Loading...

Table of Content

    15 September 1999, Volume 18 Issue 03
    On weidenreichs work of sinanthropus pekinensis and his theories of human origins
    Wu Rukang
    1999, 18(03):  161-164. 
    Asbtract ( 337 )   PDF (123KB) ( 161 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Weidenreich made a detailed in-depth description of the fossils of Sinanthropus pekinensis ( now Homo erectus pekinensis) and pointed out the characteristic features of Homo erectus. He rightly postulated that the adoption of erect posture was achieved first and the transformation of skull follow ed. Brain enlargement was the motive cause of the change of skull as illustrated by the different sizes of dogs.
    Weidenreich was the first man in history in the first half of the present century attempting to correlate all human fossils yet found in the world with a chart. He believed all fossil humans belonging to one species and could interbreed each other. Man did not originate from one place but several places. He rejected the Australopithecine fossils then found in south Africa playing any post in human evolution and instead suggested a giant phase as the first human period.
    His giant theory of origin of man so far has no fossil evidence. As to the origin of modern man, the Multiregional hypothesis and the Out of Africa one are now in hot debate.
    Chinese human paleontological study in 20th century and prospects
    Wu Xinzhi
    1999, 18(03):  165-175. 
    Asbtract ( 216 )   PDF (296KB) ( 101 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    1 Changes o f the position of Chinese fossils in the early history of hominid
    Sinanthropus pekinensis had been one of the earliest hominids from 1931 through 1959. In 1931 the artefacts unearthed from Sinanthropus site were admited by Breuil, the authority of the Paleolithic study. In 1959, the discovery of Zinjanthropus and associated artefacts made the historical record o f man-made tool extended to 1. 75M a.
    Gigantopithecus had been suggested as the ancestor o f Pithecanthropus erectus and Sina nthropus pekinensis in 1940s by F. Weidenreich. But this proposal has not been commonly accepted in paleoanthropological circle.
    In 1965, Simons and Pilbeam proposed the Ramapithecus belonging to hominid and five teeth of Dryopithecus found in 1956 at Kaiyuan, Yunnan, southwestern China were included in the circle of earliest hominid. So China became one of the candidate areas of human cradle. Since 1975 many Ramapithecus fossils including 5 skulls and other pieces of bone have been unearthed from Lufeng , Yunnan. The importance of Chinese fossils in the study of human origin increased. In 1980s, Lufengpithecus was excluded from the human circle, Chinese fossils are no longer considered as a part of human earliest ancestor.
    2 Earliest human in China
    Sinanthropus is the first one acting as the earliest human in China. In 1964 Gongwangling Homo erectus skull-cap replaced Homo erectus pekinensis fossils as the earliest ancestor in China. In 1965, Yuanmou incisors took this prominent position. Yuanmou is dated by paleomagnetism as of 1. 7M a. A new ESR date of 1. 6 ( LU) — 1. 1 ( EU) Ma w as published recently. By the way, the Longgupo mandible is of an ape, the provenience of the incisor is problematic, so far this site has not yielded any early Pleistocene hominid fossil. Recent discovery of stone and bony artefacts of probably 2Ma from Fanchang , Anhui province is the indirect indicator of the existence of humans in so early period in China.
    3 Outline of human evolution in China
    3. 1 Consideration at the intercontinental level— Continuous evolution with hybridization Totally more than 60 sites yielding human fossils have been found in China. There are a series of common morphological features shown among these fossils. Between the Homo erectus and Homo sapiens fossils found in China there is mosaic of morphological features which indicates that between these chrono-species the change is transitional. No clear-cut morphological demarcation line could be drawn between them. Among Chinese human fossils there are a few specimens with morphological features inharmonious with other fossils found in China. This phenomenon indicates the result of gene flow from Western world. The inharmonious features are very few so the gene flow is not strong. Therefore the scenario in China is continous evolution with hybridization. This is also supported by the evidence from paleolithic archeology and mammalian faunas. Evidence from all of these aspects strongly supports the Maltiregional Evolution Hypothesis for the origin of modern humans which has different submodels in different regions. e. g. continuity might exist in less extent in Europe than in East Asia.
    Comparisons between the fossils from China and those from areas east and south to China indicate that there are communications among the populations of these areas during late Pleistocene.
    3. 2 Consideration at the interpopulational level in China— — There are distinct interpopulational differences between different small regions
    There are distinct differences between the recent human populations o f North and South China. The difference could be roughly in certain extent traced to Neolithic and late Paleolithic stage. There is no evidence showing that it could be extended to archaic Homo sapiens and Homo erectus. There are distinct interpopulational differences in the latter two stages. These differences might be only the interpopulational difference instead of representing the difference between North and South China.
    3. 3 Human evolution in China could be likened to a river network
    In the mind o f the present author the human evolution in China could be likened to neither a ladder nor a bush. Species multiplicity of hominid in Plio /Pleistocene could not be extended into early and middle Pleistocene at least in the case of China, because after the appearance of man-made tools the communication between human populations became increasing so that the possibility of formation of new species by isolation was prevented. But there were still distinct intra-species and interpopulational differences in hominid. The ability to resist disaster and diseases of ancient humans was rather low , extinction of small populations could happen. So the human evolution in China could be likened to a river network. There are branches of the river, some branches could be blind ( corresponding to extinction of local populations) , some branches could unite and receive small branches from other river network ( samll amount of immigrants from outside China ). Some could flow to other river( human migration to other area) . In ordinary river the increase of water volume in the lower reach is due to receiving many branches, in human evolution of China the expansion of the population in later time is mainly due to reproduction of the populations in China themselves. The contribution from the immigrants is very samll. Besides, the extinction of some small local populations might be followed by replacement in certain small areas. So the scenario includes continuous evolution with extinction of some small local populations and replacement of them by other populations in certain areas as well as supplementary hybridization with the immigrants from other areas. In short, the continuity is the main process, others are the subsidiary.
    The changes of tooth size of Chinese and the systematic status of Homo erectus in east Asia
    Liu Wu, Yang Maoyou
    1999, 18(03):  176-192. 
    Asbtract ( 317 )   PDF (450KB) ( 98 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The purpose of this paper is to study the evolution of Homo erectus by means of the analyses of dental metrics of the people of China in different time periods. The general trend of tooth reduction was found from Homo erectus to modern Chinese. From the time periods of Homo erectus till early Homo sapiens of China, there was no obvious change of tooth size. From the stage of late Homo sapiens in late Pleistocene, the tooth size of human in China decreased sharply. After that, the speed of tooth size reduction went down and came to the tooth size ranges of modern Chinese gradually. Compared with the tooth sizes of late Pleistocene and Holocene Europeans, the patterns of tooth size reduction in Chinese humans are quite different. The main differences include earlier appearance of sharp tooth size reduction, high variations of the speed of tooth size reduction and smaller scope of overall dental reduction.
    The author believes that according to the currently hold evidence, the tooth sizes and their change patterns of Chinese humans, especially the similarities between Homo erectus and early Homo sapiens in tooth sizes, are the example of the mosaic of human evolution. The Homo erectus of China differs from early Homo sapiens of China obviously in fossil morphology and living periods. The evidence for the proposal of canceling Homo erectus and putting Homo erectus into Homo sapiens is not enough. At present, it is better to treat Homo erectus and Homo sapiens as two species within the genus of Homo. The evolutionary relationship between the two species is the course of phyletic gradualism. One of the important characteristics in the course is the existence of transition forms and......
    On the important advancements of the paleolithic archeology in China since 1949
    Zhang Senshu
    1999, 18(03):  193-214. 
    Asbtract ( 319 )   PDF (610KB) ( 238 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    The paleolithic archeology in China had laid solid foundation by the researches at Zhoukoudian region in 1930s. Since 1949 over 1000 paleolithic sites have been found and studied in this country. The specimens yielded include human fossils of different stag es, over 100, 000 pieces of the stone artifacts, about 1000 bone and antler tools made by polishing or scraping , some decorated ornaments, a few bone tools with carved designs as well as plenty of fire using remains. Important results have also been obtained in related sciences such as experimental archeology , taphonomy , chronology, paleoclimate studies etc. More than one thousand papers and books on the paleolithic research in China have been published in latter half of this century.
