全谷里的手斧[J]. 人类学学报, 1995, 14(3): 189-205
[111] 林圣龙, 何乃汉. 关于百色的手斧[J]. 人类学学报, 1995, 14(2): 118-131+195-198
[112] 林圣龙. 对九件手斧标本的再研究和关于莫维斯理论之拙见[J]. 人类学学报, 1994, 13(3): 189-208
[113] 高星. 中国旧石器时代手斧的特点与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 97-112
[114] 谢光茂. 关于百色手斧问题:兼论手斧的划分标准[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(1): 65-73
[115] 黄慰文. 中国的手斧[J]. 人类学学报, 1987, 6(1): 61-68
[116] 贾兰坡. 在中国发现的手斧[J]. 科学通报, 1956, 12: 39-41
[117] 裴文中, 张森水. 中国猿人石器研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985, 277
[118] Li H, Li CR, Kuman K. Rethinking the “Acheulean” in East Asia: Evidence from recent investigations in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 163-175
[119] 侯亚梅, 黄慰文. 关于旧大陆早期人类文化发展格局—百色手斧挑战“莫氏线”[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2001, 1: 56-58+35
[120] 贺存定. 重庆发现的手斧及其问题[J]. 长江文明, 2016, 2: 24-33
[121] 胡好玥. 中国手斧等大型切割工具研究的回顾与思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 22(2): 301-315
[122] 谢光茂. 百色盆地旧石器时代考古50年[J]. 南方文物, 2024, 6: 23-35
[123] 郑喆轩, 冯玥, 谭培阳, 等. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14+2
[124] 王社江, 鹿化煜, 张红艳, 等. 陕西蓝田地区新发现黄土地层中的旧石器及其年代[J]. 科学通报, 2014, 59(14): 1318-1326
[125] 王社江. 洛南盆地的大型石刀[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 26(1): 26-33
[126] Norton CJ, Bae K. The Movius Line sensu lato (Norton et al., 2006) further assessed and defined[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55: 1148-1150
[127] Wang W, Lycett SJ, Cramon-Taubadel NV, et al. Comparison of Handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the Western Acheulean Indicates Convergence of Form, Not Cognitive Differences[J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(4): e35804
[128] Corvinus G. Homo erectus in East and Southeast Asia, and the questions of the age of the species and its association with stone artifacts, with special attention to handaxe-like tools[J]. Quaternary International, 2004, 117(1): 141-151
[129] Lycett SJ, Bae CJ. The Movius Line controversy: the state of the debate[J]. World Archaeology, 2010, 42(4): 521-544
[130] Petraglia MD, Shipton C. Large cutting tool variation west and east of the Movius Line[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55(6): 962-966
[131] Schick K, Zhuan D. Early Paleolithic of China and Eastern Asia[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1993, 2(1): 22-35
[132] Gallotti R, Mussi M. The Emergence of the Acheulean in East Africa and Beyond: Contributions in Honor of Jean Chavaillon[C]. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series. Pessac: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018
Outlines

/