综述

人类颅骨厚度研究的概述与展望

  • 李海军 ,
  • 杨筱雨 ,
  • 赵钰洁
展开
  • 中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京 100081
李海军,副教授,博士生导师,研究方向为体质人类学、骨骼考古学。E-mail: lindavy@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-08-16

  录用日期: 2023-06-08

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-14

基金资助

国家社科基金资助项目(19BKG039);国家社科基金资助项目(19VJX066)

Overview and prospects of research on human cranial thickness

  • Haijun LI ,
  • Xiaoyu YANG ,
  • Yujie ZHAO
Expand
  • School of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081

Received date: 2022-08-16

  Accepted date: 2023-06-08

  Online published: 2023-12-14

摘要

颅骨厚度是重要的解剖学特征,也是常见的测量项目,在体质人类学研究中具有重要意义。目前关于颅骨厚度的研究主要集中在颅骨厚度的年龄与时代变化、人群间和性别间的差异、颅骨厚度的影响因素和与力学性能的关系等几个方面。颅骨厚度的相关研究有助于我们更为全面地了解人类颅骨的形态变异和进化情况。国内对颅骨厚度的关注相对较少,本文通过梳理和归纳已有关于颅骨厚度研究的相关文献数据与结论,对颅骨厚度相关研究进展及其测量方法进行了概述,并对国内颅骨厚度研究作了简要回顾和展望。

关键词: 人类; 颅骨; 厚度

本文引用格式

李海军 , 杨筱雨 , 赵钰洁 . 人类颅骨厚度研究的概述与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2023 , 42(06) : 827 -841 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2023.0068

Abstract

The cranium is the most studied and utilized human skeletal material in physical anthropology. Cranial vault thickness is the distance from the inner surface of the skull to the outside of the skull, and is one of the measured characteristics of the skull. It is of great importance in the study of physical anthropology. At present, the researches on cranial thickness have focused on: age-related and era-related changes, population and gender differences, factors influencing cranial thickness, the effect of skull thickness on the mechanical properties of the skull. The above researches on various aspects of cranial thickness have investigated differences in cranial thickness in different human populations and better understood the factors that contribute to these differences, delving deeper and dispersing the relevant research, and providing a more comprehensive understanding of human cranial variation and evolution.

In the field of medicine, the study of the distribution characteristics of cranial bone thickness and the differences between sexes, ages, and populations can help to improve the correct rate of clinical diagnosis of brain diseases and the success rate of surgery. In the field of forensic anthropology, the thickness characteristics of even fragmented skulls can still provide important information for identification. In the field of archaeology, the distribution characteristics and abnormal changes of cranial thickness can help analyze the type characteristics of deformed crania, the way of applying force and related tools, and provide a basis for the study of social phenomena, cultural behaviors, social relations and other issues.

China’s attention to cranial thickness is relatively late, with fewer thematic studies and a lack of more in-depth research. However, the large number of cranial remains unearthed in China, with a large age span and a wide range of distribution, provide great basic conditions for various studies on cranial thickness.

Overall, this study provides valuable insights into population-specific cranial thickness variations and their potential underlying factors. The findings highlight the complex interplay between genetics, environment, and socio-cultural factors in shaping cranial morphology. Understanding these variations has important implications for forensic anthropology, population genetics, and evolutionary biology. This paper briefly reviews the research on cranial vault thickness variation and the measurement methods of cranial thickness-related parameters by summarizing the research data.

