研究论文

勒瓦娄哇的剥片模式与技术组合

  • 王潇玉 ,
  • 高星
展开
  • 1.西北大学文化遗产学院,西安 710127
    2.中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室,中国科学院脊椎动物与古人类研究所,北京 100044
    3.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
王潇玉, 博士研究生,主要从事旧石器时代考古研究。E-mail: wangxiaoyu28@outlook.com
高星,研究员,主要研究领域为旧石器时代考古。E-mail: gaoxing@ivpp.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2023-06-19

  修回日期: 2024-01-11

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-13

基金资助

国家社科基金中国历史研究院重大历史问题研究专项(21@WTK001);国家重点研发专项(2020YFC1521500)

Reduction patterns and assemblage of the Levallois technology

  • WANG Xiaoyu ,
  • GAO Xing
Expand
  • 1. School of Cultural Heritage, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127
    2. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2023-06-19

  Revised date: 2024-01-11

  Online published: 2025-02-13

摘要

勒瓦娄哇技术是旧石器时代中期的代表性技术之一,其特点是通过预制石核来生产特定的石片产品。早年中国发现的勒瓦娄哇技术产品较少,所以对于此类技术的研究有限。本文重点介绍勒瓦娄哇技术的概念、产品及其剥片模式的具体特点,回顾目前在中国发现的勒瓦娄哇遗存,梳理相关技术特征和遗址内石器工业的技术面貌,对相关的研究材料做了补充,希望能对后续的考古研究提供一些参考。

本文引用格式

王潇玉 , 高星 . 勒瓦娄哇的剥片模式与技术组合[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(01) : 1 -13 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0067

Abstract

Levallois technology, denominated after the Levallois-Perret site located in the northern suburbs of Paris, France, was initially recognized and demarcated by the archaeologist Henri Breuil. This particular technology, which necessitates the fabrication of specific flake products through core preparation, forms a distinctive hallmark of the Middle Paleolithic epoch in the western region of the Old World (referred to as the Middle Stone Age in the African context). It epitomizes the primary technological expression of Mode 3 preformed cores within Clark’s five-mode technological classification system. Marked by the pre-shaping of cores and the generation of specialized flake varieties, Levallois technology held sway in the Mousterian industrial complex.

Levallois technology originally sprang up during the late phase of the Lower Paleolithic Acheulian industry and subsequently experienced further progression within the Mousterian technological paradigm during the Middle Paleolithic period. The incidence and application of Levallois technology exhibited pronounced variations among diverse Paleolithic assemblages; nevertheless, it unfailingly materialized in a multitude of stone tool industries spanning the Near East, Europe, Africa, and Asia. This lithic technology was noteworthy for its elaborate preforming sequence and the production of standardized implements, attesting to the elevated cognitive capabilities of ancient humans. As a result, this technology is routinely contemplated in the reconstructions of human intellectual evolution, given that it intimates advanced powers of conceptualization, abstraction, intelligence, and language.

In contradistinction to its widespread prevalence in other regions, the documentary evidence of Levallois technology in China remains comparatively scant, attributable to the paucity of archaeological vestiges. Some scholars previously attributed the deficiency of Levallois technology in East Asia to meager effective population sizes and the absence of the Acheulian heritage. However, in recent years, with the strides made in archaeological excavations, the discovery of artifacts embodying Levallois technology at Chinese sites has galvanized the attention of the academic fraternity. Indicative Levallois artifacts have been unearthed at several locations in northern China, especially in areas proximate to Russia and Mongolia. These sites, dating back approximately 50,000 to 40,000 years ago, include Shuidonggou, Jinsitai, and Tongtian Cave. These findings have subverted prior assumptions and furnished novel vantage points for grasping technological assemblages, technological dissemination, as well as the divergences from representative sites of the late Middle Pleistocene and early Late Pleistocene in northern China.

This paper strives to introduce and encapsulate the Levallois concepts, products, and idiosyncratic traits of the reduction pattern. It clarifies the extant evidence of Levallois technology unearthed in China and the characteristics of the affiliated industries. By dint of this endeavor, we aspire to proffer valuable perspectives for further research undertakings.

