研究论文

鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦河第10地点初步研究

  • 刘扬 ,
  • 杨俊刚 ,
  • 包蕾 ,
  • 邱维理 ,
  • 侯亚梅 ,
  • 尹春雷
展开
  • 1.中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广州 510275
    2.鄂尔多斯市文物考古研究院,鄂尔多斯 017200
    3.北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875
    4.中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
刘扬(1985- ),男,湖南郴州人,中山大学人类学系副教授,主要从事旧石器考古研究。Email: liuyang_ivpp@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-02-16

  修回日期: 2019-09-11

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-17

基金资助

国家社会科学基金(19FKGB003);中山大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(19wkpy75)

A preliminary research of the Locality 10 of Wulanmulun River in Ordos, Inner Mongolia

  • Yang LIU ,
  • Jungang YANG ,
  • Lei BAO ,
  • Weili QIU ,
  • Yamei HOU ,
  • Chunlei YIN
Expand
  • 1. Anthropolgy Department, School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yet-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275
    2. Ordos Antiquity & Archaeology Institution, Ordos 017200
    3. School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    4. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044

Received date: 2019-02-16

  Revised date: 2019-09-11

  Online published: 2021-08-17

摘要

第10地点是目前乌兰木伦河流域调查发现的唯一一处保留有地层的地点,其东南距乌兰木伦遗址约9.3 km。该地点于2013-2014年进行了试掘,出土789件石质标本,其中人工制品356件。石制品大部分存在一定程度的磨蚀。原料主要为石英岩,此外还有少量的石英和燧石,它们均来源于附近老第三纪基岩砾石层。类型有石核(36%)、石片(25%)、工具(4%)和断块(35%)。其中,工具类型包括锯齿刃器、刮削器、凹缺器和带铤石镞等;毛坯以片状为主,大部分可分辨出石片特征;均采用锤击法修理。初步判断该地点地层堆积性质为二次埋藏。

本文引用格式

刘扬 , 杨俊刚 , 包蕾 , 邱维理 , 侯亚梅 , 尹春雷 . 鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦河第10地点初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2021 , 40(04) : 568 -574 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2019.0070

Abstract

The Locality 10 of Wulanmulun River is the only one that has culture layers in all of the localities of the Wulanmulun River. It is far away Wulanmulun site about 9 kilometers. From the test excavation at the locality in 2013-2014, 789 specimen have been found in 3 excavation areas, included 356 stone artifacts. There are cores, flakes, tools and chunks. The tools appear with denticulates, scrapers, notches and tanged points. The raw material are mainly quartzite, and a little quartz and chert, which are normally seen from the bedrock of the old river. Considering of the cultural features and contrast with Wulanmulun site, it belongs to the late middle Paleolithic period.

参考文献

[1] 杨俊刚, 刘扬. 鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦河上游2011年考古调查发现的石制品[A].见: 董为(主编).第十四届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014: 235-246
[2] 卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 19(2):85-96
[3] 刘扬, 侯亚梅, 杨泽蒙. 鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦遗址的工具类型与修理技术初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(2):77-88
[4] Rui X, Zhang JF, Hou YM, et al. Feldspar multi-elevated-temperature post-IR IRSL dating of the Wulanmulun Paleolithic site and its implication[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2015, 30:438-444
[5] 张森水. 内蒙中南部和山西西北部新发现的旧石器[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1959(1):31-40
[6] 侯亚梅, 王志浩, 杨泽蒙, 等. 内蒙古鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦遗址2010年1期试掘及其意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2012, 32(2):178-187
[7] 王志浩, 侯亚梅, 杨泽蒙, 等. 内蒙古鄂尔多斯市乌兰木伦旧石器时代中期遗址[J]. 考古, 2012(7):3-13
[8] 黄慰文, 侯亚梅. 萨拉乌苏遗址的新材料:范家沟湾1980年出土的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2003, 22(4):309-320
[9] 宁夏文物考古研究所. 水洞沟-1980年发掘报告[M].科学出版社, 2003
[10] 刘扬. 鄂尔多斯乌兰木伦遗址发现的带铤石镞及其对现代人迁徙研究的启示[N]. 中国文物报, 2013-11-8(6)
[11] Lee YW. Projectile point and their implications[J]. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2010, 38(3):41-49
[12] Garcea EA. Successes and failures of human dispersals from North Africa[J]. Quaternary International, 2012, 270:119-128
[13] Haslama M, Clarkson C, Roberts RG, et al. A southern Indian Middle Palaeolithic occupation surface sealed by the 74 ka Toba eruption: Further evidence from Jwalapuram Locality 22[J]. Quaternary International, 2011, 258:148-164
[14] Derevianko AP. Three Scenarios of the Uiddle to Upper Paleolithic transition: Scenario 1: The Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition in Northern Asia Archaeology[J]. Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 2010, 38(3):2-32
[15] Derevanko PA. The Paleolithic of Siberia: New Discoveries and Interpretations[M]. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1998
[16] Seong C. Tanged points, microblades and Late Palaeolithic hunting in Korea[J]. Antiquity, 2008, 82:871-883
文章导航

/