    In the previous 50 years, one of the important advancements of the paleolithic archeology in China is the expanse in space and time distribution. Before 1949 in addition to Zhoukoudian region only about 10 sites which are belong ed to middle and upper paleolithic were found in Ningxia, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Shanxi and Yunnan Provinces and Autonomous Regions. Now over 1000 sites belonging to the different stages of the paleolithic have been discovered in China. Among them the sites belonging to the early stage of the low er paleolithic ( Early Pleistocene ) have been found and distributed over rather wide region ( 101°58′- 114°39′E. , 25°14′- 40°13′N. ) in China, the earliest one was found in 1998 at Renzidong Cave near Xincun town in Fanchang county , Anhui Province. Some stone artifacts, bone tools and many mammalian fossils were found in situ. In comparison with well known early Pleistocene faunas and paleomagnetic dating of related sites, the Renzidong Cave site could be dated to earlier than 2Ma. This discovery indicates that humankind in China could be traced 0. 3 million years earlier than the Yuanmou hominid who is dated as of 1. 7Ma and had been thought as representing the earliest inhabitant of China for long time since his discovering in 1965. The distribution area of late stage of lower paleolithic ( Middle Pleistocene ) is slightly enlarged than that of earlier stage ( 105°55′— 124°07′E. , 23°39′— 41°15′N. ) . The region with middle paleolithic cultural relics has no obvious change, but may extend westward for 2 degrees longitude in North China. The culture of the late paleolithic spreaded further westward and northward and have been propagated into Tibet and the most northern part of China ( 79°26′_ 127°21′E. , 18°17′_ 52°25′N. ).
    The analysis of the stone artifacts shows that the paleolithic industrial basic frame in China consists of two main industries distributed in North and South China respectively tog ether with several local industries. The main industry designates the assemblages with common characters existed throughout the paleolithic age and distributed over wide area, while the local industry contains the assemblages with common characters but the distribution are rather limited in space and time. Following is a brief description of the main and local industries.
    Main industry of North China: Some general characters could be shown as follows: Most of the stone artifacts are small in size and less than 40mm in length. The flakes are produced by hard hammer percussion. The tools are mostly made of the flakes and can be subdivided into scraper, pointed tool, awl, graver, chopper and bolas. Among them the scraper is the main type and the pointed tool is important one. The chopper is more common in early paleolithic stage and played decreasing roleupto middle and upper paleolithic. All tools are trimmed by hard hammer percussion and mainly retouched on the dorsal surface, therefore, they are not regular in shape and the working edges are zigzag.
    The main industry of North China distributed over a rather vast area ( 107°29′_ 122°10′E. , 34°10′_ 41°15′N. ) in the early and middle paleolithic. Upto late paleolithic it extended to further west and south in China. The artifacts of the industry have been discovered in a large area including Tibet, Yunnan, Sichuan, Guizhou, Guangxi, Hunan, Hubei, Anhui and Fujian Provinces ( 87°21′_ 126°18′E. , 24°55′_ 45°36′N. ) .
    Main industry in South China: The general characters are as follows: Most of the stone artifacts are large, over 100mm in length. The too ls mainly consist of chopper, pick, biface, cleaver and stone bolas. A few scrapers and pointed tools are also contained in the assemblages. All tools are crudely retouched by hard hammer percussion. Consequently tools are rather irregular in shape, the working edges are zigzag and the trimming scars are deep and broad in most cases.
    The main industry in South China distributed over a narrower region ( 104°38′_ 118° 53′E. , 23°39′_ 33°22′N. ) than that of North China known at present. Actual distribution could be slightly wider but would not extend into the west Plateau of China , because no archeological sites found in the western part of Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan and Tibet have beer yielded any assemblage with characters similar to that of main industry in South China.
    There are nine local industries a t present. Miaohoushan industry was found at Benxi county , Liaoning Province. Most of the stone artifacts are large in size. The tools are mostly made of large and broad flakes and retouched with complex mode. Guanyindong industry was mainly found in the northwestern part of Guizhou Province. The main characters of this industry are as follows: majority of the tools are trimmed by steep chipping , so the working edges are usually obtuse and the angle of edge outstrip 75°. The tools with multi-edges are more than those with a single edge in the assemblages. A detailed description of other local industries are presented in the Chinese text.
    In spite of the diversity of characters among the various local industries some common characters in type and technique could be seen in almost all paleolithic industries of China except blade and micro-blade industries. The common characters include that the ratio of length to width of the stone artifacts tends to be equal, flakes and tools are produced by hard hammer percussion, the cores are no t prepared in advance so most of flakes chipped from the core are irregular in shape, the tools are also not regular in shape and the working edges are usually zigzag. These are obviously different from those of the paleolithic industry in West Asia and Europe. But the cultural exchange with the neighboring areas could be shown in paleolithic remains of China specially in Shuidonggou industry and Qingshuihe industry.
