研究论文

河南新郑望京楼遗址出土的动物骨骼及其反映的家养动物的差异化

  • 尤悦 ,
  • 陈相龙 ,
  • 余翀 ,
  • 戴玲玲 ,
  • 柴小羽 ,
  • 吴倩
展开
  • 1.首都师范大学历史学院,北京 100048
    2.中国社会科学院考古研究所,北京 100710
    3.中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广州 510275
    4.辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院,大连 116029
    5.郑州嵩山文明研究院,郑州 450000
    6.郑州市文物考古研究院,郑州 450052
尤悦,副教授,主要从事动物考古研究。E-mail: youyue09@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2020-12-01

  修回日期: 2021-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-16

基金资助

国家社科基金青年项目(16CKG021);北京市教委人文社会科学研究计划一般项目(SM201810028002)

Animal skeletons unearthed from the Wangjinglou site in Xinzheng, Henan province and their differentiation of domestic animals

  • Yue YOU ,
  • Xianglong CHEN ,
  • Chong YU ,
  • Lingling DAI ,
  • Xiaoyu CHAI ,
  • Qian WU
Expand
  • 1. School of History, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
    2. The Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 100710, China
    3. School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275, China
    4. School of History, Culture and Tourism, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029
    5. Zhengzhou Institute of Mount Songshan Civilization, Zhengzhou 450000, China
    6. Zhengzhou Provincial Cultural Relics and Archaeology Research Institute, Zhengzhou 450052, China

Received date: 2020-12-01

  Revised date: 2021-04-08

  Online published: 2022-06-16

摘要

聚落考古研究表明,二里头文化时期(1750~1530 BC)中原腹地出现了都邑和大、中、小型四级聚落系统,东亚地区由此进入了早期广域王权国家时代。二里头文化时期的生业经济研究对于理解中华文明形成与早期发展过程中的关键时期的社会变革与文化演进的骤然提速具有重要意义。家养动物及其副产品的开发和利用、管理和分配是生业经济研究和社会复杂化发展的重要内容。在以往研究中,尽管学界已对二里头文化时期的核心都邑二里头遗址和若干中小型聚落遗址开展了多项动物考古学研究,但是针对大型聚落的系统分析较少。鉴于此,本文以河南省新郑市望京楼遗址发掘出土的动物骨骼为研究对象,通过种属鉴定、数量统计、测量数据分析、死亡年龄推算等方法,尝试探讨居于大型聚落的先民对动物资源的消费和利用。结果显示,该遗址的家养动物有猪、黄牛、绵羊、山羊和狗,家养动物数量占多数。遗址的猪多数为未成年个体,说明肉食消费是遗址先民养猪的主要目的;绵羊多数为成年个体,说明获取羊毛是遗址先民养羊的主要目的。通过与二里头、南洼、煤山和皂角树等其他等级聚落遗址的比较可知,早期国家的都邑和大中型聚落的家养动物的种类更丰富,绵羊的数量比例随聚落等级的降低而减少,绵羊的身体尺寸随聚落等级的降低而变小,以获取羊毛为主要目的养羊业更容易在高等级聚落中出现。这一研究揭示了早期国家大型聚落和国家内部不同等级聚落开发利用动物资源的特点和差异,为从动物考古的角度探讨早期社会复杂化提供了可能性。

本文引用格式

尤悦 , 陈相龙 , 余翀 , 戴玲玲 , 柴小羽 , 吴倩 . 河南新郑望京楼遗址出土的动物骨骼及其反映的家养动物的差异化[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(03) : 406 -418 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0054

Abstract

Settlement archaeology research has shown that the earliest ancient Chinese state was formed during the Erlitou culture period (1735-1530 BC) in the Central Plain. The exploitation, management, and distribution of primary and secondary products from domestic animals during this key period are important issues in zooarchaeological research. Although some research has been conducted on materials from the central capital, middle settlements, and small settlements, there remains a gap in our understanding of animal exploitations in large settlements. In this paper, our research on the animal bone assemblage at the Wangjinglou site explores the consumption and exploitation of animal resources by commoners living in the city during the Erlitou period. Our analysis includes the taxonomic identification and statistical comparison of species frequency; calculations and comparisons of metric data for sheep, estimations of age at death of pigs and sheep; and evaluations of possible animal exploitation strategies for meat and secondary products such as wool. Domestic animals, such as pigs and cattle, were dominant species in the faunal assemblage, while wild animals, mainly deer, were small in number. Moreover, estimation of age at death indicates that pigs were raised for specialized meat consumption. However, most sheep survived beyond 3-4 years, illustrating that wool production was the main objective of sheep husbandry. Within the multi-tiered settlement hierarchy for the Erlitou state, we compare the species of domestic animals, percentages of sheep among domestic animals by NISP and MNI, distribution values (d) of sheep body sizes calculated using the Logarithmic Size Index (LSI) method, and specializations of sheep husbandry. From this, we infer that the capital, large settlements, and middle settlements had a greater variety of species than small settlements. In addition, at high level settlements, the relative percentage of sheep was greater and the body size was larger than at low level settlements. Moreover, procuring wool was more likely to be the main purpose of sheep husbandry in the capital and large settlements. This research on Wangjinglou reveals the characteristics of the animal economy in large settlements and describes the differentiation of domestic animal exploitation within the multi-tiered settlement hierarchy of the earliest Bronze Age state in ancient China.

