周口店发现的人类化石及其研究进展

  • 吴秀杰
展开
  • 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
吴秀杰, 研究员, 主要从事古人类学研究。E-mail: wuxiujie@ivpp.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2024-04-09

  修回日期: 2024-05-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-11-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(42372001);国家自然科学基金(42472006)

Human fossils discovered in Zhoukoudian and their research progress

  • WU Xiujie
Expand
  • Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044

Received date: 2024-04-09

  Revised date: 2024-05-24

  Online published: 2024-11-28

摘要

自1929年北京猿人(周口店直立人)第一件头盖骨化石出土以来,迄今周口店遗址5处地点出土了更新世时期的古人类化石,分别为第1地点、第4地点、第15地点、山顶洞和田园洞。基于化石的体质特征及其生存年代,周口店人类化石的演化地位分别被归入直立人、古老型智人(更新世中晚期“非直立人”古老型人类)和早期现代人三个演化阶段。周口店人类化石的发现史大致分为三个时间段:二十世纪二三十年代的大规模发掘期、新中国成立后的恢复发掘和清理期以及二十一世纪新发现。尽管第一时间段发现的人类化石在战争中全部丢失,但聚焦周口店人类化石的研究从未间断,一些热点问题如:北京猿人是否属于隔离人群、是否为东亚现代人的祖先、山顶洞人是否具有蒙古人种特征,等等。在纪念北京猿人第一件头盖发现95周年之际,本文对周口店遗址人类化石的发现历史、标本保存状况、热点问题及其最新研究进展进行了回顾和总结,以期为探讨东亚地区人类的演化提供参考资料。

本文引用格式

吴秀杰 . 周口店发现的人类化石及其研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2024 , 43(06) : 900 -912 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0084

Abstract

The Zhoukoudian site is located on Longgu mountain, Zhoukoudian Town, Fangshan district is 48 km southwest of Beijing. The site was discovered in the 1920s, and since the first skullcap of Peking Man was discovered in 1929, 27 paleontological and archaeological localities were found at the Zhoukoudian site(ZKD). Among them, five of the localities yielded Pleistocene human fossils; they are: ZKD-1 (800~ 200 kaBP), Locality 4 (200~ 100 kaBP), ZKD-15 (Late Middle Pleistocene to early Late Pleistocene), Upper Cave (about 30 kaBP) and Tianyuan Cave (about 40 kaBP). The geological age of the sites investigated range from the Middle Pleistocene to the Late Pleistocene, covering more than 500 ka. According to the physical characteristics of the human fossils, the evolutionary status of Zhoukoudian hominids were classified as Homo erectus, archaic Homo sapiens (Middle and Late Pleistocene “non-Homo erectus” archaic humans) or early modern humans. The research at in Zhoukoudian site can be summarized into the following three periods: 1) Large-scale excavation in the 1920s and 1930s with abundant human fossils found at the Locality 1 and Upper Cave. Locality 1 fossils were named as Sinanthropus pekinensis, Peking Man or Zhoukoudian Homo erectus, include five relatively complete crania, more than 150 teeth, several mandibles, and a large number of cranial, facial, and postcranial fragments, totalling about 40 individuals. At Upper Cave, three human skulls, four mandibles plus a few teeth and bone fragmens were found, representing about 7 to 10 individuals. Unfortunately, all the above specimens were lost during the World War II. 2) A period of excavation recovery and site clearing after the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. During this time, 11 human fossils were found at Locality 1. 3) New discoveries in the 21st century included a human skeleton from Tianyuan Cave, and a human parietal bone was identified among the fragments of mammal fossils at the Zhoukoudian Locality 15.

Over the past years, there continues much discussion about Zhoukoudian such as: Whether the Peking Man has unique or derived features which is not shared by the African and other Asian representatives; whether Peking Man is the direct ancestor of modern populations in East Asia; and whether the Upper Cave Man has Mongoloid characteristics. In recent years, with the new discoveries and the innovative research methods, further questions dealing with survival adaptations and genetic structure have been asked. In commemoration of the 95th anniversary of the discovery of the first Peking Man skullcap, this paper reviews and summarizes the history, research topics and research progress of work discovery at Zhoukoudian Site, in order to provide reference for the discussion of human evolution in East Asia.

参考文献

[1] Grün R, Huang PH, Wu XZ, et al. ESR analysis of teeth from the palaeoanthropological site of Zhoukoudian, China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1997, 32: 83-91
[2] Shen GJ, Gao X, Gao B, et al. Age of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus determined with 26Al/10Be burial dating[J]. Nature, 2009, 458: 198-200
[3] 顾玉珉. 周口店新洞人及其生活环境[A]. 见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所(主编).古人类论文集[C].北京:科学出版社, 1978, 158-174
[4] 陈铁梅, 原思训, 高世君. 铀子系法测定骨化石年龄的可靠性研究及华北地区主要旧石器地点的铀子系年代序列[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3: 259-269
[5] Pei WC. A preliminary study on a new Paleolithic station known as Locality 15 at Zhoukoutien[J]. Bulletin of Geological Society of China, 1939, 19(2): 147-187
[6] Li F, Bae CJ, Ramsey CB, et al. Re-dating Zhoukoudian Upper Cave, northern China and its regional significance[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 121: 170-177
[7] Shang H, Tong HW, Zhang SQ, et al. An early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, Zhoukoudian, China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2007, 104: 6575-6578
[8] Zanolli C, Pan L, Dumoncel J, et al. Inner tooth morphology of Homo erectus from Zhoukoudian. New evidence from an old collection housed at Uppsala University, Sweden[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 116: 1-13
[9] Weidenreich F. On the earliest representative of modern mankind recovered on the soil of east Asia[M]. Peking Natural History Bulletin, 1939, 13: 161-174
[10] Lee B, Liu W, Wu XJ. Investigation of a credible report by a US Marine on the location of the missing Peking Man fossils[J]. South African Journal of Sciences, 2012, 108(3-4): 1-3
[11] 吴汝康, 贾兰坡. 周口店新发现的中国猿人化石[J]. 古生物学报, 1954, 2: 267-288
[12] 吴汝康, 赵资奎. 周口店新发现的中国猿人下颌骨[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1959, 1: 155-158
[13] 邱中郎, 顾玉珉, 张银运, 等. 周口店新发现的北京猿人化石及文化遗物[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1973, 11: 109-131
[14] 同号文, 尚虹, 张双权, 等. 周口店田园洞古人类遗址的发现[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49: 893-897
[15] Black D. On a lower molar hominid tooth from the Chou Kou Tien deposit[J]. Palaeontologica Sinica Series D, 1927, 7: 1-28
[16] Black D. Further hominid remains of lower Quaternary age from the Chou Kou Tien deposit[J]. Nature, 1927, 120: 954
[17] Black D. Sinanthropus pekinensis: The recovery of further fossil remains of this early hominid from the Chou Kou Tien deposit[J]. Science, 1929, 69: 674-676
[18] Black D, Teilhard de Chardin P, Young CC, et al. Fossil Man in China--The Choukoutien cave deposits with a synopsis of our present knowledge of the late Cenozoic of China[M]. The Geological Survey of China Series A, 1933, 11: 1-158
[19] Weidenreich F. The mandibles of Sinanthropus pekinensis: A comparative study[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D, 1936, 7: 1-162
[20] Weidenreich F. The skull of Sinanthropus pekinensis: A comparative on a primitive hominid skull[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D, 1943, 10: 1-484
[21] Weidenreich F. The dentition of Sinanthropus pekinensis: A comparative odontography of the hominids[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D, 1937, 1: 1-180
[22] Weidenreich F. The ramification of the middle meningeal artery in fossil hominids and its bearing upon phylogenetic problems[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D, 1938, 3: 1-16
[23] Weidenreich F. The extremity bones of Sinantbropus pekinensis[M]. Palaeontologia Sinica Series D5, 1941, 1-150
[24] Wu XJ, Schepartz LA, Liu W. A new Homo erectus (Zhoukoudian V) brain endocast from China[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2010, 277: 337-344
[25] Wu XJ, Schepartz LA, Christopher JN. Morphological and morphometric analysis of variation in the Zhoukoudian Homo erectus brain endocasts[J]. Quaternary International, 2010, 211: 4-13
[26] Xing S, Carlson K, Wei PP, et al. Morphology and structure of Homo erectus humeri from Zhoukoudian, Locality 1[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6: e4279
[27] Song X, Martinón-Torres M, Bermúdez de Castro JM. The fossil teeth of the Peking Man[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 2066
[28] Rightmire GP, Lordkipanidze D, Vekua A. Anatomical descriptions, comparative studies and evolutionary significance of the hominin skulls from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2006, 50(2): 115-141
[29] Kramer A. Human taxonomic diversity in the Pleistocene: Does Homo erectus represent multiple hominid species?[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1993, 91: 161-171
[30] Stringer CB. The definition of Homo erectus and the existence of the species in Africa and Europe[J]. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 1984, 69: 131-143
[31] Andrews P. An alternative interpretation of characters used to define Homo erectus[J]. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 1984, 69: 167-175
[32] Antón SC. Evolutionary significance of cranial variation in Asian Homo erectus[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2002, 118: 301-323
[33] Antón SC. Natural history of Homo erectus[J]. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 2003, 46: 126-170
