简报/发掘报告

天津蓟州区太子陵旧石器地点2021年发掘简报

  • 王家琪 ,
  • 张雪微 ,
  • 王春雪 ,
  • 盛立双
展开
  • 1.吉林大学考古学院,长春 130012
    2.天津市文化遗产保护中心,天津 300170
王家琪,博士研究生,研究方向为旧石器考古。E-mail: 512918977@qq.com
盛立双,副主任,文博研究馆员,主要从事史前考古研究。E-mail: sls_73@126.com

收稿日期: 2023-09-01

  修回日期: 2023-12-27

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-04

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2020YFC1521500)

A preliminary report of the 2021 excavation at the Taiziling locality in Jizhou County, Tianjin City

  • WANG Jiaqi ,
  • ZHANG Xuewei ,
  • WANG Chunxue ,
  • SHENG Lishuang
Expand
  • 1. School of Archaeology Jilin University, Changchun 130012
    2. Protection Center of Cultural Heritage in Tianjin, Tianjin 300170

Received date: 2023-09-01

  Revised date: 2023-12-27

  Online published: 2024-06-04

摘要

太子陵旧石器地点位于天津市蓟州区境内。2005年旧石器专项调查时发现该地点,2015年进行复查,2021年进行发掘,发掘面积为50 m2,出土石制品158件。石制品原料系就地取材于遗址附近河床或基岩。石制品类型包括石核、石片、石器以及断块等。剥片采用锤击和砸击法;石器以小型为主,包括边刮器、凹缺器、尖刃器和砍砸器等,加工方向以正向居多。根据地层堆积以及石制品面貌判断,该地点属于旧石器时代中晚期阶段。另外,在该地点的第6文化层出土了1件研磨类石器,这件具有磨光痕迹的砺石为东亚地区研磨类石器的研究提供了极为重要的线索,显示了中国北方地区在旧石器时代与欧亚大陆的紧密联系。

本文引用格式

王家琪 , 张雪微 , 王春雪 , 盛立双 . 天津蓟州区太子陵旧石器地点2021年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024 , 43(03) : 440 -447 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0025

Abstract

The Taiziling locality (TZL), buried in the second terrace near the Prince Mausoleum of the Qing Dynasty is located in the Sungezhuang village, Jizhou County,Tianjin City, which was discovered in 2005 and excavated in October 2021, covering an area of 50 m2. In this excavation, over 100 artifacts were unearthed. The lithic assemblage includes cores, flakes, chunks, debris and tools, with the representative tool being scrapers, which is widely found in the remains of Palaeolithic sites in northern China. Five kinds of raw materials are identified in the lithic artifacts, which can be arranged according to their proportion as quartzite, quartz, flint, crystal and andesite. A large number of quartzite can be easily obtained from Huanghua Mountain, which is about 200 meters to the north of the locality, with highest proportion in the raw materials for stone artifacts, showing that ancient humans who lived in TZL locality at that time adapted measures to local conditions and materials when making tools. The blanks of stone tools are mostly flakes, and individually blocks. The tools are modified mostly from dorsal surface, with the modified parts being concentrated on the side edges. As shown by the characteristics of the cores and flakes from TZL locality, two distinct technological assemblages are identified. One is flake technology, which is the local and dominant technological assemblage in North China, characterized by free-hand core reduction without preparation and simple tool modification. The other is microblade technology, which is represented by microblade cores with working surfaces for the production of micro-blade. Although only one microblade core was found at the locality, it was so highly utilized that it was nearing the abandonment stage, which reflects the fact that flint was very valuable to ancient humans. Judging from the stratigraphy and the assemblage of stone artifacts, the TZL locality belongs to the Middle and Upper Paleolithic. In addition, a stone tool with polished marks which unearthed in the 6th culture layer, provides an extremely important clue for the study of same type of stone tools in East Asia, showing the close connection between northern China and Eurasia during that period. The TZL locality owns high value in the study of lithic technology in the Late Pleistocene of North China as well as the cultural relationship between northern and northeastern China during the period.

参考文献

[1] 盛立双. 初耕集—天津蓟县旧石器考古发现与研究[M]. 天津: 天津古籍出版社, 2014
[2] 盛立双, 王春雪, 甘才超, 等. 天津蓟县2015年旧石器考古调查报告[J]. 边疆考古研究, 2018, 2: 27-39
[3] 王春雪, 盛立双. 天津蓟县太子陵旧石器地点调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(1): 37-44
[4] 蓟县志编修委员会. 蓟县志[M]. 天津:南开出版社, 天津社会科学院出版社,1991
[5] 卫奇. 《西侯度》石制品之浅见[J]. 人类学学报, 2000, 2: 85-96
[6] 河北省、天津市区域地层表编写组. 华北地区区域地层表(河北省、天津市分册(二)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社,1979
[7] 天津市地质矿产局. 天津区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社,1992
[8] 王春雪, 盛立双. 天津蓟县太子陵旧石器地点调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(1): 37-44
[9] Shea JJ. Lithic Modes A-I: A New Framework for Describing Global-Scale Variation in Stone Tool Technology Illustrated with Evidence from the East Mediterranean Levant[J]. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2013, 20(1):151-186
[10] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 旧大陆东西方比较视野下磨制石器起源探讨[J]. 考古, 2020, 10: 78-89+2
[11] 杜水生, 任海云, 张婷. 山西沁水县下川遗址富益河圪梁地点2014年T1发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 4: 14-28
[12] 解希恭, 阎金铸, 陶富海. 山西吉县柿子滩中石器文化遗址[J]. 考古学报, 1989, 3: 305-323+391-394
[13] 原思训, 赵朝洪, 朱晓东, 等. 山西吉县柿子滩遗址的年代与文化研究[J]. 考古, 1998, 6: 57-62
[14] 宋艳花, 石金鸣. 山西吉县柿子滩旧石器时代遗址S14地点2002-2005年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2013, 2: 3-13+2
[15] 赵朝洪. 北京市门头沟区东胡林史前遗址[J]. 考古, 2006, 7: 3-8+97-98
[16] 李君, 乔倩, 任雪岩. 1997年河北徐水南庄头遗址发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2010, 3: 361-392+429-432
[17] Revedin A, Aranguren B, Becattini R, et al. Thirty Thousand-year-Old Evidence of Plant Food Processing[J]. PNAS, 2010, 107(44): 18815-18819
[18] Henshilwood CS, d’Errico F, Niekerk K L, et al. A 100,000-Year-Old Ochre-Processing Workshop at Blombos Cave, South Africa[J]. Science, 2011, 334 (6053): 219-222
文章导航

/