湖北郧县学堂梁子古人类遗址年代学研究进展

doi:10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0015

人类学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (02): 316-332.doi: 10.16359/j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0015cstr: 32091.14.j.1000-3193/AAS.2025.0015

湖北郧县学堂梁子古人类遗址年代学研究进展

华杰群¹^,²(), 葛俊逸¹^,²(), 陆成秋³, 沈中山²^,⁴, 邢松¹^,², 卢泽基⁵, 高星¹^,², 邓成龙²^,⁴

1.中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所，中国科学院脊椎动物演化与人类起源重点实验室，北京 100044
2.中国科学院大学地球与行星科学学院，北京 100049
3.湖北省考古研究院，武汉 430077
4.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所岩石圈演化国家重点实验室，北京 100044
5.南京师范大学地理科学学院，南京 210023

收稿日期:2024-01-22 接受日期:2024-03-14 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-15
通讯作者: 葛俊逸，研究员，主要研究方向为第四纪年代学。E-mail: gejunyi@ivpp.ac.cn
作者简介:华杰群，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为第四纪年代学。E-mail: huajiequn@ivpp.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41977380);国家自然科学基金项目(41888101);现代古生物学和地层学国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京地质古生物研究所)开放课题(133105)

Chronological studies of the Xuetangliangzi hominin fossil site in Hubei Province

HUA Jiequn¹^,²(), GE Junyi¹^,²(), LU Chengqiu³, SHEN Zhongshan²^,⁴, XING Song¹^,², LU zeji⁵, GAO Xing¹^,², DENG Chenglong²^,⁴

1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
2. School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
3. Hubei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Wuhan 430077
4. State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044
5. College of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023

Received:2024-01-22 Accepted:2024-03-14 Online:2025-04-15 Published:2025-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

东亚是直立人的关键生存演化区域，出土了一系列更新世直立人化石。然而，迄今我国发现的早期直立人化石稀少且保存较差，制约了对东亚直立人演化历史及其演化上的系统地位的探讨。湖北郧县学堂梁子遗址先后出土三件保存较完整的直立人头骨化石，对认识东亚直立人的演化、迁徙扩散以及环境适应具有重要意义。本文系统回顾了郧县人遗址的年代研究历史及结果，发现采样分辨率、测试精度和方法以及样品可靠性是造成年代争议的主要因素，但区域地层对比的不确定才是最关键原因。由此提出，精细地层对比，建立区域综合地层序列，开展多方法测年和交叉检验是解决郧县人化石年代问题的关键。汉江阶地发育历史及区域人类活动时限的综合对比分析可望为郧县人年代及其文化联系提供重要证据。

关键词: 郧县人, 东亚直立人, 磁性地层, 测年

Abstract:

As a key area for the occupation and dispersal of Homo erectus, a large number of Pleistocene H. erectus fossils have been discovered in East Asia. This provides specific advantages for understanding the evolution and dispersal of H. erectus on our planet. However, so far, the scarcity and poor preservation of the early H. erectus fossils ever found in China, especially the lack of completely preserved skull fossils, significantly hinder our knowledge of the evolutionary history of East Asian H. erectus and its evolutionary systematic status.

Three relatively well-preserved early H. erectus skull fossils have been unearthed from the Xuetangliangzi (Yunxian hominin) site in Hubei province. These fossils hold considerable promise for elucidating this species’ evolutionary trajectory, migratory patterns, and environmental adaptability in East Asia. Consequently, establishing an accurate chronological framework for these fossils is deemed essential.

Since these skull fossils are of great significance for understanding the evolution, dispersal, and environmental adaptations of East Asian H. erectus, establishing a precise chronological framework for these fossils seems to be vitally important.

In this study, the previous studies on the stratigraphic and geochronological dating of the Yunxian hominin site were systematically reviewed and examined to analyze the potential problematic issues. At least five levels of terraces are recognizable in the Yunxian hominin site area, and the WT section which was mostly focused on by previous studies may not correspond to the terrace on which the hominin fossils were discovered. Therefore, this discrepancy suggests that many dating efforts, particularly paleomagnetic analyses, may not reliably reflect the site’s antiquity. Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) dating of mammalian remains from the same stratum provides a minimum age estimate for the Yunxian hominin fossils. Furthermore, the incomplete characterization of the mammalian fauna associated with the site complicates faunal comparisons, thereby affecting the chronological assessment.

Based on this conclusion and integrating regional geomorphological and geochronological data, we propose that disparities in sampling resolution, experimental methodologies, analytical precision, and sample integrity may contribute to the existing controversies. However, the most significant factor undermining the chronological reliability of the Yunxian hominin site is the tenuous nature of regional stratigraphic correlations. Additionally, geochronological datings on the terraces along the Han River indicate that T4 to T1 terraces developed at approximately 55,220,780 and 1,300,000 BP, respectively. The formation of the T4 terrace, where the Yunxian hominin site is located, sets a maximum age constraint for the site. Moreover, a detailed analysis of the temporal distribution of hominin occupations in this region could yield pivotal evidence for correlating the Yunxian hominin fossil with potential cultural affiliations to Paleolithic sites along the river.

Key words: Yunxian Hominin, East Asia Homo erectus, magnetostratigraphy, dating

中图分类号:

K871

华杰群, 葛俊逸, 陆成秋, 沈中山, 邢松, 卢泽基, 高星, 邓成龙. 湖北郧县学堂梁子古人类遗址年代学研究进展[J]. 人类学学报, 2025, 44(02): 316-332.

HUA Jiequn, GE Junyi, LU Chengqiu, SHEN Zhongshan, XING Song, LU zeji, GAO Xing, DENG Chenglong. Chronological studies of the Xuetangliangzi hominin fossil site in Hubei Province[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 2025, 44(02): 316-332.

图/表 6

参考文献 74

[1]	Antón SC. Natural history of Homo erectus[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2003, 122(37): 126-170
[2]	Antón SC, Potts R, Aiello LC. Evolution of early Homo: An integrated biological perspective[J]. Science, 2014, 345(6192): 1236828
[3]	Antón SC. Evolutionary significance of cranial variation in Asian Homo erectus[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2002, 118(4): 301-323
[4]	Gabunia L, Vekua A, Lordkipanidze D, et al. Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age[J]. Science, 2000, 288(5468): 1019-1025 pmid: 10807567
[5]	Larick R, Ciochon RL, Zaim Y, et al. Early Pleistocene ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar ages for Bapang formation hominins, central Jawa, Indonesia[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(9): 4866-4871
[6]	Matsu’ura S, Kondo M, Danhara T, et al. Age control of the first appearance datum for Javanese Homo erectus in the Sangiran area[J]. Science, 2020, 367(6474): 210-214
[7]	Husson L, Salles T, Lebatard AE, et al. Javanese Homo erectus on the move in SE Asia circa 1.8 Ma[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 19012
[8]	Shen GJ, Gao X, Gao B, et al. Age of Zhoukoudian Homo erectus determined with 26Al/10Be burial dating[J]. Nature, 2009, 458(7235): 198-200
[9]	陈琪, 汪永进, 刘泽纯, 等. 南京汤山猿人洞穴石笋的铀系年龄[J]. 人类学学报, 1998, 17(2): 171-176
[10]	An ZS, Ho CK. New magnetostratigraphic dates of Lantian Homo erectus[J]. Quaternary research, 1989, 32: 213-221
[11]	Guo Y, Sun CK, Luo L, et al. 26Al/10Be burial dating of the middle Pleistocene Yiyuan hominin fossil site, Shandong Province, Northern China[J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1): 6961
[12]	黄培华, 郑丽珍, 全裕才, 等. 和县猿人及其动物群年代测定的初步研究[J]. 核技术, 1995, 18: 491-494
[13]	Grün R, Huang PH, Huang WP, et al. ESR and U-series analyses of teeth from the palaeoanthropological site of Hexian, Anhui Province, China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 1998, 34(6): 555-564 pmid: 9650100
[14]	张银运, 刘武. 南京直立人与印尼, 周口店直立人的面颅形态比较[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(3): 171-177
[15]	刘武, 张银运. 中国直立人形态特征的变异[J]. 人类学学报, 2005, 24(2): 121-136
[16]	Zaim Y, Ciochon RL, Polanski JM, et al. New 1.5 million-year-old Homo erectus maxilla from Sangiran (Central Java, Indonesia)[J]. Journal of human evolution, 2011, 61(4): 363-376
[17]	Andrews P. An alternative interpretation of the characters used to define Homo erectus[J]. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 1984, 69: 167-175
[18]	Stringer CB. The definition of Homo erectus and the existence of the species in Africa and Europe[J]. Courrier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main, 1984, 69: 131-143
[19]	Rightmire GP. Evidence from facial morphology for similarity of Asian and African representatives of Homo erectus[J]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1998, 106(1): 61-85 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199805)106:1<61::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-G pmid: 9590525
[20]	Pan L, Zanolli C, Martinón-Torres M, et al. Early Pleistocene hominin teeth from Gongwangling of Lantian, Central China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2022, 168: 103212
[21]	Xing S, Martinón-Torres M, Deng CL, et al. Early Pleistocene hominin teeth from Meipu, southern China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2021, 151: 102924
[22]	李天元, 王正华, 李文森, 等. 湖北省郧县曲远河口化石地点调查与试掘[J]. 江汉考古, 1991: 1-14
[23]	李天元. 郧县人[M]. 武汉: 湖北科学技术出版社, 2001
[24]	李天元, 王正华, 李文森, 等. 湖北郧县曲远河口人类颅骨的形态特征及其在人类演化中的位置[J]. 人类学学报, 1994, 13(2): 104-116
[25]	李炎贤, 计宏祥, 李天元, 等. 郧县人遗址发现的石制品[J]. 人类学学报, 1998, 17(2): 94-113
[26]	李天元, 李文森. 从哺乳动物群看郧县人的时代[J]. 史前研究, 1998, 16(1): 35-48
[27]	Li TY, Etler DA. New middle Pleistocene hominid crania from Yunxian in China[J]. Nature, 1992, 357(6377): 404-407
[28]	李天元, 艾丹, 冯晓波. 郧县人头骨形态特征再讨论[J]. 江汉考古, 1996(1): 40-44
[29]	Vialet A, Guipert G, Jianing H, et al. Homo erectus from the Yunxian and Nankin Chinese sites: Anthropological insights using 3D virtual imaging techniques[J]. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2010, 9(6-7): 331-339
[30]	刘武, 邢松, 张银运. 中国直立人牙齿特征变异及其演化意义[J]. 人类学学报, 2015, 34(4): 425-441
[31]	张银运. 郧县人类头骨化石与周口店直立人头骨的形态比较[J]. 人类学学报, 1995, 14(01): 1-7
[32]	王宗合. 鄂西北武当山群的划分与对比[J]. 资源环境与工程, 1989: 17-29
[33]	黄培华, 李文森. 湖北郧县曲远河口的地貌,第四纪地层和埋藏环境[J]. 江汉考古, 1995(4): 83-86
[34]	胡庆, 董文钦, 余松, 等. 汉江郧阳段河流阶地发育特征及新构造运动意义[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2017, 37: 127-131,145
[35]	沈玉昌. 汉水河谷的地貌及其发育史[J]. 地理学报, 1956, 22: 295-323
[36]	De Lumley H, Li TY. Le site de l’homme de Yunxian Quyuanhekou, Qingqu, Yunxian, Province du Hubei[M]. Paris: CNRS Editions, 2008
[37]	阎桂林. 湖北“郧县人”化石地层的磁性地层学初步研究[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1993, 18: 221-226
[38]	郭永强, 黄春长, 庞奖励, 等. 汉江上游郧县人遗址地层沉积学研究[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2014, 34(2): 149-158
[39]	Guo YQ, Huang CC, Pang JL, et al. Sedimentological study of the stratigraphy at the site of Homo erectus yunxianensis in the upper Hanjiang River valley, China[J]. Quaternary International, 2013, 300: 75-82.
[40]	Sun XF, Li YH, Feng XB, et al. Pedostratigraphy of aeolian deposition near the Yunxian Man site on the Hanjiang River terraces, Yunxian Basin, central China[J]. Quaternary International, 2016, 400: 187-194
[41]	Ogg J. Geomagnetic polarity time scale, Geologic time scale 2020[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 159-192
[42]	Chen TM, Yang Q, Hu YQ, et al. ESR dating of tooth enamel from Yunxian Homo erectus site, China[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 1997, 16(3-5): 455-458
[43]	Bahain J-J, Shao QF, Han F, et al. Contribution des méthodes ESR et ESR/U-Th ā la datation de quelques gisements pléistocčnes de Chine[J]. L'Anthropologie, 2017, 121(3): 215-233
[44]	Duval M, Grün R. Are published ESR dose assessments on fossil tooth enamel reliable?[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2016, 31: 19-27
[45]	Grün R. The relevance of parametric U-uptake models in ESR age calculations[J]. Radiation Measurements, 2009, 44(5-6): 472-476
[46]	董为, 张颖奇. 更新世代表性哺乳动物群的生物年代排序及与测年值的对比[J]. 第四纪研究, 2022, 42: 1227-1246
[47]	金昌柱, 郑家坚, 王元, 等. 中国南方早更新世主要哺乳动物群层序对比和动物地理[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(4): 304-317
[48]	Zhu ZY, Dennell R, Huang WW, et al. New dating of the Homo erectus cranium from Lantian (Gongwangling), China[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 2015, 78: 144-157
[49]	同号文, 张贝, 武仙竹, 等. 湖北郧西白龙洞中更新世古人类遗址的哺乳动物化石[J]. 人类学学报, 2019, 38(4): 613
[50]	Kong Y, Deng CL, Liu W, et al. Magnetostratigraphic dating of the hominin occupation of Bailong Cave, central China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 9699
[51]	Han F, Shao QF, Bahain J-J, et al. Coupled ESR and U-series dating of Middle Pleistocene hominin site Bailongdong cave, China[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2019, 49: 291-296
[52]	李炎贤. 我国南方第四纪哺乳动物群的划分和演变[J]. 古脊椎动物与古人类, 1981, 19: 67-76
[53]	Sun XF, Lu HY, Wang SJ, et al. Early human settlements in the southern Qinling Mountains, central China[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2017, 164: 168-186
[54]	王社江, 鹿化煜. 秦岭南麓汉水上游旧石器考古研究现状与契机[J]. 人类学学报, 2014, 33(3): 272-280
[55]	鹿化煜, 张红艳, 王社江, 等. 东秦岭南洛河上游黄土地层年代的初步研究及其在旧石器考古中的意义[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(4): 559-567
[56]	Sun XF, Lu HY, Wang SJ, et al. Hominin distribution in glacial-interglacial environmental changes in the Qinling Mountains range, central China[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2018, 198: 37-55
[57]	王社江, 鹿化煜. 秦岭地区更新世黄土地层中的旧石器埋藏与环境[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2016, 46(7): 881-890
[58]	Pei SW, Niu DW, Guan Y, et al. Middle Pleistocene hominin occupation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, Central China: studies of formation processes and stone technology of Maling 2A site[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2015, 53: 391-407
[59]	裴树文, 关莹, 高星. 丹江口库区彭家河旧石器遗址发掘简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(2): 95-110
[60]	Sun XF, Lu HY, Wang SJ, et al. Ages of Liangshan Paleolithic sites in Hanzhong basin, central China[J]. Quaternary Geochronology, 2012, 10: 380-386
[61]	卞鸿雁, 庞奖励, 黄春长, 等. 汉江一级阶地抬升以来北亚热带风尘堆积,发育与东亚季风演变的耦合关系:以郧县段汉江上游谷地为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3): 674-682 doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2013.00370
[62]	庞奖励, 黄春长, 周亚利, 等. 郧县盆地风成黄土-古土壤与汉江 I 级阶地形成年龄研究[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(1): 63-72 doi: 10.11821/dlxb201501005
[63]	王蕾彬. 汉江上游一级阶地风成黄土光释光测年研究及意义[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2015
[64]	毛沛妮. 汉江一级阶地形成时代及其上覆黄土对MIS-3以来气候变化的响应研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018
[65]	朱燕燕, 周亚利, 羊俊敏, 等. 汉江上游二级阶地光释光测年研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2022, 42(5): 1260-1276
[66]	王明明. 汉中盆地发育机制及构造演化研究[J]. 国际地震动态, 2014(7): 41-45
[67]	van Buuren U, Prins MA, Wang XY, et al. Fluvial or aeolian? Unravelling the origin of the silty clayey sediment cover of terraces in the Hanzhong Basin (Qinling Mountains, central China)[J]. Geomorphology, 2020, 367: 107294
[68]	刘丽方. 汉江三级阶地磁性地层年代及其古环境研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2018
[69]	郭小奇, 孙雪峰, 王社江, 等. 秦岭汉江流域新发现旧石器遗址的地层与释光年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(2): 319-333
[70]	李英华, 周玉端, 孙雪峰, 等. 湖北郧县后房遗址石器工业的年代:操作链及其意义[J]. 江汉考古, 2018(2): 36-47
[71]	涂华, 沈冠军, 武仙竹. 古人类遗址湖北郧西黄龙洞的铀系年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2011, 30(3): 327-333
[72]	刘登科, 孙雪峰, 陆成秋, 等. 汉江流域郧县盆地柳陂酒厂和吴家沟旧石器遗址的年代学初步研究[J]. 第四纪研究, 2022, 42(2): 577-591
[73]	Li H, Li CR, Kuman K, et al. The Middle Pleistocene handaxe site of Shuangshu in the Danjiangkou reservoir region, Central China[J]. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2014, 52: 391-409
[74]	Liu DK, Sun XF, Lu CQ, et al. Stratigraphy and chronology of two newly discovered Early Pleistocene Palaeolithic sites in the Hanjiang River Valley, Central China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2022, 605: 111229

