Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 667-678.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0039
• Excavation / Investigation Reports • Previous Articles Next Articles
HONG Xiaoru1(
), CHEN Wei2,3(
), YU Guanyue4, LI Jiali5, YANG Yuchun6, LYU Hongliang1, XIANG Fang7, CHEN Huixin6
Received:2022-09-25
Revised:2023-02-08
Online:2023-10-15
Published:2023-10-16
CLC Number:
HONG Xiaoru, CHEN Wei, YU Guanyue, LI Jiali, YANG Yuchun, LYU Hongliang, XIANG Fang, CHEN Huixin. Newly discovered Paleolithic artifacts from the southern Chengdu Plain[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(05): 667-678.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0039
| 地点名称Locality | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinates | 海拔 Elevation(m) | 阶地Terrace | 石制品Lithic artifacts(n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地表Surface | 地层Stratigraphy | ||||
| 七子洞Qizidong | 30°16′33.9″N;103°53′34.9″E | 406 | 岷江T2 | 9 | 4 |
| 吊山咀Diaoshanzui | 30°16′17.9″N;103°54′13.8″E | 412 | 岷江T2 | 13 | 3 |
| 街新场Jiexinchang | 30°06′14.4″N;103°55′03.5″E | 442 | 岷江T3 | 6 | 8 |
| 马鞍山Ma'anshan | 30°01′20.9″N;103°56′47.9″E | 447 | 岷江T3 | 1 | 2 |
| 太平寺东Taipingsidong | 30°14′36.6″N;103°59′33.2″E | 483 | 岷江T4 | 3 | |
| 张瓦窑Zhangwayao | 30°10′08.8″N;103°57′29.3″E | 456 | 岷江T4 | 2 | 2 |
| 荷花村Hehuacun | 30°07′43.9″N;103°57′18.4″E | 464 | 岷江T4 | 11 | 1 |
| 高家院子Gaojiayuanzi | 30°06′49.4″N;103°57′51.6″E | 474 | 岷江T4 | 4 | 4 |
| 深丛林Shenconglin | 30°06′28.5″N;103°57′58.8″E | 479 | 岷江T4 | 13 | 2 |
| 朱家山Zhujiashan | 29°51′53.9″N;103°49′02.1″E | 372 | 古青衣江T2 | 6 | 2 |
| 鸡公堰Jigongyan | 29°46′48.1″N;103°48′52.5″E | 374 | 岷江T3 | 1 | 1 |
| 老屋基Laowuji | 29°44′40.6″N;103°47′11.7″E | 368 | 岷江T3 | 2 | |
Tab.1 The Paleolithic localities discovered newly in the southern Chengdu Plain
| 地点名称Locality | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinates | 海拔 Elevation(m) | 阶地Terrace | 石制品Lithic artifacts(n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 地表Surface | 地层Stratigraphy | ||||
| 七子洞Qizidong | 30°16′33.9″N;103°53′34.9″E | 406 | 岷江T2 | 9 | 4 |
| 吊山咀Diaoshanzui | 30°16′17.9″N;103°54′13.8″E | 412 | 岷江T2 | 13 | 3 |
| 街新场Jiexinchang | 30°06′14.4″N;103°55′03.5″E | 442 | 岷江T3 | 6 | 8 |
| 马鞍山Ma'anshan | 30°01′20.9″N;103°56′47.9″E | 447 | 岷江T3 | 1 | 2 |
| 太平寺东Taipingsidong | 30°14′36.6″N;103°59′33.2″E | 483 | 岷江T4 | 3 | |
| 张瓦窑Zhangwayao | 30°10′08.8″N;103°57′29.3″E | 456 | 岷江T4 | 2 | 2 |
| 荷花村Hehuacun | 30°07′43.9″N;103°57′18.4″E | 464 | 岷江T4 | 11 | 1 |
| 高家院子Gaojiayuanzi | 30°06′49.4″N;103°57′51.6″E | 474 | 岷江T4 | 4 | 4 |
| 深丛林Shenconglin | 30°06′28.5″N;103°57′58.8″E | 479 | 岷江T4 | 13 | 2 |
| 朱家山Zhujiashan | 29°51′53.9″N;103°49′02.1″E | 372 | 古青衣江T2 | 6 | 2 |
| 鸡公堰Jigongyan | 29°46′48.1″N;103°48′52.5″E | 374 | 岷江T3 | 1 | 1 |
| 老屋基Laowuji | 29°44′40.6″N;103°47′11.7″E | 368 | 岷江T3 | 2 | |
| 地点 Locality→ 类型 Type↓ | 七子洞QZD | 吊山咀DSZ | 街新场JXC | 马鞍山MAS | 太平寺东TPSD | 张瓦窑ZWY | 荷花村HHC | 高家院子GJYZ | 深丛林SCL | 朱家山ZJS | 鸡公堰JGY | 老屋基LWJ | 总计Total | 占比Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核 Core | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 31% | |
| 石片 Flake | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12% | |||||
| 断块 Chunk | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 31 | 31% | ||
| 石器 Retouched tool | ||||||||||||||
| 砍砸器 Chopper | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5% | |||||||||
| 手斧 Handaxe | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2% | ||||||||||
| 手镐 Pick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2% | ||||||||||
| 薄刃斧 Cleaver | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3% | |||||||||
| 重型刮削器Heavy-duty scraper | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10% | |||||||
| 刮削器 Scraper | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3% | |||||||||
| 凹缺器 Notch | 1 | 1 | 1% | |||||||||||
| 总计 Total | 13 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 100% |
Tab.2 Types and quantities of stone artifacts found in various localities
| 地点 Locality→ 类型 Type↓ | 七子洞QZD | 吊山咀DSZ | 街新场JXC | 马鞍山MAS | 太平寺东TPSD | 张瓦窑ZWY | 荷花村HHC | 高家院子GJYZ | 深丛林SCL | 朱家山ZJS | 鸡公堰JGY | 老屋基LWJ | 总计Total | 占比Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核 Core | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 31% | |
| 石片 Flake | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12% | |||||
| 断块 Chunk | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 31 | 31% | ||
| 石器 Retouched tool | ||||||||||||||
| 砍砸器 Chopper | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5% | |||||||||
| 手斧 Handaxe | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2% | ||||||||||
| 手镐 Pick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2% | ||||||||||
| 薄刃斧 Cleaver | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3% | |||||||||
| 重型刮削器Heavy-duty scraper | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10% | |||||||
| 刮削器 Scraper | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3% | |||||||||
| 凹缺器 Notch | 1 | 1 | 1% | |||||||||||
| 总计 Total | 13 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 100% |
| 类型 Type↓ 长度 L→ | 20≤L<50 mm | 50≤L<100 mm | 100≤L<200 mm | L≥200 mm | 总计Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核 Core | 5 | 21 | 5 | 31 | |
| 石片 Flake | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| 断块 Chunk | 2 | 11 | 17 | 1 | 31 |
| 石器 Retouched tool | 4 | 21 | 1 | 26 | |
| 总计 Total | 3 | 21 | 68 | 8 | 100 |
| 占比 Percentage | 3% | 21% | 68% | 8% | 100% |
Tab.3 Size of lithic artifacts from the Paleolithic localities in the southern Chengdu Plain
| 类型 Type↓ 长度 L→ | 20≤L<50 mm | 50≤L<100 mm | 100≤L<200 mm | L≥200 mm | 总计Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核 Core | 5 | 21 | 5 | 31 | |
| 石片 Flake | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 12 |
| 断块 Chunk | 2 | 11 | 17 | 1 | 31 |
| 石器 Retouched tool | 4 | 21 | 1 | 26 | |
| 总计 Total | 3 | 21 | 68 | 8 | 100 |
| 占比 Percentage | 3% | 21% | 68% | 8% | 100% |
| 编号No. | 类型Type | 原料Raw material | 尺寸(mm)Size | 重量(g)Mass | 台面Platform | 台面宽厚(mm)Platform size | 石片角Flake angle(°) | 背疤数Dorsal scar(n) | 背疤向Directions of dorsal scar | 背自然面比Cortex ratio (%) | 远端Dsital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021DSZC:17 | I型 | 石英砂岩 | 86.27×106.71×54.81 | 568 | 自然 | 90.06×50.57 | 105° | 0 | 100% | 羽状 | |
| 2021ZWYC:1 | I型 | 晶屑凝灰岩 | 221.8×155.41×56.32 | 2192 | 自然 | 106.7×48.21 | 100° | 0 | 100% | 羽状 | |
| 2021LWJC:1 | II型 | 石英岩 | 113.09×105.38×52.05 | 745.5 | 自然 | 75.89×34.05 | 115° | 1 | ↖ | 75%-99% | 羽状 |
| 2021LWJC:2 | II型 | 石英片岩 | 132.82×127.33×33.6 | 669.5 | 自然 | 49.73×30.5 | 115° | 10 | ↑8 | 25%-50% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021SCLC:2 | II型 | 硅质岩 | 140.27×117.47×44.77 | 757.5 | 自然 | 76.12×38.56 | 90° | 1 | ↑ | 25%-50% | 羽状 |
| 2021DSZC:4 | II型 | 石英砂岩 | 107.84×144.74×40.65 | 706.5 | 自然 | 58.42×29.25 | 90° | 1 | ← | 75%-99% | 羽状 |
| 2021JXCC:2 | II型 | 石英岩 | 133.61×178.71×74.45 | 2288 | 自然 | 180.43×88.19 | 120° | 1 | ↙ | 1%-25% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021HHCC:12 | II型 | 岩屑砂岩 | 190.12×80.6×42.51 | 619.5 | 自然 | 13.3×6.1 | 90° | 8 | ↓2 | 1%-25% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021QZDC:2 | III型 | 石英岩 | 50.53×89.42×30.51 | 150.9 | 自然 | 80.68×30.38 | 100° | 12 | ↓3→2向腹1 | 0 | 羽状 |
