Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (03): 413-426.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0040
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2024-10-25
Revised:2025-04-01
Online:2025-06-15
Published:2025-06-15
CLC Number:
DENG Wanwen, XIE Ying. A study of the miniaturized stone artifacts from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 413-426.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0040
| 分区比例Percentage by zones→ 石料 Raw materials*↓ | A区 / Zone A | B区 / Zone B | C区 / Zone C | D区 / Zone D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石英砂岩Quartz sandstone | 33.3% | 53.0% | 20.0% | 59.0% |
| 砂岩Sandstone | √ | √ | 5.2% | |
| 石英岩Quartzite | √ | √ | √ | |
| 硅质岩Siliceous rock | √ | 10.7% | √ | 7.0% |
| 燧石Flint | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 石英Quartz | √ | 6.9% | 30.0% | 4.7% |
| 水晶Crystal | √ | √ | √ | |
| 玻璃陨石Tektite | √ | 6.9% | 38.2% | √ |
| 赭石Ochre | √ | √ | √ | 9.9% |
| 灰岩等其他石料Limestone and others | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 合计数量Total number | n=93 | n=2324 | n=110 | n=5002 |
| 注:“*”—资料来源于参考文献[15] Data from the reference[15]. “√”—存在此类石料,但占比较低Indicates there exists a certain kind of raw material, but in quite low proportion. | ||||
Tab.1 Constitution of lithic raw materials from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an County, Guangxi, by excavation zones
| 分区比例Percentage by zones→ 石料 Raw materials*↓ | A区 / Zone A | B区 / Zone B | C区 / Zone C | D区 / Zone D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石英砂岩Quartz sandstone | 33.3% | 53.0% | 20.0% | 59.0% |
| 砂岩Sandstone | √ | √ | 5.2% | |
| 石英岩Quartzite | √ | √ | √ | |
| 硅质岩Siliceous rock | √ | 10.7% | √ | 7.0% |
| 燧石Flint | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 石英Quartz | √ | 6.9% | 30.0% | 4.7% |
| 水晶Crystal | √ | √ | √ | |
| 玻璃陨石Tektite | √ | 6.9% | 38.2% | √ |
| 赭石Ochre | √ | √ | √ | 9.9% |
| 灰岩等其他石料Limestone and others | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 合计数量Total number | n=93 | n=2324 | n=110 | n=5002 |
| 注:“*”—资料来源于参考文献[15] Data from the reference[15]. “√”—存在此类石料,但占比较低Indicates there exists a certain kind of raw material, but in quite low proportion. | ||||
| 分区Zones→ | A区 / Zone A | B区 / Zone B | C区 / Zone C | D区 / Zone D | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石器类型Tool types↓ | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | |||
| 刮削器Scraper | 6 | 100% | 167 | 82.7% | 7 | 87.5% | 89 | 71.2% | |||
| 尖状器Point | 0 | 0 | 13 | 6.4% | 1 | 12.5% | 3 | 2.4% | |||
| 砍砸器Chopper | 0 | 0 | 21 | 10.4% | 0 | 0 | 31 | 24.8% | |||
Tab.2 Main lithic tool types from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an County, Guangxi, by excavation zones
| 分区Zones→ | A区 / Zone A | B区 / Zone B | C区 / Zone C | D区 / Zone D | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石器类型Tool types↓ | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | 数量n | 占比% | |||
| 刮削器Scraper | 6 | 100% | 167 | 82.7% | 7 | 87.5% | 89 | 71.2% | |||
| 尖状器Point | 0 | 0 | 13 | 6.4% | 1 | 12.5% | 3 | 2.4% | |||
| 砍砸器Chopper | 0 | 0 | 21 | 10.4% | 0 | 0 | 31 | 24.8% | |||
| 分期Periods→ | 早期堆积 Early deposits | 中期堆积 Middle deposits | 晚期堆积 Late deposits | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 遗址sites↓ | 石料 Raw materials* | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | ||
| 仙人洞Xianrendong Cave | 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule | 63 | 82.9% | 90 | 94.7% | 262 | 50.9% | ||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles | 13 | 17.1% | 5 | 5.3% | 253 | 49.1% | |||
| 合计Total | 76 | 100.0% | 95 | 100.0% | 515 | 100.0% | |||
| 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule† | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 55.6% | 9 | 14.1% | |||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles† | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 44.4% | 55 | 85.9% | |||
| 合计 Total† | 9 | 100.0% | 9 | 100.0% | 64 | 100.0% | |||
| 吊桶环Diaotonghuan Cave | 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule | 558 | 98.1% | 581 | 84.8% | 242 | 66.9% | ||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles | 11 | 1.9% | 104 | 15.2% | 120 | 33.1% | |||
| 合计 Total | 569 | 100.0% | 685 | 100.0% | 362 | 100.0% | |||
| 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule† | 86 | 96.6% | 53 | 51.0% | 24 | 28.6% | |||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles† | 3 | 3.4% | 51 | 49.0% | 60 | 71.4% | |||
| 合计 Total† | 89 | 100.0% | 104 | 100.0% | 84 | 100.0% | |||
Tab.3 Differences in the constitution of lithic raw materials among early, middle and late deposits at the Xianrendong Cave and Diaotonghuan Cave sites in Wannian, Jiangxi
| 分期Periods→ | 早期堆积 Early deposits | 中期堆积 Middle deposits | 晚期堆积 Late deposits | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 遗址sites↓ | 石料 Raw materials* | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | ||
| 仙人洞Xianrendong Cave | 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule | 63 | 82.9% | 90 | 94.7% | 262 | 50.9% | ||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles | 13 | 17.1% | 5 | 5.3% | 253 | 49.1% | |||
| 合计Total | 76 | 100.0% | 95 | 100.0% | 515 | 100.0% | |||
| 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule† | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 55.6% | 9 | 14.1% | |||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles† | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 44.4% | 55 | 85.9% | |||
| 合计 Total† | 9 | 100.0% | 9 | 100.0% | 64 | 100.0% | |||
| 吊桶环Diaotonghuan Cave | 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule | 558 | 98.1% | 581 | 84.8% | 242 | 66.9% | ||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles | 11 | 1.9% | 104 | 15.2% | 120 | 33.1% | |||
| 合计 Total | 569 | 100.0% | 685 | 100.0% | 362 | 100.0% | |||
| 燧石等优质原料 Fine-grained raw materials, e.g., flint nodule† | 86 | 96.6% | 53 | 51.0% | 24 | 28.6% | |||
| 片岩等砾石原料 Coarse-grained raw materials, e.g., schist cobbles† | 3 | 3.4% | 51 | 49.0% | 60 | 71.4% | |||
| 合计 Total† | 89 | 100.0% | 104 | 100.0% | 84 | 100.0% | |||
| 地层Stratigraphy → | 单元Unit 10 | 单元Unit 9 | 单元Unit 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分类Category↓ | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | ||
| 石片石器Flake tools | 3 | 25.0% | 11 | 55.0% | 9 | 69.2% | ||
| 石核石器Core tools | 7 | 58.3% | 2 | 10.0% | 1 | 7.7% | ||
| 石片Flakes | 2 | 16.7% | 2 | 10.0% | 2 | 15.4% | ||
| 石核Cores | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 25.0% | 1 | 7.7% | ||
| 合计Total | 12 | 100% | 20 | 100% | 13 | 100% | ||
Tab.4 Categories of lithic artefacts from Lower Levels at the Lang Rongrien site, Krabi, Thailand
| 地层Stratigraphy → | 单元Unit 10 | 单元Unit 9 | 单元Unit 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 分类Category↓ | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | 数量n | 占比Percentage | ||
| 石片石器Flake tools | 3 | 25.0% | 11 | 55.0% | 9 | 69.2% | ||
| 石核石器Core tools | 7 | 58.3% | 2 | 10.0% | 1 | 7.7% | ||
| 石片Flakes | 2 | 16.7% | 2 | 10.0% | 2 | 15.4% | ||
| 石核Cores | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 25.0% | 1 | 7.7% | ||
| 合计Total | 12 | 100% | 20 | 100% | 13 | 100% | ||
| [1] | 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 18(3): 193-214 |
| [2] | Elston RG, Khun SL. Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization[M]. Washington DC: American Anthropological Association, 2002 |
| [3] | 贾兰坡, 盖培, 尤玉柱. 山西峙峪旧石器时代遗址发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 1972, 1: 39-58 |
| [4] | 张森水. 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990, 9(4): 322-333 |
