甘肃五坝墓地人骨反映的史前人群变迁
收稿日期: 2022-12-12
修回日期: 2023-05-06
网络出版日期: 2024-04-02
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(42001073);国家自然科学基金(42372001)
Changes of the prehistoric people reflected by their remains from the Wuba cemetery in Gansu Province
Received date: 2022-12-12
Revised date: 2023-05-06
Online published: 2024-04-02
在跨大陆交流的大背景下,河西走廊史前时期人群的迁徙、扩散、融合及其与古文化发展之间的关系等问题一直备受关注。但人骨材料的缺乏使学界对该区新石器时代人群的来源及其与青铜时代人群的关系并不清楚。本文以地处河西走廊中部的五坝墓地(4400~3800 BP)中出土的14例成年个体颅骨为研究对象,进行了非测量和测量性状的分析。结果显示:五坝人群属东亚类群,与青海省东北部新石器时代晚期人群具有最近的亲缘关系。对河西地区史前时期人群变迁历史的梳理则表明该地区至少经历了两次大规模的人群迁徙:新石器时代晚期,来自河湟地区的农人成规模地向河西走廊扩散,同时带来了波浪式的文化传播;青铜时代早中期,该区人群的颅面部形态特征变得相对复杂,但人群属性并未发生根本性变化。青铜时代晚期以后,欧亚草原游牧人群的大规模南下使河西人群的颅面部形态发生明显改变,也使该地区迎来了考古学文化和生业方式的转型。
贺乐天 , 陈国科 , 杨谊时 . 甘肃五坝墓地人骨反映的史前人群变迁[J]. 人类学学报, 2024 , 43(02) : 247 -258 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0020
Located in northwestern China, the Hexi Corridor was an important route for communication between east-west and north-south in prehistoric and historical times. In the context of the rise of transcontinental exchanges, the migration, diffusion, and integration of prehistoric populations in the Hexi Corridor and their relationship with the development of archaeological cultures have been of great interest. However, the lack of human remains has led to an obscure understanding of the origin of Neolithic populations and their relationship to the Bronze Age population in this area. In this study, 14 adult crania excavated from the Wuba cemetery located in the central region of the Hexi Corridor were analyzed for non-metric and metric craniofacial traits. The Wuba population was compared with 30 populations from the Howells database and 26 groups from ancient northern China by principal component analysis and neighbor-joining network analysis. The results show that: 1) the Wuba population belongs to an East Asia taxon, and no individuals with craniofacial features close to those of the western Eurasian group were found; 2) the results of comparison with craniometric data from ancient populations in northern China indicate that the Wuba population has the closest affinity with the late Neolithic population from northeastern Qinghai province. The review and integration of the prehistoric population history in the Hexi Corridor indicate that this region has experienced at least two large-scale population migrations. In the late Neolithic Age, groups from Hehuang Valley spread to the Hexi Corridor on a large scale, bringing wavy cultural diffusion. In the early and middle Bronze Age, the craniofacial morphology of the Hexi population became complex due to increased human mobility, but the population attributes did not change. The large-scale southward migration of nomads from the Eurasian steppes after the Late Bronze Age brought major changes to the craniofacial morphology of the Hexi population, as well as ushering in archaeological cultural changes and shifts in subsistence in the region.