参考文献

[1] Clark G. World Prehistory: A New Outline[M]. Cambridge: University Press, 1969, 40-64
[2] 李锋. 莫斯特石器组合与尼安德特人的演化[J]. 科学, 2019, 71(3): 6-9
[3] Dibble HL, Bar-yosef O. Definition and interpretation of Levallois technology[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1993, 2(3): 77
[4] Schlanger N. Understanding Levallois: Lithic technology and cognitive archaeology[J]. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1996, 6(2): 231-254
[5] Movius HL. The Lower Palaeolithic cultures of southern and eastern Asia[J]. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1948, 38(4): 329-420
[6] Lycett SJ. Why is there a lack of Mode 3 Levallois technologies in East Asia? A phylogenetic test of the Movius-Schick hypothesis[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2007, 26(4): 541-575
[7] De Perthes JB. Antiquités Celtiques et Antédiluviennes[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
[8] Perpère M. A propos de quelques nucléus Levallois africains[A]. In: Roubet C, Hugot H, Souville G(eds). Préhistoire Africaine[C]. Paris: ADPF, 1981, 301-311
[9] De Mortillet G. Le préhistorique antiquité de l’homme[M]. Paris: Reinwald, 1883
[10] Reboux J. Silex taillés associés à des ossements fossiles dans les terrains quaternaires de environs de Paris [A]. In: Hampel J(eds). Congrès international d’archéologie et d’anthropologie préhistorique[C]. 1867, 103-109
[11] Ranov VA. The Levallois Paradox[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 69-78
[12] Mark F. Principles and Properties of Litch Core Reduction: Implications for Levallois technology[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 11-23
[13] Sellet F. Levallois or not Levallois: Does it really matter? Learning from an African case[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 25-39
[14] Bordes F. Mousterian cultures in France: Artifacts from recent excavation dispel some popular misconceptions about Neanderthal man[J]. Science, 1961, 134(3482): 803-810
[15] Delagnes A. Variability within uniformity: three levels of variability within Levallois system[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 201-212
[16] Dibble HL. The implications of stone tool types for the presence of language during the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic[A]. In: Mellars P, Stringer C(eds). The human revolution: behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans[C]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1989, 415-431
[17] Dibble H. Raw material variation in Levallois flake manufacture[J]. Current Anthropology, 1985, 26(3): 391-393
[18] Davidson I, Noble W. Tools and language in human evolution[A]. In: Gibson KR, Ingold T(eds). Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 363-388
[19] Bo?da E. Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 41-68
[20] Tryon CA, McBrearty S, Texier PJ. Levallois lithic technology from the Kapthurin formation, Kenya: Acheulian origin and Middle Stone Age diversity[J]. African Archaeological Review, 2005, 22: 199-229
[21] Blegen N, Jicha BR, McBrearty S. A new tephrochronology for early diverse stone tool technologies and long-distance raw material transport in the Middle to Late Pleistocene Kapthurin Formation, East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 121: 75-103
[22] White M, Ashton N. Lower Palaeolithic core technology and the origins of the Levallois method in North-Western Europe[J]. Current Anthropology, 2003, 44(4): 598-609
[23] Picin A, Peresani M, Falgueres C, et al. San Bernardino Cave (Italy) and the appearance of Levallois technology in Europe: Results of a radiometric and technological reassessment[J]. PloS one, 2013, 8(10): 1-8
[24] Fontana F, Moncel MH, Nenzioni G, et al. Widespread diffusion of technical innovations around 300,000 years ago in Europe as a reflection of anthropological and social transformations? New comparative data from the western Mediterranean sites of Orgnac (France) and Cave dall’Olio (Italy)[J]. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2013, 32(4): 478-498
[25] Rosenberg-Yefet T, Shemer M, Barkai R. Lower Paleolithic winds of change: Prepared core technologies and the onset of the Levallois method in the Levantine late Acheulian[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2022, 10: 1-29
[26] Chazan M. Flake production at the Lower Palaeolithic site of Holon (Israel): Implications for the origin of the Levallois method[J]. Antiquity, 2000, 74(285): 495-499
[27] Kuhn SL, Zwyns N. Rethinking the initial upper paleolithic[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 29-38
[28] Brantingham PJ, Krivoshapkin AI, Jinzeng L, et al. He initial upper paleolithic in northeast Asia[J]. Current Anthropology, 2001, 42(5): 735-746
[29] Foley R, Lahr MM. Mode 3 technologies and the evolution of modern humans[J]. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 1997, 7(1): 3-36
[30] Zaidner Y, Weinstein-Evron M. The emergence of the Levallois technology in the Levant: A view from the Early Middle Paleolithic site of Misliya Cave, Israel[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2020, 144: 1-21
[31] Adler DS, Wilkinson KN, Blockley S, et al. Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus[J]. Science, 2014, 345(6204): 1609-1613
[32] Rolland N. Levallois technique emergence: Single or multiple? A review of the Euro-African record[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 333-359
[33] Goren-Inbar N, Grosman L, Sharon G. The technology and significance of the Acheulian giant cores of Gesher Benot Ya ‘aqov, Israel[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2011, 38(8): 1901-1917
[34] Li H, Kuman K, Lotter MG, et al. The Victoria West: Earliest prepared core technology in the Acheulean at Canteen Kopje and implications for the cognitive evolution of early hominids[J]. Royal Society Open Science, 2017, 4(6): 1-12
[35] 雷蕾, 李大伟, 麻晓荣, 等. 阿舍利大石片生产方式与策略研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(2): 183-192
[36] Lycett SJ. Are Victoria West cores “proto-Levallois”? A phylogenetic assessment[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2009, 56(2): 175-191
[37] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. “勒瓦娄哇技术”源流管窥[J]. 考古, 2015, 2: 71-78
[38] Gamble C. The palaeolithic societies of Europe[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999
[39] Tuffreau A, Antoine P. The earliest occupation of Europe: Continental Northwestern[A]. In: Roebroeks W, Kolfschoten T(eds). The earliest occupation of Europe[C]. Leiden: University of Leiden and European Science Foundation, 1995, 147-163
[40] DeBono H, Goren-Inbar N. Note on a link between Acheulian handaxes and the Levallois method[J]. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society, 2001, 31: 9-23
[41] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 盘状石核相关问题探讨[J]. 考古, 2016, 2: 88-94
[42] 李文成. 盘状石核剥片实验及对华北石片石器研究的启示[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(3): 514-522
[43] Terradas X. Discoid flaking method: Conception and technological variability[A]. In: Peresani M(ed). Discoid Lithic Technology: Advances and Implications[C]. Oxford: BAR International Series 1120, 2003, 19-31
[44] Inizan ML, Roche H, Tixier J. Technology of knapped stone[M]. Nanterre: CREP, 1992, 65-66
[45] Brantingham PJ, Kuhn SL. Constraints on Levallois core technology: A mathematical model[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2001, 28(7): 747-761
[46] Lycett SJ, Eren MI. Levallois economics: An examination of ‘waste’ production in experimentally produced Levallois reduction sequences[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2013, 40(5): 2384-2392
[47] Meignen L. Levallois lithic production systems in the Middle Paleolithic of the Near East: The case of the unidirectional method[A]. In: Dibble H L, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 361-380
[48] Shimelmitz R, Kuhn SL. The toolkit in the core: There is more to Levallois production than predetermination[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 464: 81-91
[49] Peresani M, Di Taranto LEC. Blades, bladelets and flakes: A case of variability in tool design at the dawn of the Middle-Upper Palaeolithic transition in Italy[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2013, 12(4): 211-221
[50] 彭菲. 中国北方旧石器时代石叶遗存研究:以水洞沟与新疆材料为例[D].博士学位论文, 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2012
[51] Eren MI, Lycett SJ. Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘preferential’Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes[J]. PLoS one, 2012, 7(1): 1-10
[52] Van Peer P. Current issues in the Levallois problem[A]. In: Dibble HL, Bar-Yosef O(eds). The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology[C]. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1995, 1-9
[53] Debénath A, Dibble HL. Handbook of Paleolithic Typology: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe[M]. Philadelphia: UPenn Museum of Archaeology, 1994, 50-51
[54] 王晓琨, 魏坚, 陈全家, 等. 内蒙古金斯太洞穴遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2010, 29(1): 15-32
[55] Li F, Kuhn SL, Chen F, et al. The easternmost middle paleolithic (Mousterian) from Jinsitai cave, north China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2018, 114: 76-84
[56] 于建军, 王幼平, 何嘉宁, 等. 新疆吉木乃县通天洞遗址[J]. 考古, 2018, 7: 3-14
[57] Nian X, Gao X, Zhou L. Chronological studies of Shuidonggou (SDG) Locality 1 and their significance for archaeology[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 347: 5-11
[58] Li F, Gao X, Chen FY, et al. The development of Upper Paleolithic China: New results from the Shuidonggou site[J]. Antiquity, 2013, 87: 368-383
[59] 李锋, 陈福友, 汪英华, 等. 晚更新世晚期中国北方石叶技术所反映的技术扩散与人群迁移[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2016, 46(7): 891-905
[60] 牛东伟, 裴树文, 王惠民, 等. 宁夏水洞沟遗址第7地点石制品的剥片与修理技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(3): 367-378
[61] 高星, 王惠民, 裴树文, 等. 水洞沟:2003-2007年度考古发掘与研究报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013, 146-156
[62] 高星, 裴树文, 彭菲, 等. 2004年新疆旧石器考古调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 499-509
[63] 张森水. 内蒙古中南部和山西西北部新发现的旧石器[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1959, 1: 31-40
[64] 裴文中, 袁振新, 林一朴, 等. 贵州黔西县观音洞试掘报告[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1965, 3: 36-45
[65] 李炎贤, 文本亨. 观音洞:贵州黔西旧石器时代初期文化遗址[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1986
[66] Li Y, Hou Y, Be?da E. Mode of débitage and technical cognition of hominids at the Guanyindong site[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54 (21): 3864-3871
[67] 李英华. 贵州黔西观音洞遗址石器工业技术研究[D].博士学位论文, 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2009
[68] Hu Y, Marwick B, Zhang J, et al. Late Middle Pleistocene Levallois stone-tool technology in southwest China[J]. Nature, 2019, 565: 82-85
[69] Li F, Li Y, Gao X, et al. A refutation of reported Levallois technology from Guanyindong Cave in South China[J]. National Science Review, 2019, 6(6): 1094-1096
[70] Li Y, Bo?da E, Forestier H, et al. Lithic Technology, typology and cross-regional comparison of Pleistocene lithic industries: Comment on the earliest evidence of Levallois in East Asia[J]. L’anthropologie, 2019, 123(4-5): 769-781
[71] Hu Y, Marwick B, Zhang JF, et al. Robust technological readings identify integrated structures typical of the Levallois concept in Guanyindong Cave, south China[J]. National Science Review, 2019, 6(6): 1096-1099
[72] 李锋, 李英华, 高星. 贵州观音洞遗址石制品剥片技术辨析[J]. 人类学学报, 2020, 39(1): 1-11
[73] 任进成. 泥河湾盆地板井子旧石器时代遗址形成过程与石器技术研究[D].博士学位论文, 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2019
[74] 贾兰坡, 卫奇, 李超荣. 许家窑旧石器时代文化遗址1976 年发掘报告[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1979, 17(4): 277-293
[75] 王志浩, 侯亚梅, 杨泽蒙, 等. 内蒙古鄂尔多斯市乌兰木伦旧石器时代中期遗址[J]. 考古, 2012, 7: 3-13
[76] 高星. 关于周口店第15 地点石器类型和加工技术的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2001, 20(1): 1-18
[77] Bar-Yosef O, Wang Y. Paleolithic archaeology in China[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2012, 41: 319-335
[78] 高星. 关于“中国旧石器时代中期”的探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 1999(1): 3-17
[79] Li F, Kuhn S L, Olsen J W, et al. Disparate stone age technological evolution in North China: Lithic technological variability and relations between populations during MIS 3[J]. Journal of Anthropological Research, 2014, 70(1): 35-67
[80] 陈虹, 沈辰. 石器研究中“操作链” 的概念、内涵及应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(2): 201-214
文章导航

/