元谋猿人遗址

元谋猿人遗址大哺乳动物群生态学与动物地理意义

  • 孙博阳 ,
  • 史勤勤 ,
  • 侯素宽 ,
  • 李雨 ,
  • 孟月 ,
  • 关建宇 ,
  • 魏金凯 ,
  • 阮齐军
展开
  • 1.中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所北京 100044
    2.玉溪师范学院玉溪 653100
    3.云南省文物考古研究所昆明 650206
孙博阳,副研究员,主要从事晚新生代哺乳动物演化研究。E-mail: sunboyang@ivpp.ac.cn
阮齐军,副研究馆员,主要从事旧石器时代考古研究。E-mail: ynruanqijun@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-03-01

  录用日期: 2025-10-15

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-15

基金资助

国家重点文物保护专项补助资金;全国考古人才振兴计划项目资助(2024-278)

Ecologic and zoogeographic significances of large mammal assemblage from the Yuanmou hominin site

  • SUN Boyang ,
  • SHI Qinqin ,
  • HOU Sukuan ,
  • LI Yu ,
  • MENG Yue ,
  • GUAN Jianyu ,
  • WEI Jinkai ,
  • RUAN Qijun
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
    2. Yuxi Normal University, Yuxi 653100
    3. Yunnan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Kunming 650206

Received date: 2025-03-01

  Accepted date: 2025-10-15

  Online published: 2025-12-15

摘要

本文对元谋猿人遗址大哺乳动物群在属一级层面上与中国不同时代和地点的早更新世大哺乳动物群进行了相似程度比较分析,旨在讨论中国早更新世大哺乳动物群的动物地理格局。分析结果显示,元谋猿人遗址动物群与中国南方早更新世各个地点动物群的相似度总体高于北方,与早更新世早期动物群的相似度总体高于早更新世晚期动物群。这进一步表明,地理位置是影响大哺乳动物迁徙和交流的重要因素,而发生在关键时期的环境事件是动物群发生显著成分改变的重要因素。在本文选取的所有地点中,位于南方的驼子洞与元谋人遗址动物群相似度较低,位于北方的公王岭与元谋人遗址动物群相似度较高,表明这两个地点由于特殊的环境条件成为了南北方动物交会杂居的地区。对本文涉及的各个地点动物群组分的对比显示,元谋猿人遗址动物群的生存环境存在更大比例的灌丛草地,相比其他地点更加开阔,从而导致元谋猿人遗址动物群的组分与典型的早更新世东洋界动物群略有不同。

本文引用格式

孙博阳 , 史勤勤 , 侯素宽 , 李雨 , 孟月 , 关建宇 , 魏金凯 , 阮齐军 . 元谋猿人遗址大哺乳动物群生态学与动物地理意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2025 , 44(06) : 967 -977 . DOI: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0101

Abstract

Homo erectus yuanmouensis is renowned as the earliest hominin discovered in China and has attracted global scholarly interest regarding its physical evolution and cultural aspects. Since its initial discovery, multiple excavations have been carried out by institutions such as the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Beijing Museum of Natural History. These efforts have yielded a rich diversity of vertebrate fossils at the Yuanmou Hominin site. The most recent excavation began in July 2023, led by the Yunnan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology. Across all excavation seasons, the fossil mammalian assemblage identified so far comprises 4 orders, 13 families, 26 genera, and 30 species. Among these, Homotherium crenatidens, Megaviverra pleistocaenica, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, and Tapirus sp. represent the first recorded occurrences at the Yuanmou Hominin site. Notably, the latter two are typical taxa of the Ailuropoda-Stegodon fauna found in southern China. This study has analyzed the genus-level resemblance between the Yuanmou hominin site fauna and other early Pleistocene faunas from different locations and ages in China, aiming to discuss the zoogeographic pattern of Early Pleistocene large mammalian faunas in China. The results indicate that the Yuanmou hominin site fauna, being a mammalian fauna in the early stage of the Early Pleistocene in southern China, shows a higher degree of resemblance with faunas from southern China in general, compared to those from northern China, and a higher degree of resemblance with faunas in the early stage of the Early Pleistocene, compared to those in the late stage of the Early Pleistocene. This suggests that geographic location is a significant factor influencing the dispersal and exchange of large mammals, and that the composition of mammalian fauna would shift due to environmental events in critical periods. In the analysis of all the localities in this study, Tuozidong fauna in southern China had less similarity with Yuanmou hominin site fauna, in contrast, Gongwangling fauna in northern China had more similarity with Yuanmou hominin site fauna, which indicating that due to their special environments, exchange and co-residence of mammals from southern and northern China had occurred in these two localities. Based on the comparison of all the localities in this study, it is found that there was a higher proportion of shrubby grassland in the area around the Yuanmou hominin site, making the habitat of the fauna more open than those in other localities, which has led to the minor difference between the Yuanmou hominin site fauna and the typical mammalian faunas from Oriental realm in the Early Pleistocene.

