Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (06): 978-988.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0090
• Yuanmou Hominin Site • Previous Articles Next Articles
RUAN Qijun1(
), ZHANG Shuai2, LI Xiang3, LIU Jianhui1, GUO Xiangqi4, LI Jun5, CHE Decai6, LI Junyi1, ZHENG Xiaoyong6, YONG Chun7, WANG Zhenzhen7, JIA Zhenxiu2, LI Hao2
Received:2025-02-05
Accepted:2025-04-02
Online:2025-12-15
Published:2025-12-15
CLC Number:
RUAN Qijun, ZHANG Shuai, LI Xiang, LIU Jianhui, GUO Xiangqi, LI Jun, CHE Decai, LI Junyi, ZHENG Xiaoyong, YONG Chun, WANG Zhenzhen, JIA Zhenxiu, LI Hao. A preliminary report on the survey of Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex in the Yuanmou Basin, Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 978-988.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0090
| 遗址名称Sites | 地貌位置Location | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinate | 海拔(m)Altitude | 文化层数量(n)Cultural layers | 面积Acrea (m2) | 石制品数量(n) Stone artifacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 第1地点 | 山包 | 25°40′42.37″N, 101°51′40.01″E | 1197 | 2 | 4600 | 182 |
| 第2地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′25.33″N, 101°51′30.99″E | 1185 | 2 | 6700 | 54 |
| 第3地点 | 沟谷 | 25°40′33.51″N, 101°51′29.93″E | 1175 | 1 | 60 | 6 |
| 第4地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′22.83″N, 101°51′24.31″E | 1202 | 2 | 8800 | 133 |
| 第5地点 | 陡坎 | 25°40′14.19″N, 101°51′24.10″E | 1176 | 1 | 400 | 1 |
| 第6地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′45.58″N, 101°51′0.69″E | 1149 | 1 | 5600 | 4 |
| 第7地点 | 山脚缓坡 | 25°40′53.79″N, 101°51′4.76″E | 1134 | 1 | 800 | 4 |
| 第8地点 | 陡坎 | 25°40′40.49″N, 101°51′47.96″E | 1145 | 2 | 3800 | 7 |
Tab.1 Information of the Paleolithic sites in the Laoyatang
| 遗址名称Sites | 地貌位置Location | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinate | 海拔(m)Altitude | 文化层数量(n)Cultural layers | 面积Acrea (m2) | 石制品数量(n) Stone artifacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 第1地点 | 山包 | 25°40′42.37″N, 101°51′40.01″E | 1197 | 2 | 4600 | 182 |
| 第2地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′25.33″N, 101°51′30.99″E | 1185 | 2 | 6700 | 54 |
| 第3地点 | 沟谷 | 25°40′33.51″N, 101°51′29.93″E | 1175 | 1 | 60 | 6 |
| 第4地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′22.83″N, 101°51′24.31″E | 1202 | 2 | 8800 | 133 |
| 第5地点 | 陡坎 | 25°40′14.19″N, 101°51′24.10″E | 1176 | 1 | 400 | 1 |
| 第6地点 | 缓坡 | 25°40′45.58″N, 101°51′0.69″E | 1149 | 1 | 5600 | 4 |
| 第7地点 | 山脚缓坡 | 25°40′53.79″N, 101°51′4.76″E | 1134 | 1 | 800 | 4 |
| 第8地点 | 陡坎 | 25°40′40.49″N, 101°51′47.96″E | 1145 | 2 | 3800 | 7 |
| 样品编号Sample No. | 地层Layer | 深度Depth(cm) | 等效剂量Equivalent dose(Gy) | 剂量率Dose rate(Gy/ka) | 年代Age(ka) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYT1-OSL:1 | 3 | 40 | 75.09±2.57 | 2.26±0.03 | 33.20±1.25 |
| LYT1-OSL:2 | 3 | 58 | 95.12±3.56 | 2.12±0.04 | 44.86±1.84 |
| LYT1-OSL:3 | 3 | 80 | 117.79±5.13 | 2.10±0.03 | 56.05±2.59 |
| LYT1-OSL:4 | 4 | 100 | 161.33±5.49 | 2.22±0.03 | 72.76±2.68 |
| LYT1-OSL:5 | 4 | 126 | 161.54±5.50 | 2.17±0.03 | 74.32±2.76 |
Tab.2 Preliminary results of luminescence dating in the Loc.1 of Laoyatang
| 样品编号Sample No. | 地层Layer | 深度Depth(cm) | 等效剂量Equivalent dose(Gy) | 剂量率Dose rate(Gy/ka) | 年代Age(ka) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYT1-OSL:1 | 3 | 40 | 75.09±2.57 | 2.26±0.03 | 33.20±1.25 |
| LYT1-OSL:2 | 3 | 58 | 95.12±3.56 | 2.12±0.04 | 44.86±1.84 |
| LYT1-OSL:3 | 3 | 80 | 117.79±5.13 | 2.10±0.03 | 56.05±2.59 |
| LYT1-OSL:4 | 4 | 100 | 161.33±5.49 | 2.22±0.03 | 72.76±2.68 |
| LYT1-OSL:5 | 4 | 126 | 161.54±5.50 | 2.17±0.03 | 74.32±2.76 |
| 石制品类型Classes | CL1 | CL2 | CL3 | N-CL | 数量Quantity(n) | 比例Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核Cores | 锤击石核Free-hand cores | 22 | 38 | 0 | 47 | 106 | 96.4% | 28.1% |
