南亚次大陆打制石器的发现与研究综述
收稿日期: 2022-07-31
修回日期: 2022-10-19
网络出版日期: 2023-06-13
基金资助
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0601);中国科学院A类战略性先导科技专项“泛第三极环境变化与绿色丝绸之路建设”(XDA2004010102);国家自然科学基金(42072033);国家社会科学基金中国历史研究院重大历史研究专项“现代中国人起源;演化与适应模式研究”(21@WTK001)
Discovery and research review of knapped lithics of the South Asian subcontinent
Received date: 2022-07-31
Revised date: 2022-10-19
Online published: 2023-06-13
杨紫衣 , 靳英帅 , 王社江 , 张晓凌 . 南亚次大陆打制石器的发现与研究综述[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(03) : 398 -411 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0019
The South Asian subcontinent, located south of the Eurasian continent and adjacent to East Asia, has a close relationship with Southeast Asia and China. It has long been a critical pivot of eastern and western Eurasia playing a unique and irreplaceable role in cultural communication and technology diffusion. In this paper, we clarify the research history, chronology and technology of knapped lithics from the South Asian subcontinent, in order to offer more information for further work.
Traces of ancient humans first appeared in the Early Paleolithic, and numerous lithics of different technological characteristics have been discovered since 1863, when Foote RB collected the first hand-axe in Madras, southeast India. Due to some historical reasons, however, there are three main problems in Paleolithic research of the South Asian subcontinent. First, only a few sites have been excavated, with most findings on the surface, which has led to controversies such as the identity of the Soan culture and its relationship to the Acheulian. Second, both the lack and uncertainty of dating data makes the chronology somewhat questionable and thus ambiguous for each stage of the Paleolithic. Third, despite the efforts of several generations of scholars, most archaeological reports of the subcontinent are still scarce, and many lack clear photographs or 3D models for researchers who do not have access to these important materials.
Various lithic technologies are recognized in the South Asian continent. Core-flake technology, including pebble tool and flake tool assemblages from the Early Pleistocene to the Holocene. This is a unique phenomenon because pebble tools such as chopper-chopping tools decrease and finally disappear with the rise of more complicated technologies in most cases. The Acheulian, Mousterian, blade, and geometric microlithic technologies are similar to those in western Eurasian, respectively. Large cutting tools such as hand-axes, cleavers and picks predominate in the Early Pleistocene, whereas geometric microliths are also widely distributed in Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene. Mousterian and blade products are not as common, which might hint at a different role that the subcontinent plays in human dispersal and communication in the early Late Pleistocene. Microblade products, such as minute blades(microblades) and specially prepared microblade cores, might come from East Asia where these products are large in quantity, mature in technique, and clear and complete in a developing sequence.
Key words: Paleolithic; Lithics; Typology; Technology; South Asian subcontinent
[1] | Petraglia MD, Allchin B. Human evolution and culture change in the Indian subcontinent[A]. In:The Evolution and History Populations in South Asia[C]. The Netherlands: Springer, 2007, 1-20 |
[2] | 全洪涛. 古代“南丝路”经济文化探究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2015 |
[3] | Foote RB. The Foote collection of Indian Prehistoric and Protohistoric antiquities[M]. Chennai, Madras Government Museum, 1914 |
[4] | Logan AC. Old Chipped Stones of India[M]. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and co, 1906 |
[5] | Brown JA. On some small highly specialized forms of stone implements found in Asia, North Africa and Europe[J]. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1899, 18: 134-139 |
[6] | Cammiade LA, Burkitt MC. Fresh light on the stone ages in Southeast India[J]. Antiquity, 1930, 4(15): 327-339 |
[7] | Todd KRU. Palaeolithic industries of Bombay[J]. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 1939, 59: 257-272 |
[8] | de Terra H, Paterson TT. Studies on The Ice Age in India and Associated Human cultures[M]. Washington DC: The Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1939 |
[9] | de Terra H. Joint geological and prehistoric studies of the late Cenozoic in India[J]. Science, 1936, 83: 233-236 |
[10] | Movius HL. The Lower Palaeolithic Cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia[J]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, 1948, 38(4): 329-420 |
[11] | Hou YM R. Potts, Yuan BY, et al. Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like Stone Technology of the Bose Basin, South China[J]. Science, 2000, 287(5458): 1622-1626 |
[12] | Li H, Li CR, Kuman K, et al. The Middle Pleistocene handaxe site of Shuangshu in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 52: 391-409 |
[13] | Wang SJ. Perspectives on Hominid Behaviour and Settlement Patterns: A Study of the Lower Palaeolithic Sites in the Luonan Basin, China[M]. Oxford:BAR International Series 1406, 2005 |
[14] | 四川省文物考古研究院, 北京大学考古文博学院. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14 |
[15] | Peng F, Lin SC, Patania I, et al. A chronological model for the Late Paleolithic at Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China[J]. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(5): e0232682 |
[16] | Li F, Kuhn SL, Chen F, et al. The easternmost Middle Paleolithic (Mousterian) from Jinsitai Cave, North China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 114: 76-84 |
[17] | Zwyns N, Lbova LV. The Initial Upper Paleolithic of Kamenka site, Zabaikal region (Siberia): A closer look at the blade technology[J]. Archaeological Research in Asia, 2019, 17: 24-49 |
[18] | Li F, Vanwezer N, Boivin N, et al. Heading north: Late Pleistocene environments and human dispersals in central and eastern Asia[J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14: e0216433 |
[19] | James HVA, Petraglia MD. Modern human origins and the evolution of behavior in the later Pleistocene record of South Asia[J]. Current Anthropology, 2005, 46: 3-27 |
[20] | Field JS, Petraglia MD, Mirazón Lahr M. The southern dispersal hypothesis and the South Asian archaeological record: Examination of dispersal routes through GIS analysis[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2007, 26: 88-103 |
[21] | Zhang XL, Ha BB, Wang S, et al. The earliest human occupation of the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 thousand to 30 thousand years ago[J]. Science, 2018, 362(6418): 1049-1051 |
[22] | Chen F, Welker F, Shen CC, et al. A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature, 2019, 569: 409-412 |
[23] | Zhang DD, Bennett MR, Cheng H, et al. Earliest parietal art: hominin hand and foot traces from the middle Pleistocene of Tibet[J]. Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(24): 2506-2515 |
[24] | 霍巍. 论青藏高原古代各族人民共同开创了“高原丝绸之路”[J]. 中央民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2021, 2: 5-15 |
[25] | Hazarika M. Tracing post-Pleistocene human movements and cultural connections of the eastern Himalayan region with the Tibetan plateau[J]. Archaeological Research in Asia, 2016, 5: 44-53 |
[26] | Chakrabarti DK. India: An Archaeological History-Paleolithic Beginnings to Early Historic Foundations[M]. Oxford University Press. 2010 |
[27] | Bordes F. Typologie du Paldolithique Ancienet Moyen[m]. Delmas, Bordeaux, 1961 |
[28] | Subbarao B. The Personality of India[M]. Baroda: Maharaja Sayajirao University, 1958 |
[29] | Sankalia HD. Prehistory and Protohistory of India and Pakistan[M]. Poona: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 1974 |
[30] | Kenndy K. God-Apes and Fossil Men: Paleoanthropology of South Asia[M]. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2000, 137-171 |
[31] | Korisettar R. Antiquity of Modern Humans and Behavioral Modernity in the Indian Subcontinen: Implications of the Jwalapuram Evidence[A].Tokyo Conference 2011 Volume: Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 80-93 |
