人类学学报 ›› 1993, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03): 235-240.
• 人类学学报 • 上一篇 下一篇
孙殿军,王忠旭,高本
出版日期:
发布日期:
Sun Dianjun, Wang Zhongxu, Gao Ben
Online:
Published:
摘要: 我们运用李果珍“百分计数法”,哈尔滨医科大学制成的标准图谱法和Tanner-TW2 法对哈尔滨市553名7—12岁汉族小学生分别进行骨龄判定,比较了这三种方法估计骨龄的差异,结果表明:李果珍法判定骨龄比其余两种方法准确;图谱法估计的骨龄与李果珍法接近;TW2 法不适用于中国北方汉族儿童骨龄判定。
关键词: 学龄儿童;骨龄;TW2法
Abstract: Tanner--Whitehouse( TW2 )method, the Atlas method and Scorring system ( Li Guozhen ) skeletal age assessments were made in the school children sample of 275 males and 278 females aged 7--12 years in the Northern Chinese city of Harbin. The accuracy of skeletal age assessed respectively by three kinds of methods was compared each other. Wefound that Tanner-White house method was not fit for assessment of skeletal maturity onthe Northern Chinese school children of Han nationality. The Tanner- -White house skeletal ages were markedly greater than the corresponding chronological ages. The scorring systen( Li Guozhen ) skeletal ages were similar to the chronological ages as were Harbin Atlas skeletal ages.
Key words: School children; Skeletal maturity; TW2 method
孙殿军,王忠旭,高本. 三种判定骨龄方法的比较[J]. 人类学学报, 1993, 12(03): 235-240.
Sun Dianjun, Wang Zhongxu, Gao Ben. Study on the difference of this skeletal maturity assessed by three kinds of methods[J]. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 1993, 12(03): 235-240.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/CN/
https://www.anthropol.ac.cn/CN/Y1993/V12/I03/235