资阳人头骨化石的内部解剖结构

  • 吴秀杰 ,
  • 严毅
展开
  • 1.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    2.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
吴秀杰, 女, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所研究员, 从事古人类学研究, Email: wuxiujie@ivpp.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2020-06-15

  修回日期: 2020-07-15

  网络出版日期: 2020-09-11

基金资助

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB26000000);国家自然科学基金项目资助(41630102);国家自然科学基金项目资助(41672020)

Endocranial anatomy of the Ziyang 1 human skull

  • Xiujie WU ,
  • Yi YAN
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2020-06-15

  Revised date: 2020-07-15

  Online published: 2020-09-11

摘要

资阳人头骨化石,是新中国成立后首次发现的保存较为完整的人类化石,曾经引起学术界的广泛关注。由于其出土的具体位点和层位不是很清楚,对其年代目前还存有争议。长期以来,对资阳人的研究局限于传统的头骨外部形态的描述和测量。本文利用高分辨率工业CT(Computed tomography)扫描资阳人头骨,并对其内部解剖结构 (包括骨壁结构、额窦、骨内耳迷路、颞骨乳突小房、颅内模) 进行3D虚拟复原和研究,以期获得更多的形态信息。CT断层图显示资阳人头骨的骨壁板障层较厚,远大于外板层和内板层,支持以往研究认为的该头骨属于50岁以上个体的鉴定结果。额窦呈叶形,局限于两侧眼眶的内上方;左、右侧额窦的表面积分别为1780mm2和2910mm2。骨性内耳迷路半规管的大小及其比例,与尼安德特人不同,而位于晚更新世和全新世现代人变异范围之间。颞骨乳突小房为气化型,几乎占据了整个乳突部。根据复原的颅内模,资阳人的颅容量约为1250mL。颅内模的各项测量数值虽然都偏小,但脑的绝大多数形态特征、宽-高指数、顶叶-脑长指数都位于现代人的变异范围之内,而与直立人和更新世古老型人类不同。资阳人头骨内部解剖结构保留有少量原始特征,包括枕叶向后突显著、大脑窝比小脑窝大而深,这些特征不同于全新世人类,更类似于晚更新世早期现代人。

本文引用格式

吴秀杰 , 严毅 . 资阳人头骨化石的内部解剖结构[J]. 人类学学报, 2020 , 39(04) : 511 -520 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0024

Abstract

Although the specific location is not clear and its dating is still debated, the Ziyang human fossil has attracted extensive attention from academic circles because it is the first almost complete human skull fossil found after the establishment of the People’s Republic of China. For a long time, the research on the Ziyang skull was limited to only external morphology and measurements using traditional methods. In order to better understand the evolutionary stage of the Ziyang hominid, a high-resolution industrial CT scanner was used to analyze its internal anatomy, and 3D virtual reconstructions of its bone structure, frontal sinus, bony labyrinth, pneumatization of mastoid air cells, and endocast were created and analyzed. CT images of the bone structure shows that the diploë is very thick—much thicker than the outer and inner layers. This supports the previous identification results of the Ziyang individual over 50 years old. The frontal sinus of the Ziyang is in the shape of a leaf, bilaterally located on the inner and upper orbital areas, with surface areas on the left and right of 1780 mm2and 2910mm2, respectively. The size and proportion of the Ziyang semicircular canals of the bony labyrinth are different from Neandertals, but are in the ranges of those from Late Pleistocene Homo sapiens and recent modern humans. The pneumatization of mastoid cells was in pneumatic type, and almost occupied the entire mastoid process with pneumatic cavities. Based on the 3D virtual reconstruction of the endocast, the cranial capacity of the Ziyang skull was estimated at around 1250 mL. Although the endocast is small in all measurements, most of the brain morphology as well as the width-height index and the parietal lobe-length index were all within the variation range of modern humans, which are different from those of Homo erectus and Pleistocene archaic humans. The internal anatomy of the Ziyang skull retains a few original features, including the two occipital lobes that are prominently backwardly convex, and the cerebral fossa, which is larger and deeper than the cerebellar fossa. These two features are different from Holocene humans but are similar to Pleistocene early modern humans.

参考文献

[1] 裴文中, 吴汝康 .资阳人. 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所甲种专刊,第1号[M]. 科学出版社, 北京, 1957: 1-71
[2] 裴文中. 四川资阳黄鳝溪人类及其他哺乳动物化石发掘简报[J]. 科学通报, 1952,3:709-713
[3] 中国科学院考古研究所实验室. 放射性碳素测定年代报告(一)[J]. 考古, 1972,11:52-56
[4] 安志敏. 关于我国若干原始文化年代的讨论[J]. 考古, 1972,42(1):57-89
[5] 成都地质学院第四纪科研组. 资阳人化石地层时代问题的商榷[J]. 考古学报, 1974,2:111-124
[6] 北京大学历史系考古教研室, 四川省博物馆. 四川资阳鲤鱼桥旧石器地点发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 1973,3:331-346
[7] 原思训, 陈铁梅, 王良训, 等. 14C 测定报告——地质部分[J]. 地震地质, 1980,2:73-78
[8] 李宣民, 张森水. 资阳人B地点发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1984,3:215-224
[9] 吴汝康, 贾兰坡. 中国发现的各种人类化石及其在人类进化上的意义[J]. 科学通报, 1:23-29
[10] 吴新智. 中国古人类的进化[J]. 人类学学报, 1990,9:312-321
[11] 吴茂霖. 中国的晚期智人.见:吴汝康等主编. 中国远古人类[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989: 42-61
[12] Hauser G, De Stefano GF. Epigenetic variants of the human skull[M]. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart, 1989: 31-34
[13] Spoor F, Hublin JJ, Braun M, et al. The bony labyrinth of Neanderthals[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003,44:141-165
[14] Wu XJ, Crevecoeur I, Liu W, et al. The temporal labyrinths of eastern Eurasian Pleistocene humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the United States of America, 2014,111(29):10509-10513
[15] 张玄, 吴秀杰. 颞骨乳突小房的3D虚拟复原及形态变异——以现代云南人为例[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017,037:747-753
[16] Holloway RL, Broadfield DC, Yuan MS. The human fossil record, Volume three: Brain Endocasts—the Paleoneurological evidence[M]. New Jersey: A John Wiley-Liss Publication, 2004
[17] Koertvelyessy T. Relationships between the frontal sinus and climatic conditions: a skeletal approach to cold adaptation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1972,37:161-172
[18] Churchill S. Cold adaptation, heterochrony, and Neanderthals[J]. Evolution of Anthropology, 1998,7:46-61
[19] Rae TC, Koppe T, Stringer CB. The Neanderthal face is not cold adapted[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011,60:234-239
[20] Weidenreich F. The skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis: A comparative study on a primitive hominid skull[M]. Palaeontologica Sinica, New Series D. no. 10, 1943: 164-167
[21] 吴汝康. 陕西蓝田发现的猿人头骨化石[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1966,10:1-16
[22] Prossinger H. Mathematical analysis techniques of frontal sinus morphology, with emphasis on Homo[J]. Anatomy Record, 200, 291:1455-1478
[23] Wu XJ, Emiliano B. The Endocranial Anatomy of Maba 1[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2016,160:633-643
[24] Spoor F, Wood B, Zonneveld F. Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal evolution[J]. Nature, 1994,369:645-648
[25] Li ZY, Wu XJ, Zhou LP, et al. Late Pleistocene archaic human crania from Xuchang, China[J]. Science, 355:969-972
[26] Diamant M. Mastoid pneumatization and its function[J]. Archives of Otolaryngology, 1962,76(5):390-397
[27] 田勇全. 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 260-261
[28] Balzeau A, Grimaud-Hervé D. Cranial base morphology and temporal bone pneumatization in Asian Homo erectus[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2006,51(4):350-9
[29] 吴秀杰, 刘武, Christopher N. 颅内模——人类脑演化研究的直接证据及研究状况[J]. 自然科学进展, 2007,17(6):707-715
[30] 吴秀杰, 张伟. 中国古人类颅容量的推算方法比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2019,38(04):513-524
[31] 吴秀杰, 刘武, 董为, 等. 柳江人头骨化石的CT扫描与脑形态特征[J]. 科学通报, 53(13):1570-1575
[32] Coon CS. The Origin of Races[M]. New York: Alfred A Knopf, 1962: 1-742
[33] 刘武, 何嘉宁, 吴秀杰, 等. 山顶洞人与现代华北人头骨非测量性特征比较及中国更新世晚期人类演化的一些问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2006,21:26-41
[34] 吴汝康. 广西柳江发现的人类化石[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1959,1:97-104
[35] 吴新智. 周口店山顶洞人化石的研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1961,3(3):181-203
[36] 河北新医大学《人体解剖学》编写组. 人体解剖学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1977: 243-244
[37] Skrzat J, Brzegowy P, Walocha J, et al. Age dependent changes in the diploe in the human skull[J]. Folia Morphologica, 2004,63:67-70
[38] Webb SG. Cranial thickening in an Australian hominid as a possible palaeoepidemiological indicator[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1990,82:403-411
文章导航

/