中国汉族、回族、蒙古族、苗族和维吾尔族的牙齿形态
收稿日期: 2023-12-04
修回日期: 2024-05-07
网络出版日期: 2024-08-13
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(32271186)
Teeth morphology of Han, Hui, Mongolia, Miao and Uyghur peoples in China
Received date: 2023-12-04
Revised date: 2024-05-07
Online published: 2024-08-13
研究表明牙齿形态特征具有高度遗传性,在不同群体中存在明显差异。本研究针对中国汉族、回族、蒙古族、苗族和维吾尔族5个人群的牙齿形态特征,进行侧别、性别、年龄等检验,并对这5个人群与其他中国人群及日本、东北亚、东南亚、欧洲、非洲等地区人群进行多元统计分析。研究结果显示,5个人群的多数牙齿特征未见侧别和性别差异,多数牙齿特征与年龄无显著相关性。汉族、维吾尔族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率较高及Y型沟纹出现率偏低与东北亚人群相似;苗族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率也偏高;蒙古族、回族的铲形门齿和双铲形门齿出现率较低与东南亚人群相似;维吾尔族的四尖型出现率较高与欧洲人群相似。多元统计分析结果证实蒙古人种牙齿复合体及巽他型齿、中国型齿是客观存在的。
祝海歌 , 乔辉 , 杨晨 , 管海娟 , 张航 , 文少卿 , 夏斌 , 谭婧泽 . 中国汉族、回族、蒙古族、苗族和维吾尔族的牙齿形态[J]. 人类学学报, 2024 , 43(04) : 613 -628 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0050
Studies showed that the dental morphological traits are mostly controlled by multiple genes, and environmental factors have a relatively small impact on them. Therefore, there are significant distribution differences in different geographical or ethnic groups. The formation of these differences is closely related to the origin and evolution of populations or ethnic groups in different regions, as well as the communication and integration between populations. It is of great significance for revealing the origin and evolution of populations and the relationships between populations. In this study, 26 dental morphological traits of Han Chinese, Hui, Mongolian, Miao, and Uyghur populations were analyzed. We conducted the side consistency analysis, gender difference analysis, correlation analysis between traits and ageto explore the characteristics of dental morphological traits in five populations. Based on the population frequency data, the dental morphological traits of the five populations were compared with other Chinese populations, Japanese populations, Northeast Asia populations, Southeast Asia populations, European populations and African populations by multivariate statistical analysis. We explored the group relationships between five Chinese populations and global populations, as well as the dental morphological traits of the five populations. Our results showed that there was no difference between left and right sides in most dental morphological traits of the five populations, no gender difference in all traits, most dental traits showed no significant correlation with age. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed that results confirmed that there objectively exist two types of dental features called Sundadonty and Sinodonty. The Han Chinese in Taizhou belongs to Northeast Asia populations, and has a high frequency of Shoveling and Double Shoveling. The Miao in Guizhou is located between Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia populations, and the incidence of Shoveling is relatively high. The Mongolian in Inner Mongolia and Hui in Ningxia belong to Southeast Asian population by the principal component analysis and multidimensional scale analysis, but they are located between Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia populations, and are clustered with the Miao in Guizhou through the adjacency network diagram. The lower frequency of Shoveling and Double Shoveling of Mongolian and Hui are similar to the Southeast Asian population. The Uyghur population is located between the East Asian population, the European, and North African populations, and is closest to the Han Chinese in Taizhou. The high-frequency Shoveling, Double Shoveling, and low-frequency Y-Groove are very similar to the Northeastern Asian population, but the absolute high-frequency of the Cusp4 is similar to the European population, confirming that the Uyghur population is a typical Eurasian mixed population.
Key words: Dental Morphological; Traits; Anthropology; Han; Ethnic Minority
[1] | Hanihara K. Mongoloid dental complex in the deciduous dentition with special reference to the dentition of the Ainu[J]. The Journal of Anthropological Society of Nippon, 1970, 78(1): 3-17 |
[2] | Turner CG II. Late Pleistocene and Holocene population history of East Asia based on dental variation[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1987, 73(3): 305-321 |
[3] | Turner CG II. Teeth and prehistory in Asia[J]. Scientific American, 1989, 260(2): 88-96 |
[4] | Turner CG II. Major features of Sundadonty and Sinodonty, including suggestions about East Asian microevolution, population history, and late Pleistocene relationships with Australian aboriginals[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1990, 82(3): 295-317 |
[5] | 刘武. 《牙齿人类学进展》评介[J]. 人类学学报, 1996, 15(1): 89-91 |
[6] | Hrdli?ka A. Shovel-shaped teeth[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1920, 3(4): 429-465 |
[7] | 李春芳, 皮昕, 陈国栋, 等. 卡氏尖名称的探讨[J]. 口腔医学纵横杂志, 1995, 11(4): 237-238 |
[8] | Dietz VH. A common dental morphotropig factor the carabelli cusp[J]. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1944, 31(11): 784-789 |
[9] | Dahlberg AA. Materials for the establishment of standards for classification of tooth characters, attributes, and techniques in morphological studies of the dentition[D]. Chicago: Zollar Laboratory of Dental Anthropology, University of Chicago (mimeo), 1956, 34-681 |
[10] | Turner CG II, Nichol CR, Scott GR. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: the Arizona State University dental anthropology system[A]. In: Kelley M, Larsen CS(eds). Advances in Dental Anthropology[C]. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc, 1991, 13-31 |
[11] | Scott GR, Turner CG II. The anthropology of modern human teeth[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018: 23-52, 216-219, 253-262, 285-295 |
[12] | Turner CG II. Expression count: A method for calculating morphological dental trait frequencies by using adjustable weighting coefficients with standard ranked scales[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1985, 68(2): 263-267 |
[13] | 金力, 席焕久, 谭婧泽. 中华民族体质表型调查方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024, 151-168 |
[14] | Jacob C. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: differences between correlation coefficients[M]. Academic Press, 1977, 109-143 |
[15] | Buda A, Jarynowski A. Life time of correlations and its applications[M]. ABRASCO - Associa??o Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva Press, 2010, 132-153 |
[16] | 金泽英作, 佐竹隆, 佐佐木佳世子, 等. 中国云南省5个少数民族人群的牙齿性状[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2009, 15: 77-84 |
[17] | Chikushi S. Dental charasteristics in the Dafurs tribe of Inner Mongoria, China.[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 2001, 55(3): 189-205 |
[18] | Kiyosue T. Dental characteristics in the Hui of Liao-ning, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 2000, 54(6): 510-520 |
[19] | Jin H. Dental characteristics in the Chaoxian of Liao-ning province, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1999, 53(5): 529-537 |
[20] | Fukunari F. Dental characteristics in the Manchu tribe of Xin-Bin, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1999, 53(1): 63-88 |
[21] | Kikuti N. Dental characteristics in the Han of Liao-Ning, China[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1997, 51(1): 193-216 |
[22] | Manabe Y, Rokutanda A, Kitagawa Y, et al. Genealogical position of native Taiwanese(Bunun Tribe) in East Asian populations based on tooth crown morphology[J]. The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, 1991, 99(1): 33-47 |
[23] | Manabe Y, Rokutanda A, Kitagawa Y. Nonmetric tooth crown traits in the Ami tribe, Taiwan aborigines: comparisons with other east Asian populations[J]. Human Biology, 1992, 64(5): 717-726 |
[24] | Yamaguchi Y. Dental characteristics in Balinese[J]. The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society, 1996, 50(4): 663-680 |
[25] | Corruccini RS, Potter RHY. Developmental correlates of crown component asymmetry and occlusal discrepancy[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1981, 55: 21-31 |