    The great achievement in the paleolithic aracheology of China of 20th century especially in the latter half of it has laid solid foundantation which may keep up a continuous development for 21st century. Nevertheless the disequilibrium of paleolithic archeological study in China is obvious. The research work is very weak especially in the eastern and western parts of China. The qualified archeologists and technicians are insufficient. If we could overcome the weakness in a short time, paleolithic archeology in China could be more and more greatly developed in near future.
    On the geomorphological evolution of the bose basin, a lower paleolithic locality in south China
    Yuan Baoyin, Hou Yamei, Wang Wei, Rick Potts, Guo Zhengtang, Huang Weiwen
    1999, 18(03):  215-224. 
    Asbtract ( 202 )   PDF (321KB) ( 82 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Bose basin, which has a NW-SE strike and is ca. 100km long , lies in western Guangxi of South China. The basin formed in the beginning of the Tertiary, as defined by a series of lacustrine beds yielding coal. Influenced by the main episode of Himalayan movement a t the end o f the Eogene, the basin was uplifted causing erosion that was responsible for the nearly complete lack of Neogene deposits. During the end o f the Pliocene and Quaternary, new deposits were laid down and several erosional terraces were developed in the basin ( Fig . 1) . The present paper discusses some problems on the geomorphological evolution of the basin, especially TerraceⅣ ( TⅣ ) , which is the stratum yielding Lower Paleolithic stone artefacts.
    1 Sequence of terraces
    The Youjiang river, which originates from the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau adjacent to the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, crosses the Bose basin from northwest to southeast and is associated with seven river terraces of differing elevation.
    TⅠ and TⅡ , 10m and 15m above the river level, respectively, and 5- 7km in width, represent the main geomophological features of the present basin. TⅠ consists of yellowish-brown clayey , silty loam, and basal g ravel. TⅡ consists of red clay and basal gravel. TⅢ is the least developed in the terrace system of the Bose basin, especially in its eastern part, but can be seen in the western part of the basin where Bose city is built on it, as illustrated in the profile of Fig. 2-A. TⅢ is 30- 40m above the river level and consists of red clay and basal gravel. The red clay grades downward to sub-reticular mottled brick- red clay, and pebbles of sand and shale in the gravel have been strongly kaolinized.
    TⅣ , situated typically 50- 100m above the river level, is of considerable interest because it yields stone artefacts of the Paleolithic period. It is well developed and distributed throughout the basin. It consists of two parts. The upper part includes latosols on the top and typical reticular mottled brick-red clay on the bottom. The low er part consists of a basal gravel. The latosols are poorly developed, support only scarce vegetation presently , and a re typically eroded to form badlands in which abundant stone artifacts and associated tektites have been found. TⅣ is often fragmented due to later faulting , and thus forms several platforms whose altitude above the current river level ranges from 25 - 100m, which gives the misleading impression of different terraces. How ever, geomorphological evidence of faults or the likely existence of faults could be recognized between separate platforms ( Fig. 2-B) . Therefore, it can be concluded that they belong in the same terrace.
    On hills of higher elevation within the basin, three more platforms have been observed. These consist of gravel beds that unconformably overlie the Eogene beds, and dispersed pebbles and fragments of iron pan and tubercular iron-manganese, all situated at the top of the platforms, and colluvial slope materials consisting of red clay on the platform sides. These platforms ( TⅤ -TⅦ ) are 100m, 120m, and more than 170m above the river level, respectively. They may have developed at the end of the Pliocene and represent the earliest terraces in the basin ( Fig. 3-A) .
    The terraces are typically associated with characteristic vegetation or other features, and can be named as follows according to these associations: TⅠ , rice terrace; TⅡ , village / town terrace; TⅢ , vegetable terrace; TⅣ , mango terrace; and TⅤ -TⅦ , forest terraces.