| 砸击石核Bipolar cores | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3.6% | ||
| 完整石片Whole flakes | 锤击石片Free-hand flakes | 6 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 55 | 78.6% | 17.9% |
| 砸击石片Bipolar flakes | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 21.4% | ||
| 不完整石片Flake fragments | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 3.3% | ||
| 石器Tools | 刮削器Scrapers | 4 | 7 | 1 | 11 | 24 | 64.9% | 9.5% |
| 砍砸器Choppers | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13.5% | ||
| 凹缺器Notches | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 13.5% | ||
| 尖状器Points | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5.4% | ||
| 锯齿刃器Denticulates | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.7% | ||
| 残断品Debris | 38 | 68 | 0 | 55 | 161 | 41.2% | ||
Tab.3 Statistics on the distribution of stone artifacts in the Laoyatang Paleolithic site-complex
| 石制品类型Classes | CL1 | CL2 | CL3 | N-CL | 数量Quantity(n) | 比例Percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 石核Cores | 锤击石核Free-hand cores | 22 | 38 | 0 | 47 | 106 | 96.4% | 28.1% |
| 砸击石核Bipolar cores | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3.6% | ||
| 完整石片Whole flakes | 锤击石片Free-hand flakes | 6 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 55 | 78.6% | 17.9% |
| 砸击石片Bipolar flakes | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 15 | 21.4% | ||
| 不完整石片Flake fragments | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 3.3% | ||
| 石器Tools | 刮削器Scrapers | 4 | 7 | 1 | 11 | 24 | 64.9% | 9.5% |
| 砍砸器Choppers | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13.5% | ||
| 凹缺器Notches | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 13.5% | ||
| 尖状器Points | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5.4% | ||
| 锯齿刃器Denticulates | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.7% | ||
| 残断品Debris | 38 | 68 | 0 | 55 | 161 | 41.2% | ||
| 测量指标 Measure index | 石核Cores | 完整石片Whole flakes | 石器Tools | 残断品Debris | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长度L (mm) | 最大值Max | 418 | 67 | 133 | 112 |
| 最小值Min | 25 | 23 | 26 | 18 | |
| 平均值Ave | 71.4 | 36.6 | 57.4 | 46.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 61.5 | 10.8 | 31.9 | 20.5 | |
| 宽度b (mm) | 最大值Max | 408 | 46 | 103 | 78 |
| 最小值Min | 16 | 12 | 21 | 13 | |
| 平均值Ave | 58.6 | 26.3 | 39.7 | 33.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 60.8 | 9.8 | 24.1 | 14.2 | |
| 厚度d (mm) | 最大值Max | 376 | 33 | 61 | 54 |
| 最小值Min | 13 | 6 | 10 | 6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 44.4 | 14.4 | 22.8 | 22.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 55.6 | 6.8 | 16.4 | 11.5 | |
| 质量m (g) | 最大值Max | 1097.9 | 114.2 | 1042.5 | 578 |
| 最小值Min | 9.0 | 2.1 | 6.8 | 1.8 | |
| 平均值Ave | 237.5 | 20.3 | 139.8 | 69.3 | |
| 标准差σ | 293.0 | 26.6 | 291.0 | 96.9 | |
Tab.4 The size and weight of stone artifacts in the second phase of the Laoyatang site-complex
| 测量指标 Measure index | 石核Cores | 完整石片Whole flakes | 石器Tools | 残断品Debris | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长度L (mm) | 最大值Max | 418 | 67 | 133 | 112 |
| 最小值Min | 25 | 23 | 26 | 18 | |
| 平均值Ave | 71.4 | 36.6 | 57.4 | 46.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 61.5 | 10.8 | 31.9 | 20.5 | |
| 宽度b (mm) | 最大值Max | 408 | 46 | 103 | 78 |
| 最小值Min | 16 | 12 | 21 | 13 | |
| 平均值Ave | 58.6 | 26.3 | 39.7 | 33.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 60.8 | 9.8 | 24.1 | 14.2 | |
| 厚度d (mm) | 最大值Max | 376 | 33 | 61 | 54 |
| 最小值Min | 13 | 6 | 10 | 6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 44.4 | 14.4 | 22.8 | 22.2 | |
| 标准差σ | 55.6 | 6.8 | 16.4 | 11.5 | |
| 质量m (g) | 最大值Max | 1097.9 | 114.2 | 1042.5 | 578 |
| 最小值Min | 9.0 | 2.1 | 6.8 | 1.8 | |