盆地Basins	T1年龄 Age(kaBP)	T2年龄 Age(kaBP)	T3年龄 Age(kaBP)	T4年龄 Age(kaBP)	方法 Methods	层位 Layers	参考文献References
汉中 Hanzhong	86.3±6.4	154.7±12			OSL	风成堆积底	[60]
汉中 Hanzhong	55.4±3.9				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[64]
汉中 Hanzhong			625-693		²⁶Al/¹⁰Be	砾石层顶	[66]
汉中 Hanzhong		206±18			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]
安康 Ankang	46±4				OSL	风成堆积底	[64]
安康 Ankang		215.1±9.9			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]
郧县 Yunxian	55	185.5±17		700-1000	OSL、古地磁	风成堆积底	[66]
郧县 Yunxian	18.8±8.2				OSL	风成堆积底	[61]
郧县 Yunxian	24.6±1.9				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[62]
郧县 Yunxian	54.0±4.0				OSL	黄土-砂交错层	[63]
郧县 Yunxian			152±17		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian			110±18		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian			143±16		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian				1050-1100	古地磁	风成堆积底	[68]
郧县 Yunxian	55.1±5.2				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[64]
郧县 Yunxian		212±9			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]

盆地Basins	T1年龄 Age(kaBP)	T2年龄 Age(kaBP)	T3年龄 Age(kaBP)	T4年龄 Age(kaBP)	方法 Methods	层位 Layers	参考文献References
汉中 Hanzhong	86.3±6.4	154.7±12			OSL	风成堆积底	[60]
汉中 Hanzhong	55.4±3.9				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[64]
汉中 Hanzhong			625-693		²⁶Al/¹⁰Be	砾石层顶	[66]
汉中 Hanzhong		206±18			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]
安康 Ankang	46±4				OSL	风成堆积底	[64]
安康 Ankang		215.1±9.9			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]
郧县 Yunxian	55	185.5±17		700-1000	OSL、古地磁	风成堆积底	[66]
郧县 Yunxian	18.8±8.2				OSL	风成堆积底	[61]
郧县 Yunxian	24.6±1.9				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[62]
郧县 Yunxian	54.0±4.0				OSL	黄土-砂交错层	[63]
郧县 Yunxian			152±17		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian			110±18		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian			143±16		OSL	河流相砂层	[34]
郧县 Yunxian				1050-1100	古地磁	风成堆积底	[68]
郧县 Yunxian	55.1±5.2				OSL	河流相砂层顶	[64]
郧县 Yunxian		212±9			OSL	河流相砂层顶	[65]

遗址Sites	阶地Terraces	年代Age(kaBP)	测年方法Dating methods	参考文献References
汉中何家梁 Hanzhong Hejialiang	T2	86.3±6.4	OSL	[60]
汉中杨家坪 Hanzhong yangjiaping	T2	73~115	OSL	[56,68]
汉中梁山村 Hanzhong Liangshancun	T2	140~191	OSL	[56,68]
汉中二里沟 Hanzhong Erligou	T2	107~126	OSL	[56,68]
汉中联丰-1 Hanzhong Lianfeng-1	T2	65~145	OSL	[56,68]
汉中联丰-2 Hanzhong Lianfeng-2	T2	114~172	OSL	[56,68]
汉中窑厂湾 Hanzhong Yaochangwan	T3	600	古地磁	[60]
汉中龙岗寺-1 Hanzhong Longgangsi-1	T3	7~58	地层对比	[56]
汉中龙岗寺-2 Hanzhong Longgangsi-2	T3	580~750	古地磁、地层对比	[53]
汉中龙岗寺-3 Hanzhong Longgangsi-3	T4	710~1270	古地磁、地层对比	[53]
安康池河-1 Ankang Chihe-1	T2	106~157	OSL	[56,68]
安康池河-2 Ankang Chihe-2	T2	111~157	OSL	[56,68]
安康曲家河Ankang Qujiahe	T2	101~102	OSL	[56,68]
安康双红村 Ankang Shuanghongcun	T2	110~170	OSL	[56]
安康罗家村 Ankang Luojiacun	T3	600	古地磁	[53]
安康吴台村 Ankang Wutaicun	T4	850~880	古地磁	[53]
郧县后房 Yunxian Houfang	T2	85~185	OSL	[70]
郧县滴水岩 Yunxian Dishuiyan	T2	25~108	OSL	[40]
郧县金矿村-2 Yunxian Jinkuangcun-2	T2	80~167	OSL	[69]
郧县金矿村-3 Yunxian Jinkuangcun-3	T2	78~149	OSL	[69]
郧县黄龙洞 Yunxian Huanglongdong	T2	77~100	U系	[71]
郧县酒厂 Yunxian Jiuchang	T3	710~780	OSL、古地磁	[72]
郧县吴家沟 Yunxian Wujiagou	T3	710~780	OSL、古地磁	[72]
郧县北泰山庙 Yunxian Beitaishanmiao	T3	70~580	地层对比	[56]
郧县彭家河 Yunxian Pengjiahe	T3	70~580	地层对比	[56]
郧县白龙洞 Yunxian Bailongdong	T3	509±16	²⁶Al/¹⁰Be	[51]
郧县人 Yunxian hominin site	T4	930	古地磁、ESR/U系	[36]
郧县梅铺猿人洞 Yunxian Meipu	T4	780~990	古地磁	[21]
郧县月亮湖 Yunxian Yuelianghu	T4	819~865(上层)； 943~989(下层)	古地磁、地层对比	[74]
丹江口双树 Danjiangkou Shuangshu	T3	518~651	ESR	[73]
丹江口关门岩 Danjiangkou Guanmenyan	T4	787~819	古地磁、地层对比	[74]

遗址Sites	阶地Terraces	年代Age(kaBP)	测年方法Dating methods	参考文献References
汉中何家梁 Hanzhong Hejialiang	T2	86.3±6.4	OSL	[60]
汉中杨家坪 Hanzhong yangjiaping	T2	73~115	OSL	[56,68]
汉中梁山村 Hanzhong Liangshancun	T2	140~191	OSL	[56,68]
汉中二里沟 Hanzhong Erligou	T2	107~126	OSL	[56,68]
汉中联丰-1 Hanzhong Lianfeng-1	T2	65~145	OSL	[56,68]
汉中联丰-2 Hanzhong Lianfeng-2	T2	114~172	OSL	[56,68]
汉中窑厂湾 Hanzhong Yaochangwan	T3	600	古地磁	[60]
汉中龙岗寺-1 Hanzhong Longgangsi-1	T3	7~58	地层对比	[56]
汉中龙岗寺-2 Hanzhong Longgangsi-2	T3	580~750	古地磁、地层对比	[53]
汉中龙岗寺-3 Hanzhong Longgangsi-3	T4	710~1270	古地磁、地层对比	[53]
安康池河-1 Ankang Chihe-1	T2	106~157	OSL	[56,68]
安康池河-2 Ankang Chihe-2	T2	111~157	OSL	[56,68]
安康曲家河Ankang Qujiahe	T2	101~102	OSL	[56,68]
安康双红村 Ankang Shuanghongcun	T2	110~170	OSL	[56]
安康罗家村 Ankang Luojiacun	T3	600	古地磁	[53]
安康吴台村 Ankang Wutaicun	T4	850~880	古地磁	[53]
郧县后房 Yunxian Houfang	T2	85~185	OSL	[70]
郧县滴水岩 Yunxian Dishuiyan	T2	25~108	OSL	[40]
郧县金矿村-2 Yunxian Jinkuangcun-2	T2	80~167	OSL	[69]
郧县金矿村-3 Yunxian Jinkuangcun-3	T2	78~149	OSL	[69]
郧县黄龙洞 Yunxian Huanglongdong	T2	77~100	U系	[71]
郧县酒厂 Yunxian Jiuchang	T3	710~780	OSL、古地磁	[72]
郧县吴家沟 Yunxian Wujiagou	T3	710~780	OSL、古地磁	[72]
郧县北泰山庙 Yunxian Beitaishanmiao	T3	70~580	地层对比	[56]
郧县彭家河 Yunxian Pengjiahe	T3	70~580	地层对比	[56]
郧县白龙洞 Yunxian Bailongdong	T3	509±16	²⁶Al/¹⁰Be	[51]
郧县人 Yunxian hominin site	T4	930	古地磁、ESR/U系	[36]
郧县梅铺猿人洞 Yunxian Meipu	T4	780~990	古地磁	[21]
郧县月亮湖 Yunxian Yuelianghu	T4	819~865(上层)； 943~989(下层)	古地磁、地层对比	[74]
丹江口双树 Danjiangkou Shuangshu	T3	518~651	ESR	[73]
丹江口关门岩 Danjiangkou Guanmenyan	T4	787~819	古地磁、地层对比	[74]

湖北郧县学堂梁子古人类遗址年代学研究进展

Chronological studies of the Xuetangliangzi hominin fossil site in Hubei Province

在线阅读

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 74

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张家富. 旧石器和古人类遗址释光测年技术的可靠性和测年上限[J]. 人类学学报, 2022, 41(04): 712-730.
[2]	葛俊逸, 邓成龙, 邵庆丰, 裴树文, 唐锐枰, 涂华, 高星. 中国古人类遗址年代学的研究进展与问题[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 393-410.
[3]	陆莹, 孙雪峰, 王社江, 鹿化煜. 早、中更新世中国古人类年代序列与区域演化特征[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 411-426.
[4]	姬昊, 刘春茹, 宋为娟, 魏传义, 敖红, 李建平, 尹功明. 泥河湾盆地三棵树遗址ESR年代学[J]. 人类学学报, 2021, 40(03): 427-435.
[5]	李浩;李超荣;Kathleen KUMAN;周兴明;王刚. 丹江口库区第四级阶地旧石器遗址调查简报[J]. 人类学学报, 2017, 36(02): 145-153.
[6]	李锋; 陈福友; 高星; 刘德成; 王辉; 张东菊. 甘肃省徐家城旧石器遗址的年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2013, 32(04): 432-440.
[7]	長友恒人; 下冈順直; 波冈久惠; 佐川正敏; 卫奇. 泥河湾盆地几处旧石器时代文化遗址光释光测年[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(03): 276-284.
[8]	陈铁梅; 周力平. 周口店北京猿人遗址的年代综述兼评该遗址的铝铍埋藏年龄[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(03): 285-291.
[9]	沈冠军; 邵庆丰; Darryl E.GRANGER. 26 Al/10 Be 埋藏测年法及其在我国早期人类遗址年代研究中的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2009, 28(03): 292-299.
[10]	彭菲;刘德成;王春雪. 光释光技术的新应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(04): 386-386.
[11]	蔡保全;李强;郑绍华. 泥河湾盆地马圈沟遗址化石哺乳动物及年代讨论[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(02): 127-140.
[12]	冯小波. 《郧县人遗址》(法文)一书出版[J]. 人类学学报, 2008, 27(02): 142-142.
[13]	张晓凌;于汇历;高星. 黑龙江十八站遗址的新材料与年代[J]. 人类学学报, 2006, 25(02): 115-128.
[14]	韩志勇,沈冠军,张家富. 光释光单片技术及其在澳大利亚旧石器遗址上的应用[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(03): 248-253.
[15]	冯小波. 郧县人遗址石核的研究[J]. 人类学学报, 2004, 23(01): 1-12.