收稿日期: 2025-07-10
录用日期: 2025-11-04
网络出版日期: 2025-12-15
基金资助
四川省哲学社会科学基金重点项目(SCJJ23ND62)
Progress and reflections on paleolithic archaeology in Sichuan
Received date: 2025-07-10
Accepted date: 2025-11-04
Online published: 2025-12-15
四川省位于中国西南腹地,横跨青藏高原东部与四川盆地,其独特的地理位置与阶梯式的地貌环境使其成为早期人类迁徙和文化交流的关键区域。该区旧石器考古起步较早,但既往工作有限。2019年以来,川西高原、四川盆地均发现了大量旧石器遗址,并发掘皮洛、濛溪河等遗址。这些发现不仅丰富了南方旧石器文化,更为探讨砾石石器文化的演变、手斧与“莫维斯线”、东亚现代人的出现扩散及行为复杂性等重大课题提供了新材料。本文整合当前材料,系统梳理四川旧石器发展脉络,并对上述问题展开初步探讨。研究显示从川西高原到四川盆地及临近过渡地带,四川旧石器呈现出明显的时空多样性和技术演变序列,从早期的简单石核石片到阿舍利技术,再到晚期的石器小型化及行为复杂化,不仅填补区域文化发展缺环,更为了解区域史前人群的迁徙互动、技术传播与适应策略提供了关键实证。
郑喆轩 , 谭培阳 . 四川旧石器考古的进展与思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(06) : 1094 -1105 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0110
Sichuan Province is located in the hinterland of southwestern China, spanning the eastern part of the Tibetan Plateau and the Sichuan Basin. Its unique geographical location and stepped geomorphology have led to a rich ecological diversity, making it a key area for early human migration and cultural exchange. Although the Paleolithic archaeology in this region started early, with important Paleolithic remains such as the “Ziyang Man” and the “Fulin Culture” being discovered shortly after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, limited research led to many gaps in temporal and spatial framework and a vague understanding of regional Paleolithic culture.
Since 2019, the Paleolithic archaeological work in Sichuan has gradually achieved a series of breakthroughs. A large number of Paleolithic sites have been discovered on the western Sichuan Plateau and in the Sichuan Basin. These sites feature pebble tools, typical handaxes, Middle and Upper Paleolithic cultural elements, late period remains, and microblades from the Paleolithic-Neolithic transition. These discoveries reflect the complexity and diversity of the Paleolithic culture in Sichuan in terms of time, space, and technology. Important sites such as Piluo site in Daocheng and Mengxihe site in Ziyang have been excavated, yielding lithic artifacts that include various technological traditions and rich evidence for behavioral modernity. Piluo site revealed a continuous sequence of three lithic technology. Its typical handaxes reshaped the understanding of the Acheulean in East Asia, indicating complex interactions between East and West Eurasia and the ability of archaic populations to adapt to high-altitude extreme environments. Mengxihe site discovered abundant organic remains,such as wooden and bone artifacts, which were rare worldwide. It also displayed an early case of broad-spectrum use of plant and animal resources and engraving behaviors, providing key evidence for the study of human behavioral complexity in the early to mid-Late Pleistocene in East Asia. Sites in Fujiang River Basin revealed the uniqueness of the regional “large flake industry”, while the Mengxihe site group showed the miniaturization of flake tools during the early Late Pleistocene
Abundant materials from these sites documented the technological change of lithic assemblages in southwestern China, providing significant evidence for major scientific questions such as the evolution of the pebble tool traditions, East Asian handaxes and the “Movius Line”, behavioral complexity and the emergence of modern human in East Asia, etc. This paper reanalyzes the previous and recent archaeological records in Sichuan and reconstruct the developmental trajectory of regional Paleolithic cultures, and further discusses its implication in above-mentioned questions. The research reveals clear spatiotemporal diversity and technological sequences—from early simple core-flake techniques, through Acheulean assemblages, to late-stage miniaturization of tools and emerging behavioral complexity—across the highlands of western Sichuan, the basin, and adjacent transitional zones. These advances not only fill gaps in regional cultural development but also provide crucial evidence for understanding migration interactions, technological transmission, and adaptive strategies among ancient populations in northern and southern China, as well as between Eastern and Western Eurasia.
