收稿日期: 2019-06-03
修回日期: 2020-02-13
网络出版日期: 2020-08-31
基金资助
河北师范大学人文社会科学基金资助(S2014B06);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB26000000)
Core reduction and tool modification, a case study on lithic technology of Shuidonggou Locality 7, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region
Received date: 2019-06-03
Revised date: 2020-02-13
Online published: 2020-08-31
水洞沟遗址是中国较早发现并且最早发掘的旧石器遗址,该遗址自1923年发现以来便因其出土较多具有欧洲旧石器时代中晚过渡期特征的石制品而受到国内外学者的广泛关注。本文以水洞沟遗址第7地点(SDG7)出土的石制品材料为基础,主要从石核剥片策略和工具修理策略两个方面进行石器技术的分析研究。石核、石片以及工具的分析显示,SDG7存在两大石器技术体系:一是中国北方常见的占主导地位的石片石器技术,该技术不存在剥片前对石核的预制过程,而是以简单剥片石核、大量的不规则石片以及修理程度较低的工具为代表,少量采用优质原料精致加工的工具类型体现出旧石器时代晚期该技术的发展和进步;二是Levallois-like石叶技术,以少量的Levallois-like石核(扁脸石核)为代表,与SDG1、SDG2(CL5a)以及SDG9出土的同类石核呈现技术理念的一致性,该技术以剥离较大尺寸的石叶/长石片为目的,且均具有台面的预制修理和剥片面的维护现象,应为外来的技术体系。SDG7石器技术的分析可为水洞沟遗址区技术演化序列的构建、整体文化面貌的揭示以及技术变化原因的探讨提供新的材料和参考。
牛东伟 , 裴树文 , 王惠民 , 高星 . 宁夏水洞沟遗址第7地点石制品的剥片与修理技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2020 , 39(03) : 367 -378 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0010
The Shuidonggou (SDG) site complex, located in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of Northwest China and yielded Middle-Upper Paleolithic transitional blade-rich assemblages, has been given more and more focuses since its discovery and first excavation in the 1920s. This paper presents a specific lithic analyses (core reduction and tool modification) on the stone artefacts yielded by three years of systematic and advanced excavations at Shuidonggou locality 7 (SDG7), an important locality within the SDG site cluster.
As shown by the characteristics of the cores and flakes from SDG7, direct hammer percussion was the dominant flaking technique, but the bipolar technique was also used on a small-scale, especially for some high-quality and small-sized cherts. As for the core reduction strategy, most of the cores, including simple flake cores (free-hand direct hammer percussion), discoid cores and bipolar cores, show the features of flake production without core preparation.Compared to the centripetal reduction of discoid cores, the reduction strategy of simple flake cores is to look for the most suitable platforms and working surfaces by changing flaking direction. However, it should be noted that there are four flat-faced cores that display consistent features of the Levallois-like blade assemblage with the ones identified at other localities like SDG1, 2 and 9, which have been described as an intrusive large blade technology with characteristics of initial Upper Paleolithic from the Siberian/Mongolian region.
There are five kinds of tool forms (scrapers, points, notches, denticulates and choppers) identified at SDG7, most of which are small in size and made by complete flakes. The predominant tool forms are scrapers (n=105; 86.77%), most of which are side scrapers. Most working edges of the tools appear to be unifacially and lightly retouched by direct hammer percussion. However, the presence of some finely retouched tools (end scrapers and some side scrapers) made from high quality raw materials may indicate the technological innovations of local industry during the Upper Paleolithic.
Above all, based on the detailed lithic analyses, two distinct technological assemblages are identified at SDG7. One is a flake-tool technology, which is the local and dominant technological assemblage in North China, characterized by free-hand core reduction without preparation and simple tool modification. The other is an intrusive Levallois-like blade technology, which is represented by flat-faced cores with preparation of platforms and working surfaces for the production of blades and/or elongated flakes. We believe the detailed study of the lithic materials from SDG7 would be of a great relevance for the comprehensive understanding of the whole technological complex at SDG site region and its role in the Upper Paleolithic of North China.
[1] | Licent E, Teilhard de Chardin P. Le Paleolithique de la Chine[J]. L’Anthropolgie, 1925,25:201-234 |
[2] | 宁夏文物考古研究所. 水洞沟——1980年发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 1-235 |
[3] | 王惠民, 裴树文, 马晓玲, 等. 水洞沟遗址第3、4、5地点发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2007,26:206-221 |
[4] | 陈福友, 李锋, 王惠民, 等. 宁夏水洞沟遗址第2 地点发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2012,31(4):317-333 |
[5] | Pei SW, Gao X, Wang HM, et al. The Shuidonggou site complex: New excavations and implications for the earliest late Palaeolithic in North China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2012,39:3610-3626 |
[6] | 高星, 王惠民, 裴树文, 等. 水洞沟2003-2007年度考古发掘和研究报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013, 1-376 |
[7] | 裴树文, 牛东伟, 高星, 等. 宁夏水洞沟遗址第7地点发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2014,33(1):1-16 |
[8] | Li F, Kuhn SL, Bar Yosef O, et al. History, Chronology and techno-typology of the Upper Paleolithic sequence in the Shuidonggou Area, Northern China[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2019,32:111-141 |
[9] | Pei SW, NiuDW , Guan Y, et al. The earliest Late Paleolithic in North China: Site formation processes at Shuidonggou Locality 7[J]. Quaternary International, 2014,347:122-132 |
[10] | Niu DW, Pei SW, Zhang SQ, et al. The Initial Upper Palaeolithic in Northwest China: New evidence of cultural variability and change from Shuidonggou locality 7[J]. Quaternary International, 2016,400:111-119 |
[11] | 牛东伟, 裴树文, 王惠民, 等. 水洞沟遗址第7地点石制品原料开发与利用策略研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2019,39(6):1457-1466 |
[12] | 高星, 裴树文, 王惠民, 等. 宁夏旧石器考古调查报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2004,23(4):307-325 |
[13] | 刘德成, 王旭龙, 高星, 等. 水洞沟遗址地层划分与年代测定新进展[J]. 科学通报, 2009,54:2879-2885 |
[14] | 李锋. “文化传播”与“生态适应”——水洞沟第2地点的旧石器考古学观察[D]. 中国科学院大学博士学位论文, 2012: 1-158 |
[15] | Brantingham PJ, Krivoshapkin AI, Li JZ, et al. The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia[J]. Current Anthropology, 2001,42:735-747 |
[16] | 彭菲. 中国北方旧石器时代石叶遗存研究—以水洞沟与新疆材料为例[D]. 中国科学院研究生院博士学位论文, 2012: 1-222 |
[17] | 高星, 王惠民, 关莹. 水洞沟旧石器考古研究的新进展与新认识[J]. 人类学学报, 2013,32(2):121-132 |
[18] | Madsen DB, Li JZ, BrantinghamPJ , et al. Dating Shuidonggou and the Upper Palaeolithic blade industry in North China[J]. Antiquity, 2001,75:706-716 |
[19] | Li F, Gao X, Chen FY, et al. The development of Upper Palaeolithic China: new results from the Shuidonggou site[J]. Antiquity, 2013,87:1-16 |
[20] | Toth N. The Oldowan reassessed: A close look at early stone artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985,12:101-120 |
[21] | 卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000,19(2):85-96 |
[22] | 卫奇. 石制品观察格式探讨[A].见:邓涛、王原主编,第八届古脊椎动物学术年会文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2001: 209-218 |
[23] | Li F, Kuhn SL, Olsen JW, et al. Disparate Stone Age technological evolution in North China: Lithic technological variability and relations between populations during MIS3[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 2014,70(1):35-67 |
/
〈 | 〉 |