A preliminary report on excavation at the Huangmenyan Cave 2 of Qingtang site, South China in 2016
Received date: 2018-05-28
Online published: 2020-07-17
Located in Qingtang Town, Yingde City, Guangdong Province, a group of prehistoric caves was found alongside the middle Wengjiang River, which is a tributary of the nearby Beijiang River. As part of the Qingtang site, four caves were recorded during the previous investigations around the Huangmenyan hillock. From June 2016 to October 2016, excavations have been conducted both at the Huangmenyan Cave 2 and the Huangmenyan Cave 1. The total area of that first season’s excavation is about 20 m 2. Here we present the preliminary report on Huangmenyan Cave 2 only.
At the Huangmenyan Cave 2, there exist around 40 depositional layers, among which abundant archaeological remains were uncovered, including stone artefacts, bone tools, shell tools, and many other remains, including faunal and even plant remains. Nearly 2000 specimens have been collected in total. In addition, several potsherds were found in four different layers, although no other Neolithic elements were seen from this locality. Those thick coarse potsherds with cord impressions exhibit characteristics of early pottery and are very likely the oldest pottery documented in Guangdong, dated back to around 17 ka BP.
The lithic artefacts were normally flaked at one end or one side of a cobble unifacially with a hammer stone. Such river cobbles could be obtained from nearby river gravels. Various raw materials from these river gravels were suitable for tool manufacturing, including sandstone, quartz sandstone, quartz, granodiorite, quartzite, diorite, granite, fine sandstone and siltstone. Choppers with quite large edge angles are the dominant tool types, trimmed at one or two edges. There also found large numbers of flakes, but only several of them were retouched and might be used as scrapers. Elongated cobbles as well as the big oval examples, utilized or not, are also notable finds in this locality. It has long been debated that, during the late period of Late Pleistocene, the lithic industry of southern China approaches more closely to that discovered in mainland Southeast Asia rather than that of northern China. Therefore, these cobble tools are considered strong proof for the cultural relationship between the ancient populations of southern China and that of mainland Southeast Asia.
Cervidae predominate in the faunal remains. Only a few bones of tortoise, bird, carnivore, and reptile were uncovered, although large quantities of rodent bones and teeth were collected through wet sieving. Percussion scars are usually seen on bone fragments, while polishing traces are less common. Some bones as well as antlers were processed and might have served as awls or spatulas. Many of bones are extensively burnt, which needs further investigation.
The general stratigraphic layers, from which lithic, ceramic, and other cultural materials derive, are well preserved and would help in reconstructing the chronological sequence of prehistoric cultural development in southern China. According to all the materials obtained from different localities of the Qingtang site, Huangmenyan Cave 2 seems to have been a central living area with rich and varied categories of archaeological remains. Meanwhile, Huangmenyan Cave 1 with a human burial, as well as other localities investigated in the area, probably functioned as places for special activities. The spatial arrangement of activities at the Qingtang site shows how people lived during the transitional period from the Palaeolithic to the Neolithic.
With the field records and artefactual materials recovered in this predominant locality of the Qingtang site, Huangmenyan Cave 2 is a significant case of what appears to have been a hunter-gatherer society with a gradually changing subsistence strategy in southern China. It is now possible to provide more up-to-date and significant evidence for human dispersal for this vast region covering both the southern part of East Asia and mainland Southeast Asia at that time.
Wanwen DENG , Suoqiang LIU , Youbo WU , Tuo LIU , Wencheng LI , Jianing HE , Youping WANG . A preliminary report on excavation at the Huangmenyan Cave 2 of Qingtang site, South China in 2016[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020 , 39(01) : 64 -73 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0024
[1] | 广东省博物馆. 广东翁源县青塘新石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 1961,11:585-588 |
[2] | 蔡奕芝, 刘春喜, 邱立诚 . 英德青塘洞穴文化遗存的研究[A].见:英德市博物馆、中山大学人类学系、广东省文物考古研究所编著.英德史前考古报告[C]. 广东: 广东人民出版社, 1999: 214-226 |
[3] | 李英华 . 旧石器技术:理论与实践[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017: 1-459 |
[4] | 谌世龙 . 桂林庙岩洞穴遗址的发掘与研究[A].见: 英德市博物馆、中山大学人类学系、广东省博物馆.中石器文化及有关问题研讨会论文集[C]. 广东: 广东人民出版社, 1999: 150-165 |
[5] | 张弛 . 中国南方的早期陶器[J]. 古代文明(辑刊), 2006,5:1-16 |
[6] | 吴小红 . 中国南方早期陶器的年代以及新石器时代标志的问题[A].见: 北京大学考古文博学院、北京大学中国考古学研究中心编著.考古学研究(九)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2012: 49-66 |
[7] | 宋方义, 邱立诚, 张镇洪 , 等. 广东封开黄岩洞遗址综述[A].见: 封开县博物馆等编著.纪念黄岩洞遗址发现三十周年论文集[C]. 广东: 广东旅游出版社, 1991: 1-12 |
[8] | 邱立诚, 宋方义, 王令红 . 广东阳春独石仔新石器时代洞穴遗址发掘[J]. 考古, 1982,5:456-475 |
[9] | 广东省珠江文化研究会岭南考古研究专业委员会, 中山大学地球科学系, 英德市人民政府, 等. 英德牛栏洞遗址:稻作起源与环境综合研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 1-220 |
[10] | 广西柳州白莲洞洞学科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 1-475 |
[11] | 柳州市博物馆, 广西文物考古工作队. 柳州市大龙潭鲤鱼嘴新石器时代贝丘遗址[J]. 考古, 1983,9:769-774 |
[12] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所, 广西壮族自治区文物工作队, 桂林甑皮岩遗址博物馆, 等. 桂林甑皮岩[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 1-703 |
[13] | Nguyen KS . The Sonvian and the Proto-Hoabinhian[J]. Vietnam Social Sciences. 1994,5(43):22-30 |
/
〈 | 〉 |