参考文献

[1] 高星. “元谋人”的年龄及相关的年代问题讨论[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 442-450
[2] 邱占祥, 邓涛, 王伴月. 甘肃东乡龙担早更新世哺乳动物群[M]. 见:中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所, 中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所.中国古生物志(总号第191册·新丙种第27号)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004, 1-198
[3] 南京博物院, 江苏省考古研究所. 南京驼子洞早更新世哺乳动物群[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007, 1-176
[4] 金昌柱, 刘金毅. 安徽繁昌人字洞:早期人类活动遗址[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009, 1-439
[5] 林一璞, 潘悦容, 陆庆五. 云南元谋早更新世哺乳动物群[A]. 见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所. 古人类论文集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978, 101-120
[6] 程捷, 刘学清, 岳建伟, 等. “元谋组”及“元谋动物群”含义的厘定[J]. 地层学杂志, 2002, 26(2): 146-150
[7] 钱方, 周国兴, 等. 元谋第四纪地质与古人类[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1991, 1-222
[8] Teilhard de Chardin P, Piveteau J. Les mammifères fossiles de Nihowan (Chine)[J]. Annales de Paléontologie, 1930, 19: 1-134
[9] Teilhard de Chardin P. The fossils from Locality 18 near Peking[J]. Palaeontologia Sinica, 1940, 9: 1-101
[10] Colbert EH, Hooijer DA. Pleistocene mammals from the limestone fissures of Szechwan, China[J]. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 1953, 102: 1-134
[11] 胡长康, 齐陶. 陕西蓝田公王岭更新世哺乳动物群[M].见:中国古生物志(总号第155册·新丙种第21号)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978, 1-64
[12] 裴文中. 广西柳城巨猿洞及其他山洞之食肉目、长鼻目和啮齿目化石[A].见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所集刊(第18号)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987, 5-119
[13] 韩德芬. 广西柳城巨猿洞偶蹄目化石[A].见:中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所集刊(第18号)[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987, 135-208
[14] 黄万波, 方其仁, 等(主编). 巫山猿人遗址[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社,1991: 1-205
[15] Jin CZ, Wang Y, Liu JY, et al. Late Cenozoic mammalian faunal evolution from Jinyuan cave at Luotuo hill from Dalian, Northeast China[J]. Quaternary International, 2021, 577: 15-28
[16] 钱方, 浦庆余, 王德山. 元谋人牙齿化石的发现[A]. 见:周国兴,张兴永.元谋人[C]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1984, 3-7
[17] 胡承志. 云南元谋发现的猿人牙齿化石[J]. 地质学报, 1973, 1: 65-71
[18] 尤玉柱, 祁国琴. 云南元谋更新世哺乳动物化石新材料[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1973, 11(1): 66-80
[19] 刘后一, 尤玉柱. 云南元谋云南马化石新材料:兼论云南马的定义及亚洲化石马属的系统关系[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1974, 12(2): 126-136
[20] 周国兴. 穷究元谋人:我的元谋盆地人类考古学研究30年记[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2009, 14-55
[21] 袁振新, 林一朴, 周国兴, 等. 元谋人化石产地发掘报告[A]. 见:周国兴,张兴永.元谋人[C]. 昆明: 云南人民出版社, 1984, 2-22
[22] 周国兴. 元谋盆地人类化石与文化遗存的研究[A]. 见:文集编委会. “元谋人”发现三十周年纪念暨古人类国际学术研讨会文集[C]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1998, 18-32
[23] 祁国琴, 董为. 蝴蝶古猿产地研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006, 33-34
[24] Sokal RR, Sneath PHA. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy[M]. San Francisco: Freeman and Co, 1963, 1-359
[25] Simpson CG. Mammals and the nature of continents[J]. American Journal of Science, 241, 1943, 1-31
[26] Geraads D, Raynal JP, Sbihi-Alaoui FZ. Mammalian faunas from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Casablanca (Morocco)[J]. Historical Biology, 2010, 22: 275-285
[27] Bernor RL. The mammalian systematics, biostratigraphy and biochronology of Maragheh and its importance for understanding Late Miocene hominoid zoogeography and evolution[J]. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1978, 1-324
[28] Archer AW, Maples CG. Monte Carlo simulation of selected binomial similarity coefficients: Effect of number of variables[J]. Palaios, 1987, 2: 609-617
[29] Maples CG, Archer AW. Monte Carlo simulation of selected binomial similarity coefficients: II, effect of sparse data[J]. Palaios, 1988, 3: 95-103
[30] Fortelius M, Andrews P, Bernor RL, et al. Preliminary analysis of taxonomic diversity, turnover and provinciality in a subsample of large land mammals from the later Miocene of western Eurasia[J]. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensis, 1996, 39: 167-178
[31] Fortelius M, Werdelin L, Andrews P, et al. rovinciality, diversity, turnover, and paleoecology in land mammal faunas of the later Miocene of Western Eurasia[A]. In: Bernor RL, Fahlbusch V, Mittmann HW (Eds.). The Evolution of Western Eurasian Neogene Mammal Faunas[C]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996, 414-448
[32] Wilson DE, Mitermeier RA (Eds.). Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 1. Carnivores[M]. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 2009, 1-727
[33] Wilson DE, Mitermeier RA (Eds.). Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol.2. Hoofed Mammals[M]. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 2009, 1-885
[34] Hu HQ, Tong HW, Han F, et al. Chronological and palaeoecological insights into the Dayakou fauna in Yanjinggou, Chongqing, China: Responses of large mammals to the Early-Middle Pleistocene Climate Transition[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2025, 352: 109199
[35] 尤玉柱, 刘后一, 潘悦容. 云南元谋、班果盆地晚新生代地层与脊椎动物化石[A].见:中国地质科学院古生物论文集编委会.地层古生物论文集(第7辑)[C]. 北京: 地质出版社,1978: 40-67
[36] 郑绍华, 张兆群, 陈冠芳. 哺乳动物与环境[A]. 见:郑绍华. 建始人遗址[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004, 329-337
[37] 金昌柱, 秦大公, 潘文石, 等. 广西崇左三合大洞新发现的巨猿动物群及其性质[J]. 科学通报, 2009, 54(6): 765-773
[38] 金昌柱, 郑家坚, 王元, 等. 中国南方早更新世主要哺乳动物群层序对比和动物地理[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(4): 304-317
[39] Wang W, Liao W, Li DW, et al. Early Pleistocene large-mammal fauna associated with Gigantopithecus at Mohui Cave, Bubing Basin, South China[J]. Quaternary International, 2014, 354: 122-130
文章导航

/