| [1] | 何锟宇, 丁燕飞. 四川盆地旧石器时代晚期石器工业[J]. 华夏考古, 2013, 4: 27-33+77 |
| [2] | 童恩正. 西藏高原上的手斧[J]. 考古, 1989, 9: 822-826 |
| [3] | 李森, 李海英. 炉霍的打制石器[A].中国西南民族研究学会、甘孜藏族自治州人民政府(编).六江流域民族综合科学考察报告二:雅砻江上游考察报告[C].四川: 中国西南民族研究学会出版社, 1985, 103-107 |
| [4] | 宗冠福, 陈万勇, 黄学诗. 四川省甘孜藏族自治州炉霍县发现的古人类与旧石器材料[J]. 史前研究, 1987, 3: 59-61+58+97-98 |
| [5] | 王正新. 四川筠连县发现大批哺乳动物化石[J]. 古脊椎动物学报, 1991, 1: 71 |
| [6] | 李宣民, 张森水. 资阳人B地点发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 1984, 3: 215-224+302-304 |
| [7] | 张森水. 富林文化[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1977, 15(1): 14-27+83-85 |
| [8] | 吕遵谔, 黄蕴平, 范桂杰, 等. 四川资阳鲤鱼桥旧石器地点发掘报告[J]. 考古学报, 1983, 3: 331-345+405-408 |
| [9] | 郑喆轩, 李文成, 柳江, 等. 四川攀枝花市回龙湾洞穴遗址1987年发掘石制品整理简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 4: 4-13+2 |
| [10] | 裴文中, 吴汝康. 资阳人[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1957 |
| [11] | 胡昌钰, 苏永江, 任江, 等. 四川北川县烟云洞旧石器时代遗址发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2006, 6: 3-9+98 |
| [12] | 陈苇, 仪明洁, 孙智彬, 等. 四川简阳龙垭遗址出土的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(6): 955-969 |
| [13] | 孙智彬, 陈苇, 董玉伟, 等. 四川汉源县富林遗址发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2020, 5: 4-12+2 |
| [14] | 童恩正. 试论我国从东北至西南的边地半月形文化传播带[A]. 见:文物出版编辑部(编). 文物与考古论文集[C]. 北京: 文物出版社, 1987 |
| [15] | Zhang DJ, Dong GH, Wang H, et al. History and possible mechanisms of prehistoric human migration to the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Sci China Earth Sci, 2016, 59: 1765-1778 |
| [16] | Brantingham PJ, Gao X, Olsen JW, et al. A short chronology for the peopling of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Dev Quat Sci, 2007, 9: 129-150 |
| [17] | Zhang XL, Ha BB, Wang SJ, et al. The earliest human occupation of the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau 40 thousand to 30 thousand years ago[J]. Science, 2018, 362(6418): 1049-1051 |
| [18] | Zhang DJ, Xia H, Chen FH, et al. Denisovan DNA in late pleistocene sediments from Baishiya Karst Cave on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science, 2020, 370(6516): 584-587 |
| [19] | 郑喆轩, 冯玥, 谭培阳, 等. 四川稻城县皮洛旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2022, 7: 3-14+2 |
| [20] | 郑喆轩, 谭培阳, 等. 四川甘孜藏族自治州旧石器时代遗存2019年调查简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6: 17-26+2 |
| [21] | Wang JJ, Tan PY, Feng YH, et al. Human presence in the southeastern Tibetan Plateau after the Last Glacial Maximum[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2025 |
| [22] | 陈苇, 余官玥, 洪小茹, 等. 四川眉山市东坡区坛罐山遗址2020年发掘简报[J]. 四川文物, 2021, 6: 4-16+26 |
| [23] | 黄明, 左志强, 李浩, 等. 成都王家堰旧石器遗址第1地点发掘报告[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(4): 514-522 |
| [24] | 洪小茹, 陈苇, 余官玥, 等. 成都平原南部新发现的旧石器[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(5): 667-678 |
| [25] | 郑喆轩, 程应杰, 周天路, 等. 四川资阳市濛溪河旧石器时代遗址[J]. 考古, 2024, 10: 3-16+2 |
| [26] | Huan FX, Yang SX. Lithic miniaturization in South China since the terminal Pleistocene: A multivariate analysis of lithic reduction from Fodongdi, Fulin and Xiqiaoshan[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2025, 35:1619-1641 |
| [27] | 浣发祥, 杨石霞, 陈苇, 等. 四川汉源富林遗址石制品再研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(2): 177-190 |
| [28] | 胡好玥. 中国手斧等大型切割工具研究的回顾与思考[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(2): 301-315 |
| [29] | 张森水. 管窥新中国旧石器考古学的重大发展[J]. 人类学学报, 1999, 3: 193-214 |
| [30] | 王幼平. 砾石工业传统与华南旧石器晚期文化[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 91-97 |
| [31] | 贺存定, 张瑾, 高磊, 等. 重庆市西北涪江流域旧石器考古调查[J]. 人类学学报, 2023, 42(6): 815-826 |
| [32] | 高星. 中国旧石器时代手斧的特点与意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2012, 31(2): 97-112 |
| [33] | 谢光茂. 东亚和东南亚早期旧石器文化:对莫维斯理论的重新评价[J]. 南方文物, 2022, 3: 29-42 |
| [34] | Hou YM, Potts R, Yuan BY, et al. Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like stone technology of the Bose basin,South China[J]. Science, 2000, 287: 1622-1626 |
| [35] | Li H, Kuman K. Rethinking the “Acheulean” in East Asia: Evidence from recent investigations in the Danjiangkou Reservoir region, Central China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 34: 163-175 |
| [36] | Wang SJ. Perspectives on Hominid Behaviour and Settlement Patterns: A Study of the Lower Palaeolithic Sites in the Luonan Basin, China[M]. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2005, 2: 1-248 |
| [37] | Norton CJ, Bae K, Harris JWK, et al. Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2006, 51(5): 527-536 |
| [38] | Gao X, Guan Y. Handaxes and the Pick-Chopper Industry of Pleistocene China[J]. Quaternary International, 2018, 480: 132-140 |
| [39] | Li H, Kuman K, Li CR. What is currently (un)known about the Chinese Acheulean, with implications for hypotheses on the earlier dispersal of hominids[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2018, 17(1): 120-130 |
| [40] | 李浩. 中国阿舍利技术体系:宏观视野下的思考[A].见:山西省考古研究所(编).砥砺集·丁村遗址发现60周年纪念文集[C].太原: 三晋出版社, 2017, 130-140 |
| [41] | 杨石霞. 人类演化中的“行为现代性”与“现代人行为”探讨[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(2): 181-192 |
| [42] | 阮齐军, 刘建辉, 胡越, 等. 云南鹤庆天华洞旧石器遗址石制品研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(2): 166-181 |
| [43] | 阮齐军, 周建威, 和金梅, 等. 云南鹤庆龙潭旧石器遗址2019-2020年度发掘简报[J]. 南方文物, 2021, 1: 105-118 |
| [44] | 石晶. 云南富源大河遗址石制品研究[D]. 硕士研究生毕业论文, 长春: 吉林大学, 2016 |
| [45] | 王幼平. 现代人扩散南线的考古学观察[J]. 南方文物, 2023, 3: 147-156 |
| [46] | 李浩. 探究早期现代人的南方扩散路线[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(4): 630-648 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |