综述

从石制品技术特征视角探讨史前狩猎采集者的流动性

  • 赵潮
展开
  • 陕西师范大学历史文化学院,西安 710119
赵潮,讲师,主要从事史前考古研究。E-mail: chaozhao@snnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2020-08-10

  修回日期: 2020-12-02

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-13

基金资助

中华文明根系研究(XKZDJC202006);国家社科基金项目(16BKG004)

Investigating the mobility pattern of prehistoric hunter-gatherers based on the analysis of their lithic technology characteristics

  • Chao ZHAO
Expand
  • School of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119

Received date: 2020-08-10

  Revised date: 2020-12-02

  Online published: 2022-04-13

摘要

流动采食是狩猎采集者适应环境,获取生存资源的重要策略。对不同时空范围内狩猎采集群体的流动性具体特征进行探讨,有利于我们更加深入全面地理解史前狩猎采集者的人地互动模式、文化演进、社会转型等重要问题。本文以石制品技术组织理论为视角,结合相关研究案例,探讨如何通过分析考古出土的石制品特征,推断史前狩猎采集者不同形态特征的流动性策略,并讨论了通过石制品视角推断流动性特征的局限性及所需注意的事项。

本文引用格式

赵潮 . 从石制品技术特征视角探讨史前狩猎采集者的流动性[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(02) : 370 -380 . DOI: 10.16359/j.cnki.cn11-1963/q.2020.0082

Abstract

Mobility is the key strategy for hunter-gatherers to adapt their environments and extract resources. An investigation of the specific mobility patterns of hunter-gatherers can help us get comprehensive understanding of the issues like their cultural evolution, social transitions, and interaction with environment. Based on the perspectives of technological organization and the reference of the relevant case studies, this paper aims to reveal how to investigate specific patterns of mobility from the features of lithic remains. It indicates that while the design and production of lithic tools can well indicate the degrees of mobility, the lithic assemblages across different sites within settlement system can reflect the organizational structure of mobility. Specific attentions shall be paid to avoid the “equifinality problems” when we use lithics to infer mobility pattern, and the integration with other kind of evidence, such as dwelling structures, settlement pattern, and fauna and flora remains, is highly advocated to reconstruct mobility patterns of prehistoric hunter-gatherers.

参考文献

[1] Kelly RL. The Lifeways of Hunter-Gatherers: The Foraging Spectrum (Second edition)[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015
[2] Banard H, Wendrich W. The Archaeology of Mobility: Old World and New World Nomadism[M]. Cotsen advanced seminars 4, University of California, Los Angeles, 2008
[3] 陈胜前. 史前的现代化——中国农业起源过程的文化生态考察[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013, 32-34
[4] Sellet F, Greaves R, Yu PL. Archaeology and Ethnoarchaeology of Mobility[M]. University Press of Florida, 2006
[5] Chen SQ, Yu PL. Intensified foraging and the roots of farming in China[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 2017, 73(2):149-180
[6] Kelly RL. Hunter-gatherer mobility strategies[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1983, 39(3):277-306
[7] Torrence R. Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology[A]. Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory- A European Perspective[C]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983, 11-22
[8] Binford LR. Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: Hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation[J]. American Antiquity, 1980, 45:4-20
[9] Nelson MC. The study of technological organization[J]. Archaeological Method and Theory, 1991, 3:57-100
[10] Bleed P. The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability[J]. American Antiquity, 1986, 51(4):737-747
[11] Shott M. Technological organization and settlement mobility: An ethnographic examination[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1986, 42(1):15-51
[12] Kuhn SL. A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits[J]. American Antiquity, 1994, 59(3):426-442
[13] Ebert JI. An ethnoarchaeological approach to reassessing the meaning of variability in stone tool assemblages[A]. Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology[C]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979, 59-74
[14] Kelly RL. The three sides of a biface[J]. American Antiquity, 1988, 53(4):717-734
[15] Parry WJ, Kelly RL. Expedient core technology and sedentism[A]. The Organization of Core Technology[C]. Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1987: 285-304
[16] 陈淳. 几何形细石器和细石叶的打制及用途[J]. 文物季刊, 1984(4):72-78
[17] Elston RG, Brantingham PJ. Microlithic technology in Northern Asia: A risk-minimizing strategy of the Late Paleolithic and Early Holocene[J]. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2002, 12(1):103-116
[18] 陈胜前. 细石叶工艺的起源——一个生态与理论的视角[J]. 考古学研究, 2008: 244-264
[19] Graf KE. Hunter-gatherer dispersals in the mammoth-steppe: technological provisioning and land-use in the Enisei River valley, south-central Siberia[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(1):210-223
[20] Cowan FL. Making sense of flake scatters: Lithic technological strategies and mobility[J]. American Antiquity, 1999, 64(4):593-607
[21] Binford LR. The archaeology of place[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1982, 1(1):5-31
[22] Janz L, Odsuren D, Bukhchuluun D. Transitions in paleoecology and technology: Hunter-gatherers and early herders in the Gobi Desert[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2017, 30(1):1-80
[23] Kuhn SL. On planning and curated technologies in the Middle Paleolithic[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1992, 48(3):185-214
[24] Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 1979, 35(3):255-273
[25] Andrefsky W. Raw-material availability and organization of technology[J]. American Antiquity, 1994, 59(1):21-34
[26] Bamforth DB. Technological efficiency and tool curation[J]. American Antiquity, 1986, 51(1):38-50
[27] 王幼平. 中国远古人类文化的源流[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 204-291
[28] 王幼平. 嵩山东南麓MIS3阶段古人类的栖居形态及相关问题[J]. 考古学研究, 2013: 287-296
[29] Rocek TR, Bar-Yosef O. Seasonality and Sedentism: Archaeological Perspectives from Old and New World Sites[M]. Peabody Museum Bulletin 6, Harvard University, 1998
[30] Goebel T. Pleistocene human colonization of Siberia and peopling of the Americas: An ecological approach[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 1999, 8(6):208-227
文章导航

/