Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (04): 653-663.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0035
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
BAO Jinping1(), ZHENG Lianbin2(), YU Keli2, WANG Yaxuan2, DU Huimin2
Received:
2018-10-11
Revised:
2019-09-22
Online:
2021-08-15
Published:
2021-08-17
Contact:
ZHENG Lianbin
E-mail:balaqiang111@163.com;zhenglianbin@sina.com
CLC Number:
BAO Jinping, ZHENG Lianbin, YU Keli, WANG Yaxuan, DU Huimin. Origin of the Chinese Sherpa people viewed from somatotype study[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(04): 653-663.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0035
性别 Sex | 年龄 Age | 人数 n | 身高 Statue(cm) | 体质量 Mass(kg) | 体型均值 Mean somatotypes | X | Y | 体脂率 Body fat % | HWR | SAM | BMI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性Male | 20-39 | 49 | 163.4±5.0 | 58.4±6.6 | 2.7-5.0-2.3 (0.8,1.0,0.9) | -03 | 5.0 | 11.8% | 42.2 | 1.4 | 21.9 |
40-59 | 36 | 159.1±3.8 | 57.6±6.4 | 2.9-5.4-1.7 (1.2,0.8,1.0) | -12 | 6.2 | 12.5% | 41.3 | 1.5 | 22.8 | |
60-75 | 13 | 156.8±5.3 | 49.9±5.2 | 2.3-4.8-2.7 (0.4,0.6,0.7) | 0.3 | 4.7 | 11.3% | 42.7 | 1.2 | 20.2 | |
Total | 98 | 160.9±5.3 | 57.0±6.9 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 (1.0,0.9,1.0) | 0.6 | 5.4 | 12.0% | 41.9 | 1.4 | 22.0 | |
女性Female | 20-39 | 41 | 151.9±4.9 | 52.7±6.7 | 4.5-5.1-1.3 (1.2,1.0,0.8) | -3.1 | 4.3 | 19.5% | 40.6 | 1.7 | 22.8 |
40-59 | 30 | 151.7±4.4 | 54.2±7.2 | 4.3-5.1-1.2 (1.4,1.3,0.9) | -3.1 | 4.8 | 19.5% | 40.2 | 1.9 | 23.6 | |
60-75 | 13 | 150.5±3.7 | 53.1±7.8 | 4.7-5.3-1.1 (0.8,0.7,0.9) | -3.6 | 4.8 | 20.8% | 40.2 | 1.3 | 23.4 | |
Total | 84 | 151.6±4.5 | 53.3±7.0 | 4.4-5.1-1.2(1.2,1.1,0.8) | -3.0 | 3.9 | 19.7% | 40.4 | 1.6 | 23.2 |
Tab.1 Mean somatotype of Sherpa
性别 Sex | 年龄 Age | 人数 n | 身高 Statue(cm) | 体质量 Mass(kg) | 体型均值 Mean somatotypes | X | Y | 体脂率 Body fat % | HWR | SAM | BMI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男性Male | 20-39 | 49 | 163.4±5.0 | 58.4±6.6 | 2.7-5.0-2.3 (0.8,1.0,0.9) | -03 | 5.0 | 11.8% | 42.2 | 1.4 | 21.9 |
40-59 | 36 | 159.1±3.8 | 57.6±6.4 | 2.9-5.4-1.7 (1.2,0.8,1.0) | -12 | 6.2 | 12.5% | 41.3 | 1.5 | 22.8 | |
60-75 | 13 | 156.8±5.3 | 49.9±5.2 | 2.3-4.8-2.7 (0.4,0.6,0.7) | 0.3 | 4.7 | 11.3% | 42.7 | 1.2 | 20.2 | |
Total | 98 | 160.9±5.3 | 57.0±6.9 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 (1.0,0.9,1.0) | 0.6 | 5.4 | 12.0% | 41.9 | 1.4 | 22.0 | |
女性Female | 20-39 | 41 | 151.9±4.9 | 52.7±6.7 | 4.5-5.1-1.3 (1.2,1.0,0.8) | -3.1 | 4.3 | 19.5% | 40.6 | 1.7 | 22.8 |
40-59 | 30 | 151.7±4.4 | 54.2±7.2 | 4.3-5.1-1.2 (1.4,1.3,0.9) | -3.1 | 4.8 | 19.5% | 40.2 | 1.9 | 23.6 | |
60-75 | 13 | 150.5±3.7 | 53.1±7.8 | 4.7-5.3-1.1 (0.8,0.7,0.9) | -3.6 | 4.8 | 20.8% | 40.2 | 1.3 | 23.4 | |
Total | 84 | 151.6±4.5 | 53.3±7.0 | 4.4-5.1-1.2(1.2,1.1,0.8) | -3.0 | 3.9 | 19.7% | 40.4 | 1.6 | 23.2 |
年龄Age | dsa | t | P |
---|---|---|---|
20-39 | 2.07 | 5.42 | <0.01 |
40-59 | 1.46 | 4.36 | <0.01 |
60-75 | 2.9 | 5.34 | <0.01 |
Tab.2 Comparison of somatotypes between male and female
年龄Age | dsa | t | P |
---|---|---|---|
20-39 | 2.07 | 5.42 | <0.01 |
40-59 | 1.46 | 4.36 | <0.01 |
60-75 | 2.9 | 5.34 | <0.01 |
族群Ethnic groups | 男性Male | 女性Female | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
人数n | 体型值MS | 人数n | 体型值MS | ||
夏尔巴人Sherpa | 98 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 | 84 | 4.4-5.1-1.2 | |
怒族Nu | 183 | 2.1-4.9-2.6 | 134 | 4.3-4.5-1.7 | |
苗族Miao | 150 | 2.8-5.2-2.4 | 150 | 4.5-4.5-2.1 | |
瑶族Yao | 116 | 1.8-4.9-2.2 | 102 | 3.1-4.3-1.9 | |
布依族Bouyei | 259 | 3.0-5.3-2.4 | 235 | 4.3-4.9-1.9 | |
侗族Dong | 254 | 2.2-4.5-2.4 | 261 | 4.3-4.2-1.5 | |
佤族Va | 258 | 2.2-5.5-2.5 | 184 | 4.0-5.0-1.9 | |
乌孜别克族Uzbek | 110 | 3.7-5.1-2.0 | 91 | 5.9-4.9-1.4 | |
鄂温克族Ewenki | 162 | 3.5-5.0-1.6 | 195 | 5.2-4.4-1.5 |
Tab.3 Mean somatotypes of some ethnic groups in china
族群Ethnic groups | 男性Male | 女性Female | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
人数n | 体型值MS | 人数n | 体型值MS | ||
夏尔巴人Sherpa | 98 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 | 84 | 4.4-5.1-1.2 | |
怒族Nu | 183 | 2.1-4.9-2.6 | 134 | 4.3-4.5-1.7 | |
苗族Miao | 150 | 2.8-5.2-2.4 | 150 | 4.5-4.5-2.1 | |
瑶族Yao | 116 | 1.8-4.9-2.2 | 102 | 3.1-4.3-1.9 | |
布依族Bouyei | 259 | 3.0-5.3-2.4 | 235 | 4.3-4.9-1.9 | |
侗族Dong | 254 | 2.2-4.5-2.4 | 261 | 4.3-4.2-1.5 | |
佤族Va | 258 | 2.2-5.5-2.5 | 184 | 4.0-5.0-1.9 | |
乌孜别克族Uzbek | 110 | 3.7-5.1-2.0 | 91 | 5.9-4.9-1.4 | |
鄂温克族Ewenki | 162 | 3.5-5.0-1.6 | 195 | 5.2-4.4-1.5 |
族群Erhnic groups | 男性Male | 女性Female | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人数n | 体型值MS | dsa | 人数n | 体型值MS | dsa | ||
夏尔巴人Sherpa | 98 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 | 84 | 4.4-5.1-1.2 | |||
羌族Qiang | 299 | 3.9-5.6-1.5 | 1.48 | 303 | 6.0-5.4-1.0 | 1.64 | |
木雅人Muyag | 77 | 3.3-5.3-1.9 | 0.70 | 88 | 5.4-5.3-0.9 | 1.06 | |
尔苏人Ersu | 69 | 3.1-5.5-1.8 | 0.69 | 51 | 4.9-5.3-1.1 | 0.55 | |
怒族Nu | 183 | 2.1-4.9-2.6 | 0.75 | 134 | 4.3-4.5-1.7 | 0.79 | |
云南汉族Han(Yunnan) | 247 | 3.6-4.5-2.6 | 1.15 | 243 | 5.3-4.0-2.0 | 1.63 | |
甘肃汉族Han(Gansu) | 251 | 3.2-4.5-1.9 | 0.84 | 249 | 5.6-4.3-1.0 | 1.46 | |
四川汉族Han(Sichuan) | 222 | 4.5-4.8-1.3 | 2.03 | 200 | 5.9-4.4-0.9 | 1.68 | |
僜人Deng | 60 | 2.9-4.6-2.7 | 0.73 | 84 | 5.1-4.3-1.9 | 1.27 | |
