Excavation/Investigation Reports

An excavation report of the Locality 1 of Wangjiayan Paleolithic site, Chengdu

  • Ming HUANG ,
  • Zhiqiang ZUO ,
  • Hao LI ,
  • Yu GAO ,
  • Xuefeng SUN ,
  • Guo LI ,
  • Peiyuan XIAO
Expand
  • 1. Chengdu Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Chengdu 610072
    2. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment, Beijing 100101
    3. School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023
    4. Chengdu Shuangliu District Cultural Relics Protection Administration, Shuangliu 610200
    5. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100044

Received date: 2023-03-26

  Revised date: 2023-04-18

  Online published: 2023-08-10

Abstract

Locality 1 at the Wangjiayan site is located in the northern part of the Mumatai undulating terrace in Shuangliu District, Chengdu City. In total, 82 stone artifacts were excavated from the site including cores, flakes, chunks and tools. In addition, a large quantity of unmodified cobbles were also unearthed. Raw materials were mainly collected from adjacent river gravels and lower cobble lays of the Mumashan Formation. Quartzite is the predominant type of raw material, accompanied by a small proportion of vein quartz. Freehand percussion was exclusively used for core reduction, with single-platform cores prevalent, plus a few double-platform cores. Flakes show a remarkable variation of size with some possessing the potential to make heavy-duty tools (e.g., handaxes) as a cortical platform is common for most of the flakes. Damage is observed on flake margins, which may indicate direct use of unretouched flakes. Heavy-duty tools including two handaxes and a pick share similar technological features with tools in the Acheulean techno-complex. Preliminary OSL dating indicates that the occupation was no younger than 89 ka. The discovery and excavation of this Locality 1 further extends the history of humans’ activities in the Chengdu Plain, and sheds important light for our understanding of subsistence strategies and Paleolithic culture of early hominins in the region.

Cite this article

Ming HUANG , Zhiqiang ZUO , Hao LI , Yu GAO , Xuefeng SUN , Guo LI , Peiyuan XIAO . An excavation report of the Locality 1 of Wangjiayan Paleolithic site, Chengdu[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023 , 42(04) : 514 -522 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0035

References

[1] 李勇, 黎兵, Steffen D, 等. 青藏高原东缘晚新生代成都盆地物源分析与水系演化[J]. 沉积学报, 2006, 3: 309-320
[2] 梁斌, 朱兵, 王全伟, 等. 成都平原第四纪地质与环境[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014
[3] 四川省文物管理委员会. 成都羊子山土台遗址清理报告[J]. 考古学报, 1957, 4: 17-31
[4] 叶茂林. 羊子山土台遗址出土打制石器的性质与年代浅析[J]. 四川文物, 1988, 5: 9-13
[5] 四川省文物考古研究院, 中国人民大学历史学院, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 等. 四川眉山市东坡区坛罐山遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6 :4-16
[6] Kuman K, Li CR, Li H. Large cutting tools in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 76: 129-153
[7] Lei L, Lotter MG, Li D, et al. Refining the understanding of large cutting tool technology in the Baise Basin, South China[J]. Lithic Technology, 2021, 46(2): 87-103
[8] Li H, Li YY, Yu LP, et al. Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2022, 298: 107850
[9] Kuman K. The Acheulean industrial complex[A]. In: Smith C(Ed.). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology[C]. New York: Springer, 2014, 7-18
[10] Beyene Y, Katoh S, Woldegabriel G, et al. The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at Konso, Ethiopia[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(5): 1584-1591
[11] 梁斌, 王全伟, 朱兵, 等. 川西地区成都粘土的光释光年代学[J]. 第四纪研究, 2013, 33(4): 823-828
[12] 陈苇, 仪明洁, 孙智彬, 等. 四川简阳龙垭遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(06):955-969.
[13] 裴树文, 关莹, 高星. 丹江口库区彭家河旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(2): 95-109
[14] 李浩, 李超荣, Kuman K. 丹江口库区果茶场 II 旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(2): 144-154
[15] 李浩, 李超荣, 雷蕾. 丹江口库区大土包子旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(3): 349-356
[16] 周振宇, 王春雪, 高星. 丹江口北泰山庙旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 29(3): 246-261
[17] 湖南省文物考古研究所, 临澧县文物局. 湖南临澧谢家山旧石器地点发现的石制品[A].见:湖南省文物考古研究所(编著).湖南考古辑刊(第11集)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015
[18] 袁家荣. 湖南旧石器考古回顾[A].见:《跋涉续集》编辑委员会.跋涉续集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2006
[19] 李超荣, 徐常青. 江西安义潦河发现的旧石器及其意义[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 10(1): 35-41
[20] 董哲, 战世佳. 安徽省宁国市安友庄旧石器遗址调查及发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(2): 342-353
[21] 董哲, 战世佳. 安徽省宣城麻村旧石器遗址调查及发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(1): 342-353
[22] 房迎三. 安徽省宣州市陈山旧石器地点1988年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1997, 16(2): 96-106
[23] 贺存定. 重庆发现的手斧及其问题[J]. 长江文明, 2016, 2: 74-85
[24] 四川省文物考古研究院, 北京大学考古文博学院. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14
[25] 郑喆轩, 柳江, 何治, 等. 四川甘孜藏族自治州旧石器时代遗存2019年调查简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6: 17-26
Outlines

/