| 2021HHCC:10 | III型 | 石英岩 | 100.49×102.67×30.04 | 376.5 | 自然 | 78.56×29.59 | 110° | 4 | ↓3 | 0 | 羽状 |
| 2021QZDC:1 | V型 | 硅质岩 | 111.2×136.73×38.17 | 707 | 素台面 | 89.52×39.5 | 130° | 1 | ↘ | 50%-75% | 羽状 |
Tab.4 Complete flakes from the Paleolithic localities in the southern Chengdu Plain
| 编号No. | 类型Type | 原料Raw material | 尺寸(mm)Size | 重量(g)Mass | 台面Platform | 台面宽厚(mm)Platform size | 石片角Flake angle(°) | 背疤数Dorsal scar(n) | 背疤向Directions of dorsal scar | 背自然面比Cortex ratio (%) | 远端Dsital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021DSZC:17 | I型 | 石英砂岩 | 86.27×106.71×54.81 | 568 | 自然 | 90.06×50.57 | 105° | 0 | 100% | 羽状 | |
| 2021ZWYC:1 | I型 | 晶屑凝灰岩 | 221.8×155.41×56.32 | 2192 | 自然 | 106.7×48.21 | 100° | 0 | 100% | 羽状 | |
| 2021LWJC:1 | II型 | 石英岩 | 113.09×105.38×52.05 | 745.5 | 自然 | 75.89×34.05 | 115° | 1 | ↖ | 75%-99% | 羽状 |
| 2021LWJC:2 | II型 | 石英片岩 | 132.82×127.33×33.6 | 669.5 | 自然 | 49.73×30.5 | 115° | 10 | ↑8 | 25%-50% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021SCLC:2 | II型 | 硅质岩 | 140.27×117.47×44.77 | 757.5 | 自然 | 76.12×38.56 | 90° | 1 | ↑ | 25%-50% | 羽状 |
| 2021DSZC:4 | II型 | 石英砂岩 | 107.84×144.74×40.65 | 706.5 | 自然 | 58.42×29.25 | 90° | 1 | ← | 75%-99% | 羽状 |
| 2021JXCC:2 | II型 | 石英岩 | 133.61×178.71×74.45 | 2288 | 自然 | 180.43×88.19 | 120° | 1 | ↙ | 1%-25% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021HHCC:12 | II型 | 岩屑砂岩 | 190.12×80.6×42.51 | 619.5 | 自然 | 13.3×6.1 | 90° | 8 | ↓2 | 1%-25% | 阶梯状 |
| 2021QZDC:2 | III型 | 石英岩 | 50.53×89.42×30.51 | 150.9 | 自然 | 80.68×30.38 | 100° | 12 | ↓3→2向腹1 | 0 | 羽状 |
| 2021HHCC:10 | III型 | 石英岩 | 100.49×102.67×30.04 | 376.5 | 自然 | 78.56×29.59 | 110° | 4 | ↓3 | 0 | 羽状 |
| 2021QZDC:1 | V型 | 硅质岩 | 111.2×136.73×38.17 | 707 | 素台面 | 89.52×39.5 | 130° | 1 | ↘ | 50%-75% | 羽状 |
| [1] | 西南师范学院地理系四川地理研究室. 四川地理[Z]. 重庆:西南师范学院学报编辑部, 1982, 59 |
| [2] | 中国科学院《中国自然地理》编辑委员会. 地学经典丛书·第1辑·中国自然地理总论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018, 289 |
| [3] | 梁斌, 朱兵, 王全伟, 等. 成都平原第四纪地质与环境[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014, 2-8+92-96 |
| [4] | 四川省文物考古研究院, 中国人民大学历史学院, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 等. 四川眉山市东坡区坛罐山遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6: 4-16+26 |
| [5] | 四川省地方志编纂委员会编纂. 四川省志·地理志·下[M]. 成都: 成都地图出版社, 1996, 381-389 |
| [6] | 卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A]. 见:邓涛,王原,等(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218 |
| [7] | Toth N. The stone technologies of early hominids at Koobi Fora: An experimental approach[D]. Berkeley: The PhD Dissertation of University of California, 1982, 48-101 |
| [8] | 王社江. 洛南盆地的薄刃斧[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25(4): 332-342 |
| [9] | 陈虹. 鉴微寻踪:旧石器时代石英岩石制品的微痕与功能研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2020, 3 |
| [10] | 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 18(3): 193-214 |
| [11] | 李宣民, 张森水. 铜梁旧石器文化之研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1981, 4: 359-371+386-389 |
| [12] | 李宣民, 张森水. 资阳人B地点发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 215-224+302-304 |
| [13] | 陈苇, 仪明洁, 孙智彬, 等. 四川简阳龙垭遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(6): 955-969 |
| [14] | 高星, 裴树文. 三峡远古人类的足迹三峡库区旧石器时代考古的发现和研究[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2010, 163-171 |
| [15] | 王社江, 孙雪峰, 鹿化煜, 等. 汉水上游汉中盆地新发现的旧石器及其年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(2): 125-136 |
| [16] | 四川省文物考古研究院, 北京大学考古文博学院. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14+2 |
| [17] | 冯金良, 赵振宏, 赵翔, 等. “成都粘土”的成因、物源、时代及其古环境问题[J]. 山地学报, 2014, 32(5): 513-525 |