门巴族Monba | 69 | 3.5-4.1-2.3 | 1.28 | 59 | 4.9-4.1-1.6 | 1.19 | |
珞巴族Lhoba | 56 | 3.0-4.4-2.5 | 0.82 | 60 | 5.0-3.9-1.6 | 1.40 |
Tab.4 Comparison of Sherpa and Sino-Tibetan language groups’ body types
族群Erhnic groups | 男性Male | 女性Female | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
人数n | 体型值MS | dsa | 人数n | 体型值MS | dsa | ||
夏尔巴人Sherpa | 98 | 2.7-5.1-2.2 | 84 | 4.4-5.1-1.2 | |||
羌族Qiang | 299 | 3.9-5.6-1.5 | 1.48 | 303 | 6.0-5.4-1.0 | 1.64 | |
木雅人Muyag | 77 | 3.3-5.3-1.9 | 0.70 | 88 | 5.4-5.3-0.9 | 1.06 | |
尔苏人Ersu | 69 | 3.1-5.5-1.8 | 0.69 | 51 | 4.9-5.3-1.1 | 0.55 | |
怒族Nu | 183 | 2.1-4.9-2.6 | 0.75 | 134 | 4.3-4.5-1.7 | 0.79 | |
云南汉族Han(Yunnan) | 247 | 3.6-4.5-2.6 | 1.15 | 243 | 5.3-4.0-2.0 | 1.63 | |
甘肃汉族Han(Gansu) | 251 | 3.2-4.5-1.9 | 0.84 | 249 | 5.6-4.3-1.0 | 1.46 | |
四川汉族Han(Sichuan) | 222 | 4.5-4.8-1.3 | 2.03 | 200 | 5.9-4.4-0.9 | 1.68 | |
僜人Deng | 60 | 2.9-4.6-2.7 | 0.73 | 84 | 5.1-4.3-1.9 | 1.27 | |
门巴族Monba | 69 | 3.5-4.1-2.3 | 1.28 | 59 | 4.9-4.1-1.6 | 1.19 | |
珞巴族Lhoba | 56 | 3.0-4.4-2.5 | 0.82 | 60 | 5.0-3.9-1.6 | 1.40 |
指标index | 夏尔巴人Sherpa | 三岩藏族Sanyan Tibetan | u |
---|---|---|---|
身高Stature | 1609.4±52.8 | 1692.3±54.4 | 8.86** |
胸围chest circumference | 877.3±51.4 | 923.1±63.3 | 14.26** |
坐高sitting height | 846.8±31.5 | 874.3±68.8 | 9.41** |
肩宽shoulder breadth | 365.9±17.6 | 379.9±38.9 | 8.49** |
骨盆宽cresta iliaca breadth | 258.5±15.8 | 276.6±21.5 | 17.29** |
Tab.5 Comparison of body indicators between Sherpa and Sanyan Tibetans
指标index | 夏尔巴人Sherpa | 三岩藏族Sanyan Tibetan | u |
---|---|---|---|
身高Stature | 1609.4±52.8 | 1692.3±54.4 | 8.86** |
胸围chest circumference | 877.3±51.4 | 923.1±63.3 | 14.26** |
坐高sitting height | 846.8±31.5 | 874.3±68.8 | 9.41** |
肩宽shoulder breadth | 365.9±17.6 | 379.9±38.9 | 8.49** |
骨盆宽cresta iliaca breadth | 258.5±15.8 | 276.6±21.5 | 17.29** |
Fig.1 Somatotype distributions of different age groups in Sherpa adults 1-3 represents 20-39, 40-59 and 60-75 males groups separately; 4-6 represents 20-39, 40-59 and 60-75 females groups separately
[1] | 陈明达, 于道中. 实用体质学[M]. 北京: 北京医科大学与中国协和医科大学联合出版社, 1993: 124-125 |
[2] | 郑连斌, 李咏兰, 席焕久, 等. 中国汉族体质人类学研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017: 164-176 |
[3] | 武保林, 聂金甜. 夏尔巴人研究综述[J]. 西藏研究, 2017(5):29-34 |
[4] | 桑吉东智. 陈塘夏尔巴人的氏族及其功能[J]. 青藏高原论坛, 2013, 1(3):31-35 |
[5] | 瞿霭堂. 夏尔巴话的识别——卫藏方言的又一个新土语[J]. 语言研究, 1992(2):176-189. |
[6] | 陈乃文. 夏尔巴人源流探索[J]. 中央民族学校学报, 1983(4):44-47 |
[7] | 陈锋. 西藏世居人群的母系遗传多样性和夏尔巴人遗传特征[D]. 西藏民族学院硕士学位论文, 2014 |
[8] | Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping development and applications[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 373-387 |
