发掘/调查报告

安徽巢湖地区2019年旧石器考古调查的新发现

  • 战世佳 ,
  • 董哲 ,
  • 弋双文 ,
  • 张红艳 ,
  • 李浩 ,
  • 裴树文
展开
  • 1.辽宁师范大学历史文化旅游学院,大连 116081
    2.安徽省文物考古研究所,合肥 230601
    3.南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,南京 210093
    4.中国科学院青藏高原研究所,青藏高原地球系统与资源环境国家重点实验室,北京100101
    5.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    6.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
战世佳,博士,讲师,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。Email: zhanshijia@outlook.com

收稿日期: 2021-03-08

  修回日期: 2021-05-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-13

基金资助

国家社会科学基金青年项目“安徽水阳江流域官山旧石器遗址出土遗物整理与研究”(20CKG001);安徽省创新创业领军人才特殊支持计划

The stone artifacts discovered in the Paleolithic survey in the Chaohu Lake Region, Anhui Province in 2019

  • Shijia ZHAN ,
  • Zhe DONG ,
  • Shuangwen YI ,
  • Hongyan ZHANG ,
  • Hao LI ,
  • Shuwen PEI
Expand
  • 1. School of History, Culture and Tourism, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116081
    2. Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics, Anhui Province, Hefei 230601
    3. School of Geographical and Oceanographical Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093
    4. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Resources and Environment (TPESRE), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    5. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    6. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044

Received date: 2021-03-08

  Revised date: 2021-05-10

  Online published: 2022-10-13

摘要

2019年10月,安徽省文物考古研究所在巢湖地区开展旧石器考古野外调查,新发现16处旧石器地点、1处动物化石地点,并对20世纪80年代发现的望城岗地点群进行复查,共获得石制品939件,动物化石4件。石制品原料以石英岩砾石为主,类型可划分为剥片类、废片类、修理类和砸击品。石核开发利用程度较高,周身自然砾石面占比较低;废片类包括石片、断块和碎片,石片以V型和II型为主,存在一定数量长度大于10 cm的大石片,部分石片保留直接使用痕迹;修理类多为以石片为毛坯,类型以刮削器为主,同时存在少量大型切割工具。根据对张家湾地点OSL年代学测试结果推测,巢湖地区发现旧石器地点的绝对年代不晚于距今12.5万年。这些地点的石器技术的典型特点是早期人类从大型石核上剥取大石片,并以之为毛坯加工重型工具。本次发现对进一步讨论中更新世人类在长江下游地区的石器技术多样性及该地区阿舍利技术大石片存在状况等具有重要学术意义。

本文引用格式

战世佳 , 董哲 , 弋双文 , 张红艳 , 李浩 , 裴树文 . 安徽巢湖地区2019年旧石器考古调查的新发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(05) : 927 -935 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0066

Abstract

This report presents the preliminary results of a Paleolithic survey in the Chaohu Lake Region (CLR), Anhui Province. The investigation was conducted by Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Relics of Anhui Province in 2019, and a total of sixteen new paleolithic localities and one animal fossil locality were discovered. A former Paleolithic site-complex, named Wangchenggang, discovered in 1980’s was also reexamined. Nine hundred and thirty-nine stone artifacts and four pieces of broken animal fossils were found during the investigation. Quartzite dominates the raw materials of stone artifacts and most of them are made on cobbles. Technologically, the stone artifacts can be classified into flaked pieces, detached pieces, retouched pieces and bipolar technique products. The exploitation of free-hand core is high and the ratio of cortex is low. Most of flakes belong to type V and II, with some utilized materials coexistent. There are also some large flakes (L>10 cm) in the assemblage. According to the characteristics of stone artifacts, early human detached large flakes from the large cores and further used them as blanks to manufacture heavy-duty tools. On the basis of Zhangjiawan OSL dating results, The age of these paleolithic localities in the CLR were no later than 125 kaBP. The new discoveries bear great significance for studying early human dispersals, technological diversity and the possibility of Acheulean technology large flake in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

参考文献

[1] 安徽省地矿局区域地质调查队. 安徽省地层志:第四系分册[M]. 合肥: 安徽科学技术出版社, 1985, 12-32
[2] 王心源. 巢湖北山地质考察与区域地质旅游教程[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2007, 27-50
[3] 韩立刚. 安徽巢湖市附近第四纪洞穴堆积[J]. 安徽地质, 1992, 2(2): 68-74
[4] 许春华, 张银运, 陈才弟, 等. 安徽巢县发现的人类枕骨化石和哺乳动物化石[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 202-301
[5] 许春华, 张银运, 方笃生. 安徽巢县人类化石地点的新材料[J]. 人类学学报, 1986, 5(4): 305-310
[6] 方笃生, 韩立刚. 安徽巢湖市钓鱼台发现第四纪哺乳动物化石[J]. 文物研究, 1986, 2: 34-36
[7] 郑龙亭. 安徽巢县猫儿洞的Microtus brandtioides[J]. 文物研究, 1986, 2: 37-38
[8] 郑龙亭. 安徽巢县猫儿洞哺乳动物群[J]. 文物研究, 1988, 4: 35-46
[9] 韩立刚. 巢湖市望城岗旧石器的发现与研究[J]. 文物研究, 1990, 6: 19-35
[10] 方笃生, 韩立刚. 巢湖市望城岗旧石器地点发掘报告[J]. 文物研究, 1993, 8: 80-92
[11] 吴跃东. 巢湖的形成于演变[J]. 上海地质, 2010, 31: 152-156
[12] Leaky MD. Olduvai Gorge, volume 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960-1963[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1971
[13] Isaac GL, Harris JWK, Marshall F. Small is informative: the application of the study of mini-sites and least effort criteria in the interpretation of the Early Pleistocene archaeological record at Koobi Fora, Kenya[A]. In: Proc. Union Internacional de Ciencias Prehistoricas Y Protohistoricas; X Congress[C]. Mexico: Mexico City, 1981, 101-119
[14] 裴树文. 旧石器时代石制品室内观测项目探讨[A]. 见:董为(主编).第十四届中国古脊椎动物学学术年会论文集[C]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2014, 181-194
[15] 裴树文. 奥杜威工业石制品分类综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 329-342
[16] Kleindienst MR. Components of the East African Acheulian assemblage: An analytic approach[A]. In: Mortelmans G (Ed.). Actes du IVe`me Congre`s Panafricain de Pre ?histoire et de l’Etude du Quaternaire, vol 40[C]. Tervuren (Belgique): Muse ?e Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, 1962, 81-105
[17] Toth N. The stone technologies of early hominids at Koobi Fora: An experimental approach[D]. Berkeley: The PhD Dissertation of University of California, 1982, 48-101
[18] 赵其国, 杨浩. 中国南方红土与第四纪环境变迁的初步研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 1995, 2: 107-116
[19] 乔彦松, 郭正堂, 郝振青, 等. 皖南风尘堆积-土壤序列的磁性地层学研究及其古环境意义[J]. 科学通报, 2003, 48(13): 1465-1469
[20] Sharon G. The impact of raw material on Acheulian large flake production[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35(5): 1329-1344
[21] Tixier J. Le Hachereau dans l’Acheule ?n Nord-Africain - Notes Typologi-ques[A]. In: Congre`s pre ? historique de France - Compte-rendu de la XVe` me session - Poitiers-Angouleˆ me[C]. Paris: Bureau de la Socie ? te ? Pre ? historique Française, 1956, 914-923
[22] Sharon G. Large flake Acheulian[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, 223-224: 226-233
[23] Sharon G. Acheulian large flake industries: Technology, chronology, and significance[M]. BAR International Series, 1701. Oxford:Archaeopress, 2007
[24] 雷蕾, 李大伟, 麻晓荣, 等. 阿舍利大石片生产方式与策略研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 183-192
[25] 高星. 中国旧石器时代手斧的特点与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 97-112
[26] Guan Y, Xu XM, Kuman K, et al. The absence of Acheulean: Qiliting Mode 1 site and the Mode 1 occupations in southeast China[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 480: 152-165
[27] Mishra S, Gaillard C, Hertler C, et al. India and Java: Contrasting records, intimate connections[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, (223-224): 265-270
文章导航

/