[34] Rightmire P. Homo erectus: Ancestor or evolutionary side branch[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1993, 1: 43-49
[35] Rightmire GP. Evidence from facial morphology of similarity of Asian and African representatives of Homo erectus[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1998, 106: 61-85
[36] Brauer G. How different are Asian and African Homo erectus?[J]. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg, 1994, 171: 301-318
[37] Asfaw B, Gilbert WH, Beyene Y, et al. Remains of Homo erectus from Bouri, Middle Awash, Ethiopia[J]. Nature, 2002, 416: 317-320
[38] 刘武, Mbua E, 吴秀杰. 非洲和中国直立人某些颅骨特征的比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 21(4): 255-267
[39] 刘武, 张银运. 中国直立人形态特征的变异:颅骨测量数据的分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(2): 121-136
[40] Pan L, Zanolli C. Comparative observations on the premolar root and pulp canal configurations of Middle Pleistocene Homo in China[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2019, 168(3): 637-646
[41] Xing S, Martinón-Torres M, Deng CL, et al. Early Pleistocene hominin teeth from Meipu, southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 151: 102924
[42] Weidenreich F. The trend of human evolution[J]. Evolution, 1947, 1(4): 221-236
[43] Wolpoff MH, Wu XZ, Thorne AG. Modern Homo sapiens origins: A general theory of hominid evolution involving the fossil evidence from East Asia[A]. In: Smith FH, Spencer F(eds). The Origins of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence[C]. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1984, 411-483
[44] 吴新智. 从中国晚期智人颅牙特征看中国现代人起源[J]. 人类学学报, 1998, 17(4): 276-282
[45] Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution[J]. Nature, 1987, 325: 31-36
[46] Su B, Xiao J, Underhill P, et al. Y-chromosome evidence for a northward migration of modern humans into Eastern Asia during the Last Ice Age[J]. American Journal of Hum Genetics, 1999, 65(6): 1718-1724
[47] Jin L, Su B. Natives or immigrants: modern human origin in east Asia[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2000, 1: 126-133
[48] 吴新智. 与中国现代人起源问题有联系的分子生物学研究成果的讨论[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(4): 259-269
[49] Smith FH, Falsetti AB, Donnelly SM. Modern human origins[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1989, 32: 35e68
[50] Pan L, Zanolli C, Martinón-Torres M, et al. Early Pleistocene hominin teeth from Gongwangling of Lantian, Central China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2022, 168: 103212
[51] 吴新智. 周口店山顶洞人化石的研究[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1961, 3: 181-203
[52] Cunningham D, Wescott D. Within-group human variation in the Asian Pleistocene: The three Upper Cave crania[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2002, 42: 627-638
[53] Cunningham D, Jantz R. The morphometric relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103 to modern Homo sapiens[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 45: 1-8
[54] Kamminga J, Wright RVS. The Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian and the origins of the Mongoloids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1988, 17: 739-765
[55] Lahr MM. The multiregional model of modern human origins: A reassessment of its morphological basis[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1994, 26: 23-56
[56] Neves W, Pucciarelli H. The Zhoukoudian Upper Cave skull 101 as seen from the Americas[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1998, 34: 219-222
[57] 刘武, 何嘉宁, 吴秀杰, 等. 山顶洞人与现代华北人部分头骨非测量性特征比较及中国更新世晚期人类演化的一些问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25: 26-41
[58] Shang H, Trinkaus E. The early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China[M]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2010, 1-247
[59] Wei PP, Ian W, Tea J, et al. Structural analysis of the femoral diaphyses of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 434: 48-56
[60] Wei P, Zhao Y, Walker CS, et al. Internal structural properties of the humeral diaphyses in an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China[J]. Quaternary International, 2021, 591: 107-118
[61] Trinkaus E, Shang H. Anatomical evidence for the antiquity of human foot wear: Tianyuan and Sunghir[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, 35: 1928-1933
[62] Fu Q, Meyer M, Gao X, et al. DNA analysis of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2013, 110: 2223-2227
[63] Mao X, Zhang H, Qiao S, et al. The deep population history of Northeast Asia from the Late Pleistocene to the Holocene[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(12): 3256-3266
[64] 刘武, 吴秀杰, 邢松, 等. 中国古人类化石[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014, 1-378
[65] 陈逸迎, 吴秀杰. 周口店5号直立人额骨眶上圆枕处的创伤痕迹[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42, 6: 14-23
[66] 吴秀杰. 周口店直立人头骨创伤与人工切割痕迹辨析[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 608-617
[67] Hu YW, Shang H, Tong HW, et al. Stable isotope dietary analysis of the Tianyuan 1 early modern human[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2009, 106: 10971-10974
[68] 刘武, 吴秀杰. 中更新世晚期中国古人类化石的形态多样性及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 563-575
文章导航

/