| 平均值Ave | 237.5 | 20.3 | 139.8 | 69.3 | |
| 标准差σ | 293.0 | 26.6 | 291.0 | 96.9 | |
| 测量指标Measure index | 石核Cores | 石片Flakes | 石器Tools | 残断品Debris | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长度L (mm) | 最大值Max | 365 | 60 | 93 | 100 |
| 最小值Min | 48 | 21 | 27 | 11 | |
| 平均值Ave | 104.4 | 37.3 | 56.4 | 47.8 | |
| 标准差σ | 62 | 12.7 | 24 | 23.3 | |
| 宽度b(mm) | 最大值Max | 361 | 50 | 65 | 90 |
| 最小值Min | 42 | 19 | 23 | 8 | |
| 平均值Ave | 99.7 | 35.3 | 41.4 | 36.6 | |
| 标准差σ | 85.6 | 11.8 | 15.4 | 17.2 | |
| 厚度d(mm) | 最大值Max | 73 | 25 | 39 | 56 |
| 最小值Min | 21 | 3 | 10 | 6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 48.1 | 13.8 | 21.2 | 22.9 | |
| 标准差σ | 16.6 | 5.8 | 9.9 | 12.6 | |
| 质量m (g) | 最大值Max | 1405.3 | 75.6 | 276.3 | 493.7 |
| 最小值Min | 58.3 | 1.9 | 9.6 | 0.6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 484.7 | 28.5 | 89.9 | 79.7 | |
| 标准差σ | 351.2 | 24.7 | 99.6 | 110 | |
Tab.5 The size and weight of stone artifacts in the third phase of the Laoyatang site-complex
| 测量指标Measure index | 石核Cores | 石片Flakes | 石器Tools | 残断品Debris | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 长度L (mm) | 最大值Max | 365 | 60 | 93 | 100 |
| 最小值Min | 48 | 21 | 27 | 11 | |
| 平均值Ave | 104.4 | 37.3 | 56.4 | 47.8 | |
| 标准差σ | 62 | 12.7 | 24 | 23.3 | |
| 宽度b(mm) | 最大值Max | 361 | 50 | 65 | 90 |
| 最小值Min | 42 | 19 | 23 | 8 | |
| 平均值Ave | 99.7 | 35.3 | 41.4 | 36.6 | |
| 标准差σ | 85.6 | 11.8 | 15.4 | 17.2 | |
| 厚度d(mm) | 最大值Max | 73 | 25 | 39 | 56 |
| 最小值Min | 21 | 3 | 10 | 6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 48.1 | 13.8 | 21.2 | 22.9 | |
| 标准差σ | 16.6 | 5.8 | 9.9 | 12.6 | |
| 质量m (g) | 最大值Max | 1405.3 | 75.6 | 276.3 | 493.7 |
| 最小值Min | 58.3 | 1.9 | 9.6 | 0.6 | |
| 平均值Ave | 484.7 | 28.5 | 89.9 | 79.7 | |
| 标准差σ | 351.2 | 24.7 | 99.6 | 110 | |
| [1] | 程捷. “元谋人”时代刍议[J]. 地质科技情报, 2000, 19(4): 40-44 |
| [2] | 中国地质学编辑委员会, 中国科学院地质研究所. 中国区域地层表[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1965, 413-415 |
| [3] | 陈恩志. 关于元谋组地质和元谋人地层[J]. 史前研究, 1989, 155-164 |
| [4] | 陈云. 元谋盆地的第四纪红土[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1994, 14(1): 75-86 |
| [5] | 文本亨. 云南元谋盆地发现的旧石器[A]. 见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所. 古人类论文集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978, 126-133 |
| [6] | 周国兴, 张兴勇. 元谋盆地的细石器遗存[J]. 北京自然博物馆研究报告, 1980, 5: 1-11 |
| [7] | 周国兴. 元谋盆地人类化石与文化遗存的研究[A]. 见:《“元谋人”发现三十周年纪念暨古人类国际学术研讨会文集》编委会. “元谋人”发现三十周年纪念暨古人类国际学术研讨会文集[C]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1998, 18-32 |
| [8] | 黄慰文, 卫奇, 张兴永. 元谋盆地的旧石器[J]. 史前研究, 1985, 4: 19-22 |
| [9] | 钱方, 浦庆余, 袁振新, 等. 云南元谋盆地第四纪冰期与地层[A]. 见:周国兴,张兴永.元谋人[C]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1984, 45-74 |
| [10] |
Murray AS, Wintle AG. The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2003, 37: 377-381
doi: 10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00053-2 URL |
| [11] | 李炎贤, 蔡回阳. 贵州白岩脚洞石器的第二步加工[J]. 江汉考古, 1986, 2: 56-64 |
| [12] | Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya: An Experimental Approach[M]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982 |
| [13] | 卫奇. 石制品观察格式讨论[A]. 见:邓涛,王原(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001, 209-218 |
| [14] | 阮齐军, 刘建辉, 胡越, 等. 云南鹤庆天华洞旧石器遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 166-181 |
| [15] |
Hu Y, Ruan QJ, Liu JH, et al. Luminescence chronology and lithic technology of Tianhuadong Cave, an early Upper Pleistocene Paleolithic site in southwest China[J]. Quaternary Research, 2020, 94:121-136
doi: 10.1017/qua.2019.67 URL |
| [16] | Ruan QJ, Li H, Xiao PY, et al. Quina lithic technology indicates diverse Late Pleistocene human dynamics in East Asia[J]. PNAS, 2025, 122(14): e2418029122 |
| [17] | 云南省文物考古研究所, 大理白族自治州文物管理所, 鹤庆县文物管理所. 云南鹤庆龙潭旧石器遗址2019-2020年度发掘简报[J]. 南方文物, 2020, 1: 105-118 |
| [18] |
Zhang SQ, d’Errico F, Backwell LR, et al. Ma’anshan cave and the origin of bone tool technology in China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016, 65: 57-69
doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.004 URL |
| [19] |
Wang YN, Zhang XL, Sun XF, et al. A new chronological framework for Chuandong Cave and its implications for the appearance of modern humans in southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 178: 103344
doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103344 URL |
| [20] | 贵州省文物考古研究所, 四川大学考古文博学院, 成都文物考古研究院. 贵州贵安新区岩孔村招果洞遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2024, 679(4): 3-20 |
| [21] | 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王晓敏, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 461-478 |
| [1] | LI Yiyuan. Exploitation and utilization of chert raw materials from the Tiaotougang Paleolithic site in the Daoshui River Basin, Hunan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1047-1059. |
| [2] | DENG Wanwen, LIU Suoqiang. Steep-edged flaking technology of stone tools and adaptation and diffusion of populations in South China during the Middle to Late Pleistocene [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1060-1071. |
| [3] | DU Ruiyan, JI Xueping, ZHOU Zhenyu, GUAN Ying, ZHANG Maolin, ZHOU Xiaoyan, XING Song. Starch granules in dental residues of ancient humans from the Maludong and Tangzigou sites, Yunnan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1072-1082. |
| [4] | LIU Yalin, WEI Tianxu, SHI Xiao, WANG Chunxue, SUN Xuefeng, QIU Hongliang. A preliminary report of 2022 excavation of Shangbaitang site in Anji County, Zhejiang Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(06): 1120-1130. |
| [5] | LIU Wu, WU Xiujie. The hominin fossils from Hualongdong and their significance on human evolution [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(05): 727-741. |
| [6] | XU Jianwei, LIU Lianqiang, CHENG Xiaoyu, ZHAO Yongsheng, HOU Jiaqi, WANG Fagang. Stone artifacts unearthed from the Nainaimiaogou site of Nihewan Basin in 2015 [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(04): 556-567. |
| [7] | DENG Wanwen, XIE Ying. A study of the miniaturized stone artifacts from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 413-426. |
| [8] | FU Yongxu. Origin of the miniaturized lithics during Late Pleistocene in Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 427-438. |
| [9] | WANG Jingyi, ZHAO Zhijun, XIE Guangmao, LIN Qiang, WU Yan. Utilization of plant by humans at the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(03): 488-498. |
| [10] | YANG Shixia. Exploration of "behavioral modernity” and “modern human behavior” in human evolution [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(02): 181-192. |
| [11] | CAI Xinyi, DU Shuisheng. Core flaking technology of the Shuijingbei locality of Xiachuan site in Shanxi [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(01): 14-26. |
| [12] | ZHANG Yameng, WU Xiujie. Bony labyrinth variation of the Chinese early modern humans in Late Pleistocene [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(06): 1038-1047. |
| [13] | XU Jingyue, HE Xiangdong, NIU Dongwei, LI Xiaoli. Taphonomy of the Donggou Paleolithic site at Yuxian, Nihewan Basin [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(06): 1075-1090. |
| [14] | LIU Wu. Discovery, cognition and theoretical exploration of the human evolution studies in China since the begining of 21st century [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(06): 881-899. |
| [15] | WANG Wei. Modern human fossils and their ages in southern China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2024, 43(06): 934-950. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||