研究论文

山西下川遗址水井背地点石核的剥片技术

  • 蔡馨毅 ,
  • 杜水生
展开
  • 北京师范大学历史学院,北京 100875
蔡馨毅,博士研究生,主要研究方向为旧石器考古。E-mail: caixinyi0508@qq.com
杜水生,教授,主要研究方向为旧石器考古。E-mail: ssdu@bnu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-11-02

  修回日期: 2024-01-04

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-13

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD257)

Core flaking technology of the Shuijingbei locality of Xiachuan site in Shanxi

  • CAI Xinyi ,
  • DU Shuisheng
Expand
  • School of History, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received date: 2023-11-02

  Revised date: 2024-01-04

  Online published: 2025-02-13

摘要

山西下川遗址作为中国北方地区典型的旧石器时代晚期遗址,确认包含简单石核-石片技术及细石叶技术两大技术类型。现通过全面考察下川遗址水井背地点石核-石片技术所见石核的各项技术特征,归纳得出台面导向和剥片面导向两大剥片组织策略,并指出该地点内旧石器晚期中段的石核-石片技术以更为进步的剥片面导向组织策略为主。进而推知下川遗址石核-石片技术在旧石器晚期早段至中段的发展存在连续性与进步性,推测其中的进步性受到晚期中段共存的细石叶技术影响。两大石器技术类型发展的背后,实际反映了中国北方地区晚更新世晚期现代人迁徙与流动的空间广阔性及过程复杂性。

本文引用格式

蔡馨毅 , 杜水生 . 山西下川遗址水井背地点石核的剥片技术[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(01) : 14 -26 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0049

Abstract

Located in Qinshui County, Jincheng City, Shanxi Province, the Xiachuan site stands out as a significant Upper Paleolithic archaeological site. Excavations have revealed five distinct localities within the site, namely Xiaobaihuageliang, Fuyihegeliang, Liushuiyao, Shuijingbei, and Niulu localities. Two squares exhibiting similar stratigraphic accumulations were excavated at the Shuijingbei locality. The stratigraphic accumulation can be categorized into two primary cultural stages. The lower cultural layer comprises a wealth of remains characterized by a simple core-flake industry, indicative of the early Upper Paleolithic period (44~33 kaBP). The upper cultural stage contains remnants of microblade technology, corresponding to the middle Upper Paleolithic period (26~25 kaBP). During the early Upper Paleolithic stage at the Shuijingbei locality, the prevalent technological approach was simple core-flake industry, most artifacts were directly knapped by hard hammers with a small number of artifacts using bipolar method. In the upper cultural period at the Shuijingbei locality, microblade technology emerged alongside the continued presence of the simple core-flake industry. Among all the excavation localities within the Xiachuan site, the Shuijingbei locality stands out as having the most abundant remains associated with the simple core-flake industry. This particular locality offers valuable insights into the evolutionary trajectory of flaking practices across different time periods. A thorough analysis of the technical attributes of simple core-flake industry cores discovered from these distinct cultural layers at the Shuijingbei locality reveals two distinct flaking organization strategies: Platform orientation and flaking surface orientation. The platform orientation organization encompasses four distinct flaking patterns: Single flaking direction and surface, single flaking direction with multiple flaking surfaces, dual flaking surfaces with a single flaking direction, and multiple flaking surfaces and directions. Conversely, the more sophisticated flaking surface orientation strategy incorporates lateral directions within a single flaking surface and opposing flaking directions within the same flaking surface, constituting two distinctive flaking patterns and highlighting the complexity of flaking techniques. Remnants from both the early and middle Upper Paleolithic periods at the Shuijingbei locality in the Xiachuan site display evidence of these flaking organization strategies, suggesting the enduring nature of the simple core-flake industry’s techniques. Notably, during the middle Upper Paleolithic period at the Shuijingbei locality, advancements in core-flaking techniques are evident, characterized by improved platform retouch techniques, continuous flaking on a single surface, enhanced control over flakes’ shape and size, and increased core development and utilization. By comparing the characteristics of these flaking techniques, it can be inferred that the advancements observed in the middle Upper Paleolithic stage were likely influenced by the concurrent presence of microblade technology during the same period. This interaction between the two flaking technologies reflects the movements and migrations of ancient populations across the vast eastern part of the Eurasian continent, particularly in northern China, during the Upper Paleolithic phase.

参考文献

[1] 张森水. 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990, 4: 322-333
[2] 李锋. “文化传播”与“生态适应”:水洞沟遗址第2地点考古学观察[D].博士研究生论文, 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2012, 80-82
[3] 侯亚梅. “东谷坨石核”类型的命名与初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2003, 4: 279-292
[4] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽, 张松林, 等. 郑州老奶奶庙遗址石核类型学初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 200-211
[5] 刘扬, 侯亚梅, 杨泽蒙. 鄂尔多斯市乌兰木伦遗址石核剥片技术的阶段类型学研究[J]. 考古, 2015, 6: 68-79
[6] 李三灵, 李浩. 旧石器时代早期石核分类方法试析[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(2): 194-207
[7] de la Torre I, Mora R, Dom??nguez-Rodrigo M, et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of LowerPleistocene hominids[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2003, 44(2): 203-224
[8] de la Torre I, Mora R. Technological Strategies in the Lower Pleistocene at Olduvai Beds I & II[M]. ERAUL 112, Liège: University of Liège Press, 2005
[9] de la Torre I. The early stone age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the developed Oldowan/early Acheulean in East Africa[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2011, 60(6): 768-812
[10] 杜水生. 连续与断裂:重新认识下川遗址在中国旧石器文化研究上的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(1): 153-163
[11] 王建, 王向前, 陈哲英. 下川文化:山西下川遗址调查报告[J]. 考古学报, 1978, 3: 259-288+388-395
[12] 杜水生, 王晶, 王益人, 等. 山西沁水下川遗址小白桦圪梁地点2015年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2019, 3: 383-408
[13] 杜水生, 任海云, 张婷. 山西沁水县下川遗址富益河圪梁地点2014年T1发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 4: 14-28
[14] 杜水生, 张婷, 任海云. 2014年山西下川遗址富益河圪梁地点3号探方的发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(5): 638-650
[15] 申艳茹, 王益人, 杜水生. 山西下川遗址流水腰地点的细石叶工业[J]. 第四纪研究, 2020, 40(1): 264-274
[16] William Andrefsky Jr. Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2005
[17] 马东东, 裴树文. 旧石器时代砸击法剥片技术相关问题探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 584-597
[18] 王幼平. 华北细石器技术的出现与发展[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(4): 565-576
[19] 王幼平. 华北旧石器晚期环境变化与人类迁徙扩散[J]. 人类学学报, 2018, 37(3): 341-351
[20] 王建, 王益人. 下川细石核形制研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 1:1-8+85
[21] 侯亚梅, 卫奇, 冯兴无, 等. 泥河湾盆地东谷坨遗址再发掘[J]. 第四纪研究, 1999, 2: 139-147+193-194
[22] 卫奇. 中国早更新世旧石器[J]. 文物春秋, 2000, 2: 1-14
[23] 侯亚梅. 泥河湾盆地东谷坨遗址石器工业[D]. 北京: 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所, 2000
[24] 贾兰坡, 卫奇, 李超荣. 许家窑旧石器时代文化遗址1976年发掘报告[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1979, 4: 277-293+347-350
[25] 马宁, 裴树文, 高星. 许家窑遗址74093地点1977年出土石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(3): 275-288
[26] 李占扬. 许昌灵井遗址2005年出土石制品的初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2007, 2: 138-154
[27] 李占扬. 许昌灵井旧石器时代遗址2006年发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 2010, 1: 73-100+133-140
[28] Li H, Li Y, Yu L, et al. Continuous technological and behavioral development of late Pleistocene hominins in central South China: Multidisciplinary analysis at Sandinggai[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2022, 298: 107850
[29] 李意愿, 谭远辉, 罗希, 等. 湖南澧县十里岗旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古与文物, 2020, 1: 3-13
[30] 李占扬, 赵清坡, 李雅楠. 灵井许昌人遗址2014年发掘简报[J]. 华夏考古, 2016, 1: 3-25+2+167
[31] 李意愿. 石器工业与适应行为:澧水流域晚更新世古人类文化研究[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2022
文章导航

/