人类学学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (02): 132-149.

• 人类学学报 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国人牙齿形态测量分析——近代人群上、下颌前臼齿齿冠轮廓形状及其变异

邢松; 周蜜; 刘武   

  • 出版日期:2010-06-15 发布日期:2010-06-15

Morphometric analysis of Chinese teeth: crown shapes and their variations in maxillary and mandibular premolars of a recent Chinese population

XING Song; ZHOU Mi; LIU Wu   

  • Online:2010-06-15 Published:2010-06-15

摘要: 采用基于标志点的几何形态测量方法对在河南和湖北地区考古遗址出土的291颗近代人群上、下颌前臼齿(P1=72; P2=72; P1=73; P2=74)齿冠轮廓形状(包括外轮廓及内轮廓形状) 进行了分析。结果显示: P1齿冠轮廓基本对称, 颊侧部分向近远中方向突出; 齿尖夹角区呈不规则狭长菱形, 舌侧尖向近中方向偏移。P2齿冠轮廓对称,颊侧部分向近远中方向的突出程度存在明显的个体差异; 齿尖夹角区由于舌侧尖向近中方向偏移而呈不规则菱形。P1和P2内外轮廓形状具有明显的重叠范围。P1齿冠轮廓不对称, 齿冠近中舌侧部分内缩; 齿尖区靠近近中舌侧, 近似方形。P2齿冠轮廓基本对称; 齿尖区靠近齿冠中央, 因近中舌侧尖向近中方向偏移而呈不规则狭长菱形。P1和P2内外轮廓形状重叠范围很小。P1、P2齿冠和齿尖夹角区各个部分所表现出来的变异大小、方式基本相同; 依据齿尖与齿冠基底边缘的距离大小可以将P1分为两种类型, 依据颊侧部分向近远中方向的突出程度可以将P2分为两类。P1、P2变异相对于上颌两颗前臼齿来说较大, 且变异主要集中在齿冠的近远中舌侧、齿尖夹角区的后凹点和舌侧尖;两者的变异大小范围稍有差别; P1和P2主要分为三类, 区别在于颊舌径和近远中径的大小比例、齿尖区后凹点和舌侧尖的位置上。异速生长分析显示所有四颗前臼齿的大小变化对轮廓形状的影响不大。

关键词: 前臼齿; 齿冠形状; 几何形态测量; 现代中国人

Abstract: This study analyzes the outline and polygon shapes of maxillary and mandibular premolars of recent Chinese collected from archeological sites at Xichuan, Henan Province, and from Yunxian, Dan Jiang Kou, Hubei Province. The following conclusions from this research have been made. The outline of P1 is symmetrical with the buccal part extending mesially and distally; its polygon shape is an irregular rhombus with the lingual tip moving mesially. The outline of P2 is also symmetrical, and the extent to which the buccal part extends mesially and distally varies among individual teech; its polygon shape is an irregular rhombus due mainly to the mesially displaced lingual tip. The mesiolingual edge of P1 contracts inside, which makes its outline asymmetrical as a whole; its polygon approaches the mesiolingual edge of the outline, with its shape being similar to a square. The P2 possesses a centered occlusal polygon, irregular rhombus in shape but with a basically symmetrical outline. Both shapes of the outline and polygon overlap little between P1 and P2. The extent of variation extent and manner of both the outline and the polygon collectively resembles each other between P1 and P2 . The P1could be sorted into two categories on the basis of the distance between the tip of the buccal cusp and its neighboring edge of outline. Based on the extent of the buccal part of the outline there could be two groupings of P2 . Tooth variations are greater in the mandibular premolars compared to their maxillary counterparts, with differences found mainly in the distolingual part of the outline, distal fovea, and the tip of the lingual cusp. Three types of P1 or P2 could be attained when cousidering the proportion of buccolingual and mesiodistal distances, locality of distal fovea, and the lingual cusp tip. Allometric analysis indicates that the shapes of all four premolars are not obviously impacted by their sizes.

Key words: Premolar; Shape; Geometric morphometrics; Recent Chinese population