研究论文

山西下川富益河圪梁地点燧石制品的微痕分析

  • 刘吉颖 ,
  • 任海云 ,
  • 杜水生
展开
  • 1.北京师范大学历史学院,北京 100875
    2.山西省考古研究所,太原 030001
刘吉颖,博士,主要研究方向为旧石器时代考古、微痕分析。E-mail: ljy18868819149@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-02-06

  录用日期: 2024-05-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-15

基金资助

国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD257)

Use-wear analysis of chert artifacts from the Fuyihegeliang Locality of Xiachuan site, Shanxi

  • LIU Jiying ,
  • REN Haiyun ,
  • DU Shuisheng
Expand
  • 1. School of History, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    2. Shanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, Taiyuan 030001

Received date: 2024-02-06

  Accepted date: 2024-05-10

  Online published: 2025-04-15

摘要

距今4万年前后是中国华北地区晚更新世人类演变的一个关键阶段,下川遗址下文化层正处于这一阶段,其出土的物质文化遗存对于探讨中国晚更新世的区域多样性和人类行为的演化过程具有重要意义。富益河圪梁地点的文化内涵最为丰富,旧石器时代晚期早段文化层出土了大量石制品。其中,研磨盘和重型石器以石英砂岩为原料,而刮削器、尖状器、凹缺器等轻型石器主要采用黑色燧石制作而成。为了解燧石制品的功能及其相关的人类行为,本次研究对富益河圪梁地点旧石器时代晚期早段文化层2014年发掘出土的53件燧石标本开展了全面的微痕分析。结果表明燧石制品功能多样,包括加工木、肉和骨等多种材料,显示出该地点丰富的人类活动。燧石制品使用较为灵活,多采用锋利的非修理刃。加工木材是富益河圪梁地点燧石制品最常见的功能,反映出该地点人群对于植物资源的开发和利用。

本文引用格式

刘吉颖 , 任海云 , 杜水生 . 山西下川富益河圪梁地点燧石制品的微痕分析[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(02) : 201 -209 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2024.0062

Abstract

The Upper Paleolithic period in North China began around 40,000 years ago, demonstrating increased cultural variability. While many sites primarily employed simple core and flake technology, new technologies emerged in several locations. Innovations in ochre processing, bone tools and ornaments, long-distance obsidian transportation, and intra-site spatial organization further illustrate the complex nature of human evolution and interaction between different cultural groups. However, it is argued that contextual factors such as environmental conditions and preservation variations may have influenced the cultural variability found in the archaeological record. Due to the poor preservation of organic materials in Paleolithic contexts, it is essential to reconstruct human activities through use-wear analysis of well-preserved lithic artifacts.

The Xiachuan site, with its well-preserved archaeological layers dating back approximately 44~30 kaBP (calibrated), holds great significance in the ongoing discussion about behavioral variability in North China. Among these, the Fuyihegeliang Locality (35°26′22″N, 112°0′43″E), which was re-excavated in 2014, uncovered abundant archaeological remains in the Early Upper Paleolithic layers (40~30 kaBP, calibrated). These include a large number of lithic artifacts, grindstones, ochre, and several hearths. The lithic assemblage is dominated by a simple core and flake technology, with small lithic artifacts mainly made from black chert and heavy-duty implements mainly made from quartz sandstone.

While previous studies on lithic artifacts focused on typological and technological analyses, limited knowledge exists regarding tool functions and their correlation with human activities. This study fills this gap by presenting the results of a meticulous use-wear analysis of 53 chert artifacts sampled from the Early Upper Paleolithic layer at the Fuyihegeliang Locality recovered in 2014. The sample includes various tool types such as scrapers, points, denticulates, spur-like tools, notches, retouched flakes, retouched chunks, and flakes. Through the evaluation of preservation state, multiple-scale analysis, and experimentation, this study reveals a variety of human activities at the site. A total of 26 specimens were observed to have use-wear; they were used for processing wood, bone, and flesh in various working motions. The use of the artifacts demonstrated versatility and flexibility, with a distinct preference for utilizing the unretouched sharp lateral edges of the tools. Additionally, this analysis demonstrates the invaluable role of use-wear analysis in tracing a wide range of practices that often leave minimal traces in the archaeological record.

The frequent use of chert artifacts in wood-working, which has been rarely reported from other Paleolithic sites in China, reflects the exploitation of plant materials at the Xiachuan site. This also provides new insights into the behavioral variability of ancient humans in North China around 40,000 years ago.

参考文献

[1] 王幼平. 华北晚更新世的石片石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 525-535
[2] Yang SX, Zhang JF, Yue JP, et al. Initial Upper Paleolithic material culture by 45,000 years ago at Shiyu in northern China[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8: 552-563
[3] Wang FG, Yang SX, Ge JY, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603: 284-289
[4] d’Errico F, Martí AP, Wei Y, et al. Zhoukoudian Upper Cave personal ornaments and ochre: Rediscovery and reevaluation[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 161: 103088
[5] Li F, Bae CJ, Ramsey CB, et al. Re-dating Zhoukoudian Upper Cave, northern China and its reginal significance[J]. Journal of Human Evolution. 2018, 121: 170-177
[6] Du SS, Li X, Zhou L, et al. Longquan Cave: an early Upper Palaeolithic site in Henan Province, China[J]. Antiquity, 2016, 90: 876-893
[7] 李超荣, 郁金城, 冯兴无. 北京市王府井东方广场旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2000, 9: 781-788
[8] 李超荣, 冯兴无, 郁金城, 等. 王府井东方广场遗址骨制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(1): 13-32
[9] 万晨晨. 水帘洞遗址石制品研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017
[10] 王佳音, 张松林, 汪松枝, 等. 河南新郑黄帝口遗址2009年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 127-136.
[11] 杜水生, 任海云, 张婷. 山西沁水县下川遗址富益河圪梁地点2014年T1发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2021, 4: 14-28
[12] 杜水生. 连续与断裂:重新认识下川遗址在中国旧石器文化研究上的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2021, 41(1): 153-163
[13] 杜水生, 张婷, 任海云. 2014年山西下川遗址富益河圪梁地点3号探方的发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(5): 638-650
[14] 王建, 王向前, 陈哲英. 下川文化:山西下川遗址调查报告[J]. 考古学报, 1978, 3: 259-288
[15] 中国社会科学院考古研究所, 山西省考古研究所. 下川:旧石器时代晚期文化发掘报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016
[16] 高星, 沈辰. 石器微痕分析的考古学实验研究[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008
[17] Odell GH. The mechanics of use and breakage on stone tools: some testable hypotheses[J]. Journal of Field Archaeology, 1981, 8: 197-209
[18] Keeley LH. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980
[19] Liu JY, Chen H, Shen YM. Use-wear experimental studies for differentiating flint tools processing bamboo from wood[J]. Documenta Praehistorica, 2019, 46: 326-338
[20] Van Gijn A. Flint in Focus: Lithic Biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age[M]. Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2010
[21] Burroni D, Donahue RE, Pollard AM, et al. The Surface Alteration Features of Flint Artefacts as a Record of Environmental Processes[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2002, 29: 1277-1287
[22] Levi-Sala I. Use Wear and Post-Depositional Surface Modification: a Word of Caution[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 1986, 13: 229-244
[23] Liu JY, Nadel D, Chen H, et al. An experimental-based characterization of breakage patterns of prehistoric bladelets: The combined impact of knapping, exposure to fire and trampling[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2024, 57: 104619
[24] Gao X, Liu JH, Ruan QJ, et al. 300,000-year-old wooden tools from Gantangqing, southwest China[OL]. Research Square, URL: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-226285/v1, 2021
[25] 沈辰, 陈淳. 微痕研究(低倍法)的探索与实践:兼谈小长梁遗址石制品的微痕观察[J]. 考古, 2001, 7: 62-73
[26] Rui X, Zhang JF, Hou YM, et al. Feldspar multi-elevated-temperature post-IR IRSL dating of the Wulanmulun Paleolithic site and its implication[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2015, 30(part B): 438-444
[27] 陈虹. 鉴微寻踪:旧石器时代石英岩石制品的微痕与功能研究[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2020, 119-128
[28] Zhang PQ, Zhang XL, Zwyns N, et al. The contribution of use-wear for stone tool identification at the Upper Paleolithic site Shuidonggou Locality 2, North China[J]. Quaternary International, 2020, 535: 29-37
文章导航

/