    2 Stratig raphic diachronism of terrace deposition
    The Laikui locality is situated on a convex bank of the river near Laikui village in Tianyang County. At that locality, TⅣ is 3km long and has been fragmented by faulting into four platforms o f different altitude above the riv er level( Fig. 3-B) . Stone artifacts were found on every platform and even in situ in the gravel. Were the stone artifacts from the different platforms made in the same period or during different periods? During the time of constant water flow at Laikui, the river deposited sand and gravel in the channel bed. During the overflow stage, water submerged the floodplain, which is represented by the present TⅣ terrace surface. From the channel bed to the floodplain, a succession of facies was deposited as follows: river facies of sand-gravel, bank facies of fine sand, floodplain facies of silt, loam, and clayey silt. These facies are laterally equivalent, and their interfaces represent a time-synchronous surface. Furthermore, the Laikui sediments were gradually eroded by the meandering river, removing sediment from the convex bank and depositing it on the concave bank. The resultinglitho stratigraphic sequence of reworked sediments ( and artifacts) consisted of gravel at the bottom and clayey silt a t the top. Artifacts found in the lower stratum, therefore, are not always older than the upper ( Fig. 4) . When early humans lived there, stone artifacts made by them were left not only on the floodplain ( terrace surface) but also in the river bed. Therefore, stone artifacts found in different strata of the TⅣ terrace at Laikui appear to represent the same period of time.V3 History of geomorphological developmentVAt the end of the Pliocene and beginning of Qua ternary, the Bose basin was uplifted slightly and intermittently, during which the earliest three terraces developed. In the following long , stable period, the basin subsided slightly, and the Youjiang river developed many meanders. The river 's lateral platform was continually reworked. During this period, climate was hot, vegetation was luxuriant and landform was flat. Apparently , this setting was suitable to early human occupation near the river and on the floodplain. About 0. 73 million years ago , there had been a tektite scattering event. The pieces of tektite were buried by later sedimentation associated with stone artifacts made by early man, who may have witnessed the tektite scattering. After then, the basin continued to be uplifted intermittently. With each uplift episode, the river cut terraces TⅢ , TⅡ , TⅠ , leading to the present geomorphological landscape.
    1998 excavation of the Xiaochangliang site at Yangyuan, Hebei
    Chen Chun, Shen Chen, Chen Wanyong, Tang Yingjun
    1999, 18(03):  225-239. 
    Asbtract ( 254 )   PDF (503KB) ( 105 )  
    Related Articles | Metrics
    Xiaochangliang is one of the earliest paleolithic sites so far found in China and in East Asia as well. The chronology and scientific significance of the site have been addressed by the works of both Chinese and American archaeologists at the Nihewan Basin in last twenty years. The field work carried out during the summer season in 1998 set forth two goals. One was to search for the paleo-surface or the living floor of the site. The other was to make a preliminary observation and comparison of dimentional distribution of debitage between archaeological and experimental samples in order to provide our colleagues with an explanation why the Xiao chang liang lithic artifacts were characterized by extremely irregularity in form and small in size.
    GPS was employed to pinpoint the previous test squares and the site datum, and to measure the distance between different localities and nearby archaeological sites. The 4× 4 m test squares selected in this field season were located at the Locality A. The cultural layer is about 0. 8 m thick, which is mainly composed by light gray sandy silt and mixed with several coarse sandy bars in orange color.
    The excavation yielded 901 lithic artifacts and 3291 faunal remains. The lithic industry consists of mainly debitage and debris. The faunal remains are extremely fragmental including teeth identified belonging to Coelodonta antiquitatis, Paleoeloxodon sp. , Hipparion sp. , Bison sp. , Viv vera sp. , Felidae etc.
    Taphonomic examination reveals that lithic and faunal remains were secondary deposit which had been transported by water. Mammalian bones show various traces and marks modified by water, carnivore teeth, plant roots, and probably stone artifacts.
    Sedimentary feature indicates a perilacustrine floodplain and tributary environment. The paleo-surface or living floor, although was not found this time, might have been situated in the far south of the site if it did exist.
    Six flint nodules collected in situ were seleted to conduct flintknapping experiment. The experimental products was compared with the archaeological collection by computer in order to make sure whether the small size of the lithic industry had been caused by the quality of raw material or artisan 's intention. The raw materials at Xiao chang liang are mainly local fine-grained “ cherty” rock or qaurtzite in various colors. The outcrops of raw materials can be found at several spots below the Nihew an Formation and at the Fenghuangshan to the east of the site. The shattering characteristics o f these local raw materials were the principal cause of high percentage of debitage and debris observed in both archaeological collection and experiment.
    The excavation and analysis were trying to offer an example by using advanced techniques and methods such as GPS, computerized potting , taphonomy and flintknapping experiment in order to learn more about hominid behavior and their paleoenvironment during the early Pleistocene in the Nihewan Basin, North China. The next step of the study will be followed by in-depth study of lithic and faunal analyses including usewear, refitting and taphonomic observation etc.