发掘报告/简报

泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报

  • 王法岗 ,
  • 杨石霞 ,
  • 葛俊逸 ,
  • 岳健平 ,
  • 赵克良 ,
  • Andreu Ollé ,
  • 李文艳 ,
  • 杨海勇 ,
  • 刘连强 ,
  • 关莹 ,
  • 谢飞 ,
  • Francesco d’Errico ,
  • Michael Petraglia ,
  • 邓成龙
展开
  • 1.河北省文物考古研究院,石家庄 050031
    2.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
    4.Institut Català de Palaeoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain, 43007
    5.蔚州博物馆,蔚县 075799
    6.PACEA UMR 5199, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Pessac, France, 33000
    7.Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Qld, 4111
    8.岩石圈演化国家重点实验室,中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所,北京 100029
王法岗,研究馆员,主要从事旧石器时代考古学研究。E-mail: 120835216@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-06-16

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-06

基金资助

自然科学基金项目(41888101);自然科学基金项目(42177424);国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC1521500);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB26000000);中国科学院青年促进会(2020074);中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所重点部署项目(IGGCAS-201905)

A report of 2013 excavation of the Xiamabei site in the Nihewan Basin

  • Fagang WANG ,
  • Shixia YANG ,
  • Junyi GE ,
  • Jianping YUE ,
  • Keliang ZHAO ,
  • Ollé Andreu ,
  • Wenyan LI ,
  • Haiyong YANG ,
  • Lianqiang LIU ,
  • Ying GUAN ,
  • Fei XIE ,
  • d’Errico Francesco ,
  • Petraglia Michael ,
  • Chenglong DENG
Expand
  • 1. Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archeology, Shijiazhuang 050031
    2. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    3. University of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    4. Institut Català de Palaeoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA), Tarragona, Spain, 43007
    5. Museum of Yuzhou, Yuxian 075799
    6. PACEA UMR 5199, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Pessac, France, 33000
    7. Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Qld 4111
    8. State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029

Received date: 2023-06-16

  Online published: 2024-02-06

摘要

下马碑遗址位于广义泥河湾盆地南部的蔚县盆地中东部,是坐落于壶流河二级阶地上的一处旷野遗址。2013年,河北省文物考古研究院对该遗址进行了考古发掘,揭露出丰富的遗物和遗迹现象;2018年起,国内外多家单位共同完成了遗址地层年代、埋藏过程、古环境和出土文化遗存的系统性多学科研究工作。该遗址发掘揭露面积12 m2,地层剖面深度约为290 cm,自上而下分为7个地层单位,其中第6层为原地埋藏的主文化层,基于光释光与14C测年并经贝叶斯模型计算为距今4.1~3.9万年。本文对下马碑第6层出土的各类遗物与遗迹进行系统报道,主要包括382件石制品、445件动物化石碎片、1件骨器和1套赭石颜料加工遗存,以及1处火塘。该遗址的发现与研究再现了距今4万年前东亚早期现代人加工、使用赭石颜料和复合工具的生活图景,更新了国际学术界对东亚早期现代人行为适应的认识。

本文引用格式

王法岗 , 杨石霞 , 葛俊逸 , 岳健平 , 赵克良 , Andreu Ollé , 李文艳 , 杨海勇 , 刘连强 , 关莹 , 谢飞 , Francesco d’Errico , Michael Petraglia , 邓成龙 . 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024 , 43(01) : 143 -156 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0074

Abstract

The Xiamabei Paleolithic site is located on the second terrace of the Huliu River, in the southeast edge of the Yuxian Basin, a part of the Nihewan Basin. In 2013, archaeologists from the Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology carried out excavations at the site, uncovering a wealth of cultural remains. Since 2018, several institutions at home and abroad have jointly conducted systematic and multidisciplinary research on the stratigraphy, chronology, taphonomic process, paleoenvironment and cultural remains of Xiamabei. The excavation uncovered an area of 12 m2, with a depth of about 290 cm. The stratigraphy encompasses seven main layers in a floodplain environment. Layer 6, the main cultural horizon, is dated approximately 41-39 ka by AMS 14C and optically stimulated luminescence. Here we report the results of archaeological findings from Layer 6 of Xiamabei, mainly including 382 stone artifacts, 445 animal bones, a single bone tool, a charcoal-rich hearth and evidence for ochre use and processing. A variety of scientific methods were used to identify the ochre and the sediment staining, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), micro Raman spectroscopy (MR), micro-X-ray fluorescence (Micro-XRF), mineral magnetism (MM), and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). Among them, mineral magnetism (MM) was, for the first time, applied on the anthropogenic ochre. With respect to the study of the stone tools, we conducted technological, microscopic use-wear and residue studies. The results indicated that stone tool manufacture was aimed towards production of small items, including blade-like forms with these miniaturized pieces hafted. The interdisciplinary research on the Xiamabei site provide us a vivid picture of hunter-gathers’ lifestyle 40,000 years ago in North China. People were living in a cool, steppe-like environment, and at Xiamabei they conducted activities around a warm campfire, grinding ochre powder for economic purposes, hafting blade-like stone tools to conduct a variety of tasks including hide and plant processing, and mostly likely, sharing food, including meat that they hunted. The Xiamabei site possesses a novel set of cultural characteristics, such as the earliest evidence of ochre processing, a unique miniaturized lithic technology with bladelet-like forms and hafted items. Located at the transition zone between the Inner Mongolian Plateau and the North China Plain, the site offers important new insights into the expansion of H. sapiens along the northern route.

参考文献

[1] Zhu RX, Potts R, Xie F, et al. New evidence on the earliest human presence at high northern latitudes in Northeast Asia[J]. Nature, 2004, 431: 559-562
[2] Zhu RX, Hoffman KA, Potts R, et al. Earliest presence of humans in Northeast Asia[J]. Nature, 2001, 413: 413-417
[3] Yang SX, Deng CL, Petraglia MD, et al. The Paleolithic in the Nihewan Basin, China: Evolutionary history of an Early to Late Pleistocene record in Eastern Asia[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 2020, 29(3): 125-142
[4] Yang SX, Wang FG, Xie F, et al. Technological innovations at the onset of the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition in high-latitude East Asia[J]. National Science Review, 2020, 8(1)
[5] 裴树文, 马东东, 贾真秀, 等. 蔚县盆地吉家庄旧石器遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 510-528
[6] Wang FG, Yang SX, Ge JY, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603: 284-289
[7] 孔哲生, 张文军, 陈雍. 一九七九年蔚县新石器时代考古的主要收获[J]. 考古, 1981(2): 97-105, 150+193-194
[8] Guan Y, Wang XM, Wang FG, et al. Radiocarbon dating of the earliest microblade technology in China: Evidence from the Xishahe site, North China[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 535: 38-47
[9] 马东东, 裴树文. 旧石器时代砸击法剥片技术相关问题探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 584-597
[10] Yang SX, Hou YM, Yue JP, et al. The lithic assemblages of Xiaochangliang, Nihewan Basin: Implications for Early Pleistocene hominin behaviour in North China[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(5): 1-19
[11] Song Y, Grimaldi S, Santaniello FD, et al. Re-thinking the evolution of microblade technology in East Asia: Techno-functional understanding of the lithic assemblage from Shizitan 29 (Shanxi, China)[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14, e0212643
[12] Fu QM, Meyer M, Gao X, et al. DNA analysis of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China[J]. PNAS, 2013, 110(6): 2223-2227
[13] Fu QM, Li H, Moorjani P, et al. Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from western Siberia[J]. Nature, 2014, 514, 445-449
[14] Bae CJ, Douka K, Petraglia M. On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives[J]. Science, 2017, 358: 1269
[15] 王幼平. 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址早期现代人出现的新证据[J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(22): 2573-2575
文章导航

/