华南区域考古

中国南方旧石器时代晚期石制品细小化现象初探

  • 李三灵 ,
  • 刘亚林 ,
  • 赵文杰 ,
  • 陈清懿 ,
  • 李浩
展开
  • 1.河南大学历史文化学院开封 475001
    2.浙江省文物考古研究所杭州 310012
    3.江西省文物考古研究院南昌 330095
    4.中国科学院青藏高原研究所古生态与人类适应团队青藏高原地球系统与资源环境全国重点实验室北京 100101
李三灵,副研究员,主要从事旧石器考古研究。E-mail: lisanling@henu.edu.cn
李浩,研究员,主要从事旧石器考古研究。E-mail: lihao@itpcas.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2025-03-10

  录用日期: 2025-06-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-15

基金资助

国家社会科学基金青年项目(24CKG002);国家自然科学基金面上项目(42471180);国家资助博士后研究人员计划(GZC20240398);中国博士后科学基金第75批面上资助(2024M750757)

A preliminary exploration of the phenomenon of miniaturization of stone artifacts during the late Paleolithic period in South China

  • LI Sanling ,
  • LIU Yalin ,
  • ZHAO Wenjie ,
  • CHEN Qingyi ,
  • LI Hao
Expand
  • 1. School of History and Culture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001
    2. Zhejiang Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, Hangzhou 310012
    3. Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology, Nanchang 330095
    4. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Alpine Paleoecology and Human Adaptation Group, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101

Received date: 2025-03-10

  Accepted date: 2025-06-10

  Online published: 2025-12-15

摘要

石制品细小化现象在中国南方地区旧石器时代晚期广泛出现,但是学者对其出现时间和技术特征等问题的讨论比较有限。本文首先对细小石器技术的概念进行梳理和界定,并阐明其与小石器技术或小型石片石器技术的区别。在此基础上,较为系统地总结和介绍中国南方地区旧石器时代晚期细小石制品组合的发现和最新研究情况。我们认为:石制品细小化现象在我国南方地区出现的时间至少在距今4万年前,并延续至更新世末期,甚至进入全新世阶段;细小石制品组合的主要特征包括:对燧石、石英等硅质岩原料的选择偏好,石制品尺寸的显著细小化,使用砸击技术,制作琢背器等石器类型。这些特征与东南亚和南亚地区旧石器时代晚期石制品组合表现出较多相似性,很可能指示了人群和技术的跨区域扩散传播。

本文引用格式

李三灵 , 刘亚林 , 赵文杰 , 陈清懿 , 李浩 . 中国南方旧石器时代晚期石制品细小化现象初探[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(06) : 1034 -1046 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0095

Abstract

Recent discoveries of Upper Paleolithic sites across southern China featuring miniaturized lithic assemblages have led to a growing recognition that this trend may represent a significant technological innovation with important evolutionary implications. However, scholarly discussion on the subject remains limited, and consensus has yet to emerge regarding its occurrence time and specific technological characteristics. To address these gaps, this study begins by clarifying the conceptual distinctions between “miniaturized lithic” in southern China and “small stone tool” in the northern region, next systematically reviews key sites in southern China that exhibit lithic miniaturization, and finally focuses on the timing of its appearance, technological features, and adaptive strategies.

Findings indicate that lithic miniaturizatiwon first emerged around 40,000 years before present during late Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 3, observed in cave sites throughout Lingnan and Southwest China, such as Yahuai Cave, Fengyan Cave, and Zhaoguodong Cave. By approximately 30,000 years before present, amid the climatic transition from MIS 3 to MIS 2, the technological phenomenon had become widespread around Poyang Lake, with key sites including Shanghu Site and Xianrendong-Diaotonghuan Cave.

Technologically, these miniaturized lithic assemblages found across southern China exhibit far more commonalities than regional variations, maintaining a remarkable evolutionary continuity over tens of millennia. Key features of the miniaturized lithic assemblages include a pronounced preference for siliceous raw materials such as chert and quartz, the systematic production of miniaturized size of stone artifacts, the widespread adoption of bipolar flaking techniques, and the occasional presence of backed tools. These shared technological traits, though seemingly ordinary, display notable parallels with lithic technologies found in broader geographic regions, such as Southeast Asia and South Asia. This, on the one hand, indicates that the lithic miniaturization in southern China might be an integral part of the global process of lithic miniaturization in the late Pleistocene period. On the other hand, it also underscores the need for a wider comparative framework in future research to better understand technological connections and potential population interactions across these regions.

The extensive occurrence of miniaturized lithic assemblages and the associated minialithic technocomplex during Upper Paleolithic in southern China reflects a survival strategy adopted by the population to cope with the high mobility of hunting activities. Essentially, it is the product of multi-dimensional technological integration, reflecting the comprehensive assessment by hunting group of variables such as the texture of raw materials, the efficiency of tool production and use, and the maintenance costs.

参考文献

[1] 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 3: 193-214
[2] 吕遵谔. 中国考古学研究的世纪回顾:旧石器时代考古卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004
[3] Bar-Yosef O, Wang YP. Paleolithic archaeology in China[J]. Annual review of anthropology, 2012, 41(1): 319-335
[4] Gao X. Paleolithic cultures in China: Uniqueness and divergence[J]. Current Anthropology, 2013, 54(S8): 358-370
[5] 高星. 更新世东亚人群连续演化的考古证据及相关问题论述[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 237-253
[6] 张森水. 我国南方旧石器时代晚期文化的若干问题[J]. 人类学学报, 1983, 3: 218-230
[7] 广西柳州市白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆. 柳州白莲洞[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
[8] 北京大学考古文博学院, 江西省文物考古研究所. 仙人洞与吊桶环[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2014
[9] Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A. Following Pleistocene road signs of human dispersals across Eurasia[J]. Quaternary International, 2013, 285: 30-43
[10] 王幼平. 砾石工业传统与华南旧石器晚期文化[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 91-97
[11] 王幼平. 华南晚更新世晚期人类行为复杂化的个案:江西万年吊桶环遗址的发现[J]. 人类学学报, 2016, 35(3): 397-406
[12] Wang FG, Yang SX, Ge JY, et al. Innovative ochre processing and tool use in China 40,000 years ago[J]. Nature, 2022, 603(7900): 284-289
[13] 贾兰坡, 盖培, 尤玉桂. 山西峙峪旧石器时代遗址发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 1972, 1: 39-58+135-136
[14] 王益人. 贾兰坡与华北两大旧石器传统[J]. 人类学学报, 2002, 3: 171-177
[15] 张森水. 中国北方旧石器工业的区域渐进与文化交流[J]. 人类学学报, 1990, 4: 322-333
[16] 杜水生, 刘富良. 华北北部小石器文化成因分析[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 232-243
[17] 刘连强, 蒲昱晓, 侯佳岐, 等. 泥河湾盆地马圈沟遗址鱼咀沟1号地点2017-2018年发掘出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(1): 40-54
[18] 王幼平. 华北晚更新世的石片石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 525-535
[19] 湖南省文物考古研究所, 石门县博物馆. 石门燕耳洞旧石器遗址试掘[J]. 湖南考古辑刊, 1994, 6: 1-7
[20] 袁家荣. 长江中游地区的旧石器时代考古[A]. 见:吕遵谔(编). 中国考古学研究的世纪回顾:旧石器时代考古卷[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004, 370-391
[21] 蒋远金, 叶亮, 李刚. 浅析白莲洞遗址的石器工业[J]. 史前研究, 2009, 145-153
[22] 蒋远金, 刘文. 鲤鱼嘴遗址旧石器文化向新石器文化过渡的探讨[J]. 史前研究, 2004, 232-240
[23] 中国社会科学院考古研究所华南一队, 广西文物保护与考古研究所, 柳州白莲洞洞穴科学博物馆, 等. 广西柳州市凤岩遗址2023年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2025, 2: 3-18
[24] 浣发祥, 杨石霞, 陈苇, 等. 四川汉源富林遗址石制品再研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(2): 177-190
[25] 李浩. 探究早期现代人的南方扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 630-648
[26] 李浩, 肖培源, 彭培洺, 等. 西南丝绸之路上的旧石器文化与人群交流[J]. 人类学学报, 2024, 43(6): 979-992
[27] Pargeter J. Lithic miniaturization in late Pleistocene southern Africa[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2016, 10: 221-236
[28] Pargeter J, Faith JT. Lithic miniaturization as adaptive strategy: A case study from Boomplaas Cave, South Africa[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12(9): 225
[29] Pargeter J, Shea JJ. Going big versus going small: Lithic miniaturization in hominin lithic technology[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 2019, 28(2): 72-85
[30] Kuhn SL, Elston RG. Introduction:Thinking small globally[A]. In: Elston RG, Kuhn SL (eds.). Thinking small: Global perspectives on microlithization[C]. Washington: American Anthropological Association, 2002, 1-7
[31] Brown KS, Marean CW, Jacobs Z, et al. An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa[J]. Nature, 2012, 491(7425): 590-593
[32] Mellars P. Going east: New genetic and archaeological perspectives on the modern human colonization of Eurasia[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5788): 796-800
[33] McBrearty S, Brooks AS. The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2000, 39(5): 453-563
[34] Clarkson C, Harris C, Li B, et al. Human occupation of northern India spans the Toba super-eruption -74,000 years ago[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 961
[35] Clarkson C, Petraglia M, Korisettar R, et al. The oldest and longest enduring microlithic sequence in India: 35 000 years of modern human occupation and change at the Jwalapuram Locality 9 rockshelter[J]. Antiquity, 2009, 83(320): 326-348
[36] Wedage O, Picin A, Blinkhorn J, et al. Microliths in the South Asian rainforest -45-4 ka: New insights from Fa-Hien Lena Cave, Sri Lanka[J]. PloS One, 2019, 14(10): e0222606
[37] 李浩, 谢光茂, 李大伟, 等. 广西娅怀洞遗址B区出土的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(3): 404-412
[38] 李意愿. 石器工业与适应行为:澧水流域晚更新世古人类文化研究[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2020
[39] 赵文杰, 李三灵, 李浩. 江西旧石器考古新发现与认识[J]. 南方文物, 2023, 6: 53-60
[40] 陈淳, 张祖方. 三山文化:江苏吴县三山岛旧石器时代晚期遗址发掘报告[J]. 南京博物院院刊, 1987, 1: 7-29
[41] 浙江省文物考古研究所, 长兴县文物保护管理所. 七里亭与银锭岗[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009
[42] 钟倩, 向其芳, 李杭. 以夹口山遗址发掘为中心湖北当阳九里岗遗址群旧-新石器时代过渡阶段的探索[J]. 大众考古, 2024, 7: 20-29+98
[43] 李意愿, 谭远辉, 罗希, 等. 湖南澧县十里岗旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 考古与文物, 2020, 1: 3-13
[44] 袁家荣. 洞庭湖西部平原旧石器文化向新石器文化过渡的研究[J]. 考古学研究, 2008, 317-332
[45] 李意愿. 澧县袁家山遗址黑褐色土文化层出土石制品的初步研究[J]. 湖南考古辑刊, 2018, 214-225+376-377
[46] 李意愿. 十里岗遗址石制品微痕初步研究[J]. 湖南考古辑刊, 2016, 196-214
[47] 李三灵, 赵文杰, 高玉, 等. 江西高安盆地旧石器遗址调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(6): 807-814
[48] 李三灵. MIS 2阶段江西上湖遗址古人类石器工业及流动策略研究[D]. 博士学位毕业论文, 北京: 北京师范大学, 2023
[49] 赵文杰, 贾真秀, 李三灵, 等. 2020年江西高安上湖旧石器遗址发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(3): 373-380
[50] 张兴龙, 姜铭, 黄明, 等. 贵州贵安新区岩孔村招果洞遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 考古, 2024, 4: 3-20+129
[51] Lu HL, Zhang XL, Qin YP, et al. New Evidence of Human Occupation in Southwest China Since 44,800 Years ago[J]. Lithic Technology, 2024, 1-21
[52] 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王晓敏, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址2013年发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 461-477
[53] 关莹, 蔡回阳, 王新金, 等. 贵州毕节老鸦洞遗址1985年出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(3): 304-317
[54] 胡晓纯, 高星. 贵州马鞍山遗址1986年出土石制品初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(5): 788-803
[55] 张森水. 穿洞史前遗址(1981年发掘)初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 1995, 2: 132-146+190-192
[56] Zhao M, Shen GJ, He JN, et al. AMS 14C dating of the hominin archaeological site Chuandong Cave in Guizhou Province, southwestern China[J]. Quaternary International, 2017, 447: 102-110
[57] Wang YN, Zhang XL, Sun XF, et al. A new chronological framework for Chuandong Cave and its implications for the appearance of modern humans in southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2023, 178: 103344
[58] 张兴龙, 毕忠荣, 龙小平, 等. 贵州清水苑大洞遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(4): 512-526
[59] Huan FX, Yang SX, Gao F, et al. Technological diversity in the tropical-subtropical zone of Southwest China during the terminal Pleistocene: Excavations at Fodongdi Cave[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2024, 16(1): 25
[60] Huan FX, Yang SX, Marwick B, et al. Lithic miniaturization in South China since the terminal Pleistocene: A multivariate analysis of lithic reduction from Fodongdi, Fulin and Xiqiaoshan[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2025, 1-23
[61] 郑喆轩, 李文成, 柳江, 等. 四川攀枝花市回龙湾洞穴遗址1987年发掘石制品整理简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 4: 4-13+2
[62] 张森水. 富林文化[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1977, 1: 14-27+83-85
[63] 陈全家. 四川汉源狮子山旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1991, 1: 42-49+88
[64] Anderson DD. Cave archaeology in southeast Asia[J]. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 1997, 12(6): 607-638
[65] Shipton C, O’Connor S, Jankowski N, et al. A new 44,000-year sequence from Asitau Kuru (Jerimalai), Timor-Leste, indicates long-term continuity in human behaviour[J]. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2019, 11: 5717-5741
[66] Reynolds T, Barker G. Reconstructing Late Pleistocene climates, landscapes, and human activities in northern Borneo from excavations in the Niah Caves[A]. In: Kaifu Y, Izuho M, Goebel T, et al (eds.). Emergence and diversity of modern human behavior in Paleolithic Asia[C]. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2015, 140-157
[67] Shipton C, Blinkhorn J, Archer W, et al. The Middle to Later Stone Age transition at Panga ya Saidi, in the tropical coastal forest of eastern Africa[J]. Journal of human Evolution, 2021, 153: 102954
[68] Villa P, Soriano S, Tsanova T, et al. Border cave and the beginning of the later stone age in South Africa[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(33): 13208-13213
[69] McCall GS, Thomas JT. Re-examining the South African Middle-to-Later Stone Age transition: Multivariate analysis of the Umhlatuzana and Rose Cottage Cave stone tool assemblages[J]. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 2009, 44(3): 311-330
[70] Roberts P, Boivin N, Petraglia M. The Sri Lankan ‘microlithic’tradition c. 38,000 to 3,000 years ago: Tropical technologies and adaptations of Homo sapiens at the southern edge of Asia[J]. Journal of World Prehistory, 2015, 28: 69-112
[71] Petraglia M, Clarkson C, Boivin N, et al. Population increase and environmental deterioration correspond with microlithic innovations in South Asia ca. 35,000 years ago[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(30): 12261-12266
[72] Sano K, Arrighi S, Stani C, et al. The earliest evidence for mechanically delivered projectile weapons in Europe[J]. Nature ecology & evolution, 2019, 3(10): 1409-1414
[73] Wedage O, Amano N, Langley MC, et al. Specialized rainforest hunting by Homo sapiens -45,000 years ago[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 08623-1
[74] Perera N, Kourampas N, Simpson IA, et al. People of the ancient rainforest: Late Pleistocene foragers at the Batadomba-lena rockshelter, Sri Lanka[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2011, 61(3): 254-269
[75] Barker G, Barton H, Bird M, et al. The ‘human revolution’in lowland tropical Southeast Asia: The antiquity and behavior of anatomically modern humans at Niah Cave (Sarawak, Borneo)[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2007, 52(3): 243-261
[76] 张双权, 裴树文, 张乐, 等. 水洞沟遗址第7地点动物化石初步研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 343-354
[77] 张乐, 王春雪, 张双权, 等. 马鞍山旧石器时代遗址古人类行为的动物考古学研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2009, 39(9): 1256-1265
[78] 宋艳波, 谢光茂, 赵文丫. 广西隆安娅怀洞遗址出土动物遗存初步研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2020, 40(2): 344-346+348-353
[79] Knutsson H, Knutsson K, Taipale N, et al. How shattered flakes were used: Micro-wear analysis of quartz flake fragments[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2015, 2: 517-531
[80] Delagnes A, Wadley L, Villa P, et al. Crystal quartz backed tools from the Howiesons Poort at Sibudu Cave[J]. Southern African Humanities, 2006, 18(1): 43-56
[81] Hiscock P. Making it small in the Palaeolithic: Bipolar stone-working, miniature artefacts and models of core recycling[J]. World Archaeology, 2015, 47(1): 158-169
[82] Horta P, Bicho N, Cascalheira J. Lithic bipolar methods as an adaptive strategy through space and time[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2022, 41: 103263
[83] Delpiano D, Gravina B, Peresani M. Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins’ technical innovations[J]. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 2024, 33(6): e22045
[84] Pargeter J, Chen C, Buchanan B, et al. Stone tool backing and adhesion in hunting weaponry: First results of an experimental program[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2022, 45: 103639
[85] 陈宥成, 曲彤丽. 试论旧大陆旧石器时代琢背刀[J]. 北方文物, 2021, 4: 24-32
文章导航

/