| [5] | 裴文中, 张森水. 中国猿人石器研究(中国古生物志,总号第168册,新丁种第12号)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985 |
| [6] | 王幼平. 华北晚更新世的石片石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 525-535 |
| [7] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所, 河北省文物研究所,阳原县文物管理所. 河北阳原县西白马营旧石器时代遗址2015年试掘简报[J]. 考古, 2019, 10: 3-14 |
| [8] | 周士航, 何湘栋, 徐静玥, 等. 蔚县盆地东沟遗址2017年度发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(1): 132-142 |
| [9] | Wang F, Yang S, Ge J, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603: 284-289 |
| [10] | Yang S, Zhang JF, Yue JP, et al. Initial Upper Palaeolithic material culture by 45,000 years ago at Shiyu in northern China[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8: 552-563 |
| [11] | Liu W, Martinon-torres M, Cai Y, et al. The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China[J]. Nature, 2015, 526: 696-699 |
| [12] | 刘武, 金昌柱, 吴新智. 广西崇左木榄山智人洞10万年前早期现代人化石的发现与研究[J]. 中国基础科学, 2011, 1: 11-14 |
| [13] | Bae CJ, Wang W, Zhao JX, et al. Modern human teeth from Late Pleistocene Luna Cave (Guangxi, China)[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 354: 169-183 |
| [14] | 李浩. 探究早期现代人的南方扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 630-648 |
| [15] | 谢光茂, 余明辉, 卢杰英. 广西隆安娅怀洞遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(3): 365-388 |
| [16] | Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya: An Experimental Approach[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982 |
| [17] | 柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆,北京自然博物馆,广西民族学院历史系. 广西柳州白莲洞石器时代洞穴遗址发掘报告[J]. 见:四川大学博物馆,中国古代铜鼓研究学会(编). 南方民族考古(第一辑)[C]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 1987, 143-160 |
| [18] | 广西柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009 |
| [19] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所华南一队, 广西文物保护与考古研究所, 柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆, 等. 广西柳州市凤岩遗址2023年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2025, 2: 3-18 |
| [20] | 柳州市博物馆,广西壮族自治区文物工作队. 柳州市大龙潭鲤鱼嘴新石器时代贝丘遗址[J]. 考古, 1983, 9: 769-774 |
| [21] | 湖南省文物考古研究所,澧县文化旅游广电体育局. 湖南澧县十里岗旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古与文物, 2020, 1: 3-13 |
| [22] | 湖南省文物考古研究所,石门县博物馆. 石门县燕儿洞旧石器遗址试掘[J]. 见:湖南省文物考古研究所(编). 湖南考古辑刊(第6辑)[C]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 1994, 1-7 |
| [23] | 北京大学考古文博学院, 江西省文物考古研究所. 仙人洞与吊桶环[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014 |
| [24] | 赵文杰, 李三灵, 李浩. 江西旧石器考古新发现与认识[J]. 南方文物, 2023, 6: 53-60 |
| [25] | 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王晓敏, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 461-477 |
| [26] | 贵州省文物考古研究所. 贵州开阳打儿窝岩厦遗址试掘简报[J]. 长江文明, 2013, 1: 1-19 |
| [27] | 张兴龙, 毕忠荣, 龙小平, 等. 贵州清水苑大洞遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(4): 512-526 |
| [28] | Bui V. The Stone Age archaeology in Viet Nam: Achievements and general model[J]. In: Manguin PY. Southeast Asian Archaeology 1994: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologist, Paris, 24th-28th October 1994, Vol.1[C]. Hull: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hull, 1994, 5-12 |
| [29] | Ha VT. The Late Pleistocene climate in Southeast Asia: New data from Vietnam[J]. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 1985, 9: 81-86 |
| [30] | Anderson DD. Lang Rongrien Rockshelter: A Pleistocene-Early Holocene Archaeological Site from Krabi, Southwestern Thailand[M]. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, 1990 |
| [31] | Majid Z. The West Mouth, Niah, in the Prehistory of Southeast Asia[J]. The Sarawak Museum Journal, 1982, XXXI(52, New Series): 1-200 |
| [32] | Majid Z, Tjia HD. Kota Tampan, Perak: The geological and archaeological evidence for a Late Pleistocene site[J]. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1988, 61-2(255): 123-134 |
| [33] | Fox RB. The Tabon Cave. Monograph of the National Museum No. 1[M]. Manila: National Museum Press, 1970 |
| [34] | Glover I. Leang Burung 2: An Upper Paleolithic rock shelter in south Sulawesi, Indonesia[J]. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 1981, 6: 1-38 |
| [35] | O'Connor S, Spriggs M, Veth P. Excavation at Lene Hara establishes occupation in East Timor at least 30 000-35 000 years[J]. Antiquity, 2002, 76: 45-50 |
| [36] | O'Connor S. New Evidence from East Timor contributes to our understanding of earliest modern human colonization east of the Sunda Shelf[J]. Antiquity, 2007, 81: 523-535 |
| [37] | 尹检顺. 澧水流域的“细小石器”及相关问题[J]. 湖南省博物馆馆刊, 2005, 2: 102-112 |
| [38] | 王幼平. 华南晚更新世晚期人类行为复杂化的个案—江西万年吊桶环遗址的发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(3): 397-406 |
| [39] | Mijares AS. Human emergence and adaptation to an island environment in the Philippine Paleolithic[J]. In: Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T, et al (Eds.). Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 171-181 |
| [40] | Pawlik AF. Detecting traits of modern behavior through microwear analysis: A case study from the Philippine Terminal Pleistocene[J]. In: Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T, et al (Eds.). Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 182-198 |
| [41] | 王法岗, 杨石霞, 葛俊逸, 等. 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(1): 143-156 |
| [42] | Bae CJ. Modern humans in Northeast Asia[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8: 368-369 |
| [43] | 王幼平. 更新世环境与中国南方旧石器文化发展[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社,1997 |
| [44] | Wang YP. Late Pleistocene human migrations in China[J]. Current Anthropology, 2017, 58(S17): 504-513 |
| [45] | Heinreich H. Origin and consequences of cyclic ice rafting in the Northeast Atlantic ocean during the past 130,000 years[J]. Quaternary Research, 1988, 29: 142-152 |
| [46] | 张美良, 林玉石, 覃嘉铭, 等. 广西灌阳县观音阁响水洞的形成环境及1号石笋的古气候信息[J]. 地质地球化学, 2000, 1: 34-40 |
| [47] | 汪洪娇. 泥炭记录的黔西北51.91-37.96 ka BP古植被演化[D].硕士研究生毕业论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2023 |
| [48] | 彭子成, 张兆峰, 蔡演军, 等. 贵州七星洞晚更新世晚期石笋的古气候环境记录[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002, 3: 273-282 |
| [49] |
Wang Y, Cheng H, Edwards RL, et al. A high-resolution absolute-dated Late Pleistocene monsoon record from Hulu Cave, China[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5550): 2345-2348
pmid: 11743199 |
| [1] | WANG Jingyi, ZHAO Zhijun, XIE Guangmao, LIN Qiang, WU Yan. Utilization of plant by humans at the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 488-498. |
| [2] | HU Zhanghua, CHEN Hongbo, XIE Li, WANG Yuqing, XIE Guangmao. Shell tools excavated from the Yahuai Cave site in Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 477-487. |
| [3] | LI Dawei, ZHOU Guangchao, LI Fan, CUI Jingyi, XU Xiulan, XIE Guangmao, JIA Zhenxiu, LI Hao. A preliminary study of the newly found ochres at the Yahuai Cave site, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 466-476. |
| [4] | GUO Yunhao, CHEN Hong, LI Dawei, XIE Guangmao, XUE Liping. Research on the tektite artifacts unearthed at the Yahuai Cave site in Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 451-465. |
| [5] | XIE Ying, FU Lin. Perforated stone tools from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 439-450. |
| [6] | XIE Guangmao, LIN Qiang, YU Minghui, LU Jieying. An excavation report of the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 365-388. |
| [7] | TONG Haowen, SHANG Hong, ZHANG Shuangquan, LIU Jinyi, CHEN Fuyou, WU Xiaohong, LI Qing. Mammalian biostratigraphy of Tianyuan Cave, compared with that of upper cave at Zhoukoudian (Choukoutien) [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2006, 25(01): 68-81. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