Key words: Human; Skull; Thickness

参考文献

[1] Hakim S, Watkin K, Elahi M, et al. Measurement of cranial bone thickness using A-mode ultrasound[A].Proceedings of the 1997 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society[C]. Piscataway: IEEE, 1997, 2: 613-616
[2] Smith K, Politte D, Reiker G, et al. Automated measurement of pediatric cranial bone thickness and density from clinical computed tomography[J]. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2012, 4462-4465
[3] Boman F, Froment A, Charlier P. Variations in the thickness of the cranial vault in a deformed skull from pre-Hispanic Ancón (Peru)[J]. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d Anthropologie de Paris, 2016, 28(3-4): 1-5
[4] Khonsari RH, Friess M, Nysj? J, et al. Shape and volume of craniofacial cavities in intentional skull deformations[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2013, 151(1): 110-119
[5] Kamnikar KR, Herrmann NP, Pierre MM, et al. Estimating age in juvenile crania using cranial vault thickness(CVT)[J]. American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2016, 198-199
[6] Li HJ, Song Q, Guo JY, et al. Delayed closure of the anterior fontanelle in Iron Age children from Zaghunluq, northwestern China[J]. Anthropologischer Anzeiger: Journal of Biological and Clinical Anthropology. 2023, 80(4): 471-480
[7] Adeloye A, Kattan KR, Silverman FN. Thickness of the normal skull in the American Blacks and Whites[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1975, 43(1): 23-30
[8] Zaichenko AA. Pubertatny? skachok rosta tolshchiny koste? svoda cherepa cheloveka (Pubertal growth spurt in the thickness of the bones of the human cranium)[J]. Arkhiv Anatomii, Gistologii I Embriologii, 1985, 88(5): 81-82
[9] Calderbank T, Morgan B, Rutty GN, et al. An investigation of juvenile cranial thickness-analysis of skull morphometrics across the complete developmental age range[J]. Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging, 2016, 4: 70-75
[10] Anzelmo M, Ventrice F, Barbeito-Andrés J, et al. Ontogenetic changes in cranial vault thickness in a modern sample of Homo sapiens[J]. American Journal of Human Biology, 2015, 27(4): 475-485
[11] Lillie EM, Urban JE, Lynch SK, et al. Evaluation of skull cortical thickness changes with age and sex from Computed Tomography Scans[J]. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research: The Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2016, 31(2): 299-307
[12] De Boer HH, Van der Merwe AE, Soerdjbalie-Maikoe VV. Human cranial vault thickness in a contemporary sample of 1097 autopsy cases: relation to body weight, stature, age, sex and ancestry[J]. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2016, 130(5): 1371-1377
[13] Smith P, Wax Y, Becker A, et al. Diachronic variation in cranial thickness of Near Eastern populations[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1985, 67(2): 127-133
[14] Moreira-Gonzalez A, Papay FE, Zins JE. Calvarial thickness and its relation to cranial bone harvest[J]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2006, 117(6): 1964-1971
[15] Dodo Y, Ishida H. Cranial thickness of modern and neolithic populations in Japan[J]. Human Biology, 1990, 62(3): 389-401.
[16] Lynnerup N, Astrup JG, Sejrsen B. Thickness of the human cranial diploe in relation to age, sex and general body build[J]. Head & Face Medicine, 2005, 1(1): 1-7
[17] Sabanciogullari V, Kosar MI, Salk I, et al. Diploe thickness and cranial dimensions in males and females in mid-Anatolian population: An MRI study[J]. Forensic Science International, 2012, 219: 289. e1-289.e7
[18] Gil OG, Cambra-Moo ó, Gil JA, et al. Investigating histomorphological variations in human cranial bones through ontogeny[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2016, 15: 527-535
[19] Woodmorappe J. How different is the cranial-vault thickness of Homo erectus from modern man?[J]. CEN Technical Journal, 2000, 14(1): 10-13
[20] Weidenreich F. Observations on the form and proportions of the endocranial casts of Sinanthropus Pekinensis, other hominids, and the great apes: a comparative study of brain size[M]. Peiping: Geological Survey of China Press, 1936, 1-50
[21] Brown P. Cranial vault thickness in Asian Homo erectus and Homo sapiens[J]. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 1994, 171: 33-46
[22] Copes L, Kimbel WH. Cranial vault thickness in primates: Homo erectus does not have uniquely thick vault bones[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2016, 90: 120-134
[23] Balzeau A. Variation and characteristics of the cranial vault thickness in the Krapina and western European Neandertals[J]. Periodicum Biologorum, 2007, 109(4): 369-377
[24] Beaudet A, Carlson KJ, Clarke RJ, et al. Cranial vault thickness variation and inner structural organization in the StW 578 hominin cranium from Jacovec Cavern, South Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 121: 204-220
[25] Ross MD, Lee KA, Castle WM. Skull thickness of Black and White races[J]. South African Medical Journal, 1976, 50(16): 635-638
[26] 布朗·皮特, 吴新智. 华北人欧洲人和澳洲土著人的头骨厚度[J]. 人类学学报, 1987, 6(3): 184-189
[27] Rowbotham SK, Mole CG, Tieppo D, et al. Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations[J]. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2022, 1-19
[28] Marsh HE. Is Thicker Better? Testing adaptation hypotheses for cranial vault thickness[J]. American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 2013, S58
[29] Farzana F, Shah DB, Shadad S, et al. Computed tomographic scanning measurement of skull bone thickness: a single center study[J]. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2018, 6: 913
[30] Abdel Fatah EE, Shirley NR, Jantz RL, et al. Improving sex estimation from crania using a novel three-dimensional quantitative method[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014, 59(3): 590-600
[31] Copes L. How and why do humans grow thin skulls? A test of the systemic robusticity hypothesis[J]. The FASEB Journal, 2008, 22: 15
[32] Ek?i M?, Güdük M, Usseli MI. Frontal bone is thicker in women and frontal sinus is larger in men: A morphometric analysis[J]. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2021, 32(5): 1683-1684
[33] Ruenhunsa S, Vachirawongsakorn V. Cranial thickness in relation to age, gender and head circumference in Thai population[J]. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal, 2022, 66(3): 337-342
[34] 朱正权, 敬文波, 张达, 等. 新疆哈萨克族与汉族颅盖骨厚度差异性研究[J]. 新疆医学, 2018, 48(8): 880-881+884
[35] Thulung S, Ranabhat K, Bishokarma S, et al. Morphometric measurement of cranial vault thickness: A tertiary hospital based study[J]. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2019, 57(215): 29-32
[36] Ross AH, Jantz RL, McCormick WF. Cranial thickness in American females and males[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1998, 43(2): 267-272
[37] Lynnerup N. Cranial thickness in relation to age, sex and general body build in a Danish forensic sample[J]. Forensic Science International, 2001, 117(1-2): 45-51
[38] Arntsen T, Kjaer I, Sonnesen L. Skull thickness in patients with skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions[J]. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2008, 11(4): 229-234
[39] Tawfik DM, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S. Calvarial thickness in relation to sagittal and vertical malrelations in Egyptians[J]. Tanta Dental Journal, 2016, 13(1): 34-40
[40] Arntsen T, Kjaer I, Sonnesen L, et al. Skull thickness in patients with clefts[J]. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2010, 13(2): 75-81
[41] Hershkovitz I, Greenwald C, Rothschild BM, et al. Hyperostosis frontalis interna: an anthropological perspective[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1999, 109(3): 303-325
[42] She R, Szakacs J. Hyperostosis frontalis interna: case report and review of literature[J]. Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, 2004, 34(2): 206-208
[43] May H, Mali Y, Dar G, et al. Intracranial volume, cranial thickness, and hyperostosis frontalis interna in the elderly[J]. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council, 2012, 24(6): 812-819
[44] Kazuma M, Akiko N, Munetaka N, et al. A rare case of hyperostosis frontalis interna in an 86-year-old Japanese female cadaver[J]. Anatomical Science International, 2021, 96(2): 315-318
[45] 张君. 从筛状眶和多孔骨肥厚考察中国古代人骨上的贫血现象[J]. 考古, 2009, 10: 86-90
[46] Zuckerman MK, Garofalo EM, Frohlich B, et al. Anemia or scurvy: A pilot study on differential diagnosis of porous and hyperostotic lesions using differential cranial vault thickness in subadult humans[J]. International Journal of Paleopathology, 2014, 5: 27-33
[47] Axelsson S, Kjaer I, Heiberg A, et al. Neurocranial morphology and growth in Williams syndrome[J]. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2005, 27(1): 32-47
[48] Lieberman DE. How and why humans grow thin skulls: experimental evidence for systemic cortical robusticity[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1996, 101(2): 217-236
[49] Copes LE, Schutz H, Dlugsoz EM, et al. Locomotor activity, growth hormones, and systemic robusticity: An investigation of cranial vault thickness in mouse lines bred for high endurance running[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2018, 166(2): 442-458
[50] 王东海, 徐淑军, 鲍修风. 5000年前开颅手术标本的医学研究[J]. 中华医史杂志, 2008, 38(3): 135-136
[51] Partiot C, Lepetit A, Dodré E, et al. Cranial trepanation and healing process in modern patients-Bioarchaeological and anthropological implications[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 2020, 237(6): 1049-1061
[52] Ruan J, Prasad P. The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses[J]. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 2001, (45): 395-414
[53] 阮世捷, 李超, 崔世海, 等. 颅骨厚度对颅内生物力学响应的影响[J]. 医用生物力学, 2021, 36(4): 560-567
[54] Torimitsu S, Nishida Y, Takano T, et al. Differences in biomechanical properties and thickness among frontal and parietal bones in a Japanese sample[J]. Forensic Science International, 2015, 252(190): e1-6
[55] Irene D, Bruner E, Cambra-Moo O, et al. Cranial vault thickness measurement and distribution: A study with a magnetic calliper[J]. Anthropological Science, 2019, 127(1): 1-8
[56] 日本人类工效学会人体测量编委会编. 人体测量手册[M].译者:奚振华. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1983: 1-2
[57] 周志尊, 许春环, 仇惠, 等. 颅骨的测量方法及其比较研究[J]. 中国医学物理学志, 2007, 24(5): 346-348
[58] Axelsson S, Kjaer I, Bj?rnland T, et al. Longitudinal cephalometric standards for the neurocranium in Norwegians from 6 to 21 years of age[J]. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2003, 25(2): 185-198
[59] 李海岩, 阮世捷, 彭翔, 等. 基于CT图像的活体人颅骨厚度测量方法[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2007, 26(5): 964-968+980
[60] 童春民, 吴景凯, 龚遂良, 等. 成人颅骨枕骨厚度CT测量[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2003, 5(3): 168-169
[61] 侯志鹏, 胡晓彤. 基于双Snake模型的颅骨CT图像分割方法及应用[J]. 天津科技大学学报, 2011, 26(2): 70-74
[62] 黎刚, 周忠和. 物理之光助力古生物学前行[CP/OL]. URL: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_Qe4qppizQL6Xhq_tzoLQQ. Released on: 2021-09-27
[63] 邓涛. 当古生物遇到新科技[N]. 光明日报,2023-03-02(016)
[64] 吴新智, 尚虹. 中国古人类是怎样进化的?[J]. 科学中国人, 2001(7): 14-16
[65] 刘武, 吴秀杰, 邢松. 更新世中期中国古人类演化区域连续性与多样性的化石证据[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 473-490
[66] 吴新智. 中国和非洲古老型智人颅骨特征的比较[J]. 人类学学报, 1994, 13(2): 93-103+189-190
[67] 刘武, Emma Mbua, 吴秀杰. 非洲和中国直立人某些颅骨特征的比较:中国与非洲人类头骨特征对比之一[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(4): 255-267
[68] 刘武, 吴秀杰, 张银运. 中更新世非洲Bodo人类头骨化石与周口店直立人的比较:中国与非洲人类头骨特征对比之三[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(2): 119-129
[69] Zhang YM, Li ZY. Investigating the internal structure of the suprainiac fossa in Xuchang 2[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 184: 103440
[70] 何嘉宁. 中国古代人骨体质人类学的研究进展与展望[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 165-180
文章导航

/