[32] | Chauhan PR. Human evolution in the center of the old world: An updated review of the South Asian Paleolithic[A]. In: Pleistocene Archaeology-Migration, Technology, and Adaptation[C]. London: Intechopen, 2020, 35-59 |
[33] | Chauhan PR, Ozarkar S, Kulkarni S. Genes, Stone Tools, and Modern Human Dispersals in the Center of the Old World[A]. Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. Texas: A&M University Press, 2014 |
[34] | Blinkhorn J, Achyuthan H, Petraglia M, et al. Middle Palaeolithic occupation in the Thar Desert during the Upper Pleistocene: the signature of a modern human exit out of Africa?[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2017, 77: 233-238 |
[35] | Akhilesh K, Pappu S, Rajapara HM, et al. Early Middle Palaeolithic culture in India around 385-172 ka reframes out of Africa models[J]. Nature, 2018(54):97-101 |
[36] | Dennell R. The Paleolithic Settlement of Aisa[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2012 |
[37] | Clark G. World Prehistory:In New Perspective (3rd Edtion)[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977 |
[38] | Jayaswal V. Early Iron Age in Middle Ganga Plain:Some observations & inquiries[A]. In: Early Iron Age in South Asia[C]. Beau Bassin:Lap LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2009, 10-35 |
[39] | James HVA. Becoming Human: The Emergence of Modern Human Behaviour in South Asia[D]. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2009 |
[40] | Mishra S. The Indian Lower Palaeolithic[J]. Bulletin of Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute, 2007, (66-67): 47-94 |
[41] | Johansen L, D Stapert. Handaxes from Denmark: Neandertal tools or ‘vicious flints’?[J]. Palaeohistoria, 1996, 37: 1-22 |
[42] | Shea JJ. Lithic archaeology, or, what stone tools can (and can’t) tell us about early hominin diet[A]. In: Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable[C]. Cary: Oxford University Press, 2006, 212-229 |
[43] | Dennell RW, Rendell HM, Hailwood E. Early tool making in Asia: two million year old artefacts in Pakistan[J]. Antiquity, 1988, 62: 98-106 |
[44] | Chauhan PR. Core-and-flake assemblages of Central and Penisular India[A]. In: Asian Paleoanthropology: from Africa to China and beyond[C]. New York: Springer, 2010, 113-128 |
[45] | Bain WK, Bezbaruah D. Understanding Soanian occurrences at Bam locality of Siwalik frontal range, north-western India[J]. Anthropological Science, 2021, 1: 1-16 |
[46] | Chauhan PR. Soanian lithic occurrences and raw material exploitation in the Siwalik Frontal Zone, northern India: a geoarchaeological perspective[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2008, 5: 591-614 |
[47] | Stiles D, Hay R, Neil J’O. The MNK Chert factory site, Olduvai gorge, Tanzania[J]. World Archaeology, 1974, 5: 285-308 |
[48] | Lycett SJ. Is the Soanian techno-complex a Mode 1 or Mode 3 phenomenon? A morphometric assessment[J]. Journal of Journal of Archaeological Science, 2007, 34: 1434-1440 |
[49] | Fairservis WA. The roots of ancient India[M]. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1975 |
[50] | Mohapatra GC. Soanian-Acheulian relationship[J]. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, 1990, 49: 1-26 |
[51] | Gaillard C, Dambricourt Malasse. The main human occupation phases in western Himalayas borderland[J]. L’anthropologie, 2008, 112: 404-422 |
[52] | Khatri AP. ‘Mahadevian’: An Oldowan Pebble Culture of India[J]. Asian Perspectives, 1963, 6(1-2): 186-197 |
[53] | Clark JD, Kleindienst MR. The Stone Age cultural sequence: Terminology, typology and raw material[A]. In: Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site III: The Earlier Cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 34-65 |
[54] | Sharon G. Large flake Acheulian[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, 223(23): 226-233 |
[55] | Misra VN. Stone age research in Rajasthan[A]. In: Studies in prehistory-Robert Foote memoir[C]. Calcutta: Firma KL Mukhopadhyay. 1966:122-130 |
[56] | Pappu S. The Lower Paleolithic culture of India[A]. In: Recent Studies in Indian Archaeology[C]. Delhi: Munshiram Manharlal Publishers, 2002, 17-59 |
[57] | Pappu S. Acheulian Culture in Peninsular India: An Ecological Perspective[M]. New Delhi: D.K. Printwood. 2001 |
[58] | Shipton C. Empirical Differences between the Earlier and Later Acheulian in India[A]. In: Recent Advances in Acheulian Culture Studies in India[C]. Pune: Indian Society for Prehistory and Quaternary Studies, 2014, 23-36 |
[59] | Mishra S. The Lower Palaeolithic in South Asia[A]. In: Origin of Settlements and Chronology of the Palaeolithic Cultures in Southeast Asia[C]. 1998, 73-91 |
[60] | Pappu S, Gunnell Y, Akhilesh K, et al. Early Pleistocene presence of Acheulian hominins in South India[J]. Science, 2011 |
[61] | Mishra S, Venkatesan TR, Rajaguru SN, et al. Earliest Acheulian industry from Peninsular India[J]. Current Anthropology, 1995, 36(5): 847-851 |
[62] | Jangra B, Deo SG, Rajaguru SN, et al. Analyzing and contextualizing the lithic assemblage from the Acheulian site at Bori, Pune District, Maharashtra[J]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology, 2018, 6: 109-128 |
[63] | Haslam M, Roberts RG, Shipton C, et al. Late Acheulean hominins at the Marine Isotope Stage 6/5e transition in north-central India[J]. Quaternary Research, 2011, 3: 670-682 |
[64] | Wymer J. The Paleolithic Age[M]. London: Croom Helm, 1982 |
[65] | Richter D, R Grün, Joannes-Boyau R, et al. The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age[J]. Nature, 2017, 546(7657): 293 |
[66] | Todd KRU. Prehistoric man round Bombay[J]. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, 1932, 7: 35-42 |
[67] | Ranere AJ. Human occupation in northwest Pakistan during the Late Pleistocene[A]. In: Anthropology in Pakistan. Recent Socio-Cultural and archaeological perspectives[C]. New York: Cornell University Press, 1982, 124-144 |
[68] | Anil D, Chauhan N, Ajithprasad P, et al. An early presence of Modern human or convergent evolution? A 247 ka Middle Paleolithic assemblage from Andhra Pradesh, India[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2022, 45(2): 103565 |
[69] | Blinkhorn J, Petraglia MD. Environments and cultural change in the Indian subcontinent: implications for the dispersal of Homo sapiens in the Late Pleistocene[J]. Current Anthropology, 2017, S17: 463-479 |
[70] | Blinkhorn J, Ajithprasad P, Mukherjee A, et al. The first directly dated evidence for Palaeolithic occupation on the Indian coast at Sandhav, Kachchh[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2019, 224: 105975 |
[71] | Mishra S, Chauhan N, Singhvi A. Continuity of microblade technology in the Indian subcontinent since 45 ka: Implications for the dispersal of Modern Humans[J]. PloS One, 2013, 7: 1-14 |
[72] | Clarkson C, Petraglia M, Korisettar R, et al. The oldest and longest enduring microlithic sequence in India: 35,000 years of Modern Human occupation and change at the Jwalapuram locality 9 rockshelter[J]. Antiquity, 2009, 2: 1-23 |
[73] | Corvinus Gudrun. Prehistoric Cultures in Nepal: From the Early Palaeolithic to the Neolithic and the Quaternary Geology of the Dang-deokhuri Dun Valleys[M]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verla, 2007 |
[74] | 李锋. 石叶概念探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(1): 41-50 |
[75] | Clarkson C, Harris C, Li B, et al. Human occupation of northern India spans the Toba super-eruption -74,000 years ago[J]. Nature Communication, 2020, 11: 1-10 |
[76] | Murty M. Recent research on the Upper Palaeolithic phase in India[J]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 1979, 6(3): 301-320 |
[77] | Bar-Yosef O. The Big deal about blades: Laminar technologies and human evolution[J]. American Anthropologist, 1999, 322-338 |
[78] | Agrawal DP, Kusumgar S. Tata Institute Radiocarbon Date List 11[J]. Radiocarbon, 1975, 17(2): 219-225 |
[79] | Dennell R, Rendell H, Halim M, et al. A 45,000-Year-Old Open-Air Paleolithic Site at Riwat, Northern Pakistan[J]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 1992, 19: 17-33 |