[9] | 席焕久, 陈昭. 人体测量方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010 |
[10] | 罗冬梅, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 怒族成人Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 27(4):11-15 |
[11] | 万星光, 徐飞, 李辉煌, 等. 湘西苗族成人Heath-Carter法体型分布[J]. 解剖学杂志, 2010, 33(4):535-537. |
[12] | 黄秀峰, 周庆辉, 钟斌. 瑶族体型的Heath-Carter人体测量法研究[J]. 右江民族医学院学报, 2003, 25(1):1-5 |
[13] | 杨建辉, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 等. 布依族成人Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(3):198-203 |
[14] | 黄世宁, 蒲红琴, 庞祖荫. 侗族成人Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(1):73-78 |
[15] | 于会新, 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 刘海萍. 佤族成人Heath-Carter法体型研究. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 28(2):16-20 |
[16] | 陆舜华, 郑连斌, 栗淑媛, 等. 乌孜别克族成人的体型特点[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(3):224-228 |
[17] | 朱钦, 王树勋, 陆舜华, 等. 鄂温克族成人的Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2). |
[18] | 魏榆, 宇克莉, 张兴华, 等. 四川羌族成人的Heath-Carter体型特征[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(5):70-74 |
[19] | 魏榆, 张兴华, 宇克莉, 等. 中国基诺族、木雅人、尔苏人、八甲人与空格人5个族群的体型特征[J]. 解剖学报, 2017, 48(5):605-609 |
[20] | 郑连斌, 陆舜华, 张兴华, 等. 中国莽人、僜人、珞巴族与门巴族Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(2):176-181 |
[21] | 邹智荣, 李雪雁, 刘承杏, 等. 云南汉族成人的Heath-Carter法体型研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2006, 37(2):321-323 |
[22] | 王圣巍, 孙学川, 刘坤祥. 广东省汉族人群与西藏自治区夏尔巴人群SP–A 基因单核苷酸多态性研究[J]. 细胞与分子免疫学杂志, 2007, 23(3):226-231 |
[23] | 王圣巍, 孙学川, 闫惠琴, 等. GLUT1基因单核苷酸多态性与夏尔巴人群高原低氧适应的关系[J]. 第四军医大学学报, 2009, 30(6):558-560 |
[24] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 成人体重判定(WS/T428-2013)[S]. 中华人民共和国卫生行业标准, 2013: 1-2 |
[25] | 黄颢. 夏尔巴人族源试探[J]. 西藏民族大学学(哲学社会科学版), 1980(3):22-26 |
[26] | 切排, 桑代吉. 夏尔巴人的历史与现状调查[J]. 西北民族研究, 2006(1):64-74 |
[27] | 何国强, 岳小国, 杨晓芹, 等. 三岩藏族体质特征研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(4):408-417 |
[28] | 刘杰, 王爽, 彭冬柏. 肤纹揭示四川木雅人可能是西夏国党项人后裔[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2011(5):4-10 |
[29] | 李璟. 对木雅藏族的民族学与历史学考察——以四川石棉县蟹螺乡木耳堡子木雅人为例[D]. 成都:四川大学, 2006 |
[1] | XING Song. Fossil evidence of the emergence of modern humans and their evolution [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(06): 1069-1082. |
[2] | YANG Shixia, HUAN Faxiang, WANG Hong, WU Zhenyu, LU Xiaohong, LI Jingya. Reduction strategy of the microblade cores from the Xiqiaoshan site in Guangdong [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 804-815. |
[3] | NI Xijun. Modeling the origin of modern humans in light of new evidence [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(04): 576-592. |
[4] | BAO Jinping, YU Keli, LI Yonglan, LI Chong, ZHANG Xinghua, ZHENG Lianbin. A study of Weizang and Kham Tibetans’ somatotype by Heath-Carter method [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 834-846. |
[5] | YU Keli, XIANG Xiaoxue, LI Yonglan, ZHANG Hongming, DU Huimin. A study of physical characteristics of the Sherpas [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 801-810. |
[6] | BAO Yige, LI Xiaoqiang, LIU Hanbin, ZHAO Keliang, John DODSON, SHEN Hui, ZHANG Guilin, WANG Jian, ZHOU Xinying. Evolution and bioenvironmental adaptation of Neolithic and Bronze age agriculture in the North Chinese Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(03): 461-472. |
[7] | CHEN Shengqian, YE Canyang. Theoretical retrospection on the origin of microblade technology [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(04): 547-562. |
[8] | GAO Xing, LI Feng, GUAN Ying, ZHANG Xiaoling, John W OLSEN. An archaeological perspective on the origins and evolution of modern humans in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(03): 317-334. |
[9] | WEI Yu, ZHANG Xinghua, YAN Shi, WANG Zishan. Research on six behavioral traits of lateral functional dominance in the Muya, Ersu, Bajia and Kongge peoples in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2019, 38(01): 88-97. |
[10] | CHEN Chun, ZHANG Meng. Retrospect and rethinking on the microblade industries [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(04): 577-589. |
[11] | LEI Xiaoyun, YUAN Dejian, ZHANG Ye, HUANG Shi. Review and prospect of the research of DNA-based modern human origins over the past 35 years [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2018, 37(02): 270-283. |
[12] | Gao Xing. Collaboration and Integration among Paleoanthropology, Archaeology and Genetics [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2017, 36(01): 131-140. |
[13] | LIU Wu, WU Xiujie, XING Song. Emergence and dispersal of modern humans: The fossil evidence from China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2016, 35(02): 161-171. |
[14] | WU Xinzhi, XU Xin. The Origin of Modern Humans in China Viewed from the Paleolithic Data and Daoxian Human Fossils [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2016, 35(01): 1-13. |
[15] | DENG Qiongying, WANG Xiaoqing, WANG Chuanchao, LI Hui. Genetic Structure of Y Chromosome and Paternal Origin of the Population Speaking Chadong in Guangxi, China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2014, 33(01): 118-124. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||