参考文献

[1] 袁靖. 中国古代家养动物的动物考古学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2010, 30(2): 298-306
[2] Liu L, Chen X, Lee Y, et al. Settlement Patterns and Development of Social Complexity in the Yiluo Region, North China[J]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 2004, 29: 75-100
[3] 许宏. 从二里头遗址看华夏早期国家的特质[J]. 华夏考古, 2006(3): 39-40
[4] 李志鹏, 江田真毅. 二里头遗址的野生动物资源获取与利用[J]. 南方文物, 2016(3): 162-168
[5] 中国社会科学院考古研究所. 二里头1999-2006[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014: 1316-1373
[6] 杨杰. 二里头遗址出土动物遗骸研究[A].见:中国社会科学院考古研究所.中国早期青铜文化——二里头文化专题研究[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 470-539
[7] 吕鹏, 杨梦菲, 袁靖. 动物遗骸的鉴定和研究[A]. 见:北京大学考古文博学院,河南省文物考古研究所. 登封王城岗考古发现与研究(2002-2005)[M]. 郑州: 大象出版社, 2007: 574-602
[8] 余翀. 动物遗存分析[A].见:韩国河,张继华(主编).郑州大学历史文化遗产保护中心.登封南洼——2004-2006年田野考古报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 788-795
[9] 北京大学震旦古代文明研究中心, 郑州市文物考古研究院. 新密新砦——1999-2000年田野考古发掘报告[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2008: 466-483
[10] 戴玲玲, 李志鹏, 胡耀武, 等. 新砦遗址出土羊的死亡年龄及畜产品开发策略[J]. 考古, 2014(1): 94-103
[11] 洛阳市文物工作队. 洛阳皂角树:1992-1993年洛阳皂角树二里头文化聚落遗址发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 114-119
[12] 尤悦, 袁广阔, 赵雅楠, 等. 河南省临汝县煤山遗址出土动物遗存研究[J]. 南方文物, 2017(3): 165-176
[13] Bradley DG, Magee DA. Genetics and the origins of domestic cattle[A]. Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, et al. Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms[C]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006: 317-328
[14] Zeder MA. The Domestication of Animals[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 2012, 68(2): 161-190
[15] 李志鹏, Brunson K, 戴玲玲. 中原地区新石器时代到青铜时代早期羊毛开发的动物考古学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 149-157
[16] 袁靖, 黄蕴平, 杨梦菲, 等. 公元前2500年-公元前1500年中原地区动物考古学研究[A].见:中国社会科学院考古研究所科技考古中心.科技考古(第二辑)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 12-24
[17] 许宏. 二里头遗址发掘和研究的回顾与思考[J]. 考古, 2004(11): 31-38
[18] 赵海涛. 二里头都邑聚落形态新识[J]. 考古, 2020(8): 109-120
[19] 张继华, 韩国河, 朱君孝. 登封南洼2004-2006年二里头文化聚落发掘简报[J]. 中原文物, 2011(6): 4-19+36
[20] 袁广阔. 临汝煤山遗址1987—1988年发掘报告[J]. 华夏考古, 1991(3): 5-22
[21] 张松林, 吴倩. 新郑望京楼发现二里头文化和二里岗文化城址[J]. 中国文物报, 2011年1月28日
[22] 张国硕. 望京楼夏代城址与昆吾之居[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 33(1): 184-189
[23] 陈国梁. 合与分:聚落考古视角下二里头都邑的兴衰解析[J]. 中原文物, 2019(4): 71-80
[24] 顾万发, 郑州市文物考古研究院. 新郑望京楼:2010—2012 年田野考古发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015
[25] You Y, Wu Q. The uses of domesticated animals at the Early Bronze Age City of Wangjinglou, China[J]. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2021, 31(5): 789-800
[26] Reimer PJ, Austin WEN, Bard E, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0-55 cal kBP)[J]. Radiocarbon, 2020, 62(4): 725-757
[27] Ramsey CB. Oxcal [CP/OL]. https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/OxCal.html, 2020
[28] 伊丽莎白·施密德. 动物骨骼图谱[M]. 译者:李天元. 北京: 中国地质大学出版社, 1992
[29] 西蒙·赫森. 哺乳动物骨骼和牙齿鉴定方法指南[M]. 译者:侯彦峰, 马萧林. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012
[30] 安格拉·冯登德里施. 考古遗址出土动物骨骼测量指南[M]. 译者:马萧林,侯彦峰. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007
[31] Meadow RH. Notes on faunal remains from Mehrgarh, with a focus on cattle (Bos)[A]. In: Allchin B (Ed.). South Asian Archaeology 1981[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984: 34-40
[32] Grant A. The use of tooth wear as a guide to the domestic animals[A]. In: Wilson B, Grigson C, Payne S (Eds.). Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites[C]. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 1982: 91-108
[33] Lemoine X, Zeder MA, Bishop KJ, et al. A new system for computing dentition-based age profiles in Sus scrofa[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 47: 179-193
[34] 李志鹏. 晚商都城羊的消费利用与供应——殷墟出土羊骨的动物考古学研究[J]. 考古, 2011(7): 76-87
[35] Zeder MA. Reconciling rates of long bonefusion and tooth eruption and wear in Sheep (Ovis) and Goat (Capra)[A]. In: Albarella U, Dobney K, Rowley-Conwy P (Eds.). Recent Advances in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones[C]. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2006: 297-312
[36] 马萧林. 灵宝西坡遗址家猪的年龄结构及相关问题[J]. 华夏考古, 2007(1): 55-74
[37] 李志鹏. 殷墟孝民屯遗址出土家猪的死亡年龄与相关问题研究[J]. 江汉考古, 2011(4): 89-96
[38] Payne S. Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: the mandibles from Asvan Kale[J]. Anatolian Studies, 1973, 23: 281-303
[39] Lam YM, Brunson K, Meadow R, et al. Integrating taphonomy into the practice of zooarchaeology in China[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, 211(1-2): 86-90
[40] Sherratt A. The Secondary Exploitation of Animals in the Old World[J]. World Archaeology, 1983, 15(1): 90-104
[41] Zeder MA. Feeding Cities: Specialized Animal Economy in the Ancient Near East[M]. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1991: 28, 34
[42] 赵海涛, 许宏. 中华文明总进程的核心与引领者:二里头文化的历史位置[J]. 南方文物, 2019(2): 57-67
[43] Crabtree PJ. Zooarchaeology and complex societies: some uses of faunal analysis for the study of trade, social status, and ethnicity[J]. Archaeological Method and Theory, 1992, 2: 155-205
[44] 余翀. 对数指数法在动物考古学中的应用——以新石器时代至青铜时代早期的中国黄牛属动物为例[J]. 考古, 2017(11): 112-120
[45] Meadow RH. Harappa excavations 1986-1990: a multidisciplinary approach to third millenium urbanism[M]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1991: 89-106
[46] 高江涛. 新砦遗址与中国古代文明起源问题[J]. 中原文物, 2005(4): 22-27
[47] Saña M, Tornero C. Use of animal fibres during the Neolithisation in the Middle Euphrates Valley: an archaeozoological approach[J]. Paléorient, 2012, 38(1-2): 79-91
文章导航

/