人类学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (06): 1019-1033.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0091cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0091

• 华南区域考古 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州观音洞遗址的石核剥片策略和修理技术

胡越()   

  1. 四川大学考古文博学院考古科学中心成都 610207
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-05 接受日期:2025-06-24 出版日期:2025-12-15 发布日期:2025-12-15
  • 作者简介:胡越,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为旧石器考古与光释光年代学。E-mail: yh280@scu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(42002201);四川大学考古科学中心开放课题(24SASA01)

Core reduction strategies and retouch technologies at Guanyindong site, Guizhou Province

HU Yue()   

  1. Center for Archaeological Science, School of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207
  • Received:2025-02-05 Accepted:2025-06-24 Online:2025-12-15 Published:2025-12-15

摘要:

传统上,学界认为东亚旧石器时代中期的石器技术以简单的石核-石片工业为主,整体表现出较低的复杂性和有限的创新性。最近,越来越多的考古发现和研究成果对这一观点提出质疑。本文基于观音洞遗址的最新研究进展,系统梳理并深入分析该遗址石器工业的主要特征及其在区域技术演化中的意义。研究表明,在距今18万~8万年期间,观音洞古人类掌握了多种剥片策略及熟练的工具修整技术。除了常规的单极剥片(单台面、双台面及多台面剥片)外,还采用了勒瓦娄哇剥片技术、盘状剥片、体积剥片及石片-石核剥片等多种剥片方法。工具类型丰富多样,重复利用率高,存在简单修理和精细修理两种不同的加工策略。观音洞遗址石器工业的技术特征显示出与欧亚大陆西部及非洲旧石器时代中期遗址相似的复杂性,为重新评估东亚旧石器时代中期工业在全球石器工业体系中的地位提供了重要证据。

关键词: 观音洞, 中国西南地区, 旧石器时代中期, 勒瓦娄哇, 石核剥片

Abstract:

The lithic technology of the Middle Paleolithic in East Asia has traditionally been regarded as primarily characterized by simple choppers and core-flake industries, with limited evidence of complexity and innovations. Recent archaeological discoveries and research findings have increasingly challenged this perspective. Based on the latest research progress on the Guanyindong cave site, this paper systematically reviews and summarizes the key characteristics of its lithic industry. The study reveals that between 180000 and 80000 years ago, hominins at Guanyindong employed diverse flaking strategies and demonstrated proficient tool retouch techniques.

Flakes are mostly knapped by unifacial detachments. Other core reduction systems include Levallois concept, discoidal production, volumetric exploitation, and core-on-flakes, etc. The Levallois assemblage comprises 11 cores, 30 flakes, and 4 retouched flakes. Both preferential and recurrent knapping approaches were employed in the production of oriented flakes. The primary method used to maintain the convexity of the upper surface is centripetal, supplemented by bidirectional, unidirectional, and convergent configurations. Coefficients of variation calculated for Levallois flakes and other flakes indicates that Levallois flakes exhibit a higher degree of uniformity. Core-on-flakes are commonly found at the Guanyindong site. The reduction strategy is predominantly similar to unifacial detachments, although truncated-faceted pieces and the Kombewa method are also present. A total of 10 discoidal cores were identified, which can be classified into bifacial and unifacial types based on the number of exploited surfaces. At Guanyindong, most of these cores were unifacially detached. Volumetric exploitation cores appear in small quantities (n=12) as well. This reduction strategy focuses on the narrow frontal face of the core, resulting in elongated products. Retouched pieces constitute a significant portion of the assemblage (n=999, 45%), primarily made on flakes. The tool types are diverse, including scrapers, denticulates, borers, and notches. Most tools display two or more retouched edges with steep edge angles, indicating a high frequency of recycling or resharpening. A dual pattern of curation is evident, consisting of both simple and elaborate forms. The elaborated tools include elongated-pointed pieces, tanged points, end-scrapers with parallel removals, standardized denticulates and borers. Additionally, 70 specimens exhibit Quina retouch. These Quina retouches may result from either intentional modification or repeated resharpening during the tool’s use-life. A potential Quina exploitation system may be discernible across multiple aspects, although further investigation is required for confirmation.

These technological features demonstrate a level of complexity comparable to Middle Paleolithic /Middle Stone Age sites in Western Eurasia and Africa, providing crucial evidence for reassessing the position of East Asian Middle Paleolithic industries within the global framework of lithic technological systems.

Key words: Guanyindong, Southwest China, Middle Palaeolithic, Levallois, core reduction

中图分类号: