广西隆安娅怀洞遗址发现的小型石制品

  • 邓婉文 ,
  • 谢颖
展开
  • 厦门大学历史与文化遗产学院,厦门 361005
邓婉文,助理教授,主要研究方向为旧石器时代考古。E-mail: wwdeng@xmu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-10-25

  修回日期: 2025-04-01

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-18

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(22&ZD246)

A study of the miniaturized stone artifacts from the Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi

  • DENG Wanwen ,
  • XIE Ying
Expand
  • School of History and Cultural Heritage, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005

Received date: 2024-10-25

  Revised date: 2025-04-01

  Online published: 2025-06-18

摘要

广西隆安娅怀洞遗址出土的文化遗物主要包括人类头骨与肢骨化石、大量石制品、骨制品及动植物化石等,地层堆积年代为43~14 kaBP cal;本文是对石制品的专项研究。石制品计7529件,原料包括石英砂岩、砂岩、玻璃陨石、石英、燧石等,基本为简单石核-石片技术产品。该遗址石器组合以刮削器为主,较小,整体表现为小型石制品组合特征,是近年来岭南地区旧石器时代晚期的重要考古发现之一。此类小型石制品还见于岭南、长江中下游、云贵高原乃至东南亚地区的同时期遗存中。综合比较结果显示,娅怀洞与华南及东南亚大陆地区所见小型石片石器遗存表现出相似的原料、技术与类型特点,体现了晚更新世晚期石制品小型化的全球趋势,而对燧石等优质原料的强化利用、简单石器作复合工具可能性的存在或与华南晚更新世现代人的扩散及其行为复杂化相关。

本文引用格式

邓婉文 , 谢颖 . 广西隆安娅怀洞遗址发现的小型石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(03) : 413 -426 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0040

Abstract

The Yahuai Cave site in Long’an, Guangxi, preserves stratified deposits dated to 43~14 kaBP cal, yielding a significant collection of lithic artifacts predominantly reflecting a simple core-flake reduction strategy. The lithic raw materials include quartz sandstone, sandstone, tektite, quartz, and flint. Hard-hammer percussion and bipolar techniques were primarily employed for flake production, with cores predominantly exhibiting single-platform, unidirectional reduction. Some cores show minimal preparation of platform edges prior to flaking. Retouched tools, primarily on flake blanks, were modified via unifacial hard-hammer percussion, with small portions of marginal edge retouch. The tool kit is dominated by scrapers (mostly <5 cm in size), alongside choppers and points, collectively representing a miniaturized lithic industry characteristic of the Late Paleolithic in the Lingnan region.

Similar miniaturized lithic industries have been documented at contemporaneous sites in Lingnan, the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River, the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, and Southeast Asia. Comparative analyses reveal that these small flake tool industries in Yahuai Cave and adjacent areas predominantly utilized flint, supplemented by lower-quality quartz, crystal, and other fine-grained raw materials. The preferential selection of flint and other fine-grained raw materials marks a distinctive feature of late Late Pleistocene small flake tool industries in South China. Notably, certain sites, such as the Bailian Cave in Liuzhou, Xianrendong and Diaotonghuan Cave sites in Jiangxi, and some others in the Lishui River valley of Hunan, sourced flint from distant outcrops up to 20 km away. In contrast, other sites in Guizhou, including the Da’erwo rockshelter site in Kaiyang, Laoyadong Cave site in Bijie, and Qingshuiyuan Dadong Cave site, utilized locally available materials such as flint, crystal, basalt, and siliceous limestone from nearby bedrock sources. It should also be noted that the early deposits of Yahuai Cave contain both small flint tools and retouched flakes detached from quartz sandstone cobbles. The use of small cobble flakes was also observed at the Nguom rockshelter site in northern Vietnam.

Technologically, small flake industries across Lingnan and neighbouring regions during the late Late Pleistocene are characterized by hard-hammer direct percussion, unidirectional retouch, and short, shallow, and overlapping retouch scars. Some micro-sized lithics may reflect bipolar reduction, with no evidence of prepared core technologies. At the Yahuai Cave site, cobble cores with steep edge angles exhibit unidirectional flake removal surfaces resulting from intensive, hierarchical reduction. The shared types of raw materials and technological patterns, combined with the small dimensions of retouched tools, correspond to the global trend of lithic miniaturization during the Late Pleistocene.

Although these miniaturized lithic artefacts in South China and Southeast Asia represent simple core-flake technologies, they may have functioned as composite tool components, as well demonstrated by examples from the Ille Cave site in northern Palawan, Philippines. Moreover, the Xiamabei site in the Nihewan Basin (North China) provides evidence of composite tool use associated with early modern human behavioural complexity. The presence of ochre at the Yahuai Cave site further supports the emergence of complex cultural behaviours.

Scholars have debated the origins of these small flake industries in South China-Southeast Asia. While some attribute their appearance to north-to-south migration driven by Late Pleistocene climatic cooling events, others emphasize indigenous adaptation to local arid-cool conditions, as seen in the long-standing small flake tool traditions in Southwest China since the late Middle Pleistocene. Notably, the early emergence of Yahuai Cave’s miniaturized lithic artefacts (43 kaBP cal) predates comparable assemblages in northern Jiangxi (26 kaBP), northern Vietnam, and southern Thailand. Geographically, these sites form a descending gradient from mid-altitude mountainous regions (e.g., Guizhou, Guangxi) to low-altitude hilly areas, suggesting a potential southward and eastward diffusion of modern human populations from the hinterland of East Asia. However, the relationship between climatic fluctuations and human behavioural evolution remains complex, requiring further interdisciplinary investigations.

The discoveries at the Yahuai Cave site underscore that the subtropical-tropical zones of South China and Southeast Asia witnessed the development of complex cultural behaviours among modern humans since 40 kaBP. Detailed technological comparisons of these miniaturized lithic industries will advance our understanding of population dynamics and cultural trajectories during the Late Pleistocene in eastern Eurasia.

参考文献

[1] 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 18(3): 193-214
[2] Elston RG, Khun SL. Thinking Small: Global Perspectives on Microlithization[M]. Washington DC: American Anthropological Association, 2002
[3] 贾兰坡, 盖培, 尤玉柱. 山西峙峪旧石器时代遗址发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 1972, 1: 39-58
[4] 张森水. 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990, 9(4): 322-333
[5] 裴文中, 张森水. 中国猿人石器研究(中国古生物志,总号第168册,新丁种第12号)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985
[6] 王幼平. 华北晚更新世的石片石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 525-535
[7] 中国社会科学院考古研究所, 河北省文物研究所,阳原县文物管理所. 河北阳原县西白马营旧石器时代遗址2015年试掘简报[J]. 考古, 2019, 10: 3-14
[8] 周士航, 何湘栋, 徐静玥, 等. 蔚县盆地东沟遗址2017年度发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(1): 132-142
[9] Wang F, Yang S, Ge J, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603: 284-289
[10] Yang S, Zhang JF, Yue JP, et al. Initial Upper Palaeolithic material culture by 45,000 years ago at Shiyu in northern China[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8: 552-563
[11] Liu W, Martinon-torres M, Cai Y, et al. The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China[J]. Nature, 2015, 526: 696-699
[12] 刘武, 金昌柱, 吴新智. 广西崇左木榄山智人洞10万年前早期现代人化石的发现与研究[J]. 中国基础科学, 2011, 1: 11-14
[13] Bae CJ, Wang W, Zhao JX, et al. Modern human teeth from Late Pleistocene Luna Cave (Guangxi, China)[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 354: 169-183
[14] 李浩. 探究早期现代人的南方扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 630-648
[15] 谢光茂, 余明辉, 卢杰英. 广西隆安娅怀洞遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(3): 365-388
[16] Toth N. The Stone Technologies of Early Hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya: An Experimental Approach[D]. Berkeley: University of California, 1982
[17] 柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆,北京自然博物馆,广西民族学院历史系. 广西柳州白莲洞石器时代洞穴遗址发掘报告[J]. 见:四川大学博物馆,中国古代铜鼓研究学会(编). 南方民族考古(第一辑)[C]. 成都: 四川大学出版社, 1987, 143-160
[18] 广西柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
[19] 中国社会科学院考古研究所华南一队, 广西文物保护与考古研究所, 柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆, 等. 广西柳州市凤岩遗址2023年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2025, 2: 3-18
[20] 柳州市博物馆,广西壮族自治区文物工作队. 柳州市大龙潭鲤鱼嘴新石器时代贝丘遗址[J]. 考古, 1983, 9: 769-774
[21] 湖南省文物考古研究所,澧县文化旅游广电体育局. 湖南澧县十里岗旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古与文物, 2020, 1: 3-13
[22] 湖南省文物考古研究所,石门县博物馆. 石门县燕儿洞旧石器遗址试掘[J]. 见:湖南省文物考古研究所(编). 湖南考古辑刊(第6辑)[C]. 长沙: 岳麓书社, 1994, 1-7
[23] 北京大学考古文博学院, 江西省文物考古研究所. 仙人洞与吊桶环[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014
[24] 赵文杰, 李三灵, 李浩. 江西旧石器考古新发现与认识[J]. 南方文物, 2023, 6: 53-60
[25] 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王晓敏, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 461-477
[26] 贵州省文物考古研究所. 贵州开阳打儿窝岩厦遗址试掘简报[J]. 长江文明, 2013, 1: 1-19
[27] 张兴龙, 毕忠荣, 龙小平, 等. 贵州清水苑大洞遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(4): 512-526
[28] Bui V. The Stone Age archaeology in Viet Nam: Achievements and general model[J]. In: Manguin PY. Southeast Asian Archaeology 1994: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologist, Paris, 24th-28th October 1994, Vol.1[C]. Hull: Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, University of Hull, 1994, 5-12
[29] Ha VT. The Late Pleistocene climate in Southeast Asia: New data from Vietnam[J]. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 1985, 9: 81-86
[30] Anderson DD. Lang Rongrien Rockshelter: A Pleistocene-Early Holocene Archaeological Site from Krabi, Southwestern Thailand[M]. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, 1990
[31] Majid Z. The West Mouth, Niah, in the Prehistory of Southeast Asia[J]. The Sarawak Museum Journal, 1982, XXXI(52, New Series): 1-200
[32] Majid Z, Tjia HD. Kota Tampan, Perak: The geological and archaeological evidence for a Late Pleistocene site[J]. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1988, 61-2(255): 123-134
[33] Fox RB. The Tabon Cave. Monograph of the National Museum No. 1[M]. Manila: National Museum Press, 1970
[34] Glover I. Leang Burung 2: An Upper Paleolithic rock shelter in south Sulawesi, Indonesia[J]. Modern Quaternary Research in Southeast Asia, 1981, 6: 1-38
[35] O'Connor S, Spriggs M, Veth P. Excavation at Lene Hara establishes occupation in East Timor at least 30 000-35 000 years[J]. Antiquity, 2002, 76: 45-50
[36] O'Connor S. New Evidence from East Timor contributes to our understanding of earliest modern human colonization east of the Sunda Shelf[J]. Antiquity, 2007, 81: 523-535
[37] 尹检顺. 澧水流域的“细小石器”及相关问题[J]. 湖南省博物馆馆刊, 2005, 2: 102-112
[38] 王幼平. 华南晚更新世晚期人类行为复杂化的个案—江西万年吊桶环遗址的发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(3): 397-406
[39] Mijares AS. Human emergence and adaptation to an island environment in the Philippine Paleolithic[J]. In: Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T, et al (Eds.). Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 171-181
[40] Pawlik AF. Detecting traits of modern behavior through microwear analysis: A case study from the Philippine Terminal Pleistocene[J]. In: Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T, et al (Eds.). Emergence and Diversity of Modern Human Behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 182-198
[41] 王法岗, 杨石霞, 葛俊逸, 等. 泥河湾盆地下马碑遗址2013年发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(1): 143-156
[42] Bae CJ. Modern humans in Northeast Asia[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8: 368-369
[43] 王幼平. 更新世环境与中国南方旧石器文化发展[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社,1997
[44] Wang YP. Late Pleistocene human migrations in China[J]. Current Anthropology, 2017, 58(S17): 504-513
[45] Heinreich H. Origin and consequences of cyclic ice rafting in the Northeast Atlantic ocean during the past 130,000 years[J]. Quaternary Research, 1988, 29: 142-152
[46] 张美良, 林玉石, 覃嘉铭, 等. 广西灌阳县观音阁响水洞的形成环境及1号石笋的古气候信息[J]. 地质地球化学, 2000, 1: 34-40
[47] 汪洪娇. 泥炭记录的黔西北51.91-37.96 ka BP古植被演化[D].硕士研究生毕业论文, 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2023
[48] 彭子成, 张兆峰, 蔡演军, 等. 贵州七星洞晚更新世晚期石笋的古气候环境记录[J]. 第四纪研究, 2002, 3: 273-282
[49] Wang Y, Cheng H, Edwards RL, et al. A high-resolution absolute-dated Late Pleistocene monsoon record from Hulu Cave, China[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5550): 2345-2348
文章导航

/