[80] | Pargeter J, Shea JJ. Going big versus going small: Lithic miniaturization in hominin lithic technology[J]. News, and Reviews, 2019, 28(2): 72-85 |
[81] | Wedage O, Amano N, Langley MC, et al. Specialized rainforest hunting by Homo sapiens -45,000 years ago[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 1-8 |
[82] | 仪明洁. 细石器研究中几个关键概念的厘定[J]. 考古与文物, 2014, 5: 37-41 |
[83] | 安志敏. 中国细石器发现100年[J]. 考古, 2000, 5: 45-56 |
[84] | Roberts P, Boivin N, Petraglia M. The Sri Lankan ‘Microlithic’ tradition c. 38,000 to 3,000 Years Ago: Tropical technologies and adaptations of Homo sapiens at the southern edge of Asia[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2015, 28(2): 69-112 |
[85] | Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T. Modern Human dispersal and behavior in Paleolithic Asia[A]. In: Emergence and diversity of modern human behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. Texas: A&M University Press, 2014, 535-566 |
[86] | Perera N, Kourampas N, Simpson I, et al. People of the ancient rainforest: The South Asian Microlithic: Homo sapiens dispersal or adaptive response?[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 61: 254-269 |
[87] | Clarkson C, Jones S, Harris C. Continuity and change in the lithic industries of the Jurreru Valley, India, before and after the Toba eruption[J]. Quaternary International, 2012, 258: 165-179 |
[88] | Basak B, Pradeep S. Earliest dates of Microlithic industries (42-25 ka) from West Bengal, Eastern India: New light on Modern Human occupation in the Indian Subcontinent[J]. Asian Perspectives, 2017, 56(2): 237-259 |
[89] | Mendaly S, Hussain S. Microlithic industry of Odisha with particular reference to Bhalugarh, District-Jharsuguda, Odisha: A preliminary report[J]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology, 2015, 3: 346-369 |
[90] | Sosnowaska H. Outline of Mesolithic and Beginnings of Neolithic in India[J]. Analecta Archaeologica Ressoviensia, 2011, 5: 95-139 |
[91] | Mellars P, Gori K C, Carr M, et al. Genetic and archaeological perspectives on the initial modern human colonization of southern Asia[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(26): 10699-10704 |
[92] | Clarkson C, Petraglia MD, Harris C, et al. The south Asian microlithic: Homo sapiens dispersal or adaptive response? [A]. In: Lithic Technological Organization and Paleoenvironmental Change: Global and Diachronic Perspectives[C]. New York: Springer international publishing, 2018, 37-62 |
[93] | Lewis L, Perera N, Petraglia M. First technological comparison of Southern African Howiesons Poort and South Asian microlithic industries: An exploration of inter-regional variability in microlithic assemblages[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 350: 7-25 |
[94] | Bailey G. Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2007, 26: 198-223 |
[95] | 王幼平. 石器技术与早期人类的迁徙扩散[A].见:北京大学考古文博学院、北京大学中国考古学研究中心(编).考古学研究(十一)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020, 9-20 |
[96] | 索朗旺堆, 李永宪, 等编. 阿里地区文物志[M]. 拉萨: 西藏人民出版社, 1993, 11-44 |
[97] | 李锋, 陈福友, 汪英华, 等. 晚更新世晚期中国北方石叶技术所反映的技术扩散与人群迁移[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(7): 891-905 |
[98] | Yi MJ, Gao X, Li F, et al. Rethinking the origin of microblade technology: A chronological and ecological perspective[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 400(2): 130-139 |
[99] | Paddayya K. Stone technology in India[J]. Journal of science communication, 2011, 2: 120-127 |
[100] | Allchin B, Goudie A. Dunes, aridity and early man in Gujarat, Western India[J]. Man, 1971, 6(2): 248-265 |
[101] | 韩芳, 蔡林海, 杜玮, 等. 青南高原登额曲流域的细石叶技术工艺[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(1): 53-69 |
[102] | Zhang XL, Jin YS, He W, et al. A consideration of the spatiotemporal distribution of microblade industries on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 559: 165-173 |
[103] | 盖培, 王国道. 黄河上游拉乙亥中石器时代遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 1: 49-59+116 |
[104] | 王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576 |
/
〈 | 〉 |