研究论文

重庆大水田新石器时代遗址出土人骨的健康状况及葬式

  • 滕逍霄 ,
  • 代玉彪 ,
  • 原海兵 ,
  • 白九江
展开
  • 1.吉林大学考古学院,长春 130012
    2.重庆市文物考古研究院,重庆 400010
    3.四川大学考古科学中心,成都 610041
滕逍霄,博士研究生,主要从事人类骨骼考古研究。E-mail: tengxx_arcedu@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-11-18

  录用日期: 2023-03-14

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-14

基金资助

中华文明探源研究(2020YFC1521607);吉林大学哲学社会科学研究创新团队项目(2022CXTD17);国家社科基金一般项目(19BKG038)

Research on the health condition and burial style of human bones from the Dashuitian Neolithic site in Chongqing

  • Xiaoxiao TENG ,
  • Yubiao DAI ,
  • Haibing YUAN ,
  • Jiujiang BAI
Expand
  • 1. School of Archaeology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012
    2. The Relics and Archaeology Institute of Chongqing, Chongqing 400010
    3. Center for Archaeological Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041

Received date: 2022-11-18

  Accepted date: 2023-03-14

  Online published: 2023-12-14

摘要

大水田遗址是近年三峡地区考古的重要发现,其墓葬出土的数量较多、葬式丰富的人骨材料在长江中上游地区十分罕见。本文立足于该遗址2014年度出土的大溪文化时期的248例人骨材料,研究了该人群的人口特征、健康状况、营养水平、身高和埋葬姿势等,并结合考古背景探讨了生业经济、人地关系和丧葬葬式演变特征等。研究表明,三峡地区史前人群非常适应周边聚落分散、水网密集、野生资源富集的山地环境,当时人们以采集渔猎为主,原始旱作农业为辅,过着安定和平的生活。同时,山地陡坡和相对封闭的地貌制约了当地社会经济的发展,一定程度上影响了人们的生存与健康。该研究为我们考察本区域史前人类与环境的双向互动提供了新的视角。此外,对葬式的考察表明时人在埋葬亡者时对尸身进行了有意识地屈肢陈置,且葬式存在由“屈”向“直”的历时性演变特征。随着大溪文化的衰落,三峡地区屈肢葬式渐次退出历史的舞台。

本文引用格式

滕逍霄 , 代玉彪 , 原海兵 , 白九江 . 重庆大水田新石器时代遗址出土人骨的健康状况及葬式[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(06) : 764 -778 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0047

Abstract

The Dashuitian Neolithic site is an important archaeological discovery in the Three Gorges region dating from 6300-5300 years ago. A large number of human bones with rich burial types are rarely found in this region. Based on the study of 248 human bones excavated from the Dashuitian site in 2014, this paper reveals the demographic characteristics, reproductive risk, health condition, nutritional levels, height and burial systems of the Neolithic inhabitants in the Three Gorges area. Furthermore, the subsistence economy, human-environment relationships and the evolutionary characteristics of burial patterns are discussed.

The number of male is more than female, showing a weak “high sex ratio” phenomenon. The demographic structure of the inhabitants of Dashuitian is more stable than the Daxi site. The living conditions of minors were bad. The mortality rate is very high, especially for infants and young children. Most inhabitants died in middle age. Few people lived to the old age, reflecting the generally low life expectancy of inhabitants. Males have higher mortality rates than females in both middle and prime age, which is related to the heavier manual labor and greater risk of death in productive activities. Males are not found in adolescence, and the female mortality rate is very high during this period. Because women were exposed to greater reproductive risks during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium.

The prevalence of dental caries indicates that the survival strategies were dominated by the use of wildlife, especially aquatic organisms. The production economy was transitioning from hunter-gatherer to agricultural. Dry farming was primitive, with poor production techniques and low levels of sophistication. This transitional productive economy had also caused anaemia. Joint diseases mainly involve the knee, elbow, vertebrae and foot joints. The vertebral and elbow joints in male were severely affected. Male played an important role in agricultural production. Simple cutting tools and slash-and-burn farming methods put a heavy load on the joints. In addition, the mountainous environment was an important factor leading to the high incidence of foot arthritis. The fracture rate is very low, reflecting the stability and peace of the society. Traumatic injuries mostly occurred during daily work. Studies on height have shown that male used to have lower levels of development than female. In general, prehistoric inhabitants in the Three Gorges area had certain adaptability to the mountainous environment with dense water network and abundant wild resources. They made full use of the mountainous resources and adopted the survival strategy of fishing and hunting as the mainstay, supplemented by agriculture. However, due to the special geomorphic features and closure, the agricultural production level was very backward, and people were vulnerable to trauma and diseases in their daily life and production. To some extent, they had non-benign interaction with environment.

In addition, studies on burial styles have shown that people consciously placed the bodies of the dead during burials. Not only did they place the heads mainly toward the east or northeast, but they also bent the lower limbs of the most deceased, and even tied the bodies into the graves with tools such as ropes, vines, and tree bark. The Daxi culture, which is characterized by the flexed burial, had a profound influence on the culture of Central Plains in the past. But at the same time, with the impact of foreign culture, the flexed burial in Daxi culture had undergone a diachronic change from “bending” to “straight”.

参考文献

[1] 重庆市文化遗产研究院, 巫山县文物管理所. 重庆市巫山县大水田遗址大溪文化遗存发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2017, 1: 42-60
[2] 邓晓, 刘晓亮. 重庆巫山大水田遗址中独立“狗坑葬”初探[J]. 三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 41(1): 21-24
[3] 马晓娇, 白九江. 三峡地区大溪文化时期的生业经济:重庆巫山大水田遗址2014年浮选结果分析[J]. 南方文物, 2022, 2: 127-134
[4] 林向. 大溪文化与巫山大溪遗址[A]. 见:中国考古学会(编).中国考古学会第二次年会论文集(1980)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1982, 124-132
[5] 中国大百科全书总编辑委员会《考古学》编辑委员会, 中国大百科全书出版社编辑部. 中国大百科全书·考古学[M]. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1986, 83
[6] 白九江. 重庆地区的新石器文化:以三峡地区为中心[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2010, 22-25
[7] 白九江. 三峡地区大溪文化的边缘效应:廊道效应、互惠交换、在地精神和简单聚落[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 3: 33-38
[8] 国家文物局三峡考古队. 朝天嘴与中堡岛[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2001, 307-311
[9] 王建华, 曹静. 大溪遗址单人墓葬人口自然结构及相关问题研究[J]. 东方考古, 2014, 11: 274-283
[10] 潘其风. 中国古代居民种系分布初探[A]. 见:苏秉琦.考古学文化论集(1)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1987, 221-232
[11] 陈山. 大溪文化居民种族类型初探[A]. 见:徐州博物馆(编).徐州博物馆三十年纪念文集(1960-1990)[C]. 北京: 北京燕山出版社, 1992, 186-199
[12] 朱泓. 体质人类学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004, 17, 92-106, 152-154
[13] White TD, Black MT, Folkens PA. Human Osteology (Third Edition)[M]. Burlington: Elsevier academic press, 2011, 379-426
[14] 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1985, 34-56, 150-158, 174-184
[15] El-Najjar MY. Maize, malaria and the anemias in the pre-columbian New World[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1976, 46: 329-337
[16] Waldron T. Palaeopathology[M]. London: Cambrige University Press, 2009, 27-28
[17] 杜百廉, 张松林, 等. 河南青台原始社会遗址人骨的研究[A]. 见:郑州市文物考古研究所.郑州文物考古与研究(一)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003, 1298-1310
[18] 陈世贤. 法医人类学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1998, 82-93
[19] 公安部课题组. 中国汉族男性长骨推算身高的研究[J]. 刑事技术, 1984, 5: 1-49
[20] 陈世贤. 法医骨学[M]. 北京: 群众出版社, 1980, 226-227
[21] 莫世泰. 华南地区男性成年人由长骨长度推算身长的回归方程一文的更正[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3(3): 295-296
[22] 王永豪, 翁嘉颖, 胡滨成. 中国西南地区男性成年由长骨推算身高的回归方程[J]. 解剖学报, 1979, 10(1): 1-6
[23] 张继宗. 中国汉族女性长骨推断身高的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(4): 302-307
[24] 施杞. 常见骨伤疾病的中医预防和护养[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2013, 76-77
[25] 朱少廷. 躯干骨折与脱位[M]. 南宁: 广西科学技术出版社, 1998, 51
[26] 黄公怡, 刘长贵, 温建民. 现代创伤骨科学[M]. 上海: 第二军医大学出版社, 2007, 367
[27] 张之南, 殷德厚. 贫血[M]. 重庆: 科学技术文献出版社(重庆分社), 1989, 57
[28] 李咏兰, 郑连斌, 宇克莉. 从体质特征看中国南方汉族的人种归属[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(2): 248-259
[29] 徐玖瑾, 杜若甫. 北京与重庆地区成人身高变化的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1985, 4(2): 151-159
[30] 金文俊, 刘红亮. 人口公共管理:理论、政策与思考[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2014, 30
[31] Turner C. Dental anthropological indications of agriculture among the Jomon people of central Japan: X. Peopling of the Pacific[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1979, 51: 619-635
[32] 王明辉. 中原地区古代居民的健康状况:以贾湖遗址和西坡墓地为例[J]. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(1): 51-59
[33] 王一如. 沟湾遗址新石器时代人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015, 25-28, 42-49
[34] 李法军. 河北阳原姜家梁新石器时代人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2004, 160, 203-208
[35] 朱晓汀. 江苏兴化蒋庄良渚文化墓葬人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018, 109-116, 142-143
[36] 赵冬月, 朱泓, 闵锐. 云南宾川白羊村新石器时代遗址人骨研究[J]. 南方文物, 2016, 1: 160-165
[37] 张晓雯. 章丘焦家遗址大汶口文化居民生存状态研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017, 60
[38] 朱晓汀, 林留根, 朱泓. 江苏邳州梁王城遗址大汶口文化墓地出土人骨研究[J]. 东南文化, 2013, 4: 53-64
[39] 赵永生. 甘肃临潭磨沟墓地人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013, 22-33, 59-70
[40] 傅启高. 植酸对单胃动物的抗营养作用[J]. 动物营养学报, 1998, 10(4): 1-10
[41] 郭立新. 论长江中游地区新石器时代晚期的生计经济与人口压力[J]. 华夏考古, 2006, 3: 33-39
[42] 李法军, 王明辉, 朱泓, 等. 鲤鱼墩:一个华南新石器时代遗址的生物考古学研究[M]. 广州: 中山大学出版社, 2013, 222-224
[43] 刘文, 罗安鹄, 朱芳武, 等. 柳州大龙潭鲤鱼嘴新石器时代遗址的人骨[J]. 广西民族研究, 1994, 3: 22-37
[44] 张子模, 漆招进, 朱芳武, 等. 桂林甑皮岩新石器时代遗址的人骨[J]. 广西民族研究, 1994, 3: 1-21
[45] 黄新美, 刘建安. 广东南海县鱿鱼岗新石器时代晚期墓葬人骨[J]. 人类学学报, 1988, 7(2): 102-105
[46] 张德兴, 张文光, 贺新红, 等. 东莞新石器时代“蚝岗人”遗骸的鉴定和保存[J]. 解剖学研究, 2004, 26(1): 58-59
[47] 熊建雪, 郑秀文, 黄翔, 等. 上海柘林遗址良渚文化墓地人骨初步研究[J]. 南方文物, 2020, 6: 238-245
[48] 周亚威, 周贝, 顾万发. 汪沟遗址仰韶文化居民的肢骨特征[J]. 解剖学报, 2020, 51(1): 114-123
[49] 丁长芬. 我国西南地区的屈肢葬俗[J]. 四川文物, 1991, 3: 12-19
文章导航

/