Key words: Hexi Corridor; Skull; Craniofacial morphology; Population affinity
[1] | 甘肃省文物考古研究所, 北京大学考古文博学院. 河西走廊史前考古调查报告[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2011 |
[2] | 李水城. 东风西渐:中国西北史前文化之进程[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2009 |
[3] | 杨谊时, 张山佳, Oldknow C, 等. 河西走廊史前文化年代的完善及其对重新评估人与环境关系的启示[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2019, 49: 2037-2050 |
[4] | 动物考古课题组. 中华文明形成时期的动物考古学研究[A].见:中国社会科学院考古研究所(主编).科技考古(第3辑)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011, 10-15 |
[5] | Dong GH, Yang YS, Liu XY, et al. Prehistoric trans-continental cultural exchange in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China[J]. Holocene, 2018, 28: 621-628 |
[6] | 陈国科. 西城驿—齐家冶金共同体:河西走廊地区早期冶金人群及相关问题初探[J]. 考古与文物, 2017, 5: 37-44 |
[7] | 董广辉, 杨谊时, 任乐乐, 著. 河西走廊地区史前时代生业模式和人与环境相互作用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020 |
[8] | 国家文物局. 中国文物地图集·甘肃分册[M]. 北京: 测绘出版社, 2011 |
[9] | 朱泓. 东灰山墓地人骨的研究[C].见:甘肃省文物考古研究所,吉林大学北方考古研究室(编).民乐东灰山考古:四坝文化墓地的揭示与研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998, 172-183 |
[10] | 韩康信, 谭婧泽, 张帆. 甘肃玉门火烧沟古墓地人骨的研究[A].见:韩康信,谭婧泽,张帆.中国西北地区古代居民种族研究[C]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2005, 191-293 |
[11] | 郑晓瑛. 甘肃酒泉青铜时代人类头骨种系类型的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 4: 327-336 |
[12] | 何嘉宁. 酒泉干骨崖墓地出土人骨研究[C].见:北京大学考古文博学院,甘肃省文物考古研究所(编).酒泉干骨崖[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2016, 362-405 |
[13] | 韩康信. 甘肃永昌沙井文化人骨种属研究[C].见:甘肃省文物考古研究所(编).永昌西岗柴湾岗:沙井文化墓葬发掘报告[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2001, 235-265 |
[14] | 韩翀飞, 马智全, 王永安, 等. 甘肃民乐五坝史前墓地发掘简报[J]. 考古与文物, 2012, 4: 3-13+115 |
[15] | 甘肃省文物考古研究所. 民乐五坝墓地发掘报告[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2023, 97 |
[16] | Howells WW. Skull shapes and the map: Craniometric analysis in the dispersion of modern Homo[J]. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Volume 79, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989 |
[17] | 邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社,1985 |
[18] | 吴秀杰. 中国全新世人群头骨形态特征的变异[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2006 |
[19] | von Cramon-Taubadel N. Congruence of individual cranial bone morphology and neutral molecular affinity patterns in modern humans[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2009, 140(2): 205-215 |
[20] | Relethford JH. Craniometric variation among modern human populations[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1994, 95(1): 53-62 |
[21] | Roseman CC, Weaver TD. Multivariate apportionment of global human craniometric diversity[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2004, 125: 257-263 |
[22] | Howells WW. Cranial variation in Man: A study by multivariate analysis of patterns of difference among recent human populations[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973 |
[23] | Howells WW. Who's Who in skulls, Ethnic identification of crania from measurements[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995 |
[24] | Howells WW. Howells’ Craniometric Data on the Internet[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1996, 101: 441-442 |
[25] | 韩康信. 孔雀河古墓沟墓地人骨研究[A].见:韩康信.丝绸之路古代居民种族人类学研究[C]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1994, 33-70 |
[26] | 韩康信. 哈密焉布拉克墓人骨种系成分之研究[A].见:韩康信.丝绸之路古代居民种族人类学研究[C]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1994, 175-260 |
[27] | 韩康信. 昭苏土墩墓古人类学材料的研究[A].见:韩康信.丝绸之路古代居民种族人类学研究[C]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1994, 261-304 |
[28] | 魏东. 新疆哈密地区青铜-早期铁器时代居民人种学研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2009 |
[29] | 潘其风. 平洋墓葬人骨的研究[A].见:黑龙江省文物考古研究所(编).平洋墓葬[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1990, 211-212 |
[30] | 潘其风, 韩康信. 东汉北方草原游牧民族人骨的研究[J]. 考古学报, 1982, 1: 117-136 |
[31] | 朱泓, 张全超. 内蒙古林西县井沟子遗址西区墓地人骨研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 2: 97-106 |
[32] | 张全超. 内蒙古和林格尔县新店子墓地人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2005 |