[26] | Mizoguchi Y. Mirror imagery and genetic variability of lateral asymmetries in the mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth[J]. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, 1987, 13: 11-19 |
[27] | Townsend GC, Brown T. Dental asymmetry in Australian aboriginals[J]. Human Biology, 1980, 52: 661-673 |
[28] | Scott GR. Classification, Sex dimorphism, Association, and Population variation of the canine distal accessory ridge[J]. Human Biology, 1977, 49(3): 453-469 |
[29] | Townsend GC, Brown T. The Carabelli trait in Australian Aboriginal dentition[J]. Archives of Oral Biology, 1981, 26(10): 809-814 |
[30] | Scott GR. Population Variation of Carabelli’s Trait[J]. Human Biology, 1980, 52: 63-78 |
[31] | Tan J, Peng Q, Li J, et al. Characteristics of dental morphology in the Xinjiang Uyghurs and correlation with the EDARV370A variant[J]. Science in China: Life Sciences, 2014, 57(5): 510-518 |
[32] | Matthew W. Tocheri. The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism, Asymmetry, and Inter-trait Association on the Distribution of Thirteen Deciduous Dental Nonmetric Traits in a Sample of Pima Amerindians[J]. Dental Anthropology Journal, 2002, 15 |
[33] | Khamis M. Jane AT, Samsudin A. et al. Variation in dental crown morphology in Malaysian populations[J]. Dental Anthropology Journal, 2018, 19(2): 49-60 |
[34] | Burnett SE, Irish JD, Fong MR. Wear’s the problem? Examining the effect of dental wear on studies of crown morphology. Anthropological Perspectives on Tooth Morphology[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2013, 535-554 |
[35] | Stojanowski CM, Johnson KM. Observer error, dental wear, and the inference of new world sundadonty[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2015, 156(3): 349-362 |
[36] | Molnar S. Sex, age, and tooth position as factors in the production of tooth wear[J]. American Antiquity, 1971, 36(2): 182-188 |
[37] | Tomenchuk J, Mayhall JT. A correlation of tooth wear and age among modern Igloolik Eskimos[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1979, 51(1): 67-77 |
[38] | Wen B, Li H. Genetic evidence supports demic diffusion of Han culture[J]. Nature, 2004, 431(7006): 302-305 |
[39] | Xu S, Yin X, Li S, et al. Genomic dissection of population substructure of Han Chinese and its implication in association studies[J]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2009, 85(6): 762-774 |
[40] | Qiao H, Tan JZ, Wen SQ, et al. De novo dissecting the three-dimensional facial morphology of 2379 Han Chinese individuals[J]. Phenomics, 2024, 4: 1-12 |
[41] | 李紫君. 头面部观察类形态特征揭示现代汉族的多样性[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2020, 57-61 |
[42] | 殷杏. 中国汉族头面部测量特征的南北差异性研究[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2020, 78-88 |
[43] | 吴佳姿. 现代汉族人群体部测量表型的差异研究[D].硕士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2021, 61-91 |
[44] | 陆艳, 蔡晓云, 李辉. 苗瑶与孟高棉人群的遗传同源[J]. 现代人类学通讯, 2011, 5: 214-223 |
[45] | 李辉, 金雯俐. 人类起源和迁徙之谜[M]. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2020, 144-173 |
[46] | Wang CC, Yan S, Qin ZD, et al. Late Neolithic expansion of ancient Chinese revealed by Y chromosome haplogroup O3a1c-002611[J]. J Syst Evol, 2013, 51 (3): 280-286 |
[47] | 韦兰海. 东欧亚人群父系Y染色体谱系树的更新[D].博士研究生学位论文, 上海: 复旦大学, 2016, 60-62 |
[48] | Ma X, Yang W, Gao Y, et al. Genetic Origins and Sex-Biased Admixture of the Huis[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2021, 38(9): 3804-3819 |
[49] | 郑连斌, 陆舜华. 我国23个群体体质的聚类分析与主成分分析[J]. 人类学学报, 1997, 16(2): 151-158 |
[50] | 张兴华, 张尚才, 宇克莉, 等. 山东、安徽汉族与我国19个族群体质特征的聚类分析与主成分分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 34(3): 76-80 |
[51] | 祝海歌, 乔辉, 杨晨, 等. 中国5个人群的牙齿形态特征对比研究[J]. 复旦学报 (自然科学版), 2023, 62(6): 765-774 |
[52] | Yu K, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. Physical characteristics of the Uyghurs: anthropometric data from Kashgar[J]. Science in China: Life Sciences, 2020, 50(9): 983-995 |
[53] | Feng Q, Lu Y, Ni X, et al. Genetic History of Xinjiang’s Uyghurs Suggests Bronze Age Multiple-Way Contacts in Eurasia[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2017, 34(10): 2572-2582 |
[54] | 陆九正, 乔辉, 孙畅, 等. 汉族、黎族、维吾尔族和藏族头面部测量特征比较[J]. 解剖学报, 2022, 53(4): 526-1356 |
/
〈 | 〉 |