Acta Anthropologica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (04): 599-615.doi: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0056
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-07-30
Revised:
2020-09-02
Online:
2020-11-15
Published:
2020-11-23
CLC Number:
LI Fajun. Biomechanical features of the prehistoric people’s bones from South China[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2020, 39(04): 599-615.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/EN/10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0056
遗址Site | 性别Sex | 个体数 n | 肱骨数humeri | 股骨数femora | 胫骨数tibiae | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | |||
顶蛳山Dingsishan(DSS) | 男male | 22 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 5 |
女female | 18 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |
鲤鱼墩遗址Liyudun(LYD) | 男male | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
女female | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
冲塘-江边遗址Chongtang-Jiangbian(C-J) | 男male | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
女female | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
何村遗址Hecun(HC) | 男male | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
女female | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
桃花园墓地Thaohuayuan(THY) | 男male | 46 | 42 | 42 | 43 | 41 | 39 | 38 |
女female | 33 | 29 | 31 | 33 | 31 | 28 | 28 |
Tab.1 The information of specimens from different sites
遗址Site | 性别Sex | 个体数 n | 肱骨数humeri | 股骨数femora | 胫骨数tibiae | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | 左L | 右R | |||
顶蛳山Dingsishan(DSS) | 男male | 22 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 5 |
女female | 18 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |
鲤鱼墩遗址Liyudun(LYD) | 男male | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
女female | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
冲塘-江边遗址Chongtang-Jiangbian(C-J) | 男male | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
女female | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |
何村遗址Hecun(HC) | 男male | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
女female | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
桃花园墓地Thaohuayuan(THY) | 男male | 46 | 42 | 42 | 43 | 41 | 39 | 38 |
女female | 33 | 29 | 31 | 33 | 31 | 28 | 28 |
骨骼Bones | 顶蛳山DSS | 鲤鱼墩LYD | 冲塘-江边遗址CJ | 何村遗址HC | 桃花园墓地THY | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | ||
左肱骨humeri L | n | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 47 | 46 | 46 |
x | 5.30 | 1.48 | 24.47 | 3.67 | 1.37 | 10.88 | 4.11 | 1.11 | 17.92 | 4.14 | 1.25 | 29.53 | 4.36 | 1.33 | 22.26 | |
ds | 0.60 | 0.48 | 3.22 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.43 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.07 | 0.17 | 4.56 | |
右肱骨humeri R | n | 2 | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 46 | 46 | 46 |
x | 5.02 | 1.79 | 26.49 | - | 1.25 | - | 4.01 | 1.22 | 16.57 | 4.16 | 1.22 | 19.14 | 4.33 | 1.25 | 21.32 | |
ds | 0.69 | 0.58 | 7.66 | - | - | - | 0.15 | 0.18 | 2.11 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.47 | 0.14 | 4.30 | |
左股骨femora L | n | 8 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 48 | 46 |
x | 9.22 | 1.37 | 41.83 | 9.18 | 1.65 | 44.47 | 7.25 | 1.12 | 29.70 | 7.29 | 1.57 | 29.55 | 8.39 | 1.29 | 40.69 | |
ds | 0.47 | 0.19 | 5.06 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 4.19 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 4.67 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 3.08 | 0.82 | 0.15 | 7.31 | |
右股骨femora R | n | 8 | 9 | 8 | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
x | 8.89 | 1.35 | 43.08 | 10.1 | - | 48.70 | 7.34 | 1.49 | 29.55 | 7.08 | 1.72 | 27.73 | 8.11 | 1.27 | 38.43 | |
ds | 0.81 | 0.10 | 7.07 | - | - | - | 0.66 | 0.25 | 4.62 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 1.56 | 0.87 | 0.17 | 7.53 | |
左胫骨tibiae L | n | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
x | 8.70 | 2.43 | 52.53 | 7.41 | 2.53 | 39.24 | 6.53 | 2.29 | 35.38 | 6.51 | 2.33 | 36.83 | 6.70 | 2.13 | 40.56 | |
ds | 1.87 | 0.37 | 7.93 | 1.57 | 0.41 | 15.33 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 5.66 | 0.11 | 0.45 | 3.33 | 0.79 | 0.37 | 8.58 | |
右胫骨tibiae R | n | 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
x | 8.21 | 3.33 | 49.12 | 9.01 | - | 52.426 | 6.07 | 2.25 | 29.26 | 6.17 | 2.16 | 29.87 | 6.55 | 49.12 | 39.12 | |
ds | 1.36 | 0.77 | 3.85 | - | - | - | 0.44 | 0.27 | 3.44 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 3.87 | 0.80 | 3.85 | 8.90 |
Tab.2 The information of biomechanical data from different sites (male)
骨骼Bones | 顶蛳山DSS | 鲤鱼墩LYD | 冲塘-江边遗址CJ | 何村遗址HC | 桃花园墓地THY | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | ||
左肱骨humeri L | n | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 47 | 46 | 46 |
x | 5.30 | 1.48 | 24.47 | 3.67 | 1.37 | 10.88 | 4.11 | 1.11 | 17.92 | 4.14 | 1.25 | 29.53 | 4.36 | 1.33 | 22.26 | |