[33] | 韩康信. 宁夏彭堡于家庄墓地人骨种系特点之研究[J]. 考古学报, 1995, 1: 109-125 |
[34] | 顏訚. 华县新石器时代人骨的研究[J]. 考古学报, 1962, 2: 85-104+156 |
[35] | 原海兵. 殷墟中小墓人骨的综合研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2010 |
[36] | 周亚威, 张晓冉, 顾万发. 郑州孙庄遗址仰韶文化居民的颅骨形态[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(4): 611-627 |
[37] | 潘其风. 朱开沟墓地人骨的研究[A].见:内蒙古自治区文物考古研究所,鄂尔多斯博物馆(编).朱开沟:青铜时代早期遗址发掘报告[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2000, 364 |
[38] | 韩康信. 青海民和阳山墓地人骨[A].见:青海省文物考古研究所(编).民和阳山[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1990,160-173 |
[39] | 韩康信. 甘肃永昌沙井文化人骨种属研究[A].见:甘肃省文物考古研究所(编).永昌西岗柴湾岗:沙井文化墓葬发掘报告[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2001, 235-265 |
[40] | 韩康信, 谭婧泽, 张帆. 青海大通上孙家寨古墓地人骨的研究[A].见:韩康信,谭婧泽,张帆.中国西北地区古代居民种族研究[C]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2005, 1-190 |
[41] | 潘其风, 韩康信. 柳湾墓地的人骨研究[A].见:青海省文物管理处考古队,中国社会科学院考古研究所(编).青海柳湾[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1984, 261-303 |
[42] | 韩康信. 青海循化阿哈特拉山古墓地人骨研究[J]. 考古学报, 2000, 3: 395-420 |
[43] | 张君. 青海李家山卡约文化墓地人骨种系研究[J]. 考古学报, 1993, 3: 81-413 |
[44] | 王明辉, 朱泓. 民和核桃庄史前文化墓地人骨研究[A].见:青海省文物考古研究所,青海省文物管理处,西北大学文博学院(编).民和核桃[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004, 281-320 |
[45] | 赵永生. 甘肃临潭磨沟墓地人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013 |
[46] | Darroch JN, Mosimann JE. Canonical and principal components of shape[J]. Biometrika, 1985, 72: 241-252 |
[47] | Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis[J]. Palaeontologia Electonica, 2001, 4(1): 9 |
[48] | Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2006, 23(2): 254-267 |
[49] | 朱泓. 中国西北地区的古代种族[J]. 考古与文物, 2006, 5: 60-65 |
[50] | 谭婧泽, 李黎明, 张建波, 等. 新疆西南部青铜时代欧亚东西方人群混合的颅骨测量学证据[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57(28-29): 2666-2673 |
[51] | 董广辉, 杜琳垚, 杨柳, 等. 欧亚大陆草原之路—绿洲之路史前农牧业扩散交流与生业模式时空变化[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2022, 52(8): 1476-1498 |
[52] | Roseman CC. Detecting interregionally diversifying natural selection on modern human cranial form by using matched molecular and morphometric data[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004, 101(35): 12824-12829 |
[53] | Smith HF. Which cranial regions reflect molecular distances reliably in humans? Evidence from three-dimensional morphology[J]. American Journal of Human Biology, 2009, 21(1): 36-47 |
[54] | 王辉. 甘青地区新石器—青铜时代考古学文化的谱系与格局[A].见:北京大学考古文博学院,北京大学中国考古研究中心(编).考古学研究(九)[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2012, 210-243 |
[55] | 张山佳, 董广辉. 青藏高原东北部青铜时代中晚期人类对不同海拔环境的适应策略探讨[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(4): 13 |
[56] | 李水城. “过渡类型”遗存与西城驿文化[A].见:赵化成,王辉(主编).早期丝绸之路暨早期秦文化国际学术研讨会论文集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014, 9-12 |
[57] | 陈靓, 任雪杰, 凌雪, 等. 甘肃省肃北县马鬃山地区先民的生物考古学研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2022, 42(4): 1118-1128 |
[58] | 赵东月. 汉民族的起源与形成:体质人类学的新视角[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016 |
[59] | Kuzmina EE. The Prehistory of The Silk Road[M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008 |
[60] | 甘肃省文物考古研究所. 永昌西岗柴湾岗:沙井文化墓葬发掘报告[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2001 |
[61] | Xiong JX, Du PX, Chen GK, et al. Sex-biased population admixture mediated subsistence strategy transition of Heishuiguo people in Han Dynasty Hexi Corridor[J]. Frontiers in Genetics, 2022, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.827277 |
[62] | 张群. 宁夏中卫常乐墓地人骨研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018 |
[63] | 陈靓. 匈奴、鲜卑和契丹的人种学考察[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2003 |
[64] | 潘其风. 从颅骨资料看匈奴的人种[A].见:潘其风.潘其风考古人类学文选[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015, 85-96 |
[65] | 韩康信. 固原唐代史道洛墓人骨研究[A].见:韩康信,谭婧泽.宁夏古人类学研究报告集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009, 227-287 |
[66] | 韩康信. 固原九龙山-南塬出土高加索人种头骨[A].见:韩康信,谭婧泽.宁夏古人类学研究报告集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009, 227-246 |
/
〈 | 〉 |