特邀文章

旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案

  • Ignacio de la TORRE ,
  • Rafael MORA ,
  • 裴树文 ,
  • 马东东
展开
  • 1.西班牙高级科学研究委员会(CSIC)历史研究所,西班牙马德里 28037
    2.巴塞罗那自治大学文学院史前系,西班牙巴塞罗那 08193
    3.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    4.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    5.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
Ignacio de la Torre,男,研究员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: ignacio.delatorre@cchs.csic.es

收稿日期: 2020-12-10

  修回日期: 2021-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-17

基金资助

European Research Council-Advanced Grant(832980);European Research Council-Advanced Grant(BICAEHFID);国家自然科学基金项目(41872029);国家自然科学基金项目(41372032)

A methodological protocol for the analysis of Early Stone Age lithic assemblages

  • de la TORRE Ignacio ,
  • MORA Rafael ,
  • Shuwen PEI ,
  • Dongdong MA
Expand
  • 1. Instituto de Historia, CSIC, 28037 Madrid, Spain
    2. División de Prehistoria, Facultat de Lletres, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
    3. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    4. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2020-12-10

  Revised date: 2021-03-10

  Online published: 2021-08-17

摘要

本文提出一种应用于旧石器时代早期石制品研究的分析方案。本方案以宏观分析方法为主,不包括同样重要的微观分析方法,主要应用于旧石器时代早期石制品的技术-类型学分析,不涉及特定地区和特殊石制品的讨论。在旧大陆旧石器时代早期石器研究中,鉴于学者们使用的技术学与类型学分析方案总体相似,我们认为在研究中使用标准化的分析方案会提高地区间石器面貌的可比性,并有助于理解旧石器时代早期旧大陆古人类的技术行为模式。从这个角度出发,本文将回顾旧石器时代早期石器研究的主要理论和方法,并提出分析视角和术语建议,希望有助于研究中对描述剥片类、废片类、锤击工具、拼合工具和传统石制品的测量与绘图惯例。

本文引用格式

Ignacio de la TORRE , Rafael MORA , 裴树文 , 马东东 . 旧石器时代早期石制品分析方案[J]. 人类学学报, 2021 , 40(04) : 547 -567 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0046

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytical protocol for the study of early Palaeolithic stone tools. Our proposal follows a macroscopic approach and therefore does not cover the equally-important analysis of microscopic traces. Also, it focuses on techno-typological attributes of pre-Middle Palaeolithic artefact, thus avoiding entering into the discussion of the techno-morphological and regional particularities inherent to the lithic record from the Middle Stone Age onwards. Given the overall similarities of technological solutions employed during the Early Stone Age lithic assemblages and their relative typological homogeneity across the Old World, we argue that using standardized protocols in the description of stone tool collections may improve comparability and help understanding global patterns of technological behaviour across the early Palaeolithic. From this perspective, this paper will review the main theoretical approaches to the study of Early Stone Age stone assemblages and will propose analytical perspectives and terminologies in the description of flaked, detached and pounded tools, as well in the study of refits and conventions in artefact measuring and illustration.

参考文献

[1] Nelson MC. The Study of Technological Organization[A]. In: Schiffer MB (Ed.). Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol 3[C]. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1991: 57-100
[2] Kelly RL. The three sides of a biface[J]. American Antiquity, 1988, 53(4):717-734
[3] Ricklis RA, Cox KA. Examining lithic technological organization as a dynamic cultural subsystem: the advantages of an explicitly spatial approach[J]. American Antiquity, 1993, 58(3):444-461
[4] Geneste JM. L´approvisionnement en matières premières dans les systemes de production lithique: la dimension spatiale de la technologie[A]. In: Mora R, et al (Eds.). Tecnología y cadenas operativas líticas[C]. Barcelona: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 1991: 1-36
[5] Lemonnier P. Topsy turvy techniques. Remarks on the social representation of techniques[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):27-37
[6] Bordes F. Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen[M]. Bordeaux: Institut de Préhistoire de l´Université de Bordeaux, 1961
[7] Leakey MD. Olduvai Gorge, Vol 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960-1963[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971
[8] Binford LR. Archaeology as Anthropology[J]. American Antiquity, 1962, 28(2):217-225
[9] Isaac GL. The Archaeology of Human Origins: Studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa 1971-1981[A]. In: Wendorf F, Close AE (Eds.). Advances in World Archaeology[C]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984: 1-87
[10] Isaac GL. Foundation stones: early artifacts as indicators of activities and abilities[A]. In: Bailey GN, Callow P (Eds.). Stone Age Prehistory: studies in Memory of Charles McBurney[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986: 221-241
[11] Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya; An Experimental Approach[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[12] Toth N. The Oldowan Reassessed: a Close Look at Early Stone Artifacts[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1985, 12(2):101-120
[13] Potts R. Early Hominid Activities at Olduvai[M]. New York: Aldine and Gruyter, 1988
[14] Potts R. Why the Oldowan? Plio-Pleistocene toolmaking and the transport of resources[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1991, 47(2):153-176
[15] Isaac GL, Harris JWK, Kroll EM. The Stone Artefact Assemblages: A Comparative Study[A]. In: Isaac GL (Ed.). Koobi Fora Research Project, Volume 5: Plio-Pleistocene Archaeology[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 262-362
[16] Semaw S. The World´s Oldest Stone Artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their Implications for Understanding Stone Technology and Patterns of Human Evolution Between 2.6-1.5 Million Years Ago[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2000, 27:1197-1214
[17] Reti JS. Quantifying Oldowan Stone Tool Production at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(1):e0147352
[18] Karlin C, Julien M. Prehistoric technology: a cognitive science?[A]. In: Renfrew C, Zubrow EBW (Eds.). The ancient mind. Elements of cognitive archaeology[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 152-164
[19] Delagnes A, Roche H. Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2005, 48:435-472
[20] Roche H, Texier PJ. La notion de complexité dans un ensemble lithique. Application aux séries acheuléenes d´Isenya (Kenya)[A]. In: APDCA-Juan-les-Pins (Eds). 25 ans d´études technologiques en Préhistoire[C]. Ville D’antibes: Le centre de recherches archéologiques du CNRS, 1991, 99-108
[21] Roche H, Texier PJ. Evaluation of Technical Competence of Homo erectus in East Africa During the Middle Pleistocene[A]. In: Bower JRF, Sartorno S (Eds.). Human Evolution in its Ecological Context[M]. Leiden: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1996: 153-167
[22] Texier PJ, Roche H. The impact of predetermination on the development of some Acheulean chaînes opératoires[A]. In: José Maria Bermudez, Eudald Carbonell i Roura, Juan Luis Arsuaga (Eds.). Evolución humana en Europa y los yacimientos de la Sierra de Atapuerca, Vol 2[C]. Valladolid: Junta de Castilla y León, 1995, 403-420
[23] de la Torre I. The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the Developed Oldowan / early Acheulean in East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 60:768-812
[24] de la Torre I, Mora R, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of Lower Pleistocene hominids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 44:203-224
[25] Mora R, de la Torre I. Percussion tools in Olduvai Beds I and II (Tanzania): Implications for early human activities[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2005, 24:179-192
[26] de la Torre I, Mora R. Oldowan technological behaviour at HWK EE (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:236-273
[27] de la Torre I, Mora R. Technological behaviour in the early Acheulean of EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:329-377
[28] Leroi-Gourhan A. Le geste et la parole. I- Technique et language. II- La mémoire et les rythmes[M]. Paris: Albin Michel, 1964
[29] Leroi-Gourhan A. L´homme et la matière[M]. Paris: Albin Michel, 1971
[30] Pelegrin J. Réflexions sur le comportement technique[A]. In: Otte M (Ed.). La Signification Culturelle des Industries Lithiques. Actes du Colloque de Liège du 3 an 7 octobre 1985[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 239, 1985: 72-91
[31] Pelegrin J. Prehistoric Lithic Technology: Some Aspects of Research[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):116-125
[32] Pelegrin J, Karlin K, Bodu P. “Chaînes opératoires”: un outil pour le préhistorien[J]. Technologie Prehistorique. Notes et Monographies Techniques, 1988, 25:55-62
[33] Boëda E. Approche de la variabilité des systèmes de production lithique des industries du Paléolithique inférieur et moyen: chronique d´une variabilité attendue[J]. Techniques et Culture, 1991, (17-18):37-79
[34] Boëda E, Geneste J M, Meignen L. Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen[J]. Paléo, 1990, 2:43-80
[35] Geneste JM. Analyse lithique d´industries mousteriennes du Périgord: una aproche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolitique Moyen[D]. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux I, 1985
[36] Pelegrin J. Les savoir-faire: Une très longue histoire[J]. Terrain, 1991, 16:106-113
[37] Karlin C, Bodu P, Pelegrin J. Processus techniques et chaînes opératoires; comment les préhistoriens s´approprient un concept élaboré par les ethnologues[A]. In: Balfet H (Ed.). Observer l Áction Technique[C]. 1991, 101-117
[38] de la Torre I, Mora R. Remarks on the Current Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Early Technological Strategies in Eastern Africa[A]. In: Hovers E, Braun DR (Eds.). Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Oldowan[C]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009: 15-24
[39] Perlès C. Ecological determinism, group strategies, and individual decisions in the conception of prehistoric stone assemblages[A]. In: Berthelet A, Chavaillon J (Eds.). The Use of Tools by Human and Non-humans Primates[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, 267-277
[40] Young DE, Bonnichsen R. Understanding Stone Tools: A Cognitive Approach[M]. Orono: Center for the Study of Early Man, Peopling of the Americans series, Vol. 1, University of Maine at Orono, 1984: 312
[41] Isaac GL. The Food-sharing Behavior of Protohuman Hominids[J]. Scientific American, 1978, 238(4):90-108
[42] Isaac GL. The earliest archaeological traces[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Cambridge History of Africa. Volume 1. From the Earliest Times to c500 BC[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982: 157-247
[43] Edmonds M. Description, understanding and the chaine operatoire[J]. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1990, 9(1):55-70
[44] Henry DO. Prehistoric Cultural Ecology and Evolution: Insights from the Southern Jordan[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1995
[45] Marks AE. Prehistory and Paleoenvironments in the Central Negev, Israel[M]. Dallas: Southern Methodist University, 1977
[46] Perlès C. In Search of Lithic Strategies. A Cognitive Approach to Prehistoric Chipped Stone Assembages[A]. In: Gardin JC, Peebles CS (Eds.). Representations in Archaeology[C]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992, 223-247
[47] Inizan ML, Reduron-Balliner M, Roche H, et al. Technologie de la pierre taillée[M]. Meudon: CREP, 1995
[48] Mora R, Martínez J, Terradas X. Un proyeto de análisis: el Sistema Lógico Analítico (SLA)[A]. In: Mora R, et al (Eds.). Tecnología y cadenas operativas líticas[C]. Barcelona: Treballs d´Arqueologia, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 1991, 173-199
[49] Laplace G. La typologie analytique et structurale: Base rationnelle d’étude des industries lithiques et osseuses[J]. Colloques nationaux du Centre National de la Recherche scientifique. Banques de données aechéologiques, 1972, 932:91-143
[50] de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Arroyo A, et al. Experimental protocols for the study of battered stone anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013, 40(1):313-332
[51] Cziesla E. On refitting of stone artefacts[A]. In: Cziesla E, Eickhoff E. The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts[C]. Holos: Verlag Bonn, 1990, 9-44
[52] de la Torre I, Martínez-Moreno J, Mora R. When bones are not enough: lithic refits and occupation dynamics in the Middle Palaeolithic Level 10 of Roca dels Bous (Catalonia, Spain)[A], In: Seetah K, Gravina B (Eds.). Bones for Tools - Tools for Bones: the Interplay Between Objects and Objectives[M]. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2012, 13-23
[53] Peresani M. Discoid Lithic Technology: Advances and implications[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003
[54] Texier PJ, Roche H. Polyèdre, sub-sphéroïde, sphéroïde et bola: des segments plus ou moins longs d´une même chaîne opératoire[J]. Cahier Noir, 1995, 7:31-40
[55] Schick KD, Toth N. Early Stone Age Technology in Africa: a Review and Case Study into the Nature and Function of Spheroids and Subspheroids[A]. In: Corruchini RS, Ciochon RL (Eds.). Integrative Paths to the Past. Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994, 429-449
[56] Kleindienst MR. Component of the East African Acheulian assemblage: an analytic approach[A]. In: Mortelmans G, Nenquin J (Eds.). Actes du IV Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l´Etude du Quaternaire, Leopoldville, 1959[C]. Tervuren: Belgie Annalen, Musée Royal de l´Afrique Centrale, 1962, 81-108
[57] Tixier J. Le hachereau dans l’Acheuléen Nord-Africain: notes typologiques[A]. In: Congrès préhistorique de France(Eds.). Congrès préhistorique de France: comptes rendus de la XVème session, Poitiers’Angoulème, July 15-22, 1956[C]. Société Préhistorique Française, 1956, 914-923
[58] Isaac GL. Olorgesailie. Archeological Studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977
[59] Clark JD, Kleindienst MR. The Stone Age cultural sequence: terminology, typology and raw material[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, III: The Earlier Cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 34-65
[60] Pei S, Xie F, Deng C, et al. Early Pleistocene archaeological occurrences at the Feiliang site, and the archaeology of human origins in the Nihewan Basin, North China[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(11):e0187251
[61] Pei S, Deng C, de la Torre I, et al. Magnetostratigraphic and archaeological records at the Early Pleistocene site complex of Madigou (Nihewan Basin): Implications for human adaptations in North China[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2019, 530:176-189
[62] Arroyo A, de la Torre I. Pounding tools in HWK EE and EF-HR (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania): Percussive activities in the Oldowan-Acheulean transition[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 120:402-421
[63] Clark JD. The stone ball: its associations and use by prehistoric man in Africa[A]. In: Balout L (Ed.). II Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire, Alger. Actes de la IIe session[C]. Paris: Arts et Métieres graphiqies, 1955: 403-417
[64] Clark JD, Kleindienst MR. The Stone Age cultural sequence: terminology, typology, and raw material[A]. In: Clark JD (Ed.). Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site, Vol 2[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974: 71-106
[65] Willoughby PR. Spheroids and Battered Stones in the African Early Stone Age[M]. Oxford: BAR International Series 321, 1987
[66] Sahnouni M, Schick K, Toth N. An Experimental Investigation into the Nature of Faceted Limestone “Spheroids” in the Early Palaeolithic[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1997, 24:701-713
[67] Jones PR. Results of experimental work in relation to the stone industries of Olduvai Gorge[A]. In: Leakey MD, Roe DA (Eds.). Olduvai Gorge. Volume 5. Excavations in Beds III, IV and the Masek Beds, 1968-1971[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 254-298
[68] Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G, Melamed Y, et al. Nuts, nut cracking, and pitted stones at Gesher Benot Ya´aqov, Israel[J]. PNAS, 2002, 99(4):2455-2460
[69] Kleindienst MR, Keller CM. Towards a functional analysis of handaxes and cleavers: the evidence from Eastern Africa[J]. Man, 1976, 11(2):176-187
[70] Shen C, Wang S. A preliminary study of the anvil-chipping technique: experiments and evaluations[J]. Lithic Technology, 2000, 25(2):81-100
[71] de la Torre I, Mora R, Arroyo A, et al. Acheulean technological behaviour in the Middle Pleistocene landscape of Mieso (East-Central Ethiopia)[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 76:1-25
[72] Villa P. Conjoinable Pieces and Site Formation Processes[J]. American Antiquity, 1982, 47(2):276-290
[73] Deschamps M, Zilhão J. Assessing site formation and assemblage integrity through stone tool refitting at Gruta da Oliveira (Almonda karst system, Torres Novas, Portugal): A Middle Paleolithic case study[J]. Plos One, 2018, 13(2):e0192423
[74] Blumenschine RJ, Masao FT, Tactikos J C, et al. Effects of distance from stone source on landscape-scale variation in Oldowan artifact assemblages in the Paleo-Olduvai Basin, Tanzania[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35:76-86
[75] Pei WC. Paleolithic Industries in China[A]. In: MacCurdy GG (Ed.). Early Man[M]. Philadephia: J. B. Lippincott, 1937, 221-232
[76] Pei WC. Preliminary study on a new Paleolithic station known as locality 15 within the Choukoutien region[J]. Bull. Geol. S China, 1939, 19(2):147-187
[77] 张森水. 中国旧石器文化[M]. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 1987
[78] 张森水. 丁村54:100地点石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(3):195-213
[79] 李炎贤. 关于砾石石器分类的一些问题[A].见: 封开县博物馆,等(编).纪念黄岩洞遗址发现三十周年论文集[C]. 广州: 广东旅游出版社, 1991, 147-153
[80] 王幼平. 石器研究–旧石器时代考古方法初探[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006
[81] 卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2):85-96
[82] 卫奇. 石制品观测格式探讨[A].见: 邓涛,王原(主编).第八届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2002, 209-218
[83] 裴树文. 旧石器时代石制品室内观测项目探讨[A].见: 董为(主编).第十四届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014, 181-194
[84] 黄慰文. 东亚和东南亚旧石器初期重型工具的类型学——评Movius的分类体系[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(4):297-304
[85] 裴树文. 奥杜威工业石制品分类综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3):329-342
文章导航

/