ds | 0.60 | 0.48 | 3.22 | - | 0.04 | - | 0.22 | 0.07 | 2.43 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.07 | 0.17 | 4.56 | |
右肱骨humeri R | n | 2 | 4 | 2 | - | 1 | - | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 46 | 46 | 46 |
x | 5.02 | 1.79 | 26.49 | - | 1.25 | - | 4.01 | 1.22 | 16.57 | 4.16 | 1.22 | 19.14 | 4.33 | 1.25 | 21.32 | |
ds | 0.69 | 0.58 | 7.66 | - | - | - | 0.15 | 0.18 | 2.11 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.47 | 0.14 | 4.30 | |
左股骨femora L | n | 8 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 48 | 48 | 46 |
x | 9.22 | 1.37 | 41.83 | 9.18 | 1.65 | 44.47 | 7.25 | 1.12 | 29.70 | 7.29 | 1.57 | 29.55 | 8.39 | 1.29 | 40.69 | |
ds | 0.47 | 0.19 | 5.06 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 4.19 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 4.67 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 3.08 | 0.82 | 0.15 | 7.31 | |
右股骨femora R | n | 8 | 9 | 8 | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
x | 8.89 | 1.35 | 43.08 | 10.1 | - | 48.70 | 7.34 | 1.49 | 29.55 | 7.08 | 1.72 | 27.73 | 8.11 | 1.27 | 38.43 | |
ds | 0.81 | 0.10 | 7.07 | - | - | - | 0.66 | 0.25 | 4.62 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 1.56 | 0.87 | 0.17 | 7.53 | |
左胫骨tibiae L | n | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 47 | 47 | 47 |
x | 8.70 | 2.43 | 52.53 | 7.41 | 2.53 | 39.24 | 6.53 | 2.29 | 35.38 | 6.51 | 2.33 | 36.83 | 6.70 | 2.13 | 40.56 | |
ds | 1.87 | 0.37 | 7.93 | 1.57 | 0.41 | 15.33 | 0.80 | 0.48 | 5.66 | 0.11 | 0.45 | 3.33 | 0.79 | 0.37 | 8.58 | |
右胫骨tibiae R | n | 4 | 6 | 4 | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
x | 8.21 | 3.33 | 49.12 | 9.01 | - | 52.426 | 6.07 | 2.25 | 29.26 | 6.17 | 2.16 | 29.87 | 6.55 | 49.12 | 39.12 | |
ds | 1.36 | 0.77 | 3.85 | - | - | - | 0.44 | 0.27 | 3.44 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 3.87 | 0.80 | 3.85 | 8.90 |
骨骼Bones | 顶蛳山DSS | 鲤鱼墩LYD | 冲塘-江边遗址CJ | 何村遗址HC | 桃花园墓地THY | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | ||
左肱骨humeri L | n | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | 26 | 26 |
x | 4.25 | 1.83 | 4.13 | 3.76 | 1.08 | 13.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.60 | 1.23 | 17.80 | |
ds | 1.00 | 0.16 | 8.62 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.08 | 0.19 | 4.06 | |
右肱骨humeri R | n | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 29 | 29 | 29 |
x | 4.13 | 1.72 | 18.92 | 2.91 | 1.04 | 14.42 | - | - | - | - | 1.15 | - | 3.80 | 1.31 | 16.76 | |
ds | 0.33 | 0.27 | 5.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.42 | 0.34 | 3.76 | |
左股骨femora L | n | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 30 | 30 | 29 |
x | 8.39 | 1.35 | 34.04 | 8.37 | 1.58 | 34.40 | 6.93 | 1.57 | 24.69 | - | - | - | 7.25 | 1.32 | 31.44 | |
ds | 0.91 | 0.18 | 11.51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.85 | 0.19 | 7.04 | |
右股骨femora R | n | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 28 | 28 | 28 |
x | 7.62 | 1.81 | 34.81 | 9.08 | 1.48 | 37.41 | 6.78 | 1.38 | 26.11 | - | - | - | 7.22 | 1.28 | 31.63 | |
ds | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.20 | 0.41 | 5.17 | - | - | - | 1.03 | 0.20 | 8.53 | |
左胫骨tibiae L | n | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 25 | 25 | 24 | |
x | 7.30 | 2.60 | 38.21 | 6.25 | 2.20 | 40.20 | 1.68 | - | - | - | - | 5.25 | 1.91 | 25.85 | ||
ds | - | 0.26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.73 | 0.44 | 7.30 | ||
右胫骨tibiae R | n | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 26 | 26 | 25 |
x | 6.73 | 2.32 | 34.37 | 6.99 | 2.21 | 37.23 | 5.42 | 2.52 | 25.73 | - | - | - | 5.21 | 1.92 | 25.09 | |
ds | 1.32 | 0.40 | 10.87 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.72 | 0.31 | 6.58 |
Tab.3 The information of biomechanical data from different sites (female)
骨骼Bones | 顶蛳山DSS | 鲤鱼墩LYD | 冲塘-江边遗址CJ | 何村遗址HC | 桃花园墓地THY | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | S | Isa/Isi | Js | ||
左肱骨humeri L | n | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | 26 | 26 |
x | 4.25 | 1.83 | 4.13 | 3.76 | 1.08 | 13.02 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.60 | 1.23 | 17.80 | |
ds | 1.00 | 0.16 | 8.62 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.08 | 0.19 | 4.06 | |
右肱骨humeri R | n | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 29 | 29 | 29 |
x | 4.13 | 1.72 | 18.92 | 2.91 | 1.04 | 14.42 | - | - | - | - | 1.15 | - | 3.80 | 1.31 | 16.76 | |
ds | 0.33 | 0.27 | 5.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.42 | 0.34 | 3.76 | |
左股骨femora L | n | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 30 | 30 | 29 |
x | 8.39 | 1.35 | 34.04 | 8.37 | 1.58 | 34.40 | 6.93 | 1.57 | 24.69 | - | - | - | 7.25 | 1.32 | 31.44 | |
ds | 0.91 | 0.18 | 11.51 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.85 | 0.19 | 7.04 | |
