研究论文

泥河湾盆地板井子晚更新世遗址古人类对动物资源的消费策略

  • 王晓敏 ,
  • 王法岗 ,
  • 陈福友 ,
  • 李锋 ,
  • 高星
展开
  • 1.中国社会科学院考古研究所,北京 100710
    2.河北省文物考古研究院,石家庄 050031
    3.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    4.中国科学院生物演化与环境卓越创新中心,北京 100044
    5.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
王晓敏,助理研究员,主要从事旧石器时代考古遗址的埋藏学研究。E-mail: paleowangxm@foxmail.com

收稿日期: 2021-06-09

  修回日期: 2021-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(41802022);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB26000000);国家重点研发计划(2020YFC1521500)

Exploitation strategy of animal resources by ancient humans at the Late Pleistocene site of Banjingzi, Nihewan basin

  • Xiaomin WANG ,
  • Fagang WANG ,
  • Fuyou CHEN ,
  • Feng LI ,
  • Xing GAO
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Archaeology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100710
    2. Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics, Shijiazhuang 050031
    3. Laboratory for Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of CAS at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    4. CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing 100044
    5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2021-06-09

  Revised date: 2021-08-29

  Online published: 2022-12-19

摘要

本文以泥河湾盆地板井子遗址(约90 kaBP)2015年出土的动物骨骼为材料,通过骨骼表面痕迹分析、骨骼单元出现频率研究及长骨破碎方式的统计,辨识自然作用与人类行为对动物骨骼造成的不同影响,讨论深海氧同位素5阶段(MIS 5)中国北方古人类获取、搬运及处理动物资源的综合性策略。研究结果显示:1)遗址出土的动物遗存为古人类活动所遗留,自然营力对动物骨骼有改造作用,但并未影响我们对古人类行为的辨识;2)古人类在捕获马科动物之后,将其完整地带回了遗址并肢解;3)在处理猎物遗骸时,肌肉和骨髓富集的部位是古人类利用的重点。结合河南许昌灵井遗址的动物遗存研究结果,我们认为,在MIS 5阶段前后,中国北方已经出现了可以高效利用动物资源的人类群体;稳定、充沛的能量来源,或是他们应对北半球中高纬度干旱草原环境气候波动的重要生存策略。

本文引用格式

王晓敏 , 王法岗 , 陈福友 , 李锋 , 高星 . 泥河湾盆地板井子晚更新世遗址古人类对动物资源的消费策略[J]. 人类学学报, 2022 , 41(06) : 1005 -1016 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2021.0085

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed taphonomic analysis of animal remains from the Banjingzi site dating about 90 kaBP, in the Nihewan Basin, North China. The quantification of bone surface modifications, skeletal profiles, and breakage patterns of long bones are presented, indicating strategies of prey acquisition, transportation, and consumption by humans during Marine Isotope Stage 5 in the northern China. The results show that 1) humans were the predominant accumulator of bones in Layer 5 as indicated by the frequency of percussion marks, cut marks and carnivore toothmarks; 2) horses were the dominant prey, with most brought back to the site completely; 3) limb bones (that is, portions with the most flesh and marrow) had the highest frequencies of cutmarks, percussion marks and fragmentation index. Combined with zooarchaeological results from the Lingjing site in Henan Province, we conclude that there were probably regular hunters of large games in steppe environment of North China around MIS5.

参考文献

[1] Rendu W. Hunting behavior and Neanderthal sdaptability in the Late Pleistocene site of Pech-de-l’Azé I[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2010, 37(8): 1798-1810
[2] Discamps E, Jacques J, Francois B. Human choices and environmental constraints: Deciphering the variability of large game procurement: From Mousterian to Aurignacian times (MIS 5-3) in southwestern France[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2011, 30(19-20): 2755-2775
[3] Morin E, Meier J, Guennouni K, et al. New evidence of broader diets for archaic Homo populations in the northwestern Mediterranean[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(3): 9016
[4] Stiner MC. An unshakable Middle Paleolithic? Trends versus conservatism in the predatory niche and their social ramifications[J]. Current Anthropology, 2013, 54: S288-S304
[5] 管清玉, 潘保田, 高红山, 等. 高分辨率黄土剖面记录的末次间冰期东亚季风的不稳定性特征[J]. 中国科学(D辑):地球科学, 2007, 37(1): 86-93
[6] 穆会双, 许清海, 张生瑞, 等. 孢粉资料定量重建泥河湾盆地侯家窑遗址时期的古气候[J]. 第四纪研究, 2015, 35(3): 698-711
[7] 任进成, 李锋, 王晓敏, 等. 河北阳原县板井子旧石器时代遗址2015年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2018(11): 3-14+2
[8] 谢飞, 李珺, 刘连强. 泥河湾旧石器文化[M]. 石家庄: 花山文艺出版社, 2006
[9] Guo YJ, Li B, Zhang JF, et al. Luminescence ages for three ‘Middle Palaeolithic’ sites in the Nihewan Basin, northern China, and their archaeological and palaeoenvironmental implications[J]. Quaternary Research, 2016, 85: 456-470
[10] 王法岗, 李锋. “许家窑人”埋藏地层与时代探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 161-172
[11] Li ZY, Wu XJ, Zhou LP, et al. Late Pleistocene archaic human crania from Xuchang, China[J]. Science, 2017, 355(6328): 969-972
[12] Voorhies M. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an Early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska[M]. Laramie: University of Wyoming, Contributions to Geology Special Paper, No.1, 1969
[13] 牛东伟. 水洞沟遗址第7地点遗址成因与石器技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2014
[14] 任进成, 王法岗, 李锋, 等. 泥河湾盆地板井子旧石器时代遗址的形成过程[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(3): 378-392
[15] Stiner MC. Honor among Thieves: A Zooarchaeological Study of Neandertal Ecology[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994
[16] Binford LR. Faunal Remains from Klasies River Mouth[M]. Orlando: Academic Press, 1984
[17] Lyman RL. Vertebrate Taphonomy[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994
[18] Lyman RL. Bone-density and differential survivorship of fossil classes[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1984, 3(4): 259-299
[19] Lam YM, Pearson OM, Marean CW, et al. Bone density studies in zooarchaeology[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2003, 30: 1701-1708
[20] 张乐. 马鞍山遗址古人类行为的动物考古学研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2008
[21] 王晓敏, 梅惠杰. 于家沟遗址的动物考古学研究[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2019
[22] 张双权. 河南许昌灵井动物群的埋藏学研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2009
[23] 张双权, 李占扬, 张乐, 等. 河南灵井许昌人遗址大型食草类动物的骨骼单元分布[J]. 中国科学(D辑):地球科学, 2012, 42(5): 764-772
[24] Lupo KD, O’connell JF. Cut and tooth mark distributions on large animal bones: Ethnoarchaeological data from the Hadza and their implications for current ideas about early human carnivory[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2002, 29(1): 85-109
[25] Johnson E. The taphonomy of mammoth localities in southeastern Wisconsin[J]. Quaternary International, 2006, 142-143: 58-78
[26] 张双权, 李占扬, 张乐, 等. 河南灵井许昌人遗址动物骨骼表面人工改造痕迹[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(3): 313-326
[27] Norton CJ, Gao X. Hominin-carnivore interactions during the Chinese Early Paleolithic: Taphonomic perspectives from Xujiayao[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 55(1): 164-178
[28] Villa P, Mahieu E. Breakage patterns of human long bones[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1991, 21(1): 27-48
[29] Outram AK, Rowley-Conwy P. Meat and marrow utility indices for horse (Equus)[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1998, 25: 839-849
[30] Diedrich CG. Pathologic historic mining horses from central Europe[J]. Journal of Pathology and Disease Biology, 2017, 1(1): 8-33
[31] Bunn HT. Comparative analysis of modern bone assemblage from a San hunter-gatherer camp in the Kalahari Desert, Botswana, and from a spotted hyena den near Nairobi, Kenya[A]. In: Clutton-Brock J, Grigson C (Eds.). Animals and Archaeology: Hunters and Their Prey[C]. Oxford: BAR International Series No. 163, 1983, 143-148
文章导航

/