| [18] | 葛璐月, 文星跃. 成都粘土与其下伏粘土粒度特征对比及古环境意义[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(5): 681-692 |
| [1] | SHAN Jialu, LI Yixiao, WANG Fagang, GUO Yujie, LI Feng. Preliminary study on the 2018 excavation of Xinmiaozhuang Locality 2 in the Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(03): 447-461. |
| [2] | SHEN Ke, LI Feng, WANG Xiaomin, WANG Fagang, GUO Beiheng, GAO Xing. Preliminary report on the 2023-2024 excavation of Banjingzi Locality 2 in Nihewan Basin, North China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(03): 462-477. |
| [3] | HE Xiangdong, LIANG Yue, WANG Chunxue, NIU Dongwei, DU Yuwei. A preliminary study on the animal fossils from Donggou site in Yuxian Basin, North China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(03): 586-599. |
| [4] | HOU yishan, ZHANG Yue, ZHANG Shuangquan. Micro-CT techniques and bone histology in zooarchaeology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(02): 280-295. |
| [5] | HOU Kan. Review of the domestic and international progress in paleodemography [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(01): 1-17. |
| [6] | TONG Guang, LI Feng, GAO Xing. Simulation experiment on the flaking of boat-shaped core from the Erdaoliang site in the Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(01): 46-58. |
| [7] | ZHANG Zhe, John W. IVES, WANG Lixin, WANG Chunxue. Application of the geographic information system in analyzing the spatial distribution of auroch bones from the Houtaomuga site [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2026, 45(01): 74-87. |
| [8] | LI Yiyuan. Exploitation and utilization of chert raw materials from the Tiaotougang Paleolithic site in the Daoshui River Basin, Hunan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1047-1059. |
| [9] | DENG Wanwen, LIU Suoqiang. Steep-edged flaking technology of stone tools and adaptation and diffusion of populations in South China during the Middle to Late Pleistocene [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1060-1071. |
| [10] | DU Ruiyan, JI Xueping, ZHOU Zhenyu, GUAN Ying, ZHANG Maolin, ZHOU Xiaoyan, XING Song. Starch granules in dental residues of ancient humans from the Maludong and Tangzigou sites, Yunnan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1072-1082. |
| [11] | JIA Zhenxiu, TINLEY Tsring, LI Hao, TONG Yan, SHARGAN Wangdue, CHEN Fahu. A preliminary report of the 2021-2022 paleolithic archaeological survey in Duilong River valley, Lhasa, Xizang [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1083-1093. |
| [12] | ZHENG Zhexuan, TAN Peiyang. Progress and reflections on paleolithic archaeology in Sichuan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1094-1105. |
| [13] | LIU Yalin, WEI Tianxu, SHI Xiao, WANG Chunxue, SUN Xuefeng, QIU Hongliang. A preliminary report of 2022 excavation of Shangbaitang site in Anji County, Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1120-1130. |
| [14] | RUAN Qijun, LI Tianguang, CHE Decai, HE Jinmei, SUN Boyang, SHI Qinqin, HOU Sukuan, ZHANG Shuangquan, WANG Guofu, LI Jun, YONG Chun, ZHANG Fei, SHI Junwen, ZHANG Wenjing, JIA Zhenxiu, LI Hao. The 2023 excavation report on the Yuanmou hominin site, Yunnan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 939-951. |
| [15] | RUAN Qijun, ZHANG Shuai, LI Xiang, LIU Jianhui, GUO Xiangqi, LI Jun, CHE Decai, LI Junyi, ZHENG Xiaoyong, YONG Chun, WANG Zhenzhen, JIA Zhenxiu, LI Hao. A preliminary report on the survey of Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex in the Yuanmou Basin, Yunnan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 978-988. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||