右股骨femora R | n | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | - | - | - | 28 | 28 | 28 |
x | 7.62 | 1.81 | 34.81 | 9.08 | 1.48 | 37.41 | 6.78 | 1.38 | 26.11 | - | - | - | 7.22 | 1.28 | 31.63 | |
ds | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.20 | 0.41 | 5.17 | - | - | - | 1.03 | 0.20 | 8.53 | |
左胫骨tibiae L | n | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 25 | 25 | 24 | |
x | 7.30 | 2.60 | 38.21 | 6.25 | 2.20 | 40.20 | 1.68 | - | - | - | - | 5.25 | 1.91 | 25.85 | ||
ds | - | 0.26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.73 | 0.44 | 7.30 | ||
右胫骨tibiae R | n | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 26 | 26 | 25 |
x | 6.73 | 2.32 | 34.37 | 6.99 | 2.21 | 37.23 | 5.42 | 2.52 | 25.73 | - | - | - | 5.21 | 1.92 | 25.09 | |
ds | 1.32 | 0.40 | 10.87 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.72 | 0.31 | 6.58 |
对比人群groups | St(左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性 DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.770 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.020 | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.051 | 0.085 | 0.051 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.257 | - | - | 0.149 | - | |
顶蛳山组女性 | 0.149 | 0.061 | 0.248 | 0.064 | 0.734 | 0.165 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.001 | 0.065 | 0.350 | 0.052 | 0.000 | 0.111 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.002 | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.136 | 0.044 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.019 | 0.044 | 0.026 | 0.233 | 0.368 | 0.180 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.003 | 0.083 | 0.008 | 0.037 | 0.689 | 0.037 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.003 | 0.731 | 0.003 | 0.068 | 0.335 | 0.045 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.002 | 0.137 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.517 | 0.026 | |
顶蛳山组女性 DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.051 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.772 | 0.009 | 1.000 | 0.219 | 0.005 | 0.461 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.014 | - | - | 0.017 | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.462 | 0.000 | 0.186 | 0.362 | 0.000 | 0.300 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.409 | 0.001 | 0.732 | 0.122 | 0.003 | 0.321 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.595 | 0.033 | 0.595 | 0.177 | 0.042 | 0.764 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.213 | 0.268 | 0.275 | 0.080 | 0.821 | 0.089 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.244 | 0.002 | 0.113 | 0.925 | 0.083 | 0.275 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.028 | 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.280 | 0.011 | |
鲤鱼墩组男性LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | - | 0.053 | - | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | - | 0.355 | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | - | 0.502 | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.074 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.056 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.068 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.934 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.064 | - | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性 CJ male | 何村组男性 | - | 0.086 | - | - | 0.806 | - |
桃花园组男性 | 0.183 | 0.002 | 0.038 | 0.076 | 0.526 | 0.010 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.190 | 0.096 | 0.608 | 0.198 | 0.343 | 0.903 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.202 | 0.001 | 0.671 | 0.106 | 0.008 | 0.089 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.141 | 0.003 | 0.089 | 0.149 | 0.003 | 0.176 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.049 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.680 | 0.003 | 0.752 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.017 | 0.005 | 0.012 | |
何村组男性 HC male | 桃花园组男性 | - | 0.283 | - | - | 0.830 | - |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.625 | - | - | 0.869 | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.006 | - | - | 0.004 | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.021 | - | - | 0.003 | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.065 | - | - | 0.003 | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.006 | - | - | 0.005 | - |
Tab.4 The results of Mann-Whiteney U test of biomechanical difference of humerus (35%)
对比人群groups | St(左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性 DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.770 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.020 | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.051 | 0.085 | 0.051 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.257 | - | - | 0.149 | - | |
顶蛳山组女性 | 0.149 | 0.061 | 0.248 | 0.064 | 0.734 | 0.165 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.001 | 0.065 | 0.350 | 0.052 | 0.000 | 0.111 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.002 | 0.014 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.136 | 0.044 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.019 | 0.044 | 0.026 | 0.233 | 0.368 | 0.180 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.003 | 0.083 | 0.008 | 0.037 | 0.689 | 0.037 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.003 | 0.731 | 0.003 | 0.068 | 0.335 | 0.045 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.002 | 0.137 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.517 | 0.026 | |
顶蛳山组女性 DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.051 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.772 | 0.009 | 1.000 | 0.219 | 0.005 | 0.461 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.014 | - | - | 0.017 | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.462 | 0.000 | 0.186 | 0.362 | 0.000 | 0.300 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.409 | 0.001 | 0.732 | 0.122 | 0.003 | 0.321 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.595 | 0.033 | 0.595 | 0.177 | 0.042 | 0.764 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.213 | 0.268 | 0.275 | 0.080 | 0.821 | 0.089 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.244 | 0.002 | 0.113 | 0.925 | 0.083 | 0.275 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.028 | 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.280 | 0.011 | |
鲤鱼墩组男性LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | - | 0.053 | - | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | - | 0.355 | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | - | 0.502 | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.074 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.056 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.068 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.934 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.064 | - | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性 CJ male | 何村组男性 | - | 0.086 | - | - | 0.806 | - |
桃花园组男性 | 0.183 | 0.002 | 0.038 | 0.076 | 0.526 | 0.010 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.190 | 0.096 | 0.608 | 0.198 | 0.343 | 0.903 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.202 | 0.001 | 0.671 | 0.106 | 0.008 | 0.089 | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.141 | 0.003 | 0.089 | 0.149 | 0.003 | 0.176 | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.049 | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.680 | 0.003 | 0.752 | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.017 | 0.005 | 0.012 | |
何村组男性 HC male | 桃花园组男性 | - | 0.283 | - | - | 0.830 | - |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.625 | - | - | 0.869 | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.006 | - | - | 0.004 | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.021 | - | - | 0.003 | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.065 | - | - | 0.003 | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.006 | - | - | 0.005 | - |
对比人群Groups | St (左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性 DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.432 | 0.192 | 0.602 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.006 | 0.798 | 0.017 | 0.014 | 0.288 | 0.002 | |
何村组男性 | 0.014 | 0.153 | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.006 | |
顶蛳山组女性 | 0.060 | 0.847 | 0.016 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.036 | 0.517 | 0.036 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.008 | 0.237 | 0.674 | 0.023 | 0.222 | 0.110 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.000 | 0.410 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.089 | 0.001 | |
顶蛳山组女性 DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.239 | 0.238 | 0.099 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.020 | 0.757 | 0.354 | - | - | - | |
何村组男性 | 0.033 | 0.052 | 0.309 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.662 | 0.406 | 0.015 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.005 | 0.473 | 0.482 | - | - | - | |
鲤鱼墩组男性 LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.060 | 0.348 | 0.060 | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | 0.083 | 1.000 | 0.083 | - | - | - | |
冲塘江边女性 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.092 | 0.054 | 0.409 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.024 | 0.087 | 0.030 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性 CJ male | 何村组男性 | 1.000 | 0.476 | 0.721 | 0.285 | 0.199 | 0.285 |
冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.180 | 0.300 | 0.314 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.009 | 0.391 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 0.025 | 0.006 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.915 | 0.423 | 0.620 | 0.309 | 0.020 | 0.892 | |
