人类学学报 ›› 2001, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04): 282-287.

• 人类学学报 • 上一篇    下一篇

山东临淄周-汉代人骨种族属性的讨论

韩康信,尚虹   

  • 出版日期:2001-12-15 发布日期:2001-12-15

Discussion on ethnic affinity of human populations of Zhou and Han Era in Shandong Province

HAN Kang-xin , SHANG Hong   

  • Online:2001-12-15 Published:2001-12-15

摘要: 本文指出植田信太郎等用同样比较方法先后发表的山东临淄周汉代人骨遗传学研究文章结果的不一致 ,提示这种遗传学研究结果可能受到一些未知的因素影响。同时认为他们文章中提出的 2 5 0 0年以前山东人、2 0 0 0年以前山东人、现代山东人分别具有与现代欧洲人、现代中西亚人、现代东亚人相近的遗传距离的结果与中国境内古代人骨的种族形态学研究结果不相符合。

关键词: 山东; 临淄; 周-汉代人; mtDNA; 种族形态学; 欧洲人; 中-西亚人; 东亚人

Abstract: The genetic analyses of Zhou and Han era human populations of Linzi in Shandong Province, China were done through comparing the mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA)sequences of the populations.The results of two articles written by Wang Li et al and Shintaroh Ueda were that the populations that lived in Linzi during the periods 2500 years ago, 2000 years ago and the present day showed great genetic similarity to the modern European populations, the modern central and western Asian populations and the modern eastern Asian population respectively.
However, different conclusions were drawn before from another two papers by Shintaroh et al and Hiroki Oota et al.They extracted DNA and studied specimens from the 2000 years ago remains cited later by Wang Li.The results revealed that the closest genetic distance was between the 2000 years ago population and the modern Taiwan Han Chinese.The 2000 years ago people show closer genetic affinity with Mongolians, mainland Japanese and Koreans than with other peoples.In fact, the authors of 4 papers were in the same experimental group and Shintaroh Ueda was the leader of them.They all analyzed the hypervariable region Ⅰ and compared the 185-bp MT1 and MT2 nucleotide sequences (positions:16194-16378).But they arrived at different results.How to explain the completely different results ?Maybe the results indicated that a unknown factor existed and affected the result in this kind of genetic study.
The opinions that the Linzi populations lived 2500 years ago and 2000 years ago belong to Europeans and central and western Asians respectively are not consistent with the morphological and archaeological studies of the skeletal remains of these populations.There was no reliable evidence that ancient European-like population moved to the Far East surpassing the Lake Baikal region according to the works of former Soviet Union anthropologists.The European-like populations moving eastward in the north-western region of China before Qin -Han era had not reached the west part of Gansu Province. According to the morphological and archaeological information available it is difficult to prove that the Western people entered the drainage area of Yellow River including Shandong before the Han era.

Key words: Shandong; The Zhou-Han era; Ancient population; mtDNA; Morphology; Europeans; Central Asians; East Asians; Linzi