何村组男性 HC male | 冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.165 | 0.289 | 1.000 |
桃花园组男性 | 0.028 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.008 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.900 | 0.017 | 0.539 | 0.649 | 0.007 | 0.459 |
Tab.5 The results of Mann-Whiteney U test of biomechanical difference of fumer (50%)
对比人群Groups | St (左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性 DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.432 | 0.192 | 0.602 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.006 | 0.798 | 0.017 | 0.014 | 0.288 | 0.002 | |
何村组男性 | 0.014 | 0.153 | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 0.006 | |
顶蛳山组女性 | 0.060 | 0.847 | 0.016 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.036 | 0.517 | 0.036 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.008 | 0.237 | 0.674 | 0.023 | 0.222 | 0.110 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.000 | 0.410 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.089 | 0.001 | |
顶蛳山组女性 DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.239 | 0.238 | 0.099 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.020 | 0.757 | 0.354 | - | - | - | |
何村组男性 | 0.033 | 0.052 | 0.309 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.662 | 0.406 | 0.015 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.005 | 0.473 | 0.482 | - | - | - | |
鲤鱼墩组男性 LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.060 | 0.348 | 0.060 | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | 0.083 | 1.000 | 0.083 | - | - | - | |
冲塘江边女性 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.092 | 0.054 | 0.409 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.024 | 0.087 | 0.030 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性 CJ male | 何村组男性 | 1.000 | 0.476 | 0.721 | 0.285 | 0.199 | 0.285 |
冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.180 | 0.300 | 0.314 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.009 | 0.391 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 0.025 | 0.006 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.915 | 0.423 | 0.620 | 0.309 | 0.020 | 0.892 | |
何村组男性 HC male | 冲塘-江边组女性 | - | - | - | 0.165 | 0.289 | 1.000 |
桃花园组男性 | 0.028 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.008 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.900 | 0.017 | 0.539 | 0.649 | 0.007 | 0.459 |
对比人群Groups | St (左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.439 | 0.773 | 0.439 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.094 | 0.285 | 0.044 | 0.034 | 0.033 | 0.034 | |
何村组男性 | 0.121 | 0.522 | 0.121 | 0.064 | 0.020 | 0.064 | |
顶蛳山组女性 | - | 0.285 | - | 0.372 | 0.020 | 0.034 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.002 | 0.126 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.032 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.057 | 0.633 | 0.026 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.039 | 0.832 | 0.026 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.529 | 0.215 | 0.378 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.064 | 0.470 | 0.022 | - | - | - | |
顶蛳山组女性DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.666 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | - | 0.261 | - | 0.513 | 0.734 | 0.513 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.199 | - | 0.564 | 0.307 | 0.564 | |
桃花园组男性 | - | 0.002 | - | 0.486 | 0.196 | 0.572 | |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.001 | - | 0.045 | 0.011 | 0.128 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.509 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.409 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.626 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.046 | - | - | - | - | |
鲤鱼墩组男性LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.314 | 0.285 | 1.000 | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | 1.000 | 0.286 | 1.000 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.419 | 0.050 | 0.840 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.026 | 0.008 | 0.149 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.427 | 0.915 | 0.751 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.112 | 0.915 | 0.153 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.529 | 0.535 | 0.313 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.662 | 0.264 | 0.732 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性CJ male | 何村组男性 | 0.502 | 0.748 | 0.502 | 0.564 | 0.480 | 1.000 |
桃花园组男性 | 0.400 | 0.674 | 0.077 | 0.192 | 0.412 | 0.033 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.003 | 0.045 | 0.007 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.220 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.509 | 0.231 | 0.621 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.069 | 0.322 | 0.032 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.004 | 0.113 | 0.014 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.243 | 0.622 | 0.808 | - | - | - | |
何村组男性 HC male | 桃花园组男性 | 0.578 | 0.369 | 0.390 | 0.360 | 0.828 | 0.085 |
桃花园组女性 | 0.033 | 0.012 | 0.068 | 0.074 | 0.174 | 0.195 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 1.000 | 0.458 | 0.266 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.112 | 0.302 | 0.112 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.044 | 0.152 | 0.166 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.513 | 0.959 | 0.361 | - | - | - |
Tab.6 The results of Mann-Whiteney U test of biomechanical difference of tibia (50%)
对比人群Groups | St (左L) | Imax/Imin (左L) | J (左L) | St (右R) | Imax/Imin(右R) | J(右R) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
顶蛳山组男性DSS male | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | 0.439 | 0.773 | 0.439 | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.094 | 0.285 | 0.044 | 0.034 | 0.033 | 0.034 | |
何村组男性 | 0.121 | 0.522 | 0.121 | 0.064 | 0.020 | 0.064 | |
顶蛳山组女性 | - | 0.285 | - | 0.372 | 0.020 | 0.034 | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.002 | 0.126 | 0.059 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.032 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.021 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.057 | 0.633 | 0.026 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.039 | 0.832 | 0.026 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.529 | 0.215 | 0.378 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.064 | 0.470 | 0.022 | - | - | - | |
顶蛳山组女性DSS female | 鲤鱼墩组男性 | - | 0.666 | - | - | - | - |
冲塘-江边组男性 | - | 0.261 | - | 0.513 | 0.734 | 0.513 | |
何村组男性 | - | 0.199 | - | 0.564 | 0.307 | 0.564 | |
桃花园组男性 | - | 0.002 | - | 0.486 | 0.196 | 0.572 | |
桃花园组女性 | - | 0.001 | - | 0.045 | 0.011 | 0.128 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | - | 0.509 | - | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | - | 0.409 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | - | 0.626 | - | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | - | 0.046 | - | - | - | - | |
鲤鱼墩组男性LYD male | 冲塘-江边组男性 | 0.314 | 0.285 | 1.000 | - | - | - |
何村组男性 | 1.000 | 0.286 | 1.000 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组男性 | 0.419 | 0.050 | 0.840 | - | - | - | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.026 | 0.008 | 0.149 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.427 | 0.915 | 0.751 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.112 | 0.915 | 0.153 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.529 | 0.535 | 0.313 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.662 | 0.264 | 0.732 | - | - | - | |
冲塘-江边组男性CJ male | 何村组男性 | 0.502 | 0.748 | 0.502 | 0.564 | 0.480 | 1.000 |
桃花园组男性 | 0.400 | 0.674 | 0.077 | 0.192 | 0.412 | 0.033 | |
桃花园组女性 | 0.003 | 0.045 | 0.007 | 0.053 | 0.051 | 0.220 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 0.509 | 0.231 | 0.621 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.069 | 0.322 | 0.032 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.004 | 0.113 | 0.014 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.243 | 0.622 | 0.808 | - | - | - | |
何村组男性 HC male | 桃花园组男性 | 0.578 | 0.369 | 0.390 | 0.360 | 0.828 | 0.085 |
桃花园组女性 | 0.033 | 0.012 | 0.068 | 0.074 | 0.174 | 0.195 | |
原史安达曼岛人男性 | 1.000 | 0.458 | 0.266 | - | - | - | |
原史安达曼岛人女性 | 0.112 | 0.302 | 0.112 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人男性 | 0.044 | 0.152 | 0.166 | - | - | - | |
史前南非人女性 | 0.513 | 0.959 | 0.361 | - | - | - |
[1] | 安志敏. 华南早期新石器试析[A]. 见:中国社会科学院考古研究所.华南及东南亚地区史前考古—纪念甑皮岩遗址发掘30周年国际学术研讨会论文集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2006, 23-30 |
[2] | 严文明. 甑皮岩遗址与华南地区史前考古[A].见: 中国社会科学院考古研究所.华南及东南亚地区史前考古—纪念甑皮岩遗址发掘30周年国际学术研讨会论文集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2006, 33-36 |
[3] | 何乃汉. 广西史前时期农业的产生和发展初探[J]. 农业考古, 1985(2):90-95, 129 |
[4] | 赵志军, 吕烈丹, 傅宪国. 广西邕宁县顶蛳山遗址出土植硅石的分析与研究[J]. 考古, 2005(11):76-84 |
[5] | 中国社会科学院考古研究所广西工作队,广西壮族自治区文物工作队,南宁市博物馆. 广西邕宁县顶蛳山遗址的发掘[J]. 考古, 1998(11):11-33 |
[6] | 张弛, 洪晓纯. 华南和西南地区农业出现的时间及相关问题[J]. 南方文物, 2009(3):64-71 |
[7] | 何安益, 彭长林. 从晓锦遗址看新石器时代洞庭湖区与珠江流域地区原始文化的交往[A].见:广西壮族自治区博物馆编. 广西考古文集[C]. 文物出版社, 2004, 315-321 |
[8] | Frankel VH, Burstein AH. Orthopaedic biomechanics[M]. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1970, 1-188 |
[9] |
Ruff CB. Sexual dimorphism in human lower limb bone structure: relationship to subsistence strategy and sexual di- vision of labor[J]. Journal Human Evolution, 1987,16(5):391-416
doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90069-8 URL |
[10] |
Trinkaus E, Churchll SE and Ruff CB. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II Humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1994,93(1):1-34
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330930102 URL pmid: 8141238 |
[11] |
Stock JT. Hunter-gatherer postcranial robusticity relative to patterns of mobility, climatic adaptation, and selection for tissue economy[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006,131(2):194-204
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20398 URL pmid: 16596600 |
[12] | Nordin M and Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeketal system (3rd edition)[M]. London: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2001, 27-55 |
[13] |
Shaw CN, Stock JT. Intensity, repetitiveness, and directionality of habitual adolescent mobility patterns influence the tibial diaphysis morphology in athletes[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2009,140(1):149-159
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21064 URL pmid: 19358289 |
[14] |
Macintosh AA, Davies TG, Ryan TM, et al. Periosteal versus true cross-sectional geometry: a comparison along humeral, femoral, and tibial diaphyses[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2013,150(3):442-452
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22218 URL |
[15] |
Macintosh AA, Pinhasi R, Stock JT. Divergence in male and female manipulative behaviors with the intensification of metallurgy in central Europe[J]. PLoS ONE , 2014,9(11):e112116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112116
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112116 URL pmid: 25389972 |
[16] | 何嘉宁, 唐小佳. 军都山古游牧人群股骨功能状况及流动性分析[J]. 科学通报, 2015,60(7):1612-1620 |
[17] | 李法军. 鲤鱼墩遗址史前人类行为模式的骨骼生物力学分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2017,36(2):193-215 |
[18] | Fu XG. The Dingsishan Site and the Prehistory of Guangxi, South China[A]. Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association Bulletin 22 (Melaka Papers, Vol.6)[C]. Canberra: Australian National University. 2002, 63-72 |
[19] | 冯孟钦. 遂溪县鲤鱼墩新石器时代贝丘遗址[Z]. 中国考古学会. 中国考古学年鉴(2003). 北京: 文物出版社, 2004, 264-265 |
[20] | 广东省文物考古研究所,湛江市博物馆,遂溪县博物馆. 广东遂溪鲤鱼墩新石器时代贝丘遗址发掘简报[J]. 文物, 2015(7):4-18 |
[21] | 何安益, 杨清平, 宁永勤. 广西左江流域贝丘遗址考古新发现及初步认识[J]. 中国历史文物, 2009(5):5-10 |
[22] |
Stock JT and Shaw CN. Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross-sectional geometric properties[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2007,134(3):412-423
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20686 URL pmid: 17632794 |
[23] |
Doube M, Kłosowski MM, Arganda-Carreras I, et al. BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in Image[J] Bone, 2010,47(6):1076-1079
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023 URL |
[24] | Ruff CB. Biomechanical analyses of archaeological human skeletons[A]. Katzenberg MA and Saunders SR. Biological Anthropology of the human skeleton[C]. New York: Wiley Liss, 2008, 183-206 |
[25] |
Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Walker A, et al. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I. Temporal trends and mechanical inter- pretation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1993,91(1):21-53
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330910103 URL pmid: 8512053 |
[26] |
McHenry HM. Body size and proportions in early Hominids[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1992,87(4):407-431
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330870404 URL pmid: 1580350 |
[27] |
Grine FE, Jungers WL, Tobias PV, et al. Fossil Homo femur from Berg Aukas, northern Namibia[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995,97(2):151-185
URL pmid: 7653506 |
[28] |
Ruff CB, Scott WW and Liu AYC. Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adults[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1991,86(3):397-413
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330860306 URL pmid: 1746645 |
[29] |
Nikita E, Siew YY, Stock JT, et al. Activity patterns in the Sahara Desert: An interpretation based on cross-sectional geometric properties[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2011,146(3):423-434
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21597 URL |
[30] | 刘万里, 薛茜, 曹明芹, 等. 用SPSS实现完全随机设计多组比较秩和检验的多重比较[J]. 地方病通报, 2007,22(2):27-29 |
[31] | Ruff CB. Structural changes in the femur with the transition to agriculture on the Georgia coast[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1984, (64):125-136 |
[32] | Marchi D, Sparacello VS, Holt BM, et al. Biomechanical approach to the reconstruction of activity patterns in Neolithic Western Liguria, Italy[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2006, (131):447-455 |
[33] |
Ruff CB, Holtb B, Niskanen M, et al. Gradual decline in mobility with the adoption of food production in Europe supporting information[J]. PNAS, 2015,112(23):7147-7152
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502932112 URL pmid: 26060299 |
[34] | Ledger M, Holtzhausen L, Constant D, et al. Biomechanical beam analysis of long bones from a late 18th century slave cemetery in Cape Town, South Africa[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2000,112(2):2078-216 |
[35] | Stock JT, O’Neill MC, Ruff CB, et al. Body size, skeletal biomechanics, mobility and habitual activity from the Late Palaeolithic to the Mid-Dynastic Nile Valley[A]. Pinhasi R and Stock JT. Human Bioarchaeology of the transition to agriculture[C]. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011, 347-370 |
[36] |
Ogilvie MD, Hilton CE. Cross-sectional geometry in the humeri of foragers and farmers from the Prehispanic American Southwest: exploring patterns in the sexual division of labor[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2011,144(1):11-21
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21362 URL pmid: 20836131 |
[37] |
Stock JT, Pfeiffer S. Linking structural variability in long bone diaphyses to habitual behaviors: foragers from the southern African Later Stone Age and the Andaman Islands[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2001,115(4):337-348
doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1090 URL pmid: 11471132 |
[38] | Sparacello VS, Pearson OM, Coppa A, et al. Changes in skeletal robusticity in an iron age agropastoral group: The samnites from the Alfedena necropolis (Abruzzo, Central Italy). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2011,144(1):119-130 |
[39] | 梅欣欣. 广西崇左冲塘-何村古人类长骨生物力学研究[D]. 广州:中山大学硕士学位论文, 2020 |
[40] | 甘才超, 盛立双. 蓟县桃花园明清墓群[Z].见:中国考古学会.中国考古学年鉴(2006)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2007,136 |
[41] | 张瑞, 盛立双. 蓟县桃花园明清墓地[Z].见:中国考古学会.中国考古学年鉴(2007)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2007,138 |
[42] | 盛立双, 李法军. 天津蓟县桃花园墓地明清人骨保护与研究述要[A].见:天津市博物馆.天津博物馆论丛[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013, 77-88 |
[43] | 何嘉宁. 军都山古代人群运动模式及生活方式的时序性变化[J]. 人类学学报, 2016,35(2):238-245 |
[1] | HUAN Faxiang, YANG Shixia, CHEN Wei, CHEN Weiju, ZHU Lidong, ZHANG Yuxiu. A restudy of stone artifacts from the Fulin site in Hanyuan, Sichuan [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 177-190. |
[2] | GAO Yao, WANG Hua, LANG Jianfeng. Utilization of the Chinese water deer of early Holocene by human from the Xiaogao site, Shandong Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 238-247. |
[3] | LI Sanling. Discovery and research of the engraved remains in the early and middle Paleolithic periods [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(02): 288-303. |
[4] | ZHANG Yue, WU Xiujie, ZHANG Shuangquan. A study of the bone awl from the Ziyang Man site, Sichuan Province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2023, 42(01): 1-14. |
[5] | ZHAO Yongsheng, ZHANG Xiaowen, DONG Wenbin, WANG Fen, ZENG Wen. Custom of dental extraction among the prehistoric residents in Haidai area [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(05): 837-847. |
[6] | DU Yuwei, DING Xin, PEI Shuwen. A brief discussion on the approaches of taphonomic study of archaeofaunas from paleoanthropological sites [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(03): 523-534. |
[7] | WEI Pianpian, ZHANG Quanchao. Biomechanical comparison of the middle femur between the Tuchengzi agricultural people and the Jinggouzi nomadic people from Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 238-247. |
[8] | ZHAO Dongyue, LÜ Zheng, ZHANG Zetao, LIU Bo, LING Xue, WAN Yang, YANG Fan. Analysis on the economic mode of the ancestors of Dayindong cave site in Yunnan province by stable isotope [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(02): 295-307. |
[9] | YU Huixin, LI Yonglan, ZHENG Lianbin, ZHANG Xinghua, YU Keli, BAO Jinping. Changes of body composition of the ethnic minorities in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2022, 41(01): 36-50. |
[10] | XU Yunliang. Effects of different ball games on bone mineral density and directional asymmetry of upper and lower limbs in college students [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(06): 1023-1031. |
[11] | WEI Pianpian, ZHAO Yuhao, HE Jianing. Structural properties of humeral remains from Jianping, Liaoning province [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(06): 943-954. |
[12] | LIANG Qiyao, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Quanjia, TIAN He. Bone artifacts of the Honghe site in Qiqihar, Heilongjiang [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(05): 751-763. |
[13] | DONG Wei, BAI Weipeng. Artiodactyla assemblages associated with Gigantopithecus blacki in China [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(03): 490-502. |
[14] | DAI Jingwen, ZHANG Shuangquan, ZHANG Yue. Exploitation of animal bone fat by prehistoric human [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(03): 503-512. |
[15] | HUANG Chao, ZHANG Shuangquan. Preliminary application of the X-rays diffraction technique in experimental study of burnt bones [J